PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 42465902

Whole-genome sequencing implicates rare, low-frequency and structural non-coding variation at the SCN5A locus in Brugada syndrome.

Abstract

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac condition characterized by a hallmark ECG pattern and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Central to the aetiology of BrS, the SCN5A region harbours both common non-coding risk variants and rare coding variants that are causative in approximately 20% of patients. However, rare non-coding genetic variation in this region remains largely unexplored. Here, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 752 European-ancestry BrS cases and 1,827 ancestry-matched controls to identify BrS-associated rare non-coding genetic variation at the SCN5A locus. Sliding-window and cis-regulatory element (CRE)-based rare-variant aggregate testing implicated three conserved CREs, including a dense aggregation of case singleton variants within a 178 bp enhancer in intron 17 of SCN5A which replicated in an independent BrS cohort. Prioritised BrS-associated rare and low-frequency non-coding variants within these elements were predicted to alter cardiac transcription factor motifs, and altered CRE activity in hiPSC-CM luciferase assays or were associated with BrS-relevant ECG endophenotypes in the UK Biobank. Single-variant analysis across the region identified a Bonferroni-significant five-fold case-enriched low-frequency variant within a known CRE in intron 1 of SCN5A, which replicated, was associated with slower cardiac conduction in the UK Biobank and accounted for part of the BrS GWAS signal at this locus. Structural variant analyses identified a 10.5 kb deletion upstream of SCN5A in a BrS case that encompassed a cardiac CRE and reduced sodium current density in a hiPSC-CM model, as well as a 6 kb BrS-enriched retrotransposon insertion in SCN5A that appeared to underlie part of the GWAS signal in this region. Together, these findings implicate rare and low-frequency non-coding variation at the SCN5A locus in BrS susceptibility and demonstrate the value of targeted WGS analysis of key disease loci.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alex Lipov, Manon Baudic, Pierre Lindenbaum, Isabella Mengarelli, Matthew J O'Neill, Fernanda M Bosada, Yanushi Wijeyeratne, Luis de la Higuera Romero, Maarten Kooyman, Marion Gaudin, Graziella Aquilina, Leander Beekman, Estelle Baron, Mathilde Bertrand, Zoya Kingsbury, Mark T Ross, Marre Corver, Paola Lombardi, Ingrid Krapels, Paul G Volders, Rafik Tadros, Fenna Tuijnenburg, Karel van Duijvenboden, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Jan H Veldink, Sean J Jurgens, Aurélie Thollet, Eric Charpentier, Camille Maiano, Philippe Mabo, Antoine Leenhardt, Frederic Sacher, Arjan C Houweling, Hanno L Tan, Vincent M Christoffels, Michael W Tanck, Andrew Grace, Koonlawee Nademanee, Apichai Khongphatthanayothin, Andrew M Glazer, Jean François Deleuze, FranceGenRef consortium, Juan Pablo Ochoa, Jérôme Montnach, Michel De Waard, Pieter G Postema, Ahmad S Amin, Jean-Baptiste Gourraud, Pascale Guicheney, Dan M Roden, Jean-Jacques Schott, Christian Dina, Vincent Probst, Pier D Lambiase, Elijah R Behr, Arthur A M Wilde, Richard Redon, Roddy Walsh, Julien Barc, Connie R Bezzina. 2026-07-10. Whole-genome sequencing implicates rare, low-frequency and structural non-coding variation at the SCN5A locus in Brugada syndrome.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.07.26356386

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article