PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “vaccine equity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Global vaccine readiness: equity-by-design in pandemic preparedness and response.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 showed that rapid vaccine development and roll-out, while lifesaving, can still yield large, avoidable harms when equity is not considered from the outset. Disparities in vaccine timing and coverage, especially in low-resource settings, amplified health and economic burdens, highlighting the need for preparedness frameworks that combine speed with fairness. AREAS COVERED: We synthesize evidence from literature and policy reports regarding global vaccine roll-out, focusing on avertable mortality under alternative sharing scenarios, procurement design, pooled mechanisms such as COVAX, and the role of distributed manufacturing and delivery capacity. We also examine how transparent data-sharing, effective public communication, genomic surveillance, adaptive trial designs, and modeling hubs can support more responsive and equitable vaccine deployment. Across six reflection points, we translate these lessons into practical priorities for future pandemic readiness, including strengthening healthcare infrastructure, equitable procurement, data transparency, and safeguarding public health decision-making from political and commercial distortion. EXPERT OPINION: We argue that equity-by-design is essential if vaccine innovation is to deliver equitable public health impact. This requires geographically distributed manufacturing, transparency, equity-conditioned advance purchase agreements, and pre-agreed, epidemiology-triggered allocation of vaccines. We recommend institutionalizing disaggregated reporting, standardized data-sharing, greater pathogen genomic sequencing capacity, and communication strategies that support public health protection while countering misinformation.

Humans

Advancing the fight against tuberculosis: integrating innovation and public health in diagnosis, treatment, vaccine development, and implementation science.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of infectious disease mortality worldwide, increasingly complicated by the emergence of drug-resistant strains and limitations in existing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Despite decades of global efforts, the disease continues to impose a significant burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where health system weaknesses hinder progress. This comprehensive review explores recent advancements in TB diagnostics, antimicrobial resistance (AMR surveillance), treatment strategies, and vaccine development. It critically evaluates cutting-edge technologies including CRISPR-based diagnostics, whole-genome sequencing, and digital adherence tools, alongside therapeutic innovations such as shorter multidrug-resistant TB regimens and host-directed therapies. Special emphasis is placed on the translational gap-highlighting barriers to real-world implementation such as cost, infrastructure, and policy fragmentation. While innovations like the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, BPaLM regimen, and next-generation vaccines such as M72/AS01E represent pivotal progress, their deployment remains uneven. Implementation science, cost-effectiveness analyses, and health equity considerations are vital to scaling up these tools. Moreover, the expansion of the TB vaccine pipeline and integration of AI in diagnostics signal a transformative period in TB control. Eliminating TB demands more than biomedical breakthroughs-it requires a unified strategy that aligns innovation with access, equity, and sustainability. By bridging science with implementation, and integrating diagnostics, treatment, and prevention within robust health systems, the global community can accelerate the path toward ending TB.

diagnostic innovation

Respiratory pandemic risk in the Anthropocene: A One Health framework and GISRS+ agenda.

Recent epidemics and pandemics caused by respiratory viruses, alongside the animal panzootic spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5Nx), have become a structural feature of the Anthropocene, yet responses remain largely reactive. This review integrates findings from WHO's Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) and related surveillance data (2000-2024), epidemiological studies of influenza A virus, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and H5Nx, and One Health literature. We examine major groups of respiratory viruses and identify mismatches between risk and surveillance by focusing on spillover potential from animal hosts, human-to-human transmission and its controllability, and Anthropocene characteristics that increase epidemic risk. The analysis indicated that SARS-related coronaviruses and influenza A viruses, particularly H5Nx, are among the leading candidates based on currently available evidence because they have large reservoirs in animal hosts and spillover to humans is highly probable. The previous presymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2 and recent mammalian adaptation in H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b highlight limitations of the traditional symptom-based and pathogen-specific surveillance system. Spillover events tend to occur in tropical and subtropical regions in low- and middle-income countries, but most genomic surveillance is in high-income countries. We propose interventions that address the upstream, midstream, downstream processes of epidemics. Upstream interventions are primary prevention measures related to land use, livestock, wildlife, and urban environments; midstream interventions are GISRS+-based pathogen-agnostic genomic and metagenomic early warning systems triggered by One Health; and downstream interventions include vaccines, antivirals, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and engineering with equity-centred global governance and sustainable financing.

Anthropocene

Bundibugyo at the border: The 2026 Ebola outbreak and the case for pre-emptive countermeasure equity.

The 2026 Ebola outbreak caused by Bundibugyo ebolavirus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda exposes a persistent structural flaw in global health security: preparedness remains overwhelmingly reactive and pathogen-specific. Despite the $518 million Africa CDC-WHO joint continental plan, no licensed BDBV vaccine or therapeutic is available; a 21-day (three-week) detection delay and cross-border transmission expose inadequate inter-epidemic investment in non-Zaire ebolavirus countermeasures. We argue for sustained, ring-fenced financing, institutionalised cross-border coordination, species-inclusive diagnostics, and real-time genomic data sharing to move African Ebola preparedness from reactive to pre-emptive.

Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola