PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A B Benson

Publications and source records attributed to A B Benson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A phase II study of high-dose bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, as initial therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E2200.

AIM: Patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to this single arm phase II multi-center cooperative group trial of bevacizumab combined with IFL. The first 20 patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) weekly for four of six weeks and high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every other week. Following a toxicity review of other trials using IFL, subsequent patients were enrolled at reduced doses of irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of the 92 patients accrued to the study, toxicity data are available for 87 patients and efficacy data for 81 patients. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months, median overall survival is 26.3 months, median progression free survival is 10.7 months and 1-year survival is 85%. The overall response rate is 49.4% (6.2% complete responses). A reduction in the starting doses of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil decreased the occurrence of vomiting, diarrhea and neutropenia related complications. Bleeding occurred in 37 patients; all events but two were grade 1 or grade 2. There were nine reports of grade 3 or grade 4 thrombo-embolic events. Hypertension of any grade occurred in 13% of patients and proteinuria was infrequent. CONCLUSION: High-dose bevacizumab added to IFL is a well-tolerated and highly active regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗

Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114.

PURPOSE: The gastrointestinal Intergroup studied postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with T3/4 and N+ rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery to try to improve chemotherapy and to determine the risk of systemic and local failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had a potentially curative surgical resection and were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy and two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens were bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU and leucovorin, 5-FU and levamisole, and 5-FU, leucovorin, and levamisole. Pelvic irradiation was given to a dose of 45 Gy to the whole pelvis and a boost to 50.4 to 54 Gy. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred ninety-five patients were entered and fully assessable, with a median follow-up of 7.4 years. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) by drug regimen. DFS and OS decreased between years 5 and 7 (from 54% to 50% and 64% to 56%, respectively), although recurrence-free rates had only a small decrease. The local recurrence rate was 14% (9% in low-risk [T1 to N2+] and 18% in high-risk patients [T3N+, T4N]). Overall, 7-year survival rates were 70% and 45% for the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Males had a poorer overall survival rate than females. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage to leucovorin- or levamisole-containing regimens over bolus 5-FU alone in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer when combined with irradiation. Local and distant recurrence rates are still high, especially in T3N+ and T4 patients, even with full adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Conventional systemic chemotherapy currently available for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma is ineffective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of patients with this highly refractory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label study evaluated a 28-day oral regimen of 5-FU (1 mg/m2 twice daily) plus the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, eniluracil (10 mg/m2 twice daily), in patients with chemotherapy-naive or anthracycline-refractory inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients enrolled into the study. No patient showed a confirmed partial or complete tumor response, although nine patients (25%) had a best response of stable disease. The median duration of progression-free survival was 9.6 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-10.6 weeks], and the median duration of overall survival was 32.7 weeks (95% CI 17.4-71.6 weeks). Eniluracil/5-FU was well tolerated. Diarrhea, the most frequent treatment-related non-hematological toxicity, occurred in 11 patients (31%). Hematological toxicities were infrequent and usually mild. CONCLUSIONS: Eniluracil/5-FU as a 28-day oral outpatient regimen is well tolerated by patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma, although minimal activity was observed when given as monotherapy at the dose used in this study.

Administration, Oral↗

Fluorouracil modulation in colorectal cancer: lack of improvement with N -phosphonoacetyl- l -aspartic acid or oral leucovorin or interferon, but enhanced therapeutic index with weekly 24-hour infusion schedule--an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate mechanism-directed regimens in maximizing the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorected cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on promising phase II data, a randomized comparison of various methods for the biochemical modulation of 5-FU was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The control group received single-agent 5-FU as a 24-hour infusion weekly. Patients (N = 1,120) with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to one of the following arms: arm A, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion, weekly; arm B, N-phosphonoacetyl-l-aspartic acid 250 mg/m2 day l, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion day 2, weekly; arm C, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with oral leucovorin (LV) 125 mg/m2 hourly for the preceding 4 hours, weekly; arm D, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with intravenous (IV) LV 600 mg/m2, weekly; arm E, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/d IV by continuous infusion for 5 days, then 750 mg/m2 weekly, and recombinant interferon alfa-2a 9 million units subcutaneously three times weekly. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. RESULTS: Of the 1,098 assessable patients, 57% had measurable disease. The toxicity of all the regimens was tolerable. Grade 4 or worse toxicity occurred in 11%, 11%, 30%, 24%, and 22% on each arm, respectively; diarrhea was the most common adverse effect. These toxicity patterns favored significantly (P <.001) the 24-hour infusion arms. Median survival (months) by arm was A, 14.8; B, 11.9; C, 13.5; D, 13.6; and E, 15.2. These survival durations did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a weekly infusion regimen of 5-FU is significantly less toxic than and as effective as 5-FU bolus regimens modulated by either LV or interferon in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Administration, Oral↗

Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival among patients with stage III colon cancer, but no reliable molecular predictors of outcome have been identified. METHODS: We evaluated loss of chromosomal material (also called loss of heterozygosity or allelic loss) from chromosomes 18q, 17p, and 8p; cellular levels of p53 and p21(WAF1/CIP1) proteins; and microsatellite instability as molecular markers. We analyzed tumor tissue from 460 patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer who had been treated with various combinations of adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole to determine the ability of these markers to predict survival. RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity at 18q was present in 155 of 319 cancers (49 percent). High levels of microsatellite instability were found in 62 of 298 tumors (21 percent), and 38 of these 62 tumors (61 percent) had a mutation of the gene for the type II receptor for transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1). Among patients with microsatellite-stable stage III cancer, five-year overall survival after fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was 74 percent in those whose cancer retained 18q alleles and 50 percent in those with loss of 18q alleles (relative risk of death with loss at 18q, 2.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.34 to 5.65; P=0.006). The five-year survival rate among patients whose cancer had high levels of microsatellite instability was 74 percent in the presence of a mutated gene for the type II receptor for TGF-beta1 and 46 percent if the tumor did not have this mutation (relative risk of death, 2.90; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 7.35; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Retention of 18q alleles in microsatellite-stable cancers and mutation of the gene for the type II receptor for TGF-beta1 in cancers with high levels of microsatellite instability point to a favorable outcome after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil-based regimens for stage III colon cancer.

Aged↗

Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We postulated that the pathologic evaluation of the lymph nodes of surgical specimens from patients with rectal cancer can have a substantial impact on time to relapse and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,664 patients with T3, T4, or node-positive rectal cancer treated in a national intergroup trial of adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Associations between the number of lymph nodes found by the pathologist in the surgical specimen and the time to relapse and survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups by nodal status and the corresponding quartiles of numbers of nodes examined. The number of nodes examined was significantly associated with time to relapse and survival among patients who were node-negative. For the first through fourth quartiles, the 5-year relapse rates were 0.37, 0.34, 0.26, and 0.19 (P: = .003), and the 5-year survival rates were 0.68, 0.73, 0.72, and 0.82 (P: = .02). No significant differences were found by quartiles among patients determined to be node-positive. We propose that observed differences are primarily related to the incorrect determination of nodal status in node-negative patients. Approximately 14 nodes need to be studied to define nodal status accurately. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the pathologic assessment of lymph nodes in surgical specimens is often inaccurate and that examining greater number of nodes increases the likelihood of proper staging. Some patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy are misclassified as node-negative due to incomplete sampling of lymph nodes.

Adult↗

A phase II study of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study testing the safety and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11). 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LCV) was conducted in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or stomach were entered onto this study. Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not allowed. Treatment consisted of repeated 6-week cycles comprising CPT-11 125 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) followed immediately by LCV 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v., all given weekly for four weeks followed by a two-week rest. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and 36 eligible patients received protocol therapy. Grade 3-5 toxicities consisted primarily of neutropenia (36%) and diarrhea (28%). Neutropenic infection was observed in 14% of patients, with 3 (8%) dying of neutropenic sepsis. The overall response rate was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5% to 35.5%). Median survival was 7.6 months, and median time to progression was 4.4 months. CONCLUSION: This weekly regimen of CPT-11 with bolus 5-FU/LCV is active in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. While rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea were similar to those observed historically in patients receiving this regimen for colorectal cancer, neutropenic fever/sepsis appeared to be more frequent, and dose modifications were substantial. Future trials of this combination in patients with gastric cancer should decrease the absolute starting drug doses and/ or employ altered scheduling that better accommodates the pattern of toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed 36 patients with liver metastases from islet cell tumors of the pancreas (n = 18) and carcinoid tumors (n = 18) who were treated with surgical resection (n = 16) or hepatic chemoembolization (n = 20). METHODS: All resections were complete and included 4 lobectomies, 6 segmental resections, and 6 wedge resections. There were no operative deaths. RESULTS: Median survival has not yet been reached, and the actuarial 5-year survival rate is 70%. Prognostic variables associated with improved disease-free survival included prior resection of the primary tumor and 4 or fewer metastases resected (P <.05). With an average of 3 chemoembolization procedures per patient, 17 of 20 patients (90%) demonstrated either a significant radiographic response (n = 5), stabilization of tumor mass (n = 2), or improvement of clinical symptoms (n = 10). Factors related to a sustained response (more then 1 year) included surgical resection of the primary tumor, 4 or more chemoembolization procedures, and liver metastases of 5 cm or smaller. Median survival after treatment was 32 months (range, 7-63 months), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors provides the best chance for extended survival. Chemoembolization effectively improves clinical symptoms and, in selected patients, may provide sustained tumor control.

Adenoma, Islet Cell↗

Oral eniluracil/5-FU for advanced colon and breast carcinomas.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is irreversibly catabolized to dihydrofluorouracil, an inactive metabolite, by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This catabolic pathway is a critical step in determining 5-FU availability for conversion to nucleotides and eventual incorporation into either RNA or DNA. Inactivation of DPD, therefore, is an approach to enhance the availability of 5-FU for potential improved therapeutic effect. Preclinical animal and human studies have demonstrated that eniluracil is an effective inactivator of DPD. Phase I studies have been completed showing the tolerability of two dosing schedules, including (1) a chronic schedule with twice-daily administration of eniluracil plus oral fluorouracil (5-FU) (10:1 ratio) for 28 days, and (2) a schedule of eniluracil administered daily on days 1-7 with oral 5-FU once daily on days 2-6. The phase I trials have demonstrated limited toxicities including diarrhea, mucositis, and neutropenia. Follow-up clinical trials have targeted colon and breast cancers in particular.

Administration, Oral↗

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: a regimen with unexpected early toxicity.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine that could be safely administered. We also sought to identify the toxicities associated with this treatment protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with planned doses of radiation (59.4 Gy) and PVI of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/d) with gemcitabine doses of 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/wk. RESULTS: Two of three patients at the 100-mg/m(2)/wk dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), as did three of four at the 50-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. One patient experienced a mucocutaneous reaction described as a Stevens-Johnson syndrome that was attributed to chemotherapy. Three patients developed gastric or duodenal ulcers with severe bleeding requiring transfusion. One patient developed severe thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 4 weeks. Three of the five episodes of DLT developed at radiation doses < or = 36 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on this experience, we cannot recommend further investigation of regimens incorporating gemcitabine into regimens of radiation with PVI 5-FU. The mechanism of this synergistic toxicity remains to be determined.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Management of cancer treatment-related diarrhea. Issues and therapeutic strategies.

The cancer treatment-related diarrhea caused by acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chemotherapeutic agents, particularly fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan, significantly affects patient morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms causing cancer treatment-related diarrhea are not fully understood, but histopathologic evidence points to a multifactorial process that causes an absorptive and secretory imbalance in the small bowel. Cancer treatment-related diarrhea could be life-threatening, yet assessment and treatment are not currently standardized. Several clinicians participated in a closed roundtable meeting to review the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) and GVHD-induced diarrhea, management issues in cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, and pharmacologic approaches to treatment. The meeting produced a proposal for new treatment guidelines and an algorithm, which include the use of octreotide for the management of CID- and GVHD-induced diarrhea. The development of diarrhea assessment guidelines that expand on the current National Cancer Institute criteria and allow for better patient management was also proposed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Treatment of squamous cell esophageal cancer with topotecan: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E2293).

Seventeen patients with enhanced measurable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days repeated every 21 days. Toxicity was severe, with 1 death from myelotoxicity and 10 patients with life-threatening myelotoxicity. Severe gastrointestinal toxicity consisting of vomiting was also seen in three patients. No response was seen in any of the patients in the study. Topotecan given in this manner has no activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Phase II trial of menogaril in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Menogaril is a semisynthetic anthracycline with relative lack of cardiotoxicity. Ten patients with multiple myeloma (MM), seven patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and one patient with diffuse well-differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma (DWDL) were treated with menogaril, 160 mg/m2 (for MM) or 200 mg/m2 (for CLL/DWDL), given as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, repeated every 28 days. All patients except one with CLL had been previously treated with one chemotherapy regimen and had either not responded or had relapsed after a response to prior treatment. There were no objective responses to treatment. Among the six evaluable patients with MM, two had stable disease with subjective improvement in symptoms for five to 25 cycles, and among the eight patients with CLL/DWDL, five patients remained stable for two to eight cycles on treatment. The remainder of the patients had progressive disease after one to two cycles of chemotherapy. Five grade 4 hematologic toxicities were observed. There was one fatal neutropenic sepsis. Menogaril, as administered in this study, does not appear to have significant activity in patients with previously treated MM or CLL.

Aged↗

A pilot trial of suramin in metastatic breast cancer to assess antiangiogenic activity in individual patients.

Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylurea with multiple potential mechanisms of action against tumors, including the ability to bind growth factors known to promote tumor angiogenesis. Using an established fixed dosing scheme for the administration of suramin in patients, a pilot study was conducted in patients with progressive, metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of this trial is to define the effect of suramin on the angiogenic activity in individual patients using in vitro laboratory assays. The secondary objective was to assess the antitumor effect of suramin in a population of metastatic breast cancer patients. No objective tumor responses were observed in any of the 9 patients who received treatment with suramin, however 1 patient did maintain stable disease status. The strength of angiogenic activity present in patient samples was assessed by testing patient plasma in the capillary endothelial cell migration assay. Angiogenic activity followed over time was lowest in patients with the highest suramin concentrations and highest in patients with the lowest suramin concentrations. We conclude that it is feasible to continually monitor the activity of antiangiogenic agents in individual patients without relying on clinical tumor response.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Adjuvant active specific immunotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer with an autologous tumor cell vaccine: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E5283.

PURPOSE: A randomized phase III clinical trial of adjuvant active specific immunotherapy (ASI) with an autologous tumor cell-bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine was conducted to determine whether surgical resection plus ASI was more beneficial than resection alone in stage II and III colon cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 412) with colon cancer (297 with stage II disease, 115 with stage III disease) were randomly allocated to an observation arm or to a treatment arm in which they received three weekly intradermal vaccine injections of 10(7) irradiated autologous tumor cells beginning approximately 4 weeks after surgery. The first two weekly injections also contained 10(7) BCG organisms. Patients were observed for determination of time to recurrence and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: This was a negative study in that after a 7.6-year median follow-up period, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the treatment arms. However, there were disease-free survival (P =.078) and overall survival (P =.12) trends in favor of ASI when treatment compliance was evaluated, ie, patients who received the intended treatment had a delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity (DCH) response to the third vaccination (induration >/=5 mm). Also, the magnitude of the DCH response correlated with improved prognosis. The 5-year survival proportion was 84.6% for those with indurations greater than 10 mm, compared with 45.0% for those with indurations less than 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When all randomized patients were evaluated, no significant clinical benefit was seen with ASI in surgically resected colon cancer patients with stage II or III colon cancer. However, there was an indication that treatment compliance with effective immunization results in disease-free and overall survival benefits.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Chronic daily low dose of 4-methyl-5-(2-pyrazinyl)-1,2-dithiole-3-thione (Oltipraz) in patients with previously resected colon polyps and first degree female relatives of breast cancer patients.

The chemoprevention agent oltipraz, one of the most active chemopreventive compounds in preclinical studies, has been shown to induce glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity in animals. Oltipraz was evaluated in a Phase I trial at daily oral doses of 20 mg (L1), 50 mg (L2), and 100 mg (L3) and twice weekly doses of 125 mg (L4) taken for 6 months with 6 patients entered at L1 and L2 and 7 patients entered at L3 and L4 (26 subjects: 19 females and 7 males). The subject population included patients with previously resected colon polyps and first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients. Patients with resected colon polyps underwent rectal biopsy for GST and glutathione (GSH) analyses. Of the 26 subjects, the following completed 6 months of therapy: 4 of 6 patients (L1), 4 of 6 patients (L2), 5 of 7 patients (L3), and 4 of 7 patients (L4). Toxicities were mild to severe and included: gastrointestinal symptoms, photosensitivity/heat intolerance, and neurological symptoms. Monthly plasma samples were obtained 2-3 h after oltipraz ingestion with minimally detectable plasma concentrations at L1. There was a significant difference in mean oltipraz concentration across the four doses, with no significant differences in mean oltipraz concentration over time. Rectal tissue and lymphocyte GSH and GST were variable, with no significant difference in mean levels across doses. At the 100-mg/day dose (L3), 1 patient experienced significant increase in rectal tissue GSH and GST activity, whereas 3 additional patients (L1 and L4) had >50% increase in tissue GSH. Lymphocyte GSH level was significantly related to plasma oltipraz concentration. There were no significant correlations between plasma oltipraz concentration and lymphocyte GST level nor any significant correlation between plasma concentration and percentage of change in tissue GSH or GST. Further investigation of dose/schedule and biological end points is ongoing.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗

NCCN Practice Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer.

The NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines panel believes that a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of the patient with colorectal cancer. The panel endorses the concept that treatment of patients in a clinical trial has priority over standard or accepted therapy. The recommended surgical procedure for resectable colon cancer is an en bloc resection; laparoscopic surgery should be done only in the context of a clinical trial. For patients with stage III disease, 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy is recommended. A patient who has metastatic disease in the liver or lung should be considered for surgical resection if he or she is a candidate for surgery and if surgery can extend survival. Surgery should be followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The panel advocates a conservative post-treatment surveillance program for colon and rectal carcinoma patients. Serial CEA determinations are appropriate if the patient is a candidate for aggressive surgical resection, should recurrence be detected. Abdominal and pelvic CT scans should be utilized only when there are clinical indications of possible recurrence. Patients whose disease progresses during 5-FU-based therapy should be treated with irinotecan or encouraged to participate in a phase I or phase II clinical trial.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗