PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Andrew Grace

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew Grace.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Whole-genome sequencing implicates rare, low-frequency and structural non-coding variation at the SCN5A locus in Brugada syndrome.

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac condition characterized by a hallmark ECG pattern and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Central to the aetiology of BrS, the SCN5A region harbours both common non-coding risk variants and rare coding variants that are causative in approximately 20% of patients. However, rare non-coding genetic variation in this region remains largely unexplored. Here, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 752 European-ancestry BrS cases and 1,827 ancestry-matched controls to identify BrS-associated rare non-coding genetic variation at the SCN5A locus. Sliding-window and cis-regulatory element (CRE)-based rare-variant aggregate testing implicated three conserved CREs, including a dense aggregation of case singleton variants within a 178 bp enhancer in intron 17 of SCN5A which replicated in an independent BrS cohort. Prioritised BrS-associated rare and low-frequency non-coding variants within these elements were predicted to alter cardiac transcription factor motifs, and altered CRE activity in hiPSC-CM luciferase assays or were associated with BrS-relevant ECG endophenotypes in the UK Biobank. Single-variant analysis across the region identified a Bonferroni-significant five-fold case-enriched low-frequency variant within a known CRE in intron 1 of SCN5A, which replicated, was associated with slower cardiac conduction in the UK Biobank and accounted for part of the BrS GWAS signal at this locus. Structural variant analyses identified a 10.5 kb deletion upstream of SCN5A in a BrS case that encompassed a cardiac CRE and reduced sodium current density in a hiPSC-CM model, as well as a 6 kb BrS-enriched retrotransposon insertion in SCN5A that appeared to underlie part of the GWAS signal in this region. Together, these findings implicate rare and low-frequency non-coding variation at the SCN5A locus in BrS susceptibility and demonstrate the value of targeted WGS analysis of key disease loci.

Journal Article↗

Immunoblot analysis of c-Met expression in human colorectal cancer: overexpression is associated with advanced stage cancer.

c-Met, the receptor of hepatocyte growth factor is known to be responsible for the motility and mitogenesis of epithelial cells including cancer cells. To investigate the significance of c-Met expression in human colorectal cancer (CRC), total cellular protein, extracted from 130 CRCs were examined by Western blot analysis. The signal was quantitated by ChemiImager 4000 Low Light Imaging System. c-Met expression was analyzed as the ratio of tumor to matched normal tissue (T/N) and expressed as fold-increase. The cellular localization of c-Met was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The T/N fold increase of c-Met varied from 0.2 to 10.7 with a mean of 3.41 +/- 0.23 (mean +/- SE). 69% primary CRC showed overexpression (T/N > 2.0) of c-Met. Significantly higher c-Met levels were found in CRC with blood vessel invasion (P = 0.04), and in advanced stage (P = 0.04). No relationship was noted between c-Met expression and age, tumor size, location, differentiation. C-Met immunoreactivity was observed in the membrane and cytoplasm of cancer cells. Positive staining of endothelial cells of blood vessels within normal submucosa and tumor was also evident. C-Met protein is expressed at levels significantly higher than adjacent mucosa in most primary adenocarcinomas of the colon. Our results support an important role for c-Met in human CRC progression and metastasis.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of synchronous resectable colorectal liver metastasis has not been defined. The aims of this study were to review our experience with synchronous colorectal metastasis and to define the safety of simultaneous versus staged resection of the colon and liver. STUDY DESIGN: From September 1984 through November 2001, 240 patients were treated surgically for primary adenocarcinoma of the large bowel and synchronous hepatic metastasis. Clinicopathologic, operative, and perioperative data were reviewed to evaluate selection criteria, operative methods, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients underwent simultaneous resection of a colorectal primary and hepatic metastasis in a single operation (Group I), and 106 patients underwent staged operations (Group II). Simultaneous resections tend to be performed for right colon primaries (p < 0.001), smaller (p < 0.01) and fewer (p < 0.001) liver metastases, and less extensive liver resection (p < 0.001). Complications were less common in the simultaneous resection group, with 65 patients (49%) sustaining 142 complications, compared with 71 patients (67%) sustaining 197 complications for both hospitalizations in the staged resection group (p < 0.003). Patients having simultaneous resection required fewer days in the hospital (median 10 days versus 18 days, p = 0.001). Perioperative mortality was similar (simultaneous, n = 3; staged, n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous colon and liver resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis. By avoiding a second laparotomy, the overall complication rate is reduced, with no change in operative mortality. Given its reduced morbidity, shorter treatment time, and similar cancer outcomes, simultaneous resection should be considered a safe option in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal metastasis.

Adenocarcinoma↗