PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “surveillance”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in The Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of the first year of the Dutch national surveillance of surgical-site infections (SSIs) and risk factors, which aims to implement a standardized surveillance system in a network of Dutch hospitals, to collect comparable data on SSIs to serve as a reference, and to provide a basic infrastructure for further intervention research. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Acute-care hospitals in The Netherlands from June 1996 to May 1997. RESULTS: 38 hospitals participated, with a slight over-representation of larger hospitals. Following a total of 18,063 operations, 562 SSIs occurred, of which 198 were deep. Multivariate analysis of pooled procedures shows that age, preoperative length of stay, wound contamination class, anesthesia score, and duration of surgery were independent risk factors for SSI. When analyzed by procedure, the relative importance of these risk factors changed. Bacteriological documentation was available for 56% of the SSIs; 35% of all isolates were Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple regression analysis computed the mean extra postoperative length of stay associated with SSI to be 8.2 days. CONCLUSION: The first year of national surveillance has shown that it is feasible to collect comparable data on SSI, which are already used for education, policy, and decision making in the network of participating hospitals. This gives room to effectuate the next aim, namely to use the network as an infrastructure for intervention research. Multivariate analysis shows that feedback on a procedure-specific level is important.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Recommended practices for surveillance. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Surveillance Initiative working Group.

Demonstration of quality health care includes documentation of outcomes of care. Surveillance is a comprehensive method of measuring outcomes and related processes of care, analyzing the data, and providing information to members of the health care team to assist in improving those outcomes. Surveillance is an essential component of effective clinical programs designed to reduce the frequency of adverse events such as infection or injury. Although there is no single or "right" method of surveillance design or implementation, sound epidemiologic principles must form the foundation of effective systems and must be understood by key participants in the surveillance program and supported by senior management. Teamwork and collaboration across the health care spectrum are important for the development of surveillance plans. Each health care organization must tailor its surveillance systems to maximize resources by focusing on population characteristics, outcome priorities, and organizational objectives. To ensure quality of surveillance, the following elements must be incorporated: A written plan should serve as the foundation of any surveillance program. The plan should outline important objectives and elements of the surveillance process so that resources can be targeted appropriately. Thoroughness or intensity of surveillance for an area of interest must be maintained at the same level over time. Fluctuations of a surveillance rate have no meaning unless the same level of data collection is maintained. External rate comparisons are meaningless unless the systems used have comparable intensity. All the elements of surveillance should be used with consistency over time. This includes application of surveillance definitions and rate calculation methods. Personnel resources need to be appropriate for the type of surveillance being performed. This includes trained professionals who understand epidemiology and who have access to continuing professional education opportunities. Other resources essential to surveillance include computer support, information and technology services, clerical services, and administrative understanding and support to maintain a quality program. As a means of quality control and to ensure accuracy, the data and process of surveillance should undergo periodic evaluation and validation. This document is intended to assist professionals who plan and conduct surveillance programs as well as those who assure that there is appropriate organizational support to accomplish appropriate surveillance. While design of surveillance systems must be unique for each organization, incorporation of these seven core Recommended Practices for Surveillance provides a scientific framework to approach surveillance programs.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2001

Duplex scan surveillance during the first year after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery: costs and clinical outcomes compared with other surveillance programs.

PURPOSE: In this study we assessed the costs and clinical outcomes of duplex scan surveillance during the first year after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery and compared duplex scan surveillance, ankle-brachial index surveillance, and clinical follow-up. METHODS: In a clinical study, 293 patients (mean age, 70.1 years; 58.7% men) with peripheral arterial disease were observed in a duplex scan surveillance program after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery. Costs were calculated from the health care perspective for surveillance and subsequent interventions from 30 days to 1 year postoperatively. All costs are presented in 1995 US dollars per patient. In a simulation model, we estimated the costs and amputations of duplex scan surveillance, ankle-brachial index surveillance, and clinical follow-up conditional on the indication for surgery. The main outcome measure was the incremental cost per major amputation per patient avoided during the first postoperative year. RESULTS: Duplex scan surveillance was the least expensive ($2823) and resulted in the fewest major amputations (17 per 1000 patients examined), compared with ankle-brachial index surveillance ($5411 and 77 amputations per 1000 patients) and clinical follow-up ($5072 and 77 amputations per 1000 patients). In patients treated for critical limb ischemia, duplex scan surveillance was the least expensive ($2974) and resulted in the fewest major amputations (19 per 1000 patients). Under all surveillance programs, 13 major amputations per 1000 patients treated for intermittent claudication were performed, and clinical follow-up had the lowest costs ($1577). In a sensitivity analysis that assumed that duplex scan surveillance could have avoided six major amputations per 1000 patients treated for intermittent claudication compared with the other programs, duplex scan surveillance had an incremental cost of $80,708 per major amputation per patient avoided compared with clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: Duplex scan surveillance is highly effective for patients treated for critical limb ischemia, leading to a reduction of major amputations and consequently to a reduction in costs compared with other surveillance programs. In patients treated for intermittent claudication, the evidence supporting duplex scan surveillance is less firm, but if duplex scan can avoid six major amputations per 1000 patients examined, the incremental costs are justified.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A GIS-driven integrated real-time surveillance pilot system for national West Nile virus dead bird surveillance in Canada.

BACKGROUND: An extensive West Nile virus surveillance program of dead birds, mosquitoes, horses, and human infection has been launched as a result of West Nile virus first being reported in Canada in 2001. Some desktop and web GIS have been applied to West Nile virus dead bird surveillance. There have been urgent needs for a comprehensive GIS services and real-time surveillance. RESULTS: A pilot system was developed to integrate real-time surveillance, real-time GIS, and Open GIS technology in order to enhance West Nile virus dead bird surveillance in Canada. Driven and linked by the newly developed real-time web GIS technology, this integrated real-time surveillance system includes conventional real-time web-based surveillance components, integrated real-time GIS components, and integrated Open GIS components. The pilot system identified the major GIS functions and capacities that may be important to public health surveillance. The six web GIS clients provide a wide range of GIS tools for public health surveillance. The pilot system has been serving Canadian national West Nile virus dead bird surveillance since 2005 and is adaptable to serve other disease surveillance. CONCLUSION: This pilot system has streamlined, enriched and enhanced national West Nile virus dead bird surveillance in Canada, improved productivity, and reduced operation cost. Its real-time GIS technology, static map technology, WMS integration, and its integration with non-GIS real-time surveillance system made this pilot system unique in surveillance and public health GIS.

Animals↗
PubMed2024

Value of HCC surveillance in a landscape of emerging surveillance options: Perspectives of a multi-stakeholder modified Delphi panel.

HCC surveillance is recommended by liver professional societies but lacks broad acceptance by several primary care and cancer societies due to limitations in the existing data. We convened a diverse multidisciplinary group of cancer screening experts to evaluate current and future paradigms of HCC prevention and early detection using a rigorous Delphi panel approach. The experts had high agreement on 21 statements about primary prevention, HCC surveillance benefits, HCC surveillance harms, and the evaluation of emerging surveillance modalities. The experts agreed that current data have methodologic limitations as well as unclear generalizability to Western populations. Although a randomized clinical trial of surveillance versus no surveillance is unlikely feasible, they concurred that alternative designs, such as a comparison of 2 surveillance modalities, could provide indirect evidence of surveillance efficacy. The panel acknowledged the presence of surveillance harms, but concurred the overall value of surveillance appears high, particularly given a greater emphasis on benefits over harms by both patients and clinicians. The experts underscored the importance of a framework for measuring both benefits and harms when evaluating emerging surveillance strategies. The panel acknowledged performance metrics of emerging methods may differ from other cancer screening programs given differences in populations, including higher risk of cancer development and competing risk of morality, and differences in diagnostic workflow in patients at risk of HCC. These data provide insights into the perceived value of HCC surveillance in an era of emerging blood- and imaging-based surveillance strategies.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of active and passive surveillance for cerebrovascular disease: The Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project.

To provide a scientific rationale for choosing an optimal stroke surveillance method, the authors compared active surveillance with passive surveillance. The methods involved ascertaining cerebrovascular events that occurred in Nueces County, Texas, during calendar year 2000. Active methods utilized screening of hospital and emergency department logs and routine visiting of hospital wards and out-of-hospital sources. Passive means relied on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), discharge codes for case ascertainment. Cases were validated by fellowship-trained stroke neurologists on the basis of published criteria. The results showed that, of the 6,236 events identified through both active and passive surveillance, 802 were validated to be cerebrovascular events. When passive surveillance alone was used, 209 (26.1%) cases were missed, including 73 (9.1%) cases involving hospital admission and 136 (17.0%) out-of-hospital strokes. Through active surveillance alone, 57 (7.1%) cases were missed. The positive predictive value of active surveillance was 12.2%. Among the 2,099 patients admitted to a hospital, passive surveillance using ICD-9 codes missed 73 cases of cerebrovascular disease and mistakenly included 222 noncases. There were 57 admitted hospital cases missed by active surveillance, including 13 not recognized because of human error. This study provided a quantitative means of assessing the utility of active and passive surveillance for cerebrovascular disease. More uniform surveillance methods would allow comparisons across studies and communities.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗
PubMed1999

[Computerized surveillance of communicable diseases as a part of public health surveillance].

Conducting surveillance of communicable diseases and/or public health surveillance in general, in developing countries such is B&H has some common specific things-health care system is an integral part of organized government services thus, fewer impediments to implementing any part of a surveillance system are recorded. Limited health care providers and laboratories reduce the number of data source and can facilitate quality assurance. An ideal surveillance system is discussed in this paper (what kind of surveillance system an epidemiologist would like to have in future), as well as barriers to the ideal surveillance system and technology of the future. Some elements of computerised public health surveillance system and surveillance of communicable diseases, particularly, are given (e.g. hardware, software, data entry, editing the data, analysis of data, ...) Computerising a surveillance system will results in increasing speed of processing providing graphic capability, enhancing analytic capabilities, improving quality of data of reports and improving quantity of data. The most important step in beginning to conduct computerising a surveillance system is identifying the public health objective such is, for example, surveillance of communicable diseases.

Bosnia and Herzegovina↗
PubMed2006

Benchmarking national surveillance systems: a new tool for the comparison of communicable disease surveillance and control in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Communicable diseases do not respect national boundaries and are important challenges to health internationally. Considerable variation exists in the structure and performance of surveillance systems for communicable disease prevention and control. European Union (EU) countries should share ideas to improve the quality of surveillance systems. The study aims to support the improvement and integration of surveillance systems of communicable diseases in Europe while using benchmarking for the comparison of national surveillance systems. METHODS: Surveillance systems from England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, and The Netherlands were described and analysed. After comprehensive data collection and validation by several European public health (PH) experts, a descriptive data analysis was carried out. Benchmarking processes were performed with selected criteria (e.g. case definitions, early warning applications, and outbreak investigations). After the description of benchmarks, best practices were identified and described. RESULTS: Benchmarking of national surveillance systems is applicable as a new tool for the comparison of communicable disease control in Europe. The countries included in the study have in general well-functioning communicable disease control and prevention systems. Nevertheless, there are different strengths and weaknesses in various countries. Practical examples from the various surveillance systems were demonstrated and recommendations were given to policy makers. CONCLUSION: A gold standard of surveillance systems in various European countries is very difficult to achieve because of heterogeneity (e.g. in disease burden, personal, and financial resources). However, to improve the quality of surveillance systems across Europe, it will be useful to benchmark the surveillance systems of all EU member states.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed2004

SARS Surveillance Project--Internet-enabled multiregion surveillance for rapidly emerging disease.

INTRODUCTION: On March 15, 2003, CDC requested health-care and public health agencies to conduct surveillance for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The SARS Surveillance Project (SARS-SP) was established to rapidly implement multiregional SARS surveillance in emergency departments (EDs) by using existing Internet-based tools. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of SARS-SP were to 1) disseminate and update SARS screening forms for ED triage, 2) establish surveillance for SARS syndrome elements by using Regional Emergency Medicine Internet (REMI), 3) expand surveillance to multiple regions, and 4) evaluate the usefulness of Internet tools for agile surveillance during a rapidly emerging global epidemic. METHODS: SARS-SP developed, distributed, and updated an Internet-based triage form to identify patients for infection control and public health reporting. EDs then were invited to report visit frequencies with various SARS syndrome elements to local public health authorities by using the REMI Internet application (first in one metropolitan area, and later in four). After pilot-testing in one metropolitan area, the surveillance system was implemented in three others. RESULTS: Active syndromic surveillance was established by health departments in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Denver, Colorado; Akron, Ohio; and Fort Worth, Texas. A total of 27 EDs reported syndrome frequencies from >146,000 patient encounters. CONCLUSIONS: ED and public health partners reported being satisfied with the system, confirming the usefulness of Internet tools in the rapid establishment of multiregion syndromic surveillance during an emerging global epidemic.

Communicable Diseases, Emerging↗
PubMed1998

Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus: a cost-effectiveness comparison with mammographic surveillance for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus is commonly practiced to detect malignancy in an early and curable stage. However, the cost-effectiveness of this practice has been questioned. To clarify this issue, we undertook a cost analysis of endoscopic surveillance to detect adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus compared with mammography used to detect occult carcinoma of the breast, a widely accepted cancer surveillance technique. METHODS: The rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma detected by endoscopic surveillance was calculated for Duluth Clinic patients with Barrett's esophagus seen from 1980 to 1995 and compared with published rates. The rate of occult breast cancer detection was calculated for all women undergoing surveillance mammography at the Duluth Clinic for the year 1994 and compared with published rates. Costs for screening studies and therapy for cancer treatment for both cancers were calculated based on clinical results and assumptions regarding outcomes derived from published reports, and the costs were compared. RESULTS: Endoscopic surveillance of 149 patients with benign Barrett's esophagus was performed for a total of 510 patient-yr, during which time seven patients developed adenocarcinoma, an incidence of one case per 73 patient-yr of follow-up. Occult breast cancer was detected in 50 of 12,537 mammograms, a detection rate of 0.4%. The incidences in both cases were comparable to published figures. The costs of detecting a case of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus and occult breast cancer were $37,928 and $54,513, respectively, and those for treatment resulting in cure were $83,340 and $83,292. Cost per life-yr saved was $4,151 for adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus and $57,926 for breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus compares favorably with the common practice of surveillance mammography to detect early breast cancer, and should therefore be considered to be as cost-effective as surveillance mammography.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Role of a sentinel surveillance system in the context of global surveillance of infectious diseases.

In some nation states, sustained integrated global epidemiological surveillance has been weakened as a result of political unrest, disinterest, and a poorly developed infrastructure due to rapidly increasing global inequality. The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome has shown vividly the importance of sensitive worldwide surveillance. The Agency for Cooperation in International Health, a Japanese non-governmental organisation, has developed on a voluntary basis a sentinel surveillance system for selected target infectious diseases, covering South America, Africa, and Asia. The system has uncovered unreported infectious diseases of international importance including cholera, plague, and influenza; current trends of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance in polio eradication; and prevalence of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in individual areas covered by the sentinels. Despite a limited geographical coverage, the system seems to supplement disease information being obtained by global surveillance. Further development of this sentinel surveillance system would be desirable to contribute to current global surveillance efforts, for which, needless to say, national surveillance and alert system takes principal responsibility.

Communicable Disease Control↗
PubMed2003

Public health surveillance for disease prevention: lessons from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

The burden of chronic diseases is increasing worldwide. Surveillance of behavioral risk factors is a crucial element for prevention and control of chronic diseases. Adequate surveillance data will provide the basis for developing and implementing appropriate preventive programs at the local and country level. A standardized surveillance system worldwide will allow data comparability, and will decrease the cost of the surveillance system. By using lessons from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a large, ongoing, state-based surveillance system in the United States, countries may save limited resources, and expedite the initiation of their own surveillance systems. To prevent cardiovascular diseases worldwide, it is time to develop and implement appropriate surveillance systems at a country level, in order to track risk factors. This strategy will provide the basis for developing intervention programs designed to reduce, or prevent a further increase in, the burden of chronic diseases.

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System↗
PubMed2003

Earlier surveillance colonoscopy programme improves survival in patients with ulcerative colitis associated colorectal cancer: results of a 23-year surveillance programme in the Japanese population.

Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) are known to have an increased risk for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to clarify the cumulative risk for the development of dysplasia or invasive cancer and the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in the Japanese population. A total of 217 patients received a total of 1027 surveillance colonoscopies between January 1979 and December 2001 at the University of Tokyo hospital. Patients with invasive cancer found in the surveillance group were compared to those referred to our hospital from the other hospitals without surveillance colonoscopy. Surveillance colonoscopy confirmed 15 patients with definite dysplasia. Of these, five were proved to have invasive cancer in the resected specimens. The cumulative risk for the development of invasive cancer at 10, 20, and 30 years was 0.5, 4.1, and 6.1%, respectively, while that for the development of definite dysplasia at 10, 20, and 30 years was 3.1, 10.0, and 15.6%, respectively. All the patients with invasive cancer in the surveillance group remained alive, while three out of four patients in the nonsurveillance group died. Our surveillance programme is useful for detecting UC-associated CRC, and survival may be improved by surveillance colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Postmarketing surveillance: curriculum for the clinical pharmacologist. Part I: Postmarketing surveillance within the continuum of the drug approval process.

This series of two articles on postmarketing safety surveillance has been developed for use in training clinical pharmacologists. It provides a basic overview useful to clinical pharmacologists in a range of occupational functions. These reports can be used as the basis for a lecture or as background reading material for establishing a unit on postmarketing surveillance. For teaching rounds, multiple illustrations and summary tables have been included. These can readily be made into 35-mm slides or transparencies. Table I outlines the curriculum on postmarketing surveillance for the clinical pharmacologist. The first article describes postmarketing surveillance within the continuum of the drug approval process. The relationship of clinical trials to safety surveillance after drug approval are reviewed. The importance of spontaneous adverse drug experience reporting also is discussed. The second article focuses on the regulatory aspects of postmarketing surveillance and discusses the FDA's (Food and Drug Administration) Spontaneous Reporting System. The two types of adverse experience reports in the Spontaneous Reporting System are described: reports voluntarily submitted by health care providers and others, and reports manufacturers are required by regulation to submit. The clinical pharmacologist's role in postmarketing surveillance is defined.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2000

Pilot testing standardized surveillance: Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance (HISS). On behalf of the HISS Reference Group.

In Australia the time-consuming nature of double handling of surveillance data has meant that surveillance methodology rarely included prospective monitoring of patients at risk for the acquisition of a nosocomial infection. To streamline surveillance activities, infection control professionals favored the collection of case data either from the ward or pathology laboratories. By default, this method introduced a variety of definitions resulting in inconsistencies across health care facilities and artificial fluctuations in the magnitude of infection. In June 1998, the New South Wales Health Department funded its first attempt to develop and implement a standardized approach to collection of nosocomial infection data-Hospital Infection Standardized Surveillance (HISS). Six months later, in December 1998, 10 public acute care hospitals pilot tested the content and methodology of HISS. HISS members tested the application of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system definitions for infection, active and passive surveillance methodology, the handheld computer for data collection, and the Electronic Infection Control Automated Technology (eICAT) version for HISS software and analysis. HISS member hospitals selected from several sentinel monitoring programs such as intravascular device-related bacteremia and nonintravascular device-related bacteremia infections, surgical site infections, respiratory syncytial virus infections, and rotavirus infections. Hospitals continued to perform active surveillance in the first 12 months, collecting demographic variables, risk factors, and outcomes. The completeness of the data sets for the two most frequently monitored programs, surgical site infections and intravascular device-related bacteremia, was high, with 99.6% of the required 36, 372 surgical site infection data fields and 99.4% of the 572,717 intravascular device-related bacteremia data fields completed.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Five years working with the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System).

A national surveillance system for nosocomial infections, Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System (KISS), was established in Germany as a joint effort by the National Reference Center for Hospital Epidemiology (currently called the National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections) and the Robert Koch Institute. To begin with a well-accepted and proven method, surveillance protocols were developed on the basis of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system. Hospitals from all parts of Germany took part voluntarily. There were 4 surveillance components: intensive care departments (227), patients undergoing operation (231 departments), neonatal intensive care departments (23 hospitals), and patients undergoing bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplants (10 hospitals). Five years after the introduction of KISS many hospitals have introduced continuous surveillance activities whereby the various definitions and methods have attained wide acceptance. This has lead to much better understanding and cooperation between clinicians and infection control personnel in preventing nosocomial infections. KISS is considered the national reference database, but continuous evaluation and development of KISS are necessary to react adequately.

Cross Infection↗