Biomedical subjects

Arthur Christopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to Arthur Christopoulos.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Regulation of serotonin 5-HT2C receptors by chronic ligand exposure.

The effect of ligand pretreatment on human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C (5-HT2C) receptors was examined in CHO cells expressing high (CHO-1C7; 67+/-3 pmol/mg) or low (CHO-1C19; 72+/-10 fmol/mg) levels of the receptor. Seventy-two hours pretreatment of CHO-1C7 cells with various ligands did not affect receptor expression. Pretreatment with inverse agonists enhanced 5-HT-mediated inositol phosphate accumulation with no change in constitutive receptor activity. The enhanced agonist responsiveness was inversely correlated with the intrinsic activity of the pretreatment ligand. Seventy-two hours of pretreatment with the weak agonist, 5-methoxygramine, caused an elevation in constitutive activity but no alteration in 5-HT-mediated signaling. In CHO-1C19 cells, 24 but not 72 h of pretreatment with the inverse agonist mianserin enhanced 5-HT-mediated signaling, with no effect on basal signaling; pretreatment with 5-methoxygramine had no significant effect. These findings highlight differences in the pattern of chronic regulation of 5HT2C receptor signaling between high and low receptor expression levels in a common cellular background.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

Regulation of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expression and signaling by prolonged exposure to allosteric modulators.

The effects of prolonged exposure of M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, to the allosteric modulators gallamine, alcuronium, and heptane-1,7-bis (dimethyl-3'-phthalimidopropyl)-ammonium bromide (C(7)/3'-phth) were compared with the effects of the agonist carbachol (CCh) and antagonists atropine and N-methylscopolamine (NMS). Intact cell saturation binding assays using [(3)H]NMS found that pretreatment of the cells for 24 h with CCh caused a significant down-regulation of receptor number, whereas atropine, NMS, and all three allosteric modulators caused receptor up-regulation. Functional assays using a cytosensor microphysiometer to measure whole-cell metabolic rate found no acute effects of gallamine on receptor signaling, whereas atropine seemed to behave as an inverse agonist. Pretreatment of the cells with gallamine (20 microM) or atropine (20 nM) resulted in a significant enhancement of the maximal effect evoked by CCh. In contrast, CCh (100 microM) pretreatment resulted in a significant reduction in maximal receptor signaling capacity. Time-course experiments revealed that the effects of atropine and gallamine on receptor up-regulation are only visualized after at least 12-h ligand exposure, compared with the more rapid effects of CCh, which achieve steady-state down-regulation within 90 min. Additional experiments monitoring CCh-mediated M(2) mAChR internalization in the presence of gallamine revealed that part of the mechanism underlying the effects of the modulator on receptor expression may involve a change in receptor internalization properties. These findings suggest that, like orthosteric ligands, G protein-coupled receptor allosteric modulators also are able to mediate long-term effects on receptor regulation.

Alcuronium↗

PubMed2004

Application of a kinetic model to the apparently complex behavior of negative and positive allosteric modulators of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

The binding of allosteric modulators to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is often described by an equilibrium allosteric ternary complex model (ATCM). This study evaluated the effects of three modulators on the binding of [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) to the human M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). The binding of each modulator was more complex than predicted by the ATCM; the inhibitors heptane-1,7-bis-(dimethyl-3-phthalimidopropyl)-ammonium bromide and gallamine yielded biphasic curves that were described empirically by a two-site binding model, whereas the enhancer alcuronium yielded a bell-shaped curve. Radioligand dissociation assays revealed that the modulators retarded [(3)H]NMS kinetics such that the system never attained equilibrium. Subsequent application of a kinetic ATCM accommodated and quantified all experimental observations. Our findings confirm and extend previous studies on the use of a kinetic ATCM for mAChR allosteric enhancers, but also highlight how complex curves displayed by allosteric inhibitors can be misinterpreted in terms of multisite orthosteric binding. It is possible that similar behavior of other allosteric modulators at GPCRs may reflect nonequilibrium binding artifacts rather than deviation from an ATCM.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2003

Investigation of the interaction of a putative allosteric modulator, N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole-5-(2H)-ylidene) methanamine hydrobromide (SCH-202676), with M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

The interaction between a novel G protein-coupled receptor modulator, N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole-5-(2H)-ylidene) methanamine hydrobromide (SCH-202676), and the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) was investigated. In contrast to the prototypical mAChR allosteric modulator, heptane 1,7-bis-(dimethyl-3'-phthalimidopropyl)-ammonium bromide (C(7)/3-phth), SCH-202676 had no effect on the dissociation kinetics of [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS) at M(1) mAChRs stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell membranes. However, SCH-202676 completely inhibited the binding of [(3)H]NMS in membrane preparations, with a Hill slope significantly greater than unity, indicative of positive cooperativity in the binding of the inhibitor. Moreover, SCH-202676 caused dextral shifts of the [(3)H]NMS saturation binding curve that were greater than expected for a competitive interaction. The addition of C(7)/3-phth (100 microM) had no significant effect on the inhibitory potency of SCH-202676. In contrast to the findings in cell membranes, the interaction between SCH-202676 and [(3)H]NMS in intact M(1) CHO cells yielded saturation and inhibition isotherms that were compatible with the predictions for a competitive interaction. Intact cell assays of acetylcholine-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the absence or presence of SCH-202676 revealed a mixed competitive/noncompetitive mode of interaction that was dependent on the concentration of SCH-202676. These data reveal that the nature of the interaction between SCH-202676 and the M(1) mAChR is dependent on whether it is studied using intact versus broken cell preparations. It is proposed that SCH-202676 uses a dual mode of ligand-receptor interaction involving both extra- and intracellular attachment points on the M(1) mAChR that are distinct from the allosteric binding site recognized by prototypical mAChR modulators such as C(7)/3-phth.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2003

RAMPs: 5 years on, where to now?

It is now approximately 5 years since the identification of the family of receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs). This finding revolutionized concepts of the pharmacology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and revealed that GPCR accessory proteins not only assist trafficking and folding but also define receptor type. Since the identification of RAMPs as modulators of the trafficking and properties of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor, much work has focused on improving our understanding of the nature of RAMP-GPCR dimers, the extent to which they occur, and the consequence of this association. In this article, we review recent developments, including the identification of new receptor partners and novel roles for RAMPs.

Calcitonin Receptor-Like Protein↗

PubMed2003

Allosteric modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Allosteric modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact with binding sites on the receptor that are topographically distinct from the orthosteric site recognized by the receptor's endogenous agonist. Allosteric modulators offer several advantages over standard orthosteric drugs, including the potential for greater receptor subtype selectivity. To date, the current paucity of clinically available allosteric drugs reflects the bias of traditional radioligand binding assays towards the detection of orthosteric effects. However, the advent of new cell-based high-throughput functional assays has led to an increased detection of allosteric GPCR ligands. The current challenge for modulator-based GPCR drug discovery is the optimization of both binding and functional assays to better detect and validate allosteric ligands.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2003

International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology.

The recommendations that follow have been updated from the proposals of a Technical Subcommittee set up by the International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (Jenkinson DH, Barnard EA, Hoyer D, Humphrey PPA, Leff P, and Shankley NP (1995) International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. IX. Recommendations on terms and symbols in quantitative pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 47:255-266).

Pharmaceutical Preparations↗

PubMed2002

Novel receptor partners and function of receptor activity-modifying proteins.

The receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) comprise a family of three accessory proteins that heterodimerize with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL receptor) or with the calcitonin receptor (CTR) to generate different receptor phenotypes. However, RAMPs are more widely distributed across cell and tissue types than the CTR and CL receptor, suggesting additional roles for RAMPs in cellular processes. We have investigated the potential for RAMP interaction with a number of Class II G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in addition to the CL receptor and the CTR. Using immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, we demonstrate, for the first time, that RAMPs interact with at least four additional receptors, the VPAC1 vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide receptor with all three RAMPs; the glucagon and PTH1 parathyroid hormone receptors with RAMP2; and the PTH2 receptor with RAMP3. Unlike the interaction of RAMPs with the CL receptor or the CTR, VPAC1R-RAMP complexes do not show altered phenotypic behavior compared with the VPAC1R alone, as determined using radioligand binding in COS-7 cells. However, the VPAC1R-RAMP2 heterodimer displays a significant enhancement of agonist-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis with no change in cAMP stimulation compared with the VPAC1R alone. Our findings identify a new functional consequence of RAMP-receptor interaction, suggesting that RAMPs play a more general role in modulating cell signaling through other GPCRs than is currently appreciated.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Allosteric binding sites on cell-surface receptors: novel targets for drug discovery.

Cell-surface receptors are the targets for more than 60% of current drugs. Traditionally, optimizing the interaction of lead molecules with the binding site for the endogenous agonist (orthosteric site) has been viewed as the best means of achieving selectivity of action. However, recent developments have highlighted the fact that drugs can interact with binding sites on the receptor molecule that are distinct from the orthosteric site, known as allosteric sites. Allosteric modulators could offer several advantages over orthosteric ligands, including greater selectivity and saturability of their effect.

Allosteric Site↗

PubMed2002

Modulation of cannabinoid agonist binding by 5-HT in the rat cerebellum.

Cross-talk between cannabinoid CB1 and serotonin 5-HT receptors in rat cerebellar membranes was investigated using radioligand binding. In competition against the CB1 antagonist, [3 H]SR141716A, the agonist, WIN 55,212-2 yielded a biphasic isotherm. The majority of binding was to a high-affinity state that was significantly reduced by the GTP analogue, Gpp(NH)p. Interestingly, 5-HT enhanced the high-affinity binding constant of WIN 55,212-2 while attenuating the proportion of high-affinity binding. 5-HT also significantly reduced the proportion of high-affinity binding of the cannabinoid agonist, HU 210, but had no effect on the agonist, CP 55,940. The effect of 5-HT on WIN 55,212-2 binding was inhibited by the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ritanserin as well as Gpp(NH)p, suggesting a dependence on the 5-HT2 receptor and on G protein-receptor interactions, respectively. Subsequent [3 H]WIN 55,212-2 dissociation kinetic experiments revealed that 5-HT promoted a slower-dissociating species of radiolabelled agonist-receptor complex. Our findings support a membrane-delimited cross-talk between two G protein-coupled receptors that are co-localized in certain cells of the central nervous system. Intriguingly, the cannabinoid agonist dependence of the 5-HT modulatory effect suggests that agonist-specific conformations of the CB1 receptor may also be important in determining the extent of this cross-talk.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell-surface receptors. These receptors are natural allosteric proteins because agonist-mediated signaling by GPCRs requires a conformational change in the receptor protein transmitted between two topographically distinct binding sites, one for the agonist and another for the G protein. It is now becoming increasingly recognized, however, that the agonist-bound GPCR can also form ternary complexes with other ligands or "accessory" proteins and display altered binding and/or signaling properties in relation to the binary agonist-receptor complex. Allosteric sites on GPCRs represent novel drug targets because allosteric modulators possess a number of theoretical advantages over classic orthosteric ligands, such as a ceiling level to the allosteric effect and a potential for greater GPCR subtype-selectivity. Because of the noncompetitive nature of allosteric phenomena, the detection and quantification of such effects often relies on a combination of equilibrium binding, nonequilibrium kinetic, and functional signaling assays. This review discusses the development and properties of allosteric receptor models for GPCRs and the detection and quantification of allosteric effects. Moreover, we provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the location of possible allosteric sites on GPCRs and candidate endogenous allosteric modulators. Finally, we discuss the potential for allosteric effects arising from the formation of GPCR oligomers or GPCRs complexed with accessory cellular proteins. It is proposed that the study of allosteric phenomena will become of progressively greater import to the drug discovery process due to the advent of newer and more sensitive GPCR screening technologies.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2001

Reversible and specific extracellular antagonism of receptor-histidine kinase signaling.

Staphylococcal pathogenesis is regulated by a two-component quorum-sensing system, agr, activated by a self-coded autoinducing peptide (AIP). The agr system is widely divergent and is unique in that variant AIPs cross-inhibit agr activation in heterologous combinations. Cross-inhibition, but not self-activation, is widely tolerant of structural diversity in the AIPs so that these two processes must involve different mechanisms of interaction with the respective receptors. Herein, we have utilized this naturally occurring antagonism to demonstrate that both activation and inhibition are reversible and that activators and inhibitors interact at a common site on the receptor. These results suggest that molecules designed to compete with natural agonists for binding at receptor-histidine kinase sensor domains could represent a general approach to the inhibition of receptor-histidine kinase signaling.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

"Ins and outs" of seven-transmembrane receptor signalling to ERK.

Extracellular-signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are important members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family and have emerged as key effector targets of activation by seven-transmembrane-spanning (G-protein-coupled) receptors (7TMRs). Regulation of ERK by 7TMRs is highly complex and dependent on cell type. Numerous studies have linked specific G protein pathways to ERK activation, but recent evidence suggests that some 7TMR-linked ERK signalling pathways might not be exclusively mediated by G proteins. In addition, the emergence of an "inside-out" model for receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) "transactivation" by 7TMRs has enhanced our understanding of the ERK signalling system and further underscores the complexity of mitogenic regulation by 7TMRs.

Animals↗