PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A B Benson

Publications and source records attributed to A B Benson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90-12): Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation therapy in patients with local/regional squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients with clinical Stage T1-4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma were entered on a prospective single-arm study, of which 38 were eligible. Patients received 3 monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1; neoadjuvant segment) followed by 2 additional monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) plus concurrent 6480 cGy (combined modality segment). The median follow-up in surviving patients was 59 months. RESULTS: For the 38 eligible patients, the primary tumor response rate was 47% complete, 8% partial, and 3% stable disease. The first site of clinical failure was 39% local/regional and 24% distant. For the total patient group, there were 6 deaths during treatment, of which 9% (4/45) were treatment related. The median survival was 20 months. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 30%, and at 5 years, 20%. CONCLUSION: This intensive neoadjuvant approach does not appear to offer a benefit compared with conventional doses and techniques of combined modality therapy. However, high dose radiation (6480 cGy) appears to be tolerable, and is being tested further in Intergroup Trial INT 0123.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The role of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in management of colorectal cancer.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an important tool in the management of colorectal cancer. Its use as a prognostic indicator in resectable disease remains controversial but may be improved with molecular detection of the antigen. In monitoring patients after resection, CEA can be the first sign of a potentially curable recurrence. It can also be useful in assessing tumor response in patients being treated for metastases without easily measurable disease. CEA alone cannot dictate the type or duration of treatment but may be used in addition to standard monitoring tests.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1999

Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective, evidence-based, postoperative surveillance strategy for the detection of recurrent colon and rectal cancer. Tests are to be recommended only if they have an impact on the outcomes listed below. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: All tests described in the literature for postoperative monitoring were considered. In addition, the data were critically evaluated to determine the optimal frequency of monitoring. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included overall and disease-free survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction, and cost-effectiveness. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Expert Panel was guided by the principle of cost minimization, ie, when two strategies were believed to be equally effective, the least expensive test was recommended. EVIDENCE: A complete MEDLINE search was performed of the past 20 years of the medical literature. Keywords included colorectal cancer, follow-up, and carcinoembryonic antigen, as well as the names of the specific tests. The search was broadened by articles from the tumor marker ASCO panel literature search, as well as from bibliographies of selected articles. VALUES: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were rated by a standard process. More weight was given to studies that tested a hypothesis directly relating testing to one of the primary outcomes in a randomized design. BENEFITS/HARMS/COSTS: The possible consequences of false-positive and false-negative tests were considered in evaluating a preference for one of two tests that provide similar information. Cost alone was not a determining factor. RECOMMENDATIONS: The expert panel's recommended postoperative monitoring schema is discussed in this article. VALIDATION: Five outside reviewers, the ASCO Health Services Research Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors examined this document. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

High dose chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: results of a phase II study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: To assess the toxicity, local response, and survival associated with multimodality therapy in a cooperative group setting, patients with biopsy-proven clinical Stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (staged according to 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria) or gastroesophageal junction were treated with concomitant radiation and chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy. METHODS: Radiotherapy was administered in daily 2-gray (Gy) fractions 5 days a week until a total of 60 Gy was reached. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was infused continuously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2/day for 96 hours on Days 2-5 and 28-31. On Day 2, a 10 mg/m2 bolus of mitomycin was injected intravenously. Esophagectomy was performed 4-8 weeks following completion of the radiotherapy. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period (August 1991 through January 1993), 46 eligible patients were accrued from 21 institutions. Eight patients were Stage I and 38 Stage II. Eighty-seven percent of patients (40 of 46) received 6000 centigray (cGy), and all received >5000 cGy. Seventy-eight percent of patients (36 of 46) received >90% of the planned 5-FU dose. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 36 months (median, 22 months). There were eight treatment-related deaths; two were preoperative (from adult respiratory distress syndrome) and six were postoperative. Complete or partial response prior to esophagectomy was observed in 63% of cases, stable disease in 15%, and progression in 20%. Thirty-three patients underwent esophagectomy (transhiatal, n=14; Ivor Lewis, n=16; other, n=3). No tumor was found in the specimens resected from 8 of these 33 patients; this represented a pathologic complete response rate of 17% overall and 24% for those who underwent esophagectomy. Overall median survival was 16.6 months, 1-year survival 57%, and 2-year survival 27%. Survival was significantly worse for patients with circumferential cancers (median, 18.1 months vs. 8.3 months; P <0.05). CONCLUSION: High dose radiation therapy with concurrent 5-FU and mitomycin may be administered to patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma with acceptable morbidity. However, in a cooperative group setting, esophagogastrectomy following intensive chemoradiotherapy is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. Circumferential tumor growth is a significant adverse prognostic factor.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of chemoembolization for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery chemoembolization represents an alternative treatment for patients whose neoplastic lesions are not amenable or have become refractory to other treatment modalities. This project was designed to test the feasibility of regional chemoembolization for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastasis to the liver who had experienced failure with one or more systemic treatments. METHODS: Thirty patients who met the study entry criteria underwent one to three hepatic artery chemoembolizations. The chemoembolization regimen consisted of an injection of a bovine collagen material with cisplatin (10 mg/mL), doxorubicin (3 mg/mL), and mitomycin C (3 mg/mL). Repeat treatments were performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. RESULTS: Radiologic responses, as measured by a decrease in lesion density of at least 75% of the lesion or a 25% decrease in the size of the lesion, occurred in 63% of the cases. A decrease of at least 25% of the baseline carcinoembryonic antigen level occurred in 95% of the cases. All responses were transient. Median survival for all 30 patients was 8.6 months after the initiation of chemoembolization and 29 months after the initial diagnosis of metastasis to the liver. Common toxicities included a "postembolization syndrome," which consisted of fever > 101 degrees F (83%), pain in the right upper quadrant (100%), nausea, and vomiting. Lethargy was a common occurrence (in 60+% of cases) and lasted up to 6 weeks. Hematologic toxicities included leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoembolization is a feasible treatment modality for patients with colorectal carcinoma metastasis to the liver who have experienced failure with other systemic treatments. It results in high response rates with transient mild-to-moderate toxicity. Responses are measured in months, however, and all patients have eventual progression of disease. Patients who are able to undergo three or more chemoembolization procedures may receive the most clinical benefit.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for patients with localized, resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: A prospective, multiinstitutional trial was initiated in 1991 to examine the tolerance to and efficacy of a program of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) and surgical resection for patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients were assessable for analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months for survivors. Radiation therapy (RT) totaling 5,040 cGy in 180 cGy fractions with mitomycin 10 mg/m2 day 2 and fluorouracil (5-FU) 1,000 mg/m2/d continuous infusion days 2 through 5 and 29 through 32 were given as preoperative adjuvant therapy. Twelve patients did not proceed to surgery (one death, one toxicity, three local progression, six distant metastases, one intercurrent illness), whereas 41 patients underwent surgery. Of these, 17 patients did not have resection (11, hepatic and/or peritoneal metastases and six local extension that precluded resection). Twenty-four patients had tumor resection (19 Whipple, four total pancreatectomy, one distal pancreatectomy). RESULTS: Treatment toxicity was primarily hematologic, although a comparable number suffered biliary tract complications, either from obstruction or cholangitis as a result of an occluded stent or the primary tumor. There was one postoperative death. Median survival for the entire group and for the 24 patients with resection was 9.7 and 15.7 months. This survival rate reflected the advanced state of most resected cancers (positive peritoneal cytology, three patients; margins within 2 mm, 13 patients; involved lymph nodes, four patients; and need for superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection, four patients). Tumor progression was most frequent at metastatic sites. CONCLUSION: This preoperative CTRT protocol was feasible and safe in a cooperative group setting. Entry of patients with advanced tumors probably accounted for the suboptimal resectability and survival results.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Recommended guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea.

PURPOSE: Management of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) has customarily involved symptomatic treatment with opioids in conjunction with supportive care. Alternatively, patients refractory to conventional therapy have been given octreotide, a somatostatin analogue. Although this agent has been effective against CID, no widely accepted treatment guidelines that incorporate its use currently exist. An expert multidisciplinary panel was convened to formulate clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of CID. METHODS: The panel reviewed clinical data on the management of CID reported in the literature and analyzed currently available tools used to assess CID. Expert consensus was applied when published data were insufficient. Panel members also considered the effect of CID on quality of life and the cost-effectiveness and efficacy of different pharmacologic approaches. Effective resolution of CID and decreases in the need for supportive care or hospitalization were considered to be primary goals in the formulation of the guidelines. RESULTS: The panel formulated suggested practice guidelines for the management of CID that detail recommendations for the assessment and evaluation of diarrhea and the sequence and duration of administration of specific pharmacologic agents. CONCLUSION: The consensus of the panel was that standardized assessment and management of diarrhea is required to effectively control CID. The panel agreed that further data from a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored intergroup trial is required to determine the optimal dosage of octreotide and its cost in the treatment of cancer. The panel also agreed that further clinical research is warranted to address significant questions about the most effective way to assess and treat CID.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Although 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used to treat advanced colorectal cancer for 45 years, the drug has only a modest response rate and impact on survival. Attempting to enhance 5-FU's activity, researchers have administered it in combination with biochemical modulators and changed its dosage schedules to increase dose intensity. The combination of 5-FU and leucovorin has been evaluated in many studies. Results of a meta-analysis comparing 5-FU administered by bolus injection with a combination of 5-FU and intravenous leucovorin indicate that the combination significantly increased response rates but failed to improve survival. Similarly, studies comparing different methods of 5-FU administration (bolus injection v prolonged infusion) have demonstrated improved response rates and decreased toxicity with prolonged infusion, but most have failed to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in survival. For patients with liver-dominant colorectal disease, researchers have investigated the administration of liver-directed therapy by techniques such as hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). Compared with systemic administration of fluoropyrimidines, HAI administration increased response rates, but no survival benefit was demonstrated. Both response and survival benefits were observed with HAI, however, in one trial comparing HAI with no treatment (palliative care) in previously untreated patients with liver metastases. This trial also demonstrated that HAI did not diminish quality of life. Intravenous fluoropyrimidine-based therapies continue to dominate as the first-line approach for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Present and future clinical trials will determine the efficacy of 5-FU pro-drugs, regimens combining oral 5-FU and 5-ethynyluracil, thymidylate synthase inhibitors, and new 5-FU combination regimens (5-FU plus oxaliplatin [Eloxatine; Sanofi, New York, NY] or irinotecan [CPT-II, Camptosar; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI], for example).

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Regional and systemic therapies for advanced colorectal carcinoma: randomized clinical trial results.

The treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has been evaluated in a series of randomized trials, including infusional and modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and three meta-analyses encompassing trials of 5-FU plus leucovorin, continuous-infusion 5-FU, and intra-arterial fluoropyrimidines. A Southwest Oncology Group seven-arm phase II trial suggested that infusional 5-FU produced the most favorable toxicity spectrum and the longest survival, warranting further investigation in phase III trials. In a randomized phase III five-arm trial conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, significant toxicity differences noted among the arms favored high-dose infusional 5-FU. In addition, the trial showed that 5-FU modulated by leucovorin or interferon was not more effective than 5-FU given as a 24-hour high-dose infusion weekly, and N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid did not enhance the activity of the weekly infusional 5-FU. Oral leucovorin provided no advantage over IV dosing. There was a significant difference in survival for patients with nonmeasurable disease (16.9 months) compared to those with measurable disease (12.6 months, P = .001). The Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-analysis Project demonstrated a response advantage for patients receiving 5-FU plus leucovorin (23%) compared to those receiving bolus 5-FU (11%, P = 10(-7); however, there was no survival advantage of 5-FU plus leucovorin over 5-FU alone (P = 0.57). The Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer showed that continuous-infusion 5-FU resulted in a statistically significantly higher response rate than bolus 5-FU (22% vs 14%, P = .0002). Overall survival also favored continuous-infusion 5-FU (P = .04). Continuous-infusion 5-FU was less toxic than bolus treatment. Data from six select randomized trials comparing hepatic intra-arterial infusion of FUDR to systemic therapy demonstrated a significant difference favoring intra-arterial therapy. Future directions for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer include ongoing trials comparing low-dose vs high-dose infusional 5-FU, intra-arterial FUDR, leucovorin and dexamethasone vs systemic leucovorin plus 5-FU and proposed trials evaluating the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor eniluracil plus oral 5-FU. Other drugs of interest include UFT, capecitabine, thymidylate synthase inhibitors, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combinations.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1997

Adjuvant postoperative fluorouracil-modulated chemotherapy combined with pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer: initial results of intergroup 0114.

PURPOSE: The combination of radiation therapy with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is generally accepted as appropriate postoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinomas of the rectum that extend through the bowel wall or with lymph nodes positive for tumor. We attempted to determine whether the efficacy of this postoperative therapy could be improved by the addition of leucovorin and/or levamisole. METHODS: A total of 1,696 patients were randomized and eligible for treatment with one of four treatment schemes. All patients received two cycles of bolus 5-FU-based systemic chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy with chemotherapy and two more cycles of the same systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was either 5-FU alone, 5-FU with leucovorin, 5-FU with levamisole, or 5-FU with leucovorin and levamisole. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 48 months, there is no statistically significant advantage to any of the treatment regimens compared with bolus 5-FU alone. There is evidence of increased gastrointestinal toxicity with the three-drug combination compared with bolus 5-FU alone. Statistical analysis suggests it is very unlikely that either levamisole-containing combination will be shown to be of value with further follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence at present for a beneficial effect of levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. Definitive evaluation of the effect of the addition of leucovorin to 5-FU and pelvic radiation will require further follow-up evaluation.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Phase I/II trial of combined 131I anti-CEA monoclonal antibody and hyperthermia in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This pilot project was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity of and tumor response to combined 131I anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody (131I anti-CEA RMoAb) and hyperthermia in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Nine patients who had colorectal carcinoma with liver metastases were enrolled in this study. Intact 131I anti-CEA RMoAb was used (the specific antibody was IMMU-4, provided by Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ). During the diagnostic phase, dosimetry revealed that the tumor site received a higher radiation dose than the surrounding normal tissues in only six patients. These six, who were treated with radioimmunotherapy and hyperthermia, were the basis of this study. The first three patients were treated with 30 mCi/m2 of 131I anti-CEA RMoAb, and the next three received 60 mCi/m2. Pharmacokinetic clearance data were reported for all nine patients. RESULTS: Thermometry data revealed an average T90 of 40.3 (+/- 1.4 degrees C) and T50 of 41.1 (+/- 1.2 degrees C). The average thermal dose equivalent at 42.5 degrees C was 34.5 (+/- 21.5) minutes. The average Tmin, Tmax, and Tmeam were 40 (+/- 1.2 degrees C), 42.4 (+/- 0.7 degrees C), and 41.1 (+/- 1.1 degrees C), respectively. The pharmacokinetic clearance data of antibody showed monoexponential plasma clearances in all patients except one, in whom a biexponential plasma clearance was observed. In general, similar plasma and whole-body clearances as well as similar urinary excretions were observed when diagnostic and therapeutic phases for each patient were compared. Two of the six patients showed a marked improvement in their symptoms; five patients showed a drop in carcinoembryonic antigen levels. A follow-up computed tomography scan one month after treatment showed no change in tumor volume in five patients; one patient showed a partial response. Three patients developed toxicity, two developed moderate thrombocytopenia (39,000 and 58,000), and the other patient developed hematoma resulting from the insertion of a catheter for thermometry. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to combine hyperthermia and radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies, and the combination was well tolerated by these patients. The interaction between hyperthermia and low dose rate radioimmunotherapy is complex. Further studies are necessary to explore the use of this combined modality in the management of maligancies.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Initial results of a phase II trial of high dose radiation therapy, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin for patients with anal cancer (E4292): an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A prospective clinical trial was performed to assess the response and toxicity associated with the use of high dose radiation therapy, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin in patients with anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with anal cancer without distant metastasis were eligible for this study. Radiation therapy consisted of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions; a 2 week break in treatment was taken after 36 Gy had been given. A treatment of 5-fluorouracil, 1,000 mg/m2 per day intravenously, was given for the first 4 days of radiation therapy, and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2 intravenously, was given on day 1 of radiation therapy. A second course of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin was given after 36 Gy of radiation, when the radiation therapy was resumed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients entered this study and received treatment. Thirteen (68%) had a complete response, 5 (26%) had a partial response, and 1 (5%) had stable disease. The patient with stable disease and one of the patients with a partial response had complete disappearance of tumor more than 8 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. Fifteen patients had toxicity of Grade 3 or higher: the worst toxicity was Grade 3 in eight patients, Grade 4 in six patients, and Grade 5 in one patient. The most common form of toxicity of Grade 3 or higher was hematologic. The one lethal toxicity was due to pseudomembranous colitis, which was a complication of antibiotic therapy for a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil resulted in an overall response rate of 95%. Significant toxicity occurred, an indication that this regimen is near the maximal tolerated dose. A Phase III clinical trial is planned in which radiation therapy, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil will be used as an experimental arm.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) results of protocol E1293.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Docetaxel 100 mg m-2 was administered as a 1 hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks to 41 patients. Patients were premedicated prior to each course with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine and cimetidine. Clinical response and toxicity were determined. Objective responses were seen in seven of 41 eligible patients (two complete responses [CRs] and five partial responses [PRs], for an objective response rate of 17% (90% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 30%). The most common toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 88% of patients; 46% of patients required a dose reduction following an episode of neutropenic fever requiring antibiotic therapy. Additional patients have had reversible grade 3-4 toxicities including nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy. Ten patients have had grade 1-3 hypersensitivity reactions. Alopecia has been seen in the majority of patients. Fluid retention grade 1-3 has been observed in patients. Docetaxel administered on this schedule is an active agent in adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Further investigation of this drug should be conducted in multi-drug combination programs.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Phase II trial of prolonged continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-alpha in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol 3292.

Evidence suggests that interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) augments the antineoplastic activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in human adenocarcinoma cell lines in vitro and may enhance the efficacy of 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. In addition, 5-FU may be more effective when given as a prolonged, continuous i.v. infusion (PCI). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performed a Phase II trial of PCI 5-FU plus IFN-alpha in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-six patients with advanced, surgically incurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas received PCI 5-FU (250 mg/m2 daily for 28 days) in combination with IFN-alpha (5 x 10(6) IU/m2 s.c. thrice weekly). Treatment cycles were repeated 14 days or longer after completion of the previous cycle. Treatment was interrupted prior to day 28 if intolerable toxicity developed, and the dose of 5-FU was reduced in subsequent cycles. Partial response occurred in two of 24 evaluable patients (8%; 95% confidence interval, 0-19%). The majority of the study group (88%) had liver metastases. Patients whose serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was more than twofold elevated developed 5-FU-related toxicity significantly sooner than patients with smaller elevations in serum LDH (9 vs. 22 days; p = 0.003). A similar trend was observed for patients with a more than twofold elevation in serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT; 9 vs. 15 days; p = 0.07). In conclusion, PCI 5-FU plus IFN-alpha has minimal activity in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma, and elevated serum LDH and/or SGOT may be useful for predicting greater toxicity from 5-FU-based therapy in patients with liver metastases.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

NCCN Colorectal Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

In summary, the committee believes that a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the management of the patient with colorectal cancer. The committee endorses the concept that treatment of patients on a clinical trial has priority over standard or accepted therapy. The recommended surgical procedure for managing resectable colon cancer is an en bloc resection; laparoscopic surgery should be done only in the context of a clinical trial. For patients with stage III disease, 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. A patient who has metastatic disease in the liver or lung should be considered for surgical resection if he or she is a candidate for surgery and if surgery can extend survival. The committee advocates a conservative post-treatment surveillance program for colon and rectal cancer patients. A determination of CEA should be done only if CEA was elevated at baseline and decreased following primary resection. Abdominal and pelvic CT scans should be utilized only when there are clinical indications of possible recurrence. Patients whose disease progresses during 5-FU-based therapy should be considered for treatment with irinotecan or encouraged to participate in a phase I or II clinical trial.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

A phase II clinical trial of echinomycin in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. An Illinois Cancer Center Study.

Echinomycin, a cyclic peptide in the family of quinoxaline antibiotics, was evaluated in patient with metastatic, soft tissue sarcoma not previously treated for metastatic disease. The starting dose of echinomycin was 1,200 mcg/m2 administered intravenously, once weekly x 4, followed by a two-week break. The protocol design called for dose escalation on subsequent cycles of therapy, but because of significant toxicity, dose escalation occurred in only 5 of 25 treatment cycles. Severe nausea and vomiting was the most common toxicity. No clinical responses were observed in the 12 evaluable patients. Echinomycin at this dose and schedule is inactive in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase II trial of taxol in patients with adenocarcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG) results.

Taxol was administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion at 250 mg/m2 in this Phase II trial in patients with adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT). Twenty-five patients were entered between July 1991 and June 1992, twenty-three were eligible and were evaluated for toxicity and twenty-two were assessable for response. There was one partial response (4.5%) in a patient with liver metastases, with a duration of 6 months. Toxicity was primarily neutropenia. Taxol as a single agent appears to have little activity in adenocarcinoma of the UGIT.

Adenocarcinoma↗