PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Basil F El-Rayes

Publications and source records attributed to Basil F El-Rayes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Phase I study of bryostatin 1 and gemcitabine.

PURPOSE: Bryostatin 1 is a macrocyclic lactone with protein kinase C inhibitory activity. Gemcitabine is a nucleotide analogue with a broad spectrum of anticancer activity. Bryostatin 1 enhanced the activity of antitumor agents including gemcitabine in preclinical models. The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the recommended doses for phase II trials of bryostatin 1 and gemcitabine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients had histologic or cytologic diagnosis of nonhematologic cancer refractory to conventional treatment; life expectancy of >3 months; normal renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; and a Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Gemcitabine was administered i.v. over 30 minutes and was followed by bryostatin 1 by i.v. infusion over 24 hours on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Bryostatin 1 (microg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (mg/m(2)) doses were escalated as follows: 25/600, 25/800, 25/1,000, 30/1,000, 35/1,000, and 45/1,000, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (mean age, 57 years; male/female 15:21) were treated. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was 3 (range, 0-24). Four patients developed dose limiting toxicities: myalgia, 2; myelosuppression, 1; and elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase levels, 1. Ten grade 3 toxicities were observed (anemia, 2; neutropenia, 5; thrombocytopenia, 3). No treatment-related death was seen. The recommended doses for phase II trials for bryostatin 1 and gemcitabine were 35 microg/m(2) and 1,000 mg/m(2), respectively. Two heavily pretreated patients with breast and colon cancer experienced partial responses lasting 22 and 8 months, respectively. Eight patients had stable disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of bryostatin 1 and gemcitabine seemed to be well tolerated with limited grade 3 toxicity. The recommended dose of bryostatin 1 in combination with full doses of gemcitabine was 35 microg/m(2).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Potentiation of the effect of erlotinib by genistein in pancreatic cancer: the role of Akt and nuclear factor-kappaB.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a target of new therapies in most nonhematologic cancers. EGFR blockade alone may not be sufficient for the control of growth and invasion of human pancreas cancer because of the independent activation of Akt and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). The expression of EGFR, Akt, and NF-kappaB was determined in six human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Selected cells for specific expression were treated with erlotinib, genistein, gemcitabine, or the combination. Growth inhibition was evaluated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, and apoptosis was assayed by ELISA. EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR, phosphorylated Akt, and survivin expressions were determined by immunoblotting. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay was used to evaluate the DNA binding activity of NF-kappaB. Genistein significantly increased (P < 0.05) erlotinib-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in BxPC-3, CAPAN-2, and AsPC-1 cells. In the BxPC-3 cell line, significant down-regulation of EGFR, phosphorylated Akt, NF-kappaB activation, and survivin was observed in the cells treated with the combination compared with the erlotinib-treated cells. In the HPAC and MIAPaCa cell line, no potentiation of the effects of erlotinib by genistein on cell growth or inhibition of the EGFR/Akt/NF-kappaB was observed. Genistein potentiated growth inhibition and apoptosis of the gemcitabine and erlotinib combination in COLO-357 cell line. Genistein potentiates the growth inhibition and apoptosis induced by erlotinib and gemcitabine in certain pancreatic cancer cells. Akt and NF-kappaB inhibition represents one of the mechanisms for the potentiation of erlotinib- and gemcitabine-induced cell death by genistein.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2006

A phase I study of flavopiridol and docetaxel.

BACKGROUND: Flavopiridol is a cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor. Preclinical models suggest a sequence dependent synergy between flavopiridol and taxanes. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of flavopiridol and docetaxel and the influence of flavopiridol on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. METHODS: The major eligibility criteria included: a diagnosis of non-hematologic cancer with no conventional effective therapy, normal organ function, and ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients were treated with docetaxel followed 24 h later by flavopiridol given via continuous intravenous infusion over a 24-h period. The starting doses of docetaxel and flavopiridol were 60 and 60 mg/m2, respectively. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. All patients received diarrhea prophylaxis consisting of bismuth subsalicylate. RESULTS: Ten patients (M:F 4:6; median age 56 years) were treated. The median number of cycles per patient was 2 (range 1-6). Two of the three patients on dose level 1 developed dose-limiting toxicities consisting of neutropenia and fever. Seven patients were subsequently enrolled on dose level -1 (docetaxel 60 mg/m2, flavopiridol 50 mg/m2). One episode of grade 3 diarrhea was reported at dose level -1. CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia complicated by infection was the major dose-limiting toxicity. The recommended doses of flavopiridol and docetaxel for phase II trials are 50 and 60 mg/m2 every three weeks, respectively.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2005

Sequence dependent potentiation of gemcitabine by flavopiridol in human breast cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Flavopiridol is a novel cyclin dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor currently in Phase I and II clinical trials. We investigated the interaction between flavopiridol and gemcitabine in two human breast cancer cell lines. Experimental design. MCF-7 [Estrogen receptor (ER) positive] and MDA-MB-231 cells (ER negative) were treated with sub-cytotoxic concentrations of gemcitabine (G), flavopiridol (F), and flavopiridol followed by gemcitabine (F-G), or gemcitabine followed by flavopiridol (G-F) and assayed for biological activity. RESULTS: Growth inhibition assessed by serial cell counting and MTT assay was highest in the G-F group. Significant increase in apoptosis assessed by flow cytometry, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) and Caspase-3 degradation was also highest in the G-F group. Expression of pro-apoptotic Bax was up-regulated and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 was down-regulated in only the G-F treated cells. Significant up regulation of p21(WAF-1) was demonstrated in the G-F group but not in the reverse regimen treated cells. No effect on protein kinase C (PKC) expression was seen in any of the treated cells. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, similar to the results in the gastrointestinal cell lines, a sequence dependent potentiation of the effect of gemcitabine by flavopiridol was demonstrated in breast cancer cell lines and it was independent of ER status. This was accompanied by enhanced apoptosis and the up regulation of p21(WAF-1) protein. These results provide rationale for pre-clinical evaluation of this treatment strategy using animal models and in the design of clinical trials of this drug in combination with cytotoxic therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A phase II study of celecoxib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is amongst the most chemoresistant malignancies. Expression of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme plays a major role in tumor progression and resistance to therapy. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the effect of gemcitabine by fixed-dose rate infusion (FDR), cisplatin and the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, on the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included a pathologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) over 100 minutes, cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) I.V. on days 1 and 8, and celecoxib continuously at a daily dose of 800 mg. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with metastatic pancreas cancer were enrolled (median age, 59.5 years; M:F, 13:9). The median number of cycles was 2 per patient. The median survival time was 5.8 months (90% CI, 3.6-7.6 months). The probability of survival at 6 months was 46% (90% CI, 27-62%). The major toxicity was neutropenia with grade 3 or 4 toxicities seen in 65% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of celecoxib to gemcitabine (by FDR) and cisplatin did not appear to increase activity of the chemotherapy doublet in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Celecoxib alone may not be sufficient to sensitize pancreatic cancer to the effects of conventional cytotoxic therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Cellular DNA content parameters as prognostic indicators in human astrocytomas.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical parameters such as grade, size and/or location of the tumor are good predictors of outcome in patients with astrocytoma. The objective of this study was to determine whether DNA content parameters have a prognostic significance for this group of tumors. METHODS: Following optimization and validation of methodology for evaluating cellular DNA content parameters (CDCP), tumor DNA ploidy and percent S phase fraction (SPF) were determined from 64 patients using formalin fixed, paraffin embedded specimens (mean coefficient of variation=4.94) obtained over a 10-year period. Median survival times correlated with grade (I/II=1154 vs. III/IV=483days, P=0.0317). Fifty-five percent of the specimens contained DNA aneuploid (DNA-A) components (average SPF=18.3%) and 45% were DNA diploid (DNA-D) (average SPF=9.6%). Survival did not correlate with overall differences in DNA ploidy (DNA-D=181 vs. DNA-A=206days, P=0.6314) when treated and untreated tumors were analyzed. However, a trend for prolonged median survival was observed in patients whose tumors were untreated with respect to cytotoxic therapy based on DNA ploidy status (DNA-D=275 vs. DNA-A=15days, P=0.3408). Survival for all patients did not correlate with median SPF (<13.5% av.=121 vs. >13.5% av.=154days, P=0.6534). CONCLUSION: DNA content parameters may correlate with the natural history and treatment outcome of newly diagnosed untreated patients with astrocytomas.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase I study of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) and cyclophosphamide in solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of the combination of cyclophosphamide and liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included: a diagnosis of non-hematologic cancer with no conventional effective therapy, normal renal, liver and bone marrow function, and ECOG performance status of 0-2. Both drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The following doses (mg/m2) of Doxil and cyclophosphamide were tested: 30/500, 40/600, and 48/600. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 62 years (male:female 21:16) received 119 cycles of Doxil and cyclophosphamide. Hand-foot syndrome and mucositis were the dose limiting toxicities for this combination. Other major toxicities included neutropenia. The side effects to the combination were cumulative. The RPTD of Doxil and cyclophosphamide was 48 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively. Three patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach, fibrosarcoma of the stomach and renal cell carcinoma showed objective antitumor responses. CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of the combination of Doxil/cyclophosphamide differs significantly from that of non-liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Major toxicities of the combination include the hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis and neutropenia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in adenocarcinoma of unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary site. Paclitaxel has shown promising activity as a single agent in a number of malignancies. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site (ACUP). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with ACUP were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel intravenously (IV) over 3 hours followed by carboplatin IV with a targeted plasma area under the curve (AUC) of 5 mg/h/mL. RESULTS: A total of 73 treatment courses were administered with a median of 5 courses per patient. Five of the 22 registered patients had a major response for an objective response rate of 23% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.40) by intention-to-treat analysis. The median response duration was 4.1 months (90% CI, 3.6-7.1). The median survival time was 6.5 months (90% CI, 5.5-10.1) and the 1-year survival rate was 27% (90% CI, 0.11-0.42). The major toxicity observed was neutropenia, with grade 3-4 neutropenia occurring in 3 patients (14%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is a tolerable and moderately active regimen in ACUP.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Simultaneous targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 pathways for pancreatic cancer therapy.

The aims of this study were to determine the effects of (a) combining the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blocker (erlotinib) and the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) on cell growth and apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cell lines, (b) baseline EGFR expression on the potentiation of erlotinib-induced apoptosis by celecoxib, and (c) the effects of the combination on the expression of the COX-2, EGFR, HER-2/neu, and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Baseline expression of EGFR was determined by Western blot analysis in five human pancreatic cancer cell lines. BxPC-3, PANC-1, and HPAC had high EGFR and MIAPaCa had low EGFR. Cells were grown in culture and treated with erlotinib (1 and 10 micromol/L), celecoxib (1 and 10 micromol/L), and the combination. Growth inhibition was evaluated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, and apoptosis was assayed by ELISA. Reverse transcriptase-PCR was used to evaluate COX-2 and EGFR mRNA. EGFR, COX-2, and HER-2/neu expression was determined by Western immunoblotting. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay was used to evaluate NF-kappaB activation. Growth inhibition and apoptosis were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in BxPC-3, HPAC, and PANC-1 cells treated with celecoxib and erlotinib than cells treated with either celecoxib or erlotinib. However, no potentiation in growth inhibition or apoptosis was observed in the MIAPaCa cell line with low expression of the EGFR. Significant down-regulation of COX-2 and EGFR expression was observed in the BxPC-3 and HPAC cells treated with the combination of erlotinib (1 micromol/L) and celecoxib (10 micromol/L) compared with celecoxib- or erlotinib-treated cells. Celecoxib significantly down-regulated HER-2/neu expression in BxPC-3 and HPAC cell lines. Significant inhibition of NF-kappaB activation was observed in BxPC-3 and HPAC cell lines treated with erlotinib and celecoxib. (a) Celecoxib can potentiate erlotinib-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cell lines, (b) high baseline EGFR expression is a predictor of this potentiation, and (c) the down-regulation of EGFR, COX-2, and HER-2/neu expression and NF-kappaB inactivation contributes to the potentiation of erlotinib by celecoxib.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2004

Cytochrome p450 and glutathione transferase expression in squamous cell cancer.

PURPOSE: The cytochrome P-450 (CYP) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme systems modulate the carcinogenic effects of tobacco. Therefore, the expression of these enzymes may be in part responsible for the observed interindividual and inter-racial differences in the risk of development of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The first aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring the expression of the CYP and GST in target tissue from the head and neck. The second aim was to compare the expression of CYPs 1A1, 2E1, and 3A4 in squamous epithelium from African-American and Caucasian pediatric patients. The third aim was to compare the expression of CYPs 1A1, 2E1, 3A4, and GST-pi on the p16 expression in patients with SCCHN. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of CYP 1A1, 2E1, 3A4, GST-pi, and p16 was quantified by immunoblotting. Expression of CYPs 1A1, 2E1, and 3A4 was quantified in tissue from 160 pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Expression of CYPs 1A1, 2E1, 3A4, GST-pi, and p16 was determined in 46 resected SCCHN patients. RESULTS: Large interindividual variability in the expression of these enzymes was observed in the pediatric and adult populations. No significant difference was observed in CYP 1A1, 2E1, and 3A4 expression of Caucasian and African-American patients. There was no correlation between p16 and enzyme expression in patients with SCCHN. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of CYP expression in the target tissue of interest is feasible. The clinical significance of CYPs and GST-pi alterations in the risk of developing SCCHN will need to be investigated in larger trials.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2004

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Local failure continues to be a major problem in the management of pancreatic cancer. Delivery of adequate radiation doses to the pancreas is limited by radiation-sensitive normal structures in the upper abdomen. To overcome some of these restrictions, we have developed a regimen of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent capecitabine. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated on this regimen (7 as adjuvant therapy after curative resection and 8 patients for unresectable disease). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was planned using the CORVUS system and delivered with a segmented multileaf collimator, using a 6-MV photon beam and 10 intensity steps. Two target volumes were entered: target 1 consisted of the gross tumor volume (in unresectable cases) or the tumor bed (in postsurgical cases); and target 2 consisted of the draining lymph nodes. Both targets were treated simultaneously in 25 daily fractions, 5 days a week. In the postoperative setting, the total dose to target 1 was 45-54 Gy (median, 54 Gy). For unresectable disease the dose was 54-55 Gy (median, 54 Gy). The total dose to target 2 was 45 Gy in all patients. Patients were treated with one of two six-field beam arrangements found to produce superior dose distributions. Capecitabine was given at 1,600 mg/m(2)/day in two divided doses, 5 days per week, concurrently with radiotherapy. In addition, most patients (73%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Systemic chemotherapy was given before, after, or both before and after chemoradiotherapy in 47%, 7%, and 20% of patients, respectively. Patients were evaluated on a weekly basis. RESULTS: Treatment was tolerated well. Grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting developed in 8 patients (53%) and Grade 1/2 hematologic toxicity developed in 9 patients (60%). Only 1 patient (7%) had Grade 3 toxicity, a gastric ulceration that responded to medical management. Nine patients (60%) had weight loss (median, 7 lbs; range, 3-12 lbs). The median follow-up time is 8.5 months (10.1 months in patients who are alive). In the resectable group there have been no deaths, and there has been 1 local relapse (14%). In the unresectable group there have been 2 deaths, and the 1-year actuarial survival rate is 69%. Two patients converted to resectability, 5 patients (62.5%) have persistent locoregional disease after chemoradiotherapy, and 1 patient (12%) is locally controlled without surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of IMRT with tumor-selective radiosensitization is well tolerated. The low toxicity profile compares favorably with that of protocols based on continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine, and the preliminary indications of efficacy are encouraging.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Apoptosis-inducing effect of chemotherapeutic agents is potentiated by soy isoflavone genistein, a natural inhibitor of NF-kappaB in BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell line.

Cancer chemotherapeutic strategies should be devised to provide higher tumor response and lower toxicity for combination chemotherapy. Genistein has been shown to inhibit the growth of various cancer cells in vitro and in vivo without toxicity to normal cells. The antitumor effects of genistein could be in part due to inactivation of NF-kappaB activity. In contrast, chemotherapeutic agents inadvertently induce NF-kappaB activity, which may lead to chemoresistance. In this study, we investigated whether the inactivation of NF-kappaB by genistein would enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells were pretreated with 30 micromol/L genistein for 24 hours and then exposed to lower concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents for an additional 24 hours. Cell growth inhibition assay, apoptosis assay, and NF-kappaB EMSA were performed. The combination of 30 micromol/L genistein with 1 nmol/L docetaxel or 100 nmol/L cisplatin elicited significantly greater inhibition of cell growth compared with either agent alone. The combination treatment induced more apoptosis in BxPC-3 cells compared with single agents. Moreover, the NF-kappaB activity was significantly increased within 2 hours of docetaxel or cisplatin treatment, and the NF-kappaB-inducing activity of these agents was completely abrogated in cells pretreated with genistein. These results clearly suggest that genistein pretreatment, which inactivates NF-kappaB activity, together with other cellular effects of genistein, may contribute to increased cell growth inhibition and apoptosis inducing effects of nontoxic doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, which could be a novel strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Cyclooxygenase-2-dependent and -independent effects of celecoxib in pancreatic cancer cell lines.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is involved in inhibition of apoptosis, potentiation of cell growth, and angiogenesis and as such is a target for drug development. The COX-2 enzyme is frequently overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of celecoxib on the growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis by gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Baseline expression of COX-2 enzyme was determined by Western blot analysis in five human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cells were treated with gemcitabine (100 nmol/L), celecoxib (1, 10, and 50 micromol/L), and the combination. No potentiation in growth inhibition was observed in MIAPaCa cells (low COX-2 expression). However, growth inhibition and apoptosis were significantly increased with celecoxib in the BxPC-3 cells that have a high COX-2 expression. Significant down-regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB activation was observed in BxPC-3 cells treated with celecoxib and gemcitabine. Moreover, down-regulation of COX-2 mRNA and protein expression was also observed in the BxPC-3 cells treated with the combination as compared with the untreated and the celecoxib-treated and gemcitabine-treated cell lines. We conclude that celecoxib potentiates gemcitabine-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cell lines. In addition to inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme, the celecoxib and gemcitabine combination down-regulated nuclear factor-kappaB activation, which in turn may have contributed to the induction of apoptosis and the down-regulation of transcription of the COX-2 enzyme.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2003

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer responding to capecitabine.

A 66-year-old male patient with advanced prostate cancer presented with bony metastases, including pathologic fractures and hepatosplenomegaly. The patient responded to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for more than 1 year. A clear progression while taking luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists manifested as a progressive rise in prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, hepatosplenomegaly, and myelophthisic pancytopenia. We administered capecitabine for 5 months with a complete clinical response. At last follow-up, the patient's liver function tests and prostate-specific antigen level have normalized. Liver size by computed tomography and blood counts both improved. To our knowledge, no previous case reports of capecitabine in the treatment of prostate cancer have been published.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine chemotherapy in high-risk/locallyadvanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine in patients with high-risk, newly diagnosed, prostate cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had prostate cancer with one or more of the following criteria: clinical Stage T2b or greater, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 15 ng/mL or greater, and/or Gleason score of 8 to 10. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and estramustine (280 mg three times daily) on days 1 to 3 every 21 days for three to six courses. This was followed by local therapy, as deemed appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a median age of 60 years, median PSA level of 16.1 ng/mL (range 2.4 to 175), and median baseline testosterone of 3.4 ng/mL were enrolled. Seven patients met one of the inclusion criteria, 10 met two, and 4 met three. The Gleason score was 8 or greater in 14 patients. A median of five cycles of chemotherapy was delivered. The most frequent high-grade toxicities were grade 3 (8 patients) and 4 (1 patient) neutropenia and deep venous thrombosis (grade 3 in 2 patients) before institution of low-dose warfarin. All patients responded as determined by protocol-defined criteria. Ten patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with negative surgical margins in 7 patients, and 11 received radiotherapy with negative preradiotherapy biopsies in 2. CONCLUSIONS: Induction docetaxel and estramustine is well tolerated and feasible in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer. This combination is active; however, its efficacy relative to hormonal therapy will require a controlled randomized trial.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Cytochrome p450 and glutathione transferase expression in human breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The cytochrome P-450 (CYP) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme systems may influence the biological effects of carcinogens, including estrogens. As such, these enzymes may predict the developmental risk of breast cancer, as well as be potential targets for chemoprevention. The purpose of this study was to compare the expression of GST-Pi and CYPs 1A1, 2B6, 2E1, and 3A4 in paired samples of normal and malignant breast tissue from patients with breast cancer and women undergoing reduction mammoplasty. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of CYPs 1A1, 2B6, 2E1, 3A4, and GST-Pi was quantified in breast tissue from 33 patients with breast cancer and in 17 women without history of cancer who underwent reduction mammoplasty. The expression of CYP 1A1, 2B6, 2E1, 3A4, and GST-Pi was quantified by immunoblotting. RESULTS: CYP 1A1, 2E1, and 3A4 expression was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in malignant tissue as compared with morphologically normal adjacent tissue. Conversely, GST-Pi expression was marginally lower in the normal tissue (P = 0.08). No significant difference in enzyme expression was seen between the tissue from reduction mammoplasty and normal tissue from breast cancer patients. There was a trend for higher expression of CYP 2B6 and GST-Pi in the estrogen receptor expressing tumors than those tumors without expression (P > 0.28). CONCLUSION: The expression of these enzymes was similar in morphologically normal breast tissue from patients with or without breast cancer. The expression of CYPs was down-regulated in the tumor tissue. The clinical significance of CYP alterations in breast cancer will need further characterization.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases↗
PubMed2003

A review of systemic therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer remains an important cause of cancer mortality with few long-term survivors. Improvement in the systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer is necessary to treat the frequently encountered metastatic disease. Several new chemotherapeutic agents with modest activity against pancreatic cancer have been identified over the past decade. Gemcitabine is currently the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Combination chemotherapy trials incorporating gemcitabine, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan generally show improved outcomes in objective response rates but with little or no improvement in survival in phase III trials. Novel therapeutic strategies targeting dysregulated molecular pathways in pancreatic cancer cells are currently being explored. Future treatment regimens for pancreatic cancer will probably incorporate conventional cytotoxic drugs and novel targeted agents.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗