PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Haycox

Publications and source records attributed to A Haycox.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

A review of telemedicine cost-effectiveness studies.

As interest in telemedicine grows, many of its proponents and vendors increasingly suggest that it is now time to move to full-scale implementation of telemedicine services in a variety of contexts throughout the world, and question the need for further evidence of its utility and cost-effectiveness. We have reviewed the published literature relating to cost-effectiveness studies in telemedicine and have identified some important weaknesses. Ten recommendations regarding the design of economic evaluations of telemedicine are suggested.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1999

Obesity. About the size of it.

Severe obesity is on the increase in Britain and accounts for considerable excess hospital costs. The benefits of new treatments need to be assessed in terms of psychological, as well as physical, benefits to patients. Programmes aimed at changing lifestyles will be effective only when obesity is considered in terms of all its effects on the individual.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed1999

The cost effectiveness of metal oesophageal stenting in malignant disease compared with conventional therapy.

Expanding metal oesophageal stents are being used more commonly to palliate patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma. Many reports have so far documented their clinical effectiveness, however, their high acquisition cost has caused on-going concern when compared with the cost of conventional therapies. We reviewed 64 consecutive patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma, half of whom had received our conventional method of palliation using a variety of techniques including, BICAP diathermy, alcohol injection and Atkinson tube insertion. The other half (32 patients) were treated with expandable metal stents -- Gianturco Z stents (Cook UK Ltd) and uncovered Ultraflex stents (Microvasive, Boston Scientific). The physical amount of resources consumed were identified and measured (number of diagnostic and support procedures, days as in patients, number of day cases or outpatient attending) and an average NHS cost was applied to this resource use. All costs were summated over the period of palliation from the date of the first intervention with palliative intent until death. Although the patients in this study were not randomized, the two groups were matched to ensure comparability in clinical manifestation (uncomplicated biopsy proven oesophageal carcinoma) and the average age of patients from each group. A difference was identified between the length of survival in both patient groups and the analysis was corrected for this by estimating a cost per day of palliative support. Patients palliated with metal stents underwent fewer procedures and spent fewer days in hospital during the time period from presentation until death even when corrected for differences in survival. Patient outcome (effectiveness of palliation) was measured by recording mean dysphagia scores which were recorded before and after palliation. Metal stents were found to lead to a significantly higher improvement in dysphagia in comparison to conventional therapy. In addition, the mortality related to metal oesophageal stents was lower than Atkinson tube insertion. The average cost of palliation was much lower in the metal stent group (mean = pound sterling 2817) compared with the cost in those palliated conventionally (mean = pound sterling 4566). However, once this was corrected for survival the difference in the cost of palliation on a per diem basis was reduced (metal stents = pound sterling 60 per day, conventional group = pound sterling 72 per day). The results of our study indicate that the initial high cost of metal stents is more than outweighed by resource savings elsewhere in the hospital by virtue of reduced need for re-intervention and shorter length of hospital in patient stay. Such cost savings taken in combination with the improved clinical effectiveness and low mortality related to metal stents provide significant support for introducing their use into clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The health economic impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the general population: results from the Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST).

BACKGROUND: The Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST) is the first large, multinational, population-based survey to assess the 3-month prevalence and economic/quality-of-life impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms (UGIS). METHODS: A total of 5581 subjects were interviewed in 10 countries (grouped into seven regions). Respondents were classified as having relevant or non-relevant upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and questioned about consumption of healthcare resources in terms of doctor consultations, prescribed and non-prescribed medications, hospital stays and investigations for both gastrointestinal and other health problems. The impact of symptoms in terms of time lost and reduced effectiveness at work or social activities was also recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-eight percent of the total sample was defined as having clinically relevant UGIS (UGIS of at least moderate severity and with a frequency of at least once per week in the previous 3 months). During the period studied, 20% of these subjects had consulted a family practitioner (16.2%) and/ or a specialist (6.3%), primarily for UGIS. Of those with clinically relevant UGIS, 49% had taken over-the-counter medication, and 27% prescription medication for gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Two percent reported a hospital stay and 27% reported days of reduced or no work, school or domestic productivity due to UGIS. Four percent of all study subjects underwent investigations for UGIS during this period. Variations between countries in these parameters may be due to differences in healthcare systems and cultural attitudes towards UGIS, influencing both the healthcare-seeking behaviour of subjects with UGIS and their management.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

North Staffordshire Community Beds Study: longitudinal evaluation of psychiatric in-patient units attached to community mental health centres. 2: Impact upon costs and resource use.

BACKGROUND: Innovative approaches to the provision of psychiatric care must justify their ability to improve the quality of life within the resource constraints imposed on psychiatry. AIMS: To examine the average costs per patient of the experimental and control group services. METHOD: An individual patient costing methodology that identified, measured and valued all public and private resources. RESULTS: The experimental group was more likely to remain in contact with services over a 12-month period, had fewer acute readmissions and spent less time in acute in-patient units. There were significantly different levels and patterns of resource consumption between the groups and between the two separate catchment areas. CONCLUSION: The cost analysis should be assessed in the context of the previous outcome analysis. It is likely, but not inevitable, that such units will increase the overall costs of care provision; this largely depends on the effectiveness with which such units are integrated into existing care provision.

Community Mental Health Services↗
PubMed1998

Review article: current treatment and optimal patient management in pancreatic cancer.

This review analyses the current state of knowledge and understanding concerning the optimum treatment and therapeutic management of patients who suffer from pancreatic cancer. It outlines recent advances in scientific understanding and assesses their potential future value to clinicians in confronting this disease. Despite a significant expansion in scientific knowledge relating to factors underlying the early development of pancreatic carcinoma, the clinician continues to be restricted to a severely limited therapeutic armoury for this disease. Local therapies (surgery and radiation) are inevitably of limited value in the face of a disease that is normally encountered at a stage where metastasis is already highly developed. Despite such limitations, however, surgery performed in specialist units may be of value for 10-20% of patients, with a 5-year survival rate in such units of between 10 and 24%. This may be improved even further by appropriate use of adjuvant treatment. The advanced stage of the disease when normally encountered emphasizes the potential value of systemic treatment in this therapeutic area. Unfortunately systemic treatment (chemotherapy) has been found to be ineffective to date in significantly extending survival, with a low rate and duration of remission being identified in most trials. The challenge for both the health service and the pharmaceutical industry is to harness recent and future developments in scientific knowledge to the practical benefit of clinicians. Where cure is possible it should be vigorously pursued; where it is not, in this field above all others, clinicians have a duty of care. To achieve this it is necessary to abandon the therapeutic nihilism that has characterized the attitudes of clinicians towards this disease in the past. It is time that such nihilism was replaced by a recognition of the challenges and the opportunities available to clinicians in enhancing the quantity and quality of life available to patients. The dictum of 'curing whenever possible but caring always' should be the future therapeutic philosophy used to guide clinicians in this important and rapidly changing therapeutic area.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Review article: current practice and future perspectives in detection and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is the tenth most prevalent malignancy and the fifth most common cause of cancer death in the developed world. Less than 10% of patients survive for more than 1 year following diagnosis and the 5-year survival rate (0.4%) is the lowest of any cancer. The poor prognosis associated with this diagnosis led in the past to therapeutic nihilism on the part of clinicians who were all too aware of the limitations of their available therapeutic strategies. Breaking this therapeutic impasse requires a significant expansion in the knowledge of clinicians concerning the pathogenesis and behaviour of pancreatic cancer. Recent advances in the scientific understanding of the aetiology of pancreatic cancer has facilitated progress towards the development of promising and innovative approaches to the early detection and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. While acknowledging that pancreatic cancer will continue to present significant challenges to both scientists and clinicians in the foreseeable future, it is becoming increasingly clear that recent advances in our scientific knowledge base holds the potential to significantly improve prognosis for patients. The challenge facing both scientists and clinicians is how best to translate such promising scientific advances into survival and quality of life benefits to patients.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed1998

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of onychomycosis in general practice.

Analysis of the computer records of 100 general practices from the CompuFile Doctors Independent Network revealed 1492 patients receiving treatment for onychomycosis in the first 6 months of 1994 with terbinafine, tioconazole, amorolfine or griseofulvin. These records indicated the average treatment time for each agent, number of general practitioner consultations and incidence of hospital referrals and minor surgery. Applying standard costs to this resource consumption gave the direct costs for each of these four agents. Published clinical and mycological cure rates allowed a cost per success to be calculated. These were as follows: terbinafine (n = 511) pound258, amorolfine (n = 315) pound312, griseofulvin (n = 196) pound356 and tioconazole (n = 470) pound520. Sensitivity analysis showed that terbinafine remained the most cost-effective option despite variations in resource costs. The cost impact on a typical practice for switching from a less to a more cost-effective treatment is discussed.

Antifungal Agents↗
PubMed1998

Cost effectiveness of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice: a clinical database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous evaluation of the cost effectiveness of antireflux medication used in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) have been based on results obtained in controlled clinical trials. Unfortunately such an approach does not necessarily identify the therapeutic option which provides the greatest benefit from available resources in real life situations. To make an informed choice requires a recognition that the costs and benefits of therapy in practice may differ from those identified in trials. AIMS: To evaluate, based on a retrospective prescription database analysis, the cost effectiveness of alternative treatment options for patients with uncomplicated GORD. The analysis assesses health service resource use during the first six months of treatment in three groups of patients initially prescribed cisapride (CIS), ranitidine (RAN), or omeprazole (OME). METHODS: The MediPlus UK database was used to identify all health care resources consumed by patients in the three treatment groups during their first six months of treatment. Patients with more complicated GORD, as indicated by initial referral to a specialist or outpatient hospital visit (< 13%), were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: The average cost per patient for the initial six months of treatment for CIS, RAN, and OME based therapies was 136 Pounds, 177 Pounds, 189 Pounds per patient, respectively. A major element underlying this cost variation was the acquisition cost and quantity of antireflux medication required by patients. The average number of one month equivalent prescriptions consumed during this six month period was 1.85 (CIS), 2.57 (RAN), and 2.96 (OME) with associated costs of 49 Pounds (CIS), 67 Pounds (RAN), and 105 Pounds (OME). Antacid and alginate/antacid use was higher in the CIS and RAN groups (about 1.0 antacid prescription per patient versus 0.4 for OME), but their contribution to the total cost per patient was less than 2%. The number of general practitioner consultations over the six month period for each treatment group was 2.4 (CIS), 2.9 (RAN), and 2.6 (OME) with associated costs of 60.31 Pounds (CIS), 73.06 Pounds (RAN), and 65.52 Pounds (OME). The average number of non-drug interventions (referrals, outpatient visits, endoscopies, barium meals, or x rays) was 0.34 in the RAN group compared with less than 0.2 in the CIS and OME groups. The costs associated with such interventions were 23.80 Pounds (RAN), 9.60 Pounds (CIS), and 11.10 Pounds (OME) per patient. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that the "step up" approach, starting with a prokinetic or H2 receptor antagonist, represents the most cost effective initial therapeutic strategy for a primary care physician to adopt when faced with a patient with first diagnosis of uncomplicated GORD.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed1998

Development of an economic model for the management of upper gastrointestinal disease in primary care. Preliminary findings.

Health economic models for identifying therapeutic options that maximise health benefits from limited healthcare resources are being developed in a number of therapeutic areas. The development of such a model for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms to support decision-making by primary care clinicians is of particular importance, given the prevalence of this symptomatology. This economic model was based upon the clinical guidelines aimed at improving the management of UGI disorders at the primary care level that were developed by the International Gastro Primary Care Group. This paper discusses the derivation, methodology and results of the economic model developed to assess the resource implications arising from these clinical guidelines. In order to construct the economic model, it was necessary to identify the following: every therapeutic pathway followed by patients resource use along each pathway the probabilities of following alternative pathways. One crucial factor underlying the interpretation of results obtained from any economic model is the time period covered by the model. The model presented here analysed the initial 12-month treatment period of 'new' patients presenting with UGI symptoms. In order to test the implications of a longer term perspective, the model is currently being developed to analyse resource use over a 24-month period. The model demonstrates that utilising the predominant symptom approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with UGI disorders appears to provide significant benefits in terms of patient management and effective resource use. This factor, together with the more intensive use of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, provides the potential to reduce the cost of drugs for the treatment of UGI disorders by approximately 15% in the UK. A major strength of the model is its adaptability to a wide range of clinical and cost scenarios. Such adaptability enables the model to effectively reflect the potential resource implications in countries exhibiting significantly different levels of cost and patient management. In this manner, the model provides one valuable method by which clinicians can be supported in optimising the management of UGI disorders within current resource constraints.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1998

Customising an international disease management model to the needs of individual countries. Application to upper gastrointestinal disease.

The baseline economic model for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) disease was developed in the context of patterns of care and resource use within the UK. It provided the opportunity to evaluate the extent to which an economic model developed in one country could be applied to meet the pharmacoeconomic information needs of decision makers in another. The choice of countries for analysis was restricted to countries within the International Gastro Primary Care Group (IGPCG) who had previously agreed on the appropriateness of the basic clinical algorithm to their domestic healthcare environment. This provided a potential sample of 9 countries (Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA) of which the UK, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland were chosen as providing a broad spectrum of strategic and operating environments in which to test the international transferability of the economic model. The process and results obtained provide valuable evidence of the extent to which economic analyses can be transferred across national borders.

Disease Management↗