SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ureteroscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Suction-assisted ureteroscopy compared with traditional ureteroscopy for renal stones ≤ 2 cm: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Suction-enhanced flexible ureteroscopy (URS) aims to improve stone clearance and reduce complications. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of flexible aspiration navigable sheaths (FANS) and direct in-scope suction (DISS) for renal calculi ≤ 2 cm. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted through June 2026. Comparative studies of FANS, DISS, or conventional access sheaths for renal stones ≤ 2 cm were included. The primary outcome was 30-day stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included operative time, fever, sepsis, and complications. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis synthesized direct and indirect evidence. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 3,657 patients (1,677 FANS, 56 DISS, 1,924 control) were included. FANS showed higher SFR (OR 2.5, 95% CrI 2.0-3.1), while grouped DISS had a similar but less precise effect (OR 3.1, 95% CrI 1.0-8.8). Calyxo V2 had the highest SFR (OR 5.4, 95% CrI 1.0-29.0), whereas PUSEN showed no significant difference (OR 1.6, 95% CrI 0.41-6.3). FANS reduced postoperative fever and complications. FANS also showed lower odds of postoperative sepsis (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.12-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Suction-assisted ureteroscopy improves SFR for renal calculi ≤ 2 cm. FANS was associated with shorter operative time, fever, and complications. DISS systems show promising but limited results, with performance differing by technology configuration. Larger prospective trials are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed1979

Transurethral ureteroscopy in men using juvenile cystoscopy equipment.

The inadequacies of current procedures to yield exact diagnostic information on the last portion of the ureter in men and the urologists' frequent frustration when manipulations are attempted in the lower ureter have prompted exploration of a direct endoscopic approach to diagnosis and treatment in the terminal ureter. In the last 3 years we have become accustomed to accomplishing ureteroscopy in women on a routine basis to discover and to treat with amazing ease ureteral tumors, calculi, obstructions and so forth. Ureteroscopy in men now has been practiced sufficiently to convince us that it also should join the urologists' armamentarium of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Herein is described the equipment and the technique to endoscope the lower ureter.

Cystoscopes↗

PubMed2026

Flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and negative suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath for treatment of infectious upper urinary tract stones: A prospective, randomized controlled study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) with a flexible and negative suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional sheath for patients with infectious upper urinary tract stones (IUUTS). A total of 185 patients were enrolled, with 93 assigned to the FANS group and 92 to the traditional UAS group. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) at the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included the SFR at 30 days postoperatively, operative time, hemoglobin reduction, length of hospital stay, quality of life (QoL) improvement, incidence of ureteral stricture at 3 months, and surgery-related complications. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in baseline demographics or preoperative clinical characteristics (P > 0.05). The FANS group had significantly lower white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels at 6 and 24 h postoperatively (all P < 0.05). Mean operative time was significantly shorter (P < 0.001), QoL improvement was obviously greater (P < 0.001), and average hospital stay was shorter in the FANS group (P < 0.001). The SFRs on postoperative day 1 and at 30 days were both significantly higher in the FANS group (both P < 0.05). At 3 months, ureteral strictures occurred in three patients in the traditional UAS group and one in the FANS group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the FANS group (P < 0.05). For patients with IUUTS, fURS combined with FANS effectively improves stone clearance efficiency and reduces the risk of postoperative infection.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Advances in fragment removal devices in ureteroscopy: up-to-date review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The development of laser lithotripsy for flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has improved access and the ability to fragment renal stones. A common challenge for endourologists is managing the residual fragments (RF) of these stones. These RFs are associated with higher complication rates and the need for reinterventions and could serve as a focus for future stone formation. We aim to summarize recent technological advancements that increase the likelihood of removing more RFs and ultimately achieving stone-free status (SFS). RECENT FINDINGS: New technologies expand upon existing devices or create novel techniques, improving efficiency and increasing the volume of RF that can be extracted. Improvements to stone-grabbing baskets enable more controlled passes, reducing damage and complications. The flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) builds on the traditional ureteral access sheath (UAS) by offering greater manoeuvrability and RF extraction from difficult anatomical locations. The development of urothelial-safe hydrogels provides an effective way to group and remove fragments. Additionally, magnetic hydrogels show promise for extracting tiny particles from hidden renal structures, advancing toward an ideal SFS. The Spinner-Induced Synergistic Circulation and Spiral Flow device also shows potential for rapidly removing numerous fragments. SUMMARY: Novel technological advancements build upon existing technologies or develop new methods of maximizing RF extraction while maintaining the balance of suction, irrigation, intrarenal pressure, and temperature - the Quadrifecta of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

F-URS with FANS versus mPCNL for 2-3 cm UUTS: a RCT with a subgroup analysis of 2-2.5 cm stones.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) with a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) in the treatment of 2-3 cm upper urinary tract stones (UUTS), with a prespecified subgroup analysis for stones ≥2 to <2.5 cm. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 326 patients with 2-3 cm UUTS between June 2023 and December 2025. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either f-URS with FANS or mPCNL. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted for stones measuring ≥2 to <2.5 cm. The primary outcomes were the immediate and 1-month stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included the operative duration, decrease in haemoglobin, hospital stay, and complication rate. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the overall 2-3 cm cohort, the FANS group achieved immediate and 1-month SFRs comparable to those of the mPCNL group. Although the operative time was longer in the FANS group, it was associated with significantly less haemoglobin loss and a shorter hospital stay, with no significant difference in infection-related complications. Notably, in the subgroup of stones ≥2 to <2.5 cm, the FANS group demonstrated a non-inferior SFR at both time points, and the operative time was not significantly longer than that of the mPCNL group. CONCLUSION: For 2-3 cm UUTS, f-URS with FANS offers a SFR comparable to that of mPCNL, along with the advantages of reduced blood loss and shorter hospitalization. In the ≥2 to <2.5 cm subgroup, FANS shows comprehensive benefits over mPCNL. These findings support FANS as an effective alternative to mPCNL for 2-3 cm stones and a potentially preferred option for stones measuring 2-2.5 cm.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Temporal evolution of minimally invasive pediatric urolithiasis treatment over 30 years.

Urolithiasis in children has increased substantially over the past 30 years, and surgical management maintains an important role in treatment. Technological advances such as lasers and miniaturization have broadened treatment options, and researchers investigate the best indications for each procedure. The aim was to identify publication trends in the field and explore reasons why Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy is being gradually less applied in the treatment of pediatric urolithiasis. A Reverse Systematic Review of the literature was conducted regarding the surgical treatment of urolithiasis in children. Five databases were screened, gathering all articles from inception that were evaluated in systematic reviews. We examined 123 publications, 197 reports, and 15,878 procedures, consisting of the largest studied population in the field. There was an increasing number of publications, although in progressively less prestigious journals. The number of studies on miniaturized percutaneous techniques and flexible ureteroscopy has increased closely with the rise in popularity of these procedures worldwide, mainly driven by studies from Asia, Europe, and North America. A trend of self-renewed interest is fueled by technological innovation and has led to fewer publications on Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy over the years. This review highlights the fact that, despite positive results in recent studies, the low popularity of ESWL within the scientific community is driving a decline in the technique's indications. Moreover, based on the findings of this study, key research priorities include continued reporting of high-quality outcomes, and technological progress in ESWL would contribute meaningfully to the field.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical management of urolithiasis in older adults: overview from EAU endourology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Population ageing is changing everyday urological practice. The number of older adults is increasing, and urology already treats a patient population that is, on average, older than the general population. Consequently, older adults with urolithiasis represent a core part of contemporary endourological practice. Given this, a focused review of the available evidence is valuable to inform clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: A peak in stone disease can occur in older adults who may also be less likely to present with the classical features of renal colic. As such, delayed or missed diagnosis may carry greater clinical consequences. Although the literature remains relatively limited, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy remain feasible options in appropriately selected older adults. In this group in particular, broader health associations merit consideration, as the presence of urolithiasis in older adults may reflect overall health status in later life. SUMMARY: The burden of urolithiasis in older adults is increasing and now represents a routine component of everyday clinical practice. Clinical presentation may differ from that seen in younger "index" patients, and complications may have a greater impact on recovery and function. Management should therefore be individualized, taking into account comorbidity, frailty, functional status, and the patient's own priorities.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Novel non-contrast computed tomography parameters for predicting spontaneous stone passage and surgical requirement in ureteral stones: The role of ureteral wall thickness and dilatation ratio.

We investigated the predictive value of standard non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) measurements, the ureteral dilatation ratio (DDR) and intraluminal urine stasis markers, for spontaneous stone passage (SSP) versus surgical intervention in patients with ureteral stones. We also evaluated ureteral wall thickness (UWT) as a practical clinical marker. This retrospective study included 461 patients diagnosed with ureteral stones via NCCT. Patients were categorised into two groups based on clinical outcomes: the spontaneous passage group (MET; n = 229) and the endoscopic surgery group (URS; n = 232). Stone volume, stone density (HU), UWT, DDR and intraluminal urine attenuation values were measured for all patients. Independent risk factors were identified using a multivariate logistic regression model and clinical cut-off values were determined via ROC curve analysis. Stone volume, density, UWT and hydronephrosis grade were all significantly higher in the URS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that increased UWT (OR: 5.03, 95% CI: 3.66-6.90; p < 0.001) was the strongest independent predictor of surgery. Higher DDR (OR: 1.88; p = 0.003), advanced hydronephrosis, stone volume, and density also increased surgical risk. A UWT cut-off ≥ 2.97 mm predicted surgery with 84.8% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity (AUC: 0.872). A DDR cut-off > 1.79 yielded 81.7% specificity and 40.4% sensitivity. UWT weakly correlated with stone volume (r = 0.145), indicating wall thickening reflects an inflammatory response rather than a mere mechanical consequence. UWT is a superior predictor of SSP failure, supported by increased DDR as a highly specific complementary risk factor. These parameters could help clinicians to identify patients who would benefit from early surgical counselling and intervention rather than prolonged conservative management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with flexible and navigable suction access sheaths vs mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and perioperative outcomes of contemporary flexible and navigable suction access sheath-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (FANS-RIRS) against percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the management of large upper urinary tract stones, as despite technological advances in RIRS such as high-powered lasers and FANS that have substantially enhanced its performance, current guidelines continue to recommend PCNL as first-line treatment for renal stones >2cm. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies performing direct comparisons of FANS-RIRS against PCNL in adult patients until September 2025. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFRs) and need for ancillary procedures. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of postoperative hospitalisation, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (three randomised control trials, seven retrospective cohort studies) comprising 2347 patients were included; preoperative stone sizes were predominantly 2-3 cm. All PCNL procedures in the studies included were performed as mini-PCNL. The SFRs for FANS-RIRS were comparable with mini-PCNL across all stone sizes (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.17) and stones ≥2 cm (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.08), with low heterogeneity. Ancillary procedures rates were similar (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.61-2.44). FANS-RIRS was associated with significantly fewer overall complications, specifically smaller haemoglobin decline, need for transfusion, and shorter hospital stay. However, mini-PCNL demonstrated shorter operative times for stones ≥2 cm. Urosepsis rates were low and similar between both groups. Limitations include predominance of Asian studies, variability of practice, and inclusion of non-randomised studies. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary FANS-RIRS achieves SFRs comparable to mini-PCNL even for 2-3 cm stones, while offering superior safety profiles and shorter hospitalisation; this supports FANS-RIRS as a viable primary treatment in selected patients.

Humans↗