SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “total neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Outcomes of Response-Based Watch-and-Wait and Surgical Management After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BackgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) increases clinical complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC), allowing response-based management strategies such as watch-and-wait (WW) as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME). Outcomes associated with WW after TNT remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to compare oncologic and organ-preservation outcomes between WW and surgical management following TNT.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to April 2025. Observational studies comparing WW and TME following TNT were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Secondary outcomes included tumor regrowth, salvage surgery, and permanent stoma. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I.ResultsSix studies comprising 793 patients were analyzed. WW showed no significant difference compared with TME regarding local recurrence (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.07-26.17; I2 = 80%), distant metastases (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29-1.33; I2 = 49%), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31; I2 = 51.7%), or overall survival (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.30; I2 = 27.9%). Permanent stoma rates were lower with WW (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-1.23; I2 = 71%), becoming significant after sensitivity analysis (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.19).ConclusionWW after TNT offers oncologic outcomes comparable to TME, with high organ preservation and reduced surgical morbidity in highly selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genomic, transcriptomic, and molecular predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a key treatment paradigm for locally advanced rectal cancer, reducing distant metastasis rates and facilitating organ preservation in selected patients. However, treatment response remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for biomarkers that can guide treatment selection and optimise outcomes. This narrative review synthesises the current evidence regarding tumour-intrinsic genomic biomarkers associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy, encompassing somatic mutations, germline polymorphisms, gene expression profiles, mismatch repair (MMR) status, protein expression, epigenetic markers, and circulating tumour-derived biomarkers across conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and TNT paradigms. Across the reviewed literature, individual somatic mutations, including KRAS, TP53, and BRAF, demonstrated limited reproducibility as predictive biomarkers, although KRAS mutations were recurrently associated with lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates in CRT-era cohorts. Germline polymorphisms in DNA repair (XRCC1) and folate metabolism (MTHFR) genes showed inconsistent associations with treatment response. In contrast, transcriptomic biomarkers demonstrated greater biological coherence, with proliferative, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and metabolic signatures frequently associated with treatment resistance, while multi-gene classifiers generally outperformed single-gene markers. Among currently available tumour-intrinsic biomarkers, MMR deficiency was the most consistently reported biomarker associated with reduced response to fluoropyrimidine-based regimens, including TNT, although TNT-specific evidence remains comparatively limited. Dynamic circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring, particularly ctDNA clearance during or after therapy, was consistently associated with pathological response and long-term oncologic outcomes across reviewed studies, whereas baseline ctDNA levels showed limited predictive value. Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that biomarker research in rectal cancer has evolved from single-gene analyses towards pathway-level and dynamic biomarkers. The integration of transcriptomic signatures, MMR status, and dynamic ctDNA monitoring may represent a promising strategy for personalising neoadjuvant therapy, improving patient selection for organ-preserving approaches, and enhancing oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence base remains heterogeneous, and further prospective validation, assay standardisation, and evaluation within contemporary TNT cohorts are required before these biomarkers can be routinely incorporated into clinical decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of localized rectal cancer in the Nordic countries-comparison of Nordic to Dutch, ESMO, and NCCN guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer treatment in Nordic countries has traditionally differed, especially regarding neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the current rectal cancer guidelines in the Nordics and compare these to international guidelines. METHODS: Oncologists and colorectal surgeons from the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) and the Netherlands were invited to participate in this narrative review. Two consensus meetings were held to agree on the content. All authors provided recommendations from their national guidelines. In addition, recommendations from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and from the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were extracted. RESULTS: Several differences between the included guidelines were identified. The radiological "sigmoid take-off" definition for the upper margin of the rectum has been adapted in Denmark and the Netherlands, whereas the other guidelines rely on distance from the anal verge on rigid sigmoidoscopy. Indications for direct surgery vary considerably, where the NCCN guidelines recommend more aggressive neoadjuvant treatment, primarily total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), the Nordic and European guidelines open for direct surgery more often, and reserve especially TNT for high-risk cases. European countries more often recommend short-course radiotherapy, whereas NCCN maintains chemoradiotherapy as the mainstay. Whereas intentional and opportunistic organ preservation is an established part of the Dutch, NCCN, and ESMO guidelines, its use is mostly restricted to clinical trials in the Nordics. The Nordics and the Netherlands are restrictive in terms of adjuvant treatment, which is frequently recommended in ESMO and NCCN. Whereas neoadjuvant immunotherapy is recommended for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) rectal cancer in NCCN, this use is off-label in Europe and not routinely recommended. CONCLUSION: Although all guidelines rely on the same evidence, there are considerable differences, especially in the indications and type of oncologic treatment, both in the neoadjuvant and in the adjuvant setting.

Rectal Neoplasms↗

PubMed2026

Nonmuscle-Invasive Recurrence and Management During Surveillance in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Achieve Clinical Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Many patients are medically unfit for or refuse radical cystectomy. Few postchemotherapy bladder-sparing active surveillance programs have reported on nonmuscle-invasive recurrences and treatment outcomes. In this study, we present data on nonmuscle-invasive recurrences and their management in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. All patients received cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were determined to have a clinical complete response (cCR) based on negative endoscopic resection, urine cytology, and cross-sectional imaging. Patient data were entered into a strict active surveillance protocol. Primary outcomes of interest were number of nonmuscle-invasive recurrences, grade and stage, and treatment. Secondary outcomes of interest were nonmuscle-invasive treatment response rate and muscle-invasive and metastatic recurrence rate. RESULTS: A total of 61 cCR patients were identified. In total, 28 patients experienced a median of 1 nonmuscle-invasive recurrence over a median follow-up of 28.3 months. There were a total of 46 nonmuscle-invasive recurrences, including 9 (20%) low-grade recurrences and 37 (80%) high-grade recurrences. Of the 37 high-grade recurrences, the majority (60%) were treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction. Nonmuscle-invasive recurrence was not associated with later muscle-invasive recurrence or metastasis. Genomic analysis of paired tumor samples demonstrated clonal relatedness in one patient sample while another sample demonstrated a likely precancerous urothelial field effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of nonmuscle-invasive recurrences in patients who achieve cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, most of these patients may be safely managed with bladder-preserving treatments. These findings emphasize the importance of vigilant surveillance protocols and appropriate patient selection.

bladder cancer↗

PubMed2026

Fatty acids and breast cancer: Epidemiology, subtype-specific metabolism, immune regulation, and clinical translation.

Fatty acids (FAs) are bioactive dietary and metabolic molecules that participate in membrane architecture, energy homeostasis, inflammatory signaling, gene regulation and immune function, all of which intersect with breast cancer (BC) risk, progression and treatment response. In this narrative review we integrate epidemiological, clinical, translational and mechanistic evidence on the role of FAs in BC. Saturated, monounsaturated, trans- and polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) are treated as distinct biological exposures rather than interchangeable measures of total fat intake. Similarly, evidence from dietary assessment, circulating biomarkers, erythrocyte membrane composition, adipose tissue stores and tumor lipid signatures is interpreted separately, because each captures exposure and biology at a different level. BC subtypes differ in FA synthesis, uptake, oxidation, storage and remodeling: luminal tumors are frequently linked to hormone-regulated lipogenesis, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors to growth-factor-driven lipid metabolism, and triple-negative tumors to exogenous FA uptake, inflammatory lipid mediators and ferroptosis-related vulnerabilities. FA-derived mediators also shape immune-cell polarization, cytokine signaling and the tumor microenvironment, and dietary FAs may reshape the gut microbiota; the fiber-derived short-chain FAs it produces, distinct from dietary FAs, likewise help regulate immune and inflammatory tone. Clinical data suggest possible roles for fat-quality modification and selected n-3 PUFA interventions, but findings are heterogeneous and not yet sufficient to support routine biomarker-guided precision onco-nutrition. Candidate biomarkers, such as erythrocyte n-6:n-3 composition, require prospective validation before clinical implementation. FA biology thus represents a modifiable but complex axis in BC prevention, tumor biology and supportive care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

[Effect of Cancer Antigen-125 Elimination Rate Constant K and BRCA Mutation Status on the Prognosis of Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive value of the cancer antigen-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) for treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS), and to analyze the combined prognostic significance of KELIM and the mutation status of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA). METHODS: A total of 106 patients with advanced HGSOC who had undergone NACT-IDS were retrospectively enrolled. The KELIM values during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were calculated, and patients were divided into high- and low-KELIM groups using a cutoff value of 1.0. Clinicopathological characteristics, R0 resection rates, and platinum sensitivity rates were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for R0 resection, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the patients were stratified according to both KELIM and BRCA status to assess the risk of platinum-resistant recurrence in each subgroup. RESULTS: The R0 resection rate was higher in the KELIM ≥ 1 group than in the KELIM < 1 group (77.1% vs 55.2%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KELIM was an independent predictor of R0 resection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.922, 95% CI: 1.112-7.678). Survival analysis demonstrated longer PFS in the KELIM ≥1 group compared with that in the KELIM <1 group (33.0 months vs 18.0 months), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that KELIM ≥ 1 was associated with a reduced risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.481, 95% CI: 0.280-0.826). Combined stratification analysis revealed that no platinum-resistant recurrence was observed in the subgroup with both KELIM ≥1 and a BRCA-positive status (0/21). Compared with patients with KELIM <1 and a BRCA-negative status, this subgroup exhibited a lower risk of platinum-resistant recurrence (OR = 0.053, 95% CI: 0.003-0.932, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: KELIM is an effective dynamic biomarker for predicting surgical outcomes and PFS in patients undergoing NACT-IDS. Combined stratification by KELIM and BRCA status allows more precise identification of the patient population with both KELIM ≥1 and BRCA-positive status, who have an extremely low risk of platinum-resistant recurrence, thereby providing an important basis for individualized treatment and risk stratification management in patients with advanced HGSOC.

Humans↗