SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “target volume delineation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation.

Current radiation therapy techniques, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy rely on the precise delivery of high doses of radiation to well-defined volumes. CT, the imaging modality that is most commonly used to determine treatment volumes cannot, however, easily distinguish between cancerous and normal tissue. The ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to more readily differentiate between malignant and healthy tissues has generated great interest in using PET images to delineate target volumes for radiation treatment planning. At present the accurate geometric delineation of tumor volumes is a subject open to considerable interpretation. The possibility of using a local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation to accurately delineate PET target cross sections is investigated using well-defined cylindrical and spherical volumes. Contrast levels which yield correct volumetric quantification are found to be a function of the activity concentration ratio between target and background, target size, and slice location. Possibilities for clinical implementation are explored along with the limits posed by this form of segmentation.

Contrast Media↗

PubMed2005

Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with left sided breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery agreed to participate in our study. Volumes of the glandular breast tissue (CTV breast) and of the boost (CTV boost) were delineated by five observers. We determined 'conformity indices' (CI) and the ratio between the volume of each CTV and the mean volume of all CTVs (CTV ratio). Subsequently we determined the most medial, lateral, anterior, posterior, cranial and caudal extensions both of CTV breast and CTV boost for all observers separately. RESULTS: The mean CI breast was 0.87. For one observer we noted the highest CTV ratio in 17 out of 18 cases. No association was noted between CI breast and menopausal status. The mean CI boost was 0.56. We did not find a relation between the presence or absence of clips and the CI boost. For another observer we noted the lowest CTV boost ratio in 10 out of 17 cases. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that each institute should determine its interobserver variability with respect to CTV breast and CTV boost before implementing the delineation of target volumes by planning CT in daily practice.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

Variability of target volume delineation in cervical esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT) assumes and requires the precise delineation of the target volume. To assess the consistency of target volume delineation by radiation oncologists, who treat esophageal cancers, we have performed a transCanada survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One of three case presentations, including CT scan images, of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly chosen and sent by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline boost target volumes for the primary tumor on CT scans, using ICRU-50 definitions. RESULTS: Of 58 radiation oncologists who agreed to participate, 48 (83%) responded. The external beam techniques used were mostly anterior-posterior fields, followed by a multifield boost technique. Brachytherapy was employed by 21% of the oncologists, and concurrent chemotherapy by 88%. For a given case, and the three volumes defined by ICRU-50 (i.e., gross tumor volume [GTV], clinical target volume [CTV], and planning target volume [PTV]) we determined: 1. The total length in the cranio-caudal dimension; 2. the mean diameter in the transverse slice that was located in a CT slice that was common to all participants; 3. the total volume for each ICRU volume; and 4. the (5, 95) percentiles for each parameter. The PTV showed a mean length of 14.4 (9.6, 18.0) cm for Case A, 9.4 (5.0, 15.0) cm for Case B, 11.8 (6.0, 16.0) cm for Case C, a mean diameter of 6.4 (5.0, 9.4) cm for Case A, 4.4 (0.0, 7.3) cm for Case B, 5.2 (3.9, 7.3) cm for Case C, and a mean volume of 320 (167, 840) cm3 for Case A and 176 (60, 362) cm3 for Case C. The results indicate variability factors (95 percentile divided by 5 percentile values) in target diameters of 1.5 to 2.6, and in target lengths of 1.9 to 5.0. CONCLUSION: There was a substantial inconsistency in defining the planning target volume, both transversely and longitudinally, among radiation oncologists. The potential benefits of 3D treatment planning with high-precision dose delivery could be offset by this inconsistency in target-volume delineation by radiation oncologists. This may be particularly important for multicenter clinical trials, for which quality assurance of this step will be essential to the interpretation of results.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Computed tomography slice-by-slice target-volume delineation for stereotactic proton irradiation of large intracranial arteriovenous malformations: an iterative approach using angiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Target-volume delineation for stereotactic irradiation is problematic for large and irregularly shaped arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The purpose of this report is to quantify modifications in the target volume that result from iterative treatment planning that incorporates multimodality imaging data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Stereotactic neuroimaging procedures were performed for 20 consecutive patients with AVM volumes > 10 cm3. Angiographically defined extrema were transformed into computed tomography (CT) space. The resulting target contours were then modified by a multidisciplinary treatment planning team after iterative review of angiographic, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Volumes of interest and dose-volume histograms for proton irradiation were calculated before and after iterative target delineation. RESULTS: Initial (angiographically defined) target volumes ranged from 15.3 to 96.1 cm3 (mean, 43.6 cm3). Final (iteratively defined) target volumes ranged from 10.7 to 114.0 cm3 (mean, 38.4 cm3). The volume of presumed normal tissue excluded by iterative planning ranged from 2.6 to 47.0 cm3 (mean, 15.5 cm3). Initially untargeted AVM, most commonly obscured by embolization material, was identified in all cases (range, 0.3 to 57.8 cm3; mean, 10.3 cm3). Corresponding dose-volume histograms demonstrated marked differences regarding lesion coverage and sparing of normal tissue structures. CONCLUSIONS: Iterative target-volume delineation resulted in significant modifications from initial, angiographically defined target volumes. Substantial amounts of apparently normal tissue were excluded from the final target, and additional abnormal vascular structures were identified for incorporation. We conclude that an iterative multimodality approach to target-volume delineation may improve the overall results for stereotactic irradiation of large and complex AVMs.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation.

PURPOSE: To review the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF) experience of using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat head-and-neck cancer focusing on the importance of target volume delineation and adequate target volume coverage. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and January 2002, 150 histologically confirmed patients underwent IMRT for their head-and-neck cancer at our institution. Sites included were nasopharynx 86, oropharynx 22, paranasal sinus 22, thyroid 6, oral tongue 3, nasal cavity 2, salivary 2, larynx 2, hypopharynx 1, lacrimal gland 1, skin 1, temporal bone 1, and trachea 1. One hundred seven patients were treated definitively with IMRT +/- concurrent platinum chemotherapy (92/107), whereas 43 patients underwent gross surgical resection followed by postoperative IMRT +/- concurrent platinum chemotherapy (15/43). IMRT was delivered using three different techniques: 1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, 2) computer-controlled auto-sequencing segmental multileaf collimator, and 3) sequential tomotherapy using dynamic multivane intensity-modulating collimator. Forty-two patients were treated with a forward plan, 102 patients with an inverse plan, and 6 patients with both forward and inverse plans. The gross target volume (GTV) was defined as tumor detected on physical examination or imaging studies. In postoperative cases, the GTV was defined as the preoperative gross tumor volume. The clinical target volume (CTV) included all potential areas at risk for microscopic tumor involvement by either direct extension or nodal spread including a margin for patient motion and setup errors. The average prescription doses to the GTV were 70 Gy and 66 Gy for the primary and the postoperative cases, respectively. The site of recurrence was determined by the diagnostic neuroradiologist to be either within the GTV or the CTV volume by comparison of the treatment planning computed tomography with posttreatment imaging studies. RESULTS: For the primary definitive cases with a median follow-up of 25 months (range 6 to 78 months), 4 patients failed in the GTV. The 2- and 3-year local freedom from progression (LFFP) rates were 97% and 95%. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 8 to 56 months), 7 patients failed in the postoperative setting. The 2-year LFFP rate was 83%. For the primary group, the average maximum, mean, and minimum doses delivered were 80 Gy, 74 Gy, 56 Gy to the GTV, and 80 Gy, 69 Gy, 33 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 3% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. For the postoperative group, the average maximum, mean, and minimum doses delivered were 79 Gy, 71 Gy, 37 Gy to the GTV and 79 Gy, 66 Gy, 21 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 6% of the GTV and 6% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSION: Accurate target volume delineation in IMRT treatment for head-and-neck cancer is essential. Our multidisciplinary approach in target volume definition resulted in few recurrences with excellent LFFP rates and no marginal failures. Higher treatment failure rates were noted in the postoperative setting in which lower doses were prescribed. Potential dose escalation studies may further improve the local control rates in the postoperative setting.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2006

The reasons for discrepancies in target volume delineation : a SASRO study on head-and-neck and prostate cancers.

PURPOSE: To understand the reasons for differences in the delineation of target volumes between physicians. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18 Swiss radiooncology centers were invited to delineate volumes for one prostate and one head-and-neck case. In addition, a questionnaire was sent to evaluate the differences in the volume definition (GTV [gross tumor volume], CTV [clinical target volume], PTV [planning target volume]), the various estimated margins, and the nodes at risk. Coherence between drawn and stated margins by centers was calculated. The questionnaire also included a nonspecific series of questions regarding planning methods in each institution. RESULTS: Fairly large differences in the drawn volumes were seen between the centers in both cases and also in the definition of volumes. Correlation between drawn and stated margins was fair in the prostate case and poor in the head-and-neck case. The questionnaire revealed important differences in the planning methods between centers. CONCLUSION: These large differences could be explained by (1) a variable knowledge/interpretation of ICRU definitions, (2) variable interpretations of the potential microscopic extent, (3) difficulties in GTV identification, (4) differences in the concept, and (5) incoherence between theory (i.e., stated margins) and practice (i.e., drawn margins).

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Quality assurance in radiotherapy of breast cancer--variability in planning target volume delineation.

The inter-physician and inter-patient variability in planning target volume delineation for the radiotherapy of breast cancer after conservative surgery is presented. Eleven experienced radiation oncologists determined the planning target volume (PTV) for four breast cancer patients. Delineation was based on CT slices taken at intervals of 15 mm. The variability in target volume delineation was determined by measuring the volumes in units of cc and the position of the drawn PTVs. Statistical analysis was based on X/R-charts and on Pareto chart and analysis. The maximum range in PTV for one patient was from 670 to 1,200 cc. The observations of three physicians were in excess of the warning limit altogether 18 times. The methods used in this study clearly reveal inter-physician variability in PTV delineation and widest variations found are not acceptable. Training targeted to some physicians and more detailed and unambiguous protocols for PTV delineation are needed.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Quantitative assessment of inter-clinician variability of target volume delineation for medulloblastoma: quality assurance for the SIOP PNET 4 trial protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess inter-clinician variability amongst specialist paediatric radiation oncologists in delineating clinical target volumes for treating medulloblastoma as a quality assurance exercise prior to the introduction of the SIOP PNET 4 trial protocol of conformal radiotherapy to the posterior fossa and tumour bed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants from 17 UK centres attended an educational meeting and then completed a clinical planning exercise to outline: (1) the whole posterior fossa and (2) the tumour bed. Quantitative analysis of the volumes, lengths, spatial positioning and axial planes for each individual was carried out and variation between individuals analysed. RESULTS: Outlining of the posterior fossa was reasonably consistent, although most variation was seen in defining the superior border of the tentorium. A major difference was the decision whether or not to include the post-surgical meningocoele in the clinical target volume (CTV). The CTV for the tumour bed was under treated by all participants due to lack of inclusion of pre-operative tumour extent. CONCLUSIONS: This exercise demonstrated several ambiguities in the draft protocol and highlighted particular areas of inter-clinician variation. Consequently the protocol was revised and improved to take account of these findings. We recommend that planning exercises, in conjunction with education and training, should be implemented before the start of any new radiotherapy trial. In the future, the use of image transfer will allow prospective peer review of target volumes before treatment commences. These measures are essential to ensure that alterations in clinical practice are achieved in a uniform way.

Cerebellar Neoplasms↗

PubMed2001

Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast.

PURPOSE: To determine the intra- and interobserver variation in delineation of the target volume of breast tumors on computed tomography (CT) scans in order to perform conformal radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical target volume (CTV) of the breast was delineated in CT slices by four radiation oncologists on our clinically used delineation system. The palpable glandular breast tissue was marked with a lead wire on 6 patients before CT scanning, whereas 4 patients were scanned without a lead wire. The CTV was drawn by each observer on three separate occasions. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were constructed by expanding the CTV by 7 mm in each direction, except toward the skin. The deviation in the PTV extent from the average extent was quantified in each orthogonal direction for each patient to find a possible directional dependence in the observer variations. In addition, the standard deviation of the intra- and interobserver variation in the PTV volume was quantified. For each patient, the common volumes delineated by all observers and the smallest volume encompassing all PTVs were also calculated. RESULTS: The patient-averaged deviations in PTV extent were larger in the posterior (42 mm), cranial (28 mm), and medial (24 mm) directions than in the anterior (6 mm), caudal (15 mm), and lateral (8 mm) directions. The mean intraobserver variation in volume percentage (5.5%, 1 SD) was much smaller than the interobserver variation (17.5%, 1 SD). The average ratio between the common and encompassing volume for the four observers separately was 0.82, 0.74, 0.82, and 0.80. A much lower combined average ratio of 0.43 was found because of the large interobserver variations. For the observer who placed the lead wire, the intraobserver variation in volume was decreased by a factor of 4 on scans made with a lead wire in comparison to scans made without a lead wire. For the other observers, no improvement was seen. Based on these results, an improved delineation protocol was designed. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and especially interobserver variation in the delineation of breast target volume on CT scans can be rather large. A detailed delineation protocol making use of CT scans with lead wires placed on the skin around the palpable breast by the delineating observer reduces the intraobserver variation. To reduce the interobserver variation, better imaging techniques and pathology studies relating glandular breast tissue to imaging may be needed to provide more information on the extent of the clinical target volume.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1999

A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation.

A generic method for three-dimensional (3-D) evaluation of target volume delineation in multiple imaging modalities is presented. The evaluation includes geometrical and statistical methods to estimate observer differences and variability in defining the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) in relation to the diagnostic CT and MRI modalities. The geometrical method is based on mapping the 3-D shape of the target volume to a scalar representation, thus enabling a one-dimensional statistical analysis. The statistical method distinguishes observer and modality related uncertainties, which are expressed in terms of three error components: random observer deviations, systematic observer differences, and systematic modality differences. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the standard errors of each of the three model parameters are inversely proportional to the square root of the product of the patient group size and the number of observers and proportional to the intraobserver variation. For 18 patients and 3 observers the standard errors of the estimated systematic modality and observer differences are 19% and 14% of the intraobserver standard deviation, respectively. A scalar representation of the shape of the prostate, delineated by 3 observers for 18 patients, was obtained by sampling the distance between the average center of gravity of the prostate in CT and the prostate surface for a large number of directions (2500), using polar coordinates. Observer variability and differences were obtained by applying the statistical method to the samples independently. The intraobserver variation for CT was largest in regions near the seminal vesicles (s.d: 3 mm) and the apex (s.d: 3 mm). The systematic observer variation in CT was largest in a region near the plexus Santorini, at the caudal-anterior side of the prostate (s.d.: 2 mm). The sensitivity for the choice of origin was tested by using the average center of gravity from axial MRI instead of CT. The results were almost identical. The polar map measures distances in the scanning directions. A correction procedure to get the variability in directions perpendicular to the surface of the prostate yielded variations that were a factor of 0.85 smaller for all directions. It is concluded that by separating the shape evaluation in a geometrical and a statistical part, the complexity of the analysis of 3-D shape differences can be significantly reduced. The method was successfully applied to a group of prostate patients, where we demonstrated that delineation variability is nonhomogeneous, with the largest variations occurring near the seminal vesicles and the apex.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed2006

11C-methionine PET improves the target volume delineation of meningiomas treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) in target volume delineation for meningiomas and to determine the interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent observers performed treatment planning in 10 patients according to a prospective written protocol. In the first step, they used coregistered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the second step, MET-PET was added to CT/MRI (image fusion based on mutual information). RESULTS: The correlation between gross tumor volume (GTVs) delineated by the two observers based on CT/MRI was r=0.855 (Spearman's correlation coefficient, p=0.002) and r=0.988 (p=0.000) when MET-PET/CT/MRI were used. The number of patients with agreement in more then 80% of the outlined volume increased with the availability of MET-PET from 1 in 10 to 5 in 10. The median volume of intersection between the regions delineated by two observers increased significantly from 69% (from the composite volume) to 79%, by the addition of MET-PET (p=0.005). The information of MET-PET was useful to delineate GTV in the area of cavernous sinus, orbit, and base of the skull. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis-generating findings of potential normal tissue sparing and reduced interobserver variability provide arguments for invasive studies of the correlation between MET-PET images and histologic tumor extension and for prospective trials of target volume delineation with CT/MRI/MET-PET image fusion.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

[Factors influencing clinical target volume delineation of intact breast in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: In patients with breast cancer who underwent breast conservation treatment, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been approved to hold better dosimetric advantages and improbable future. Target delineation is the most important process, which determines the accuracy of planning and application of IMRT. However, there is no consensus criterion for the delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) of intact breast. This study was to investigate the factors influencing the delineation of CTV of intact breast in IMRT for breast cancer. METHODS: The CTV of intact breast in 6 patients was delineated by 4 radiation oncologists and 1 radiologist individually, and reference CTV was determined by group consensus. The extent of variation in CTV delineation was quantified by the ratio of common volumes (Vco) of all CTVs to the maximum volume encompassing all CTVs (Vmax). The deviation in the extent of CTV from the extent of reference CTV was quantified in each orthogonal direction to find the origins of variations. In addition, all central lung distances (CLD) in tangential fields, which were designed based on CTVs, were measured. RESULTS: The ratios of Vco to Vmax were low (0.660 and 0.651, respectively) in 2 patients with low glandular density. Among the other 4 patients with high glandular density, the ratio was relatively higher in 2 patients with radio-opaque marks than in the other 2 patients with no marks (0.799, 0.769 vs. 0.735, 0.752, respectively). Compared with reference CTVs, the patients' average deviations of the extent of CTVs were 0 in anterior direction, (1.2+/-3.4) mm in posterior direction, (1.5+/-2.1) mm in cranial direction, (0.7+/-4.1) mm in caudal direction, (0.6+/-3.3) mm in medial direction, and (0.8+/-0.8) mm in lateral direction. The most obvious variations were observed in the area of breast axillary part and primary tumor bed after surgery. The mean CLD in 4 patients exceeded over the conventional limitation of 2 cm. CONCLUSION: The variability between CTVs of intact breast delineated by different radiation oncologists is strongly related to individual glandular density, the extent of breast axillary part, the primary tumor bed after surgery, and the different understanding for lung sparing limitations.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a 'Big Brother' evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the process of target volume delineation in lung cancer for optimization of imaging, delineation protocol and delineation software. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven radiation oncologists (observers) from five different institutions delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) including positive lymph nodes of 22 lung cancer patients (stages I-IIIB) on CT only. All radiation oncologist-computer interactions were recorded with a tool called 'Big Brother'. For each radiation oncologist and patient the following issues were analyzed: delineation time, number of delineated points and corrections, zoom levels, level and window (L/W) settings, CT slice changes, use of side windows (coronal and sagittal) and software button use. RESULTS: The mean delineation time per GTV was 16 min (SD 10 min). The mean delineation time for lymph node positive patients was on average 3 min larger (P = 0.02) than for lymph node negative patients. Many corrections (55%) were due to L/W change (e.g. delineating in mediastinum L/W and then correcting in lung L/W). For the lymph node region, a relatively large number of corrections was found (3.7 corr/cm2), indicating that it was difficult to delineate lymph nodes. For the tumor-atelectasis region, a relative small number of corrections was found (1.0 corr/cm2), indicating that including or excluding atelectasis into the GTV was a clinical decision. Inappropriate use of L/W settings was frequently found (e.g. 46% of all delineated points in the tumor-lung region were delineated in mediastinum L/W settings). Despite a large observer variation in cranial and caudal direction of 0.72 cm (1 SD), the coronal and sagittal side windows were not used in 45 and 60% of the cases, respectively. For the more difficult cases, observer variation was smaller when the coronal and sagittal side windows were used. CONCLUSIONS: With the 'Big Brother' tool a method was developed to trace the delineation process. The differences between observers concerning the delineation style were large. This study led to recommendations on how to improve delineation accuracy by adapting the delineation protocol (guidelines for L/W use) and delineation software (double window with lung and mediastinum L/W settings at the same time, enforced use of coronal and sagittal views) and including FDG-PET information (lymph nodes and atelectasis).

Aged↗

PubMed2006

New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy.

MRI is being increasingly used in oncology for staging, assessing tumour response and also for treatment planning in radiotherapy. Both conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires improved means of defining target volumes for treatment planning in order to achieve its intended benefits. MRI can add to the radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) process by providing excellent and improved characterization of soft tissues compared with CT. Together with its multiplanar capability and increased imaging functionality, these advantages for target volume delineation outweigh its drawbacks of lacking electron density information and potential image distortion. Efficient MR distortion assessment and correction algorithms together with image co-registration and fusion programs can overcome these limitations and permit its use for RTP. MRI developments using new contrast media, such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for abnormal lymph node identification, techniques such as dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion MRI to better characterize tissue and tumour regions as well as ultrafast volumetric or cine MR sequences to define temporal patterns of target and organ at risk deformity and variations in spatial location have all increased the scope and utility of MRI for RTP. Information from these MR developments may permit treatment individualization, strategies of dose escalation and image-guided radiotherapy. These developments will be reviewed to assess their current and potential use for RTP and precision high dose radiotherapy.

Contrast Media↗

PubMed2006

Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It has been shown that the use of pre-treatment FDG-PET impacted on the GTV delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumors. The goals of this study were to evaluate (1) the impact of FDG-PET GTV on dose distribution, and (2) the impact of per-treatment re-imaging on target volume delineation and dose distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or larynx/hypopharynx were treated with curative intent by forward planning IMRT. Prior to treatment and on average after a dose of 46 Gy, all patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT, MRI and FDG-PET. After coregistration, GTVs were delineated manually on CT and MRI and automatically on FDG-PET. From these volumes, CTVs and PTVs were derived using consistent guidelines. Planning was performed using conformal radiotherapy. RESULTS: GTVs, CTVs and PTVs based on pre-treatment FDG-PET were significantly smaller than those based on pre-treatment CT. Such difference in target volumes (TV) translated into a significant reduction in the irradiated volumes (reduction of 13 and 18% of the V50 and V95, respectively), Dmean to ipsilateral parotids (30.7 and 38.6% for FDG-PET and CT based plans, respectively) and to controlateral parotids (11.2 and 14.4% for FDG-PET and CT based plans, respectively). TVs based on per-treatment CT or MRI were also significantly smaller compared to those delineated from pre-treatment CT. Volumes delineated with MRI were significantly smaller than those delineated with CT. Due to radiotherapy-induced peri-tumoral inflammation, automatic delineation of FDG-PET GTV could not be performed. Such reductions in TVs translated into a reduction of the irradiated volumes compared to pre-treatment CT planning (reduction for V50 of 19 and 32%, and for V95 of 22 and 40%, for CT and MRI, respectively); Dmean to the ipsilateral parotids were also reduced (ipsilateral parotid Dmean of 20.4% for CT and of 20.1% for MRI compared to 24.7% for pre-treatment CT). CONCLUSIONS: The use of pre-treatment FDG-PET and per-treatment CT or MRI significantly impacts on the delineation of TVs in pharyngo-laryngeal SCC, translating into more normal tissue sparing after conformal radiotherapy planning.

Body Burden↗

PubMed2002

[Computerized tomography for dosimetry purposes: technical factors in helical acquisition. Importance and limits of this technique in target-volume delineation and dose calculation].

The computerized tomography (CT) used for target volumes contouring is an essential step of the radiotherapy process. The CT technical factors must be adapted to explored organs and anatomic regions: data acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithm, digestive or intravenous contrast. The choice of these parameters and its consequences for contouring are discussed. Respiratory motion must be considered for some organs. Helical CT allow a data acquisition during one apnoea. Knowledge of these technical factors is essential for good contouring and for the future use of multiple row detectors. Precise exams protocols depending on lesions, on treatment methods and patients are demanded. Close cooperation between radiation oncologists, physicists and radiologists is not only a wish but becomes a necessity.

Artifacts↗

PubMed1993

Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours.

The enormous developments in radiation technology open new horizons for improvements in local tumour control. However, the evolution from conventional external beam radiotherapy planning to conformal therapy might be hampered by the potential risk of over-reliance on the physician's capability of estimating the tumour extent from imaging modalities. The variability between 12 volunteering physicians in the delineation of tumour and target volume on the lateral orthogonal localisation radiograph from CT was assessed for 5 brain tumours. The estimated tumour and target sizes varied, respectively with a factor of 1.3-2.6 and with a factor of 1.3-2.1. The anatomical location of the volumes showed maximum variations from 11 to 27 mm in the cranio-caudal direction and from 14 to 21 mm in the fronto-occipital direction. For the 5 test cases, the tumour area on which all radiation oncologists agreed, represented only 25-73% of the corresponding mean tumour area. Although the introduction of computed tomography in radiation treatment planning was proved to be a major step forwards for treatment planning in many tumour sites, the results of the present study on brain tumours demonstrate that the subjective interpretation of the tumour extent based on CT images might be one of the largest factors contributing to the overall uncertainty in radiation treatment planning. Moreover, this study endorses the need for uncertainty analysis of the medical decision-making process. It may be that the process of making uncertainties explicit can contribute to the improvement of our present concept of radiation treatment planning.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Influence of MRI on target volume delineation and IMRT planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare CT and MRI target volumes for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and evaluate the role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in treating composite CT+MRI targets. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT and T(1)/T(2)-weighted MRI scans were obtained for 8 consecutive NPC patients. Using CT, MRI, and fused CT/MRI, various target volumes (gross target volume, clinical target volume, and planning target volume [PTV]) and critical structures were outlined. For each patient, three treatment plans were developed: (1) a three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) plan using CT-based targets; (2) a 3D-CRT plan using composite CT+MRI targets; and (3) a IMRT plan using CT+MRI targets. The prescription dose was 57.6 Gy and 70.2 Gy to the initial and boost PTV, respectively. Treatment plans were compared using the PTV dose to 95% volume (D(95)), critical structure dose to 5% organ volume (D(5)), and mean dose. RESULTS: Compared with CT, the MRI-based targets were 74% larger, more irregularly shaped, and did not always include the CT targets. For CT-based targets, 3D-CRT plans, in general, achieved adequate target coverage and sparing of critical structures. However, when these plans were evaluated using CT+MRI targets, the average PTV D(95) was approximately 60 Gy (14% underdosing), and critical structure doses were significantly worse. The use of IMRT for CT+MRI targets resulted in marked improvement in the PTV coverage and critical structure sparing: average PTV D(95) improved to 69.3 Gy, brainstem D(5) to <43 Gy (19% reduction), spinal cord D(5) to <37 Gy (19% reduction), and the mean dose to the parotids and cochlea reduced to below tolerance (23.7 Gy and 35.6 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSION: CT/MRI fusion improved the determination of target volumes in NPC. In contrast to 3D-CRT, IMRT planning resulted in significantly improved coverage of composite CT+MRI targets and sparing of critical structures.

Humans↗