Biomedical subjects

Arthur Christopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to Arthur Christopoulos.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors.

The past decade has witnessed a significant growth in the identification of allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), i.e., ligands that interact with binding sites that are topographically distinct from the orthosteric site recognized by the receptor's endogenous agonist. Because of their ability to modulate receptor conformations in the presence of orthosteric ligand, allosteric modulators can "fine-tune" classical pharmacological responses. This is advantageous in terms of a potential for engendering greater GPCR subtype-selectivity, but represents a significant challenge for detecting and validating allosteric behaviors. Although allosteric sites need not have evolved to accommodate endogenous ligands, there are a number of examples of where such modulators have been shown to contribute to physiological or pathophysiological processes. Studies are also beginning to unravel the structural basis of allosteric modulation of GPCRs. It remains to be determined whether such modulation represents interactions within monomers versus across dimers.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2006

Determinants of 1-piperidinecarboxamide, N-[2-[[5-amino-l-[[4-(4-pyridinyl)-l-piperazinyl]carbonyl]pentyl]amino]-1-[(3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-2-oxoethyl]-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3(2H)-quinazolinyl) (BIBN4096BS) affinity for calcitonin gene-related peptide and amylin receptors--the role of receptor activity modifying protein 1.

1-Piperidinecarboxamide, N-[2-[[5-amino-l-[[4-(4-pyridinyl)-l-piperazinyl]carbonyl]pentyl]amino]-1-[(3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-2-oxoethyl]-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3(2H)-quinazolinyl) (BIBN4096BS), a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, can alleviate the symptoms of migraine and is highly selective for CGRP over adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. These receptors are heterodimers of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) and receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs), with the pharmacological properties determined by the RAMP subunit. BIBN4096BS-sensitive CGRP(1) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas BIBN4096BS-insensitive AM receptors are CL/RAMP2 or CL/RAMP3 (AM(1) and AM(2), respectively), implicating RAMP1 in conferring BIB-N4096BS sensitivity. Because calcitonin receptors [CT((a))] also interact with RAMP1 [AMY(1(a)) receptors], BIBN4096BS could also have affinity for these receptors. To test this, receptors were transfected into COS-7 cells and agonist-stimulated cAMP levels measured in the presence and absence of antagonists. We found that AMY(1(a)) receptors were approximately 150-fold less sensitive to BIBN4096BS antagonism than CGRP(1) receptors. In contrast, AMY(3(a)) [CT((a))/RAMP3] or AM(2) receptors were not sensitive to BIBN4096BS antagonism. We investigated Trp74 in RAMP1, a residue implicated in the species selectivity of BIBN4096BS. BIBN4096BS affinity was reduced at AMY(1(a)) and CGRP(1) receptors when this residue was mutated to lysine or alanine. The equivalent residue in RAMP3, Glu74, when mutated to tryptophan (E74W), induced BIBN4096BS sensitivity at AM(2) and AMY(3(a)) receptors. It is interesting that a selective reduction in AM potency was observed at E74W AM(2) receptors, implicating this residue in AM interactions with this receptor. These data support the importance of Trp74 in RAMP1 in the interaction of BIBN4096BS with CGRP(1) and AMY(1(a)) receptors and identified Glu74 in RAMP3 as the first amino acid in RAMP important for agonist interactions with calcitonin-family receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

A critical role for the short intracellular C terminus in receptor activity-modifying protein function.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) interact with and modify the behavior of the calcitonin receptor (CTR) and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). We have examined the contribution of the short intracellular C terminus, using constructs that delete the last eight amino acids of each RAMP. C-Terminal deletion of individual RAMPs had little effect on the signaling profile induced when complexed with CLR in COS-7 or human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells. Likewise, confocal microscopy revealed each of the mutant RAMPs translocated hemagglutinin-tagged CLR to the cell surface. In contrast, a pronounced effect of RAMP C-terminal truncation was seen for RAMP/CTRa complexes, studied in COS-7 cells, with significant attenuation of amylin receptor phenotype induction that was stronger for RAMP1 and -2 than RAMP3. The loss of amylin binding upon C-terminal deletion could be partially recovered with overexpression of Galpha(s), suggesting an impact of the RAMP C terminus on coupling of G proteins to the receptor complex. In HEK293 cells the c-Myc-RAMP1 C-terminal deletion mutant showed high receptor-independent cell surface expression; however, this construct showed low cell surface expression when expressed alone in COS-7 cells, indicating interaction of RAMPs with other cellular components via the C terminus. This mutant also had reduced cell surface expression when coexpressed with CTR. Thus, this study reveals important functionality of the RAMP C-terminal domain and identifies key differences in the role of the RAMP C terminus for CTR versus CLR-based receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

Allosteric agonists of 7TM receptors: expanding the pharmacological toolbox.

Approximately 1% of the genome of higher organisms encodes seven-transmembrane (7TM) G-protein-coupled receptors, which control an extensive range of physiological processes and represent drug targets for nearly half of all drugs that are prescribed currently. To date, most drugs that target 7TM receptors interact via the same domain as the endogenous agonist, called the orthosteric site. However, the advent of functional screening assays has greatly increased the number of allosteric ligands identified. Such ligands bind to topographically distinct sites on 7TM receptors. In addition to modulating the affinity of orthosteric ligands, allosteric ligands can also alter the efficacy of orthosteric ligands and activate 7TM receptors in their own right. In this article, we briefly review the current status of putative allosteric agonists of 7TM receptors, and discuss the promises and challenges that this class of ligand might pose for pharmacologists and the drug-discovery industry.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2006

Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology.

The concept of intrinsic efficacy has been enshrined in pharmacology for half of a century, yet recent data have revealed that many ligands can differentially activate signaling pathways mediated via a single G protein-coupled receptor in a manner that challenges the traditional definition of intrinsic efficacy. Some terms for this phenomenon include functional selectivity, agonist-directed trafficking, and biased agonism. At the extreme, functionally selective ligands may be both agonists and antagonists at different functions mediated by the same receptor. Data illustrating this phenomenon are presented from serotonin, opioid, dopamine, vasopressin, and adrenergic receptor systems. A variety of mechanisms may influence this apparently ubiquitous phenomenon. It may be initiated by differences in ligand-induced intermediate conformational states, as shown for the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Subsequent mechanisms that may play a role include diversity of G proteins, scaffolding and signaling partners, and receptor oligomers. Clearly, expanded research is needed to elucidate the proximal (e.g., how functionally selective ligands cause conformational changes that initiate differential signaling), intermediate (mechanisms that translate conformation changes into differential signaling), and distal mechanisms (differential effects on target tissue or organism). Besides the heuristically interesting nature of functional selectivity, there is a clear impact on drug discovery, because this mechanism raises the possibility of selecting or designing novel ligands that differentially activate only a subset of functions of a single receptor, thereby optimizing therapeutic action. It also may be timely to revise classic concepts in quantitative pharmacology and relevant pharmacological conventions to incorporate these new concepts.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Interaction studies of multiple binding sites on m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

This study investigated the reciprocal cross-interactions between two distinct allosteric sites on the M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) in the absence or presence of different orthosteric ligands. Initial studies revealed that two novel benzimidazole allosteric modulators, 17-beta-hydroxy-17-alpha-ethy nyl-delta(4)-androstano[3,2-b]pyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazole (WIN 62,577) and 17-beta-hydroxy-17-alpha-ethynyl-5-alpha-androstano[3,2-b]pyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazole (WIN 51,708), exhibited different degrees of positive, negative, or close-to-neutral cooperativity with the orthosteric site on M(1) or M(4) mAChRs, depending on the chemical nature of the orthosteric radioligand that was used [[(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) versus [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate ([(3)H]QNB)]. The largest window for observing an effect (negative cooperativity) was noted for the combination of WIN 62,577 and [(3)H]QNB at the M(4) mAChR. Experiments involving the combination of these two ligands with unlabeled agonists [acetylcholine, 4-(m-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butynyltrimethylammonium (McN-A-343), or xanomeline] revealed low degrees of negative cooperativity between WIN 62,577 and each agonist, whereas stronger negative cooperativity was observed against atropine. It is interesting that when these experiments were repeated using the prototypical modulators heptane-1,7-bis-(dimethyl-3'-phthalimidopropyl)-ammonium bromide (C(7)/3-phth), alcuronium, or brucine (which act at a separate allosteric site), WIN 62,577 exhibited negative cooperativity with each modulator when the orthosteric site was unoccupied, but this switched to neutral cooperativity when the receptor was occupied by [(3)H]QNB. Dissociation kinetic experiments using [(3)H]NMS and combination of C(7)/3-phth with WIN 62,577 also provided evidence for neutral cooperativity between the two allosteric sites when the orthosteric site is occupied. Together, these results provide insight into the nature of the interaction between two distinct allosteric sites on the M(4) mAChR and how this interaction is perturbed upon occupancy of the orthosteric site.

Allosteric Site↗

PubMed2006

Distinct receptor activity-modifying protein domains differentially modulate interaction with calcitonin receptors.

Calcitonin receptors (CTRs) dimerize with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) to generate high-affinity amylin (AMY) receptors; however, the relative contribution of individual RAMP domains to the formation of AMY receptors is poorly understood. We have used chimeras between RAMP1 and RAMP2 that specifically exchanged the N-terminal, transmembrane, or C-terminal domain and examined these in assays of [(125)I]amylin binding or peptide-induced cAMP signaling in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with wild-type or chimeric RAMPs and human CTRa. The specificity of peptides in competition for [(125)I]amylin binding was principally dictated by the N-terminal domain present in the chimeras; however, the maximal level of binding induced was dictated by the transmembrane domain present. This extended previous data (Zumpe et al., 2000) to provide a distinction between the transmembrane domain and the C terminus in this function. In contrast to the effects on binding, each of the RAMP domains played a role in the signaling phenotype of the receptors. In particular, the potency of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was most influenced by the C-terminal domain present, in which the presence of the RAMP1 C-terminal domain led to increased potency over CTRa alone, whereas chimeras with the RAMP2 C-terminal domain did not induce increased CGRP potency. The data provide additional support for the importance of the N terminus in determining binding affinity but reveal a prominent role of the transmembrane domain in the strength of amylin binding and a unique role for the C terminus in signaling by peptides to stimulate cAMP production.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

On the mechanism of interaction of potent surmountable and insurmountable antagonists with the prostaglandin D2 receptor CRTH2.

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper 2 cells (CRTH2) has attracted interest as a potential therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Ramatroban, a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist with clinical efficacy in allergic rhinitis, was recently found to also display potent CRTH2 antagonistic activity. Here, we present the pharmacological profile of three ramatroban analogs that differ chemically from ramatroban by either a single additional methyl group (TM30642), or an acetic acid instead of a propionic acid side chain (TM30643), or both modifications (TM30089). All three compounds bound to human CRTH2 stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells with nanomolar affinity. [3H]Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) saturation analysis reveals that ramatroban and TM30642 decrease PGD2 affinity, whereas TM30643 and TM30089 exclusively depress ligand binding capacity (Bmax). Each of the three compounds acted as potent CRTH2 antagonists, yet the nature of their antagonism differed markedly. In functional assays measuring inhibition of PGD2-mediated 1) guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding, 2) beta-arrestin translocation, and 3) shape change of human eosinophils endogenously expressing CRTH2, ramatroban, and TM30642 produced surmountable antagonism and parallel rightward shifts of the PGD2 concentration-response curves. For TM30643 and TM30089, this shift was accompanied by a progressive reduction of maximal response. Binding analyses indicated that the functional insurmountability of TM30643 and TM30089 was probably related to long-lasting CRTH2 inhibition mediated via the orthosteric site of the receptor. A mechanistic understanding of insurmountability of CRTH2 antagonists could be fundamental for development of this novel class of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Complexing receptor pharmacology: modulation of family B G protein-coupled receptor function by RAMPs.

The most well-characterized subgroup of family B G protein-coupledreceptors (GPCRs) comprises receptors for peptide hormones, such as secretin, calcitonin (CT), glucagon, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). Recent data suggest that many of these receptors can interact with a novel family of GPCR accessory proteins termed receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs). RAMP interaction with receptors can lead to a variety of actions that include chaperoning of the receptor protein to the cell surface as is the case for the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and the generation of novel receptor phenotypes. RAMP heterodimerization with the CLR and related CT receptor is required for the formation of specific CT gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin (AM) or amylin receptors. More recent work has revealed that the specific RAMP present in a heterodimer may modulate other functions such as receptor internalization and recycling and also the strength of activation of downstream signaling pathways. In this article we review our current state of knowledge of the consequence of RAMP interaction with family B GPCRs.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Mechanisms of ERK1/2 regulation by seven-transmembrane-domain receptors.

Control of cell growth and differentiation has long been a focus of intense research interest, particularly in the context of cancer therapeutics. The evolutionarily-conserved extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are serine-threonine kinases that respond to a wide range of mitogens and growth factors to initiate changes in cellular proliferation and differentiation, and are the most important members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family in terms of seven transmembrane-domain receptor (7TMR)-mediated regulation of mitogenic processes. Regulation of the ERK1/2 signaling cascade by 7TMRs is highly complex and cell type-specific. Recent advances in our knowledge of this effector pathway have revealed that its regulation is at least partly independent of traditional G protein-mediated actions arising from the stimulation of 7TMRs. This review summarizes the current position of our knowledge of ERK1/2 regulation, and illustrates the wealth of potential targets available for the development of new strategies for the treatment of proliferative and other ERK-related disorders.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Probing the molecular mechanism of interaction between 4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl]-piperidine (AC-42) and the muscarinic M(1) receptor: direct pharmacological evidence that AC-42 is an allosteric agonist.

4-n-Butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl]-piperidine hydrogen chloride (AC-42) is a selective agonist of the muscarinic M(1) receptor previously suggested to interact with an "ectopic" site on this receptor. However, the pharmacological properties of this site (i.e., whether it overlaps to any extent with the classic orthosteric site or represents a novel allosteric site) remain undetermined. In the present study, atropine or pirenzepine significantly inhibited the ability of either carbachol or AC-42 to stimulate inositol phosphate accumulation or intracellular calcium mobilization in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing the human M(1) receptor. However, the interaction between either of these antagonists and AC-42 was characterized by Schild slopes significantly less than unity. Increasing the concentrations of atropine revealed that the Schild regression was curvilinear, consistent with a negative allosteric interaction. More direct evidence for an allosteric mode of action of AC-42 was obtained in [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) binding studies, in that both AC-42 and the prototypical modulator gallamine failed to fully inhibit specific [(3)H]NMS binding in a manner that was quantitatively described by an allosteric model applied to both modulator data sets. Furthermore, AC-42 and gallamine significantly retarded the rate of [(3)H]NMS dissociation from CHO-hM(1) cell membranes, conclusively demonstrating their ability to bind to a topographically distinct site to change M(1) receptor conformation. These data provide the first direct evidence that AC-42 is an allosteric agonist that activates M(1) receptors in the absence of the orthosteric agonist.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2005

Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor.

We investigated the pharmacology of three novel compounds, Org 27569 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), Org 27759 (3-ethyl-5-fluoro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-94-dimethylamino-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), and Org 29647 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid (1-benzyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-amide, 2-enedioic acid salt), at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. In equilibrium binding assays, the Org compounds significantly increased the binding of the CB1 receptor agonist [3H]CP 55,940 [(1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol], indicative of a positively cooperative allosteric effect. The same compounds caused a significant, but incomplete, decrease in the specific binding of the CB1 receptor inverse agonist [3H]SR 141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride], indicative of a limited negative binding cooperativity. Analysis of the data according to an allosteric ternary complex model revealed that the estimated affinity of each Org compound was not significantly different when the radioligand was [3H]CP 55,940 or [3H]SR 141716A. However, the estimated cooperatively factor for the interaction between modulator and radioligand was greater than 1 when determined against [3H]CP 55,940 and less than 1 when determined against [3H]SR 141716A. [3H]CP 55,940 dissociation kinetic studies also validated the allosteric nature of the Org compounds, because they all significantly decreased radioligand dissociation. These data suggest that the Org compounds bind allosterically to the CB1 receptor and elicit a conformational change that increases agonist affinity for the orthosteric binding site. In contrast to the binding assays, however, the Org compounds behaved as insurmountable antagonists of receptor function; in the reporter gene assay, the guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding assay and the mouse vas deferens assay they elicited a significant reduction in the Emax value for CB1 receptor agonists. The data presented clearly demonstrate, for the first time, that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor contains an allosteric binding site that can be recognized by synthetic small molecule ligands.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2005

G-protein-coupled receptor Mas is a physiological antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas, encoded by the Mas proto-oncogene, as an endogenous receptor for the heptapeptide angiotensin-(1-7); however, the receptor is also suggested to be involved in actions of angiotensin II. We therefore tested whether this could be mediated indirectly through an interaction with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, AT1. METHODS AND RESULTS: In transfected mammalian cells, Mas was not activated by angiotensin II; however, AT1 receptor-mediated, angiotensin II-induced production of inositol phosphates and mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ was diminished by 50% after coexpression of Mas, despite a concomitant increase in angiotensin II binding capacity. Mas and the AT1 receptor formed a constitutive hetero-oligomeric complex that was unaffected by the presence of agonists or antagonists of the 2 receptors. In vivo, Mas acts as an antagonist of the AT1 receptor; mice lacking the Mas gene show enhanced angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in mesenteric microvessels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Mas can hetero-oligomerize with the AT1 receptor and by so doing inhibit the actions of angiotensin II. This is a novel demonstration that a G-protein-coupled receptor acts as a physiological antagonist of a previously characterized receptor. Consequently, the AT1-Mas complex could be of great importance as a target for pharmacological intervention in cardiovascular diseases.

Angiotensin II↗

PubMed2005

Pharmacological discrimination of calcitonin receptor: receptor activity-modifying protein complexes.

Calcitonin (CT) receptors dimerize with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) to create high-affinity amylin (AMY) receptors, but there is no reliable means of pharmacologically distinguishing these receptors. We used agonists and antagonists to define their pharmacology, expressing the CT(a) receptor alone or with RAMPs in COS-7 cells and measuring cAMP accumulation. Intermedin short, otherwise known as adrenomedullin 2, mirrored the action of alpha CGRP, being a weak agonist at CT(a), AMY(2a), and AMY(3a) receptors but considerably more potent at AMY(1a) receptors. Likewise, the linear calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) analogs (Cys(ACM)(2,7))h alpha CGRP and (Cys(Et)(2,7))h alpha CGRP were only effective at AMY(1a) receptors, but they were partial agonists. As previously observed in COS-7 cells, there was little induction of the AMY(2a) receptor phenotype; thus, AMY(2a) was not examined further in this study. The antagonist peptide salmon calcitonin(8-32) (sCT(8-32)) did not discriminate strongly between CT and AMY receptors; however, AC187 was a more effective antagonist of AMY responses at AMY receptors, and AC413 additionally showed modest selectivity for AMY(1a) over AMY(3a) receptors. CGRP(8-37) also demonstrated receptor-dependent effects. CGRP(8-37) more effectively antagonized AMY at AMY(1a) than AMY(3a) receptors, although it was only a weak antagonist of both, but it did not inhibit responses at the CT(a) receptor. Low CGRP(8-37) affinity and agonism by linear CGRP analogs at AMY(1a) are the classic signature of a CGRP2 receptor. Our data indicate that careful use of combinations of agonists and antagonists may allow pharmacological discrimination of CT(a), AMY(1a), and AMY(3a) receptors, providing a means to delineate the physiological significance of these receptors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Effects of urea pretreatment on the binding properties of adenosine A1 receptors.

The effect of denaturation and/or extraction of nonintegral membrane proteins by 7 M urea on the binding of the antagonist [3H]cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine 8 dipropyl-2,3 ([3H]DPCPX), and the agonists adenosine, (-)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (R-PIA) and N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), was investigated at human A1 adenosine receptors stably expressed in CHO cells. Pretreatment with urea caused a 56% reduction in membrane proteins. Compared to controls, the use of adenosine deaminase (ADA), 100 microM 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p) or urea each caused equivalent increases in specific [3H]DPCPX binding. Neither the binding kinetics nor the affinity of [3H]DPCPX were significantly different in urea-pretreated compared to ADA-pretreated membranes. At 25 degrees C in ADA-pretreated membranes, the competition isotherms for R-PIA and CHA were characterized by two affinity states. Gpp(NH)p (100 microM) reduced, but did not abolish, the value of the high-affinity dissociation constant. Similar results were obtained after treatment with urea for R-PIA, whereas the high-affinity state for CHA was abolished. At 37 degrees C, urea pretreatment, but not 100 microM Gpp(NH)p, abolished high-affinity agonist competition binding. There was no significant effect of any of the treatments on the low-affinity agonist binding state. In urea-pretreated membranes, exogenously added adenosine competed according to a simple mass-action model with a pK(L) of 5.66+/-0.05 (n=3). Compared to the more common approaches of ADA treatment and/or use of guanine nucleotides, our findings suggest that urea pretreatment represents an inexpensive and useful approach for investigating the binding properties of adenosine A1 ligands (including adenosine) to the G protein-uncoupled form of the receptor.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2005

Characterization of serotonin 5-HT2C receptor signaling to extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2.

Serotonin 5-HT2C receptors (5-HT(2C)Rs) are almost exclusively expressed in the CNS, and implicated in disorders such as obesity, depression, and schizophrenia. The present study investigated the mechanisms governing the coupling of the 5-HT(2C)R to the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) 1/2, using a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line stably expressing the receptor at levels comparable to those found in the brain. Using the non-RNA-edited isoform of the 5-HT(2C)R, constitutive ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed and found to be modulated by full, partial and inverse agonists. Interestingly, agonist-directed trafficking of receptor stimulus was also observed when comparing effects on phosphoinositide accumulation and intracellular Ca2+ elevation to ERK1/2 phosphorylation, whereby the agonists, [+/-]-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) and quipazine, showed reversal of efficacy between the phosphoinositide/Ca2+ pathways, on the one hand, and the ERK1/2 pathway on the other. Subsequent molecular characterization found that 5-HT-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation in this cellular background requires phospholipase D, protein kinase C, and activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK module, but is independent of both receptor- and non-receptor tyrosine kinases, phospholipase C, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and endocytosis. Our findings underscore the potential for exploiting pathway-selective receptor states in the differential modulation of signaling pathways that play prominent roles in normal and abnormal neuronal signaling.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Effects of anandamide on the binding and signaling properties of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

This study investigated the effects of the endocannabinoid, anandamide, on M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. In the presence of anandamide, [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) inhibition binding was characterized by Hill coefficients greater than 1 while saturation binding isotherms were characterized by a reduction in radioligand B(max). Anandamide did not affect the potency of classic agonists, antagonists or allosteric modulators to inhibit [(3)H]NMS binding, indicating that the site of anandamide action did not involve receptor regions recognized by these compounds. Although the mode of binding of anandamide was reversible, the order of ligand addition was important; the inhibitory effect was greatest when anandamide was equilibrated with the receptor prior to radioligand addition, and weakest in the converse situation. Interestingly, the inhibitory potency of anandamide was reduced on pre-equilibration with non-transfected CHO cell membranes, prior to addition of M(1) mAChR-transfected membranes. In phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis assays, anandamide significantly reduced the maximal response to acetylcholine, but at higher concentrations than those needed to fully inhibit radioligand binding. Studies utilizing a range of agonists with varying intrinsic activities showed that the inhibitory effects of anandamide on agonist function were most pronounced with the lowest efficacy agonists. These findings suggest that the mechanism of action of anandamide at the M(1) mAChR involves perturbation of the receptor via the membrane in a manner that is sensitive to the conformation of the receptor (occupied versus vacant).

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Evidence for pleiotropic signaling at the mouse beta3-adrenoceptor revealed by SR59230A [3-(2-Ethylphenoxy)-1-[(1,S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapth-1-ylamino]-2S-2-propanol oxalate].

This study examines the action of the beta(3)-adrenoceptor antagonist SR59230A [3-(2-ethylphenoxy)-1-[(1,S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapth-1-ylamino]-2S-2-propanoloxalate] at cloned mouse beta(3)-adrenoceptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1-beta(3)) or endogenously expressed in 3T3-F442A adipocytes or ileum. SR59230A displayed partial agonist properties compared with the beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist CL316243 [(R,R)-5-[2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-amino]-propyl]1,3-benzodioxole-2,2-dicarboxylate] in CHO-K1-beta(3) with the intrinsic activity increasing with the level of receptor expression. Functional affinity values for SR59230A at each level of receptor expression were in agreement with pK(I) values determined by binding. In cytosensor microphysiometer studies, SR59230A was a full agonist for increases in extracellular acidification rates (ECARs) at all levels of receptor expression, and antagonist actions were measurable only in medium- or low-expressing cells. In 3T3-F442A adipocytes, SR59230A antagonized CL316243-mediated increases of cAMP and had no agonist actions. However, in the cytosensor micro-physiometer, SR59230A (acting via beta(3)-adrenoceptors) was an agonist with an intrinsic activity greater than CL316243. In mouse ileum, SR59230A relaxed smooth muscle, although concentration-response curves were biphasic. Relaxant effects were produced by concentrations that did not affect cAMP levels. Differences in tissue responses to SR59230A were not caused by major differences in expression of Galphas. ECAR responses were not affected by pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin, indicating that signaling did not involve Gi. Therefore, SR59230A displays agonist and antagonist actions at the mouse beta(3)-adrenoceptor. Because SR59230A only antagonized accumulation of cAMP in 3T3-F442A adipocytes yet in the same cells was an agonist for ECAR, cAMP-independent signaling pathways must mediate part of the agonist actions in the microphysiometer.

3T3 Cells↗