PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Colette

Publications and source records attributed to C Colette.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Addition of rapid-acting insulin to basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: indications and modalities.

There are many reasons to believe that in the near future, the treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes will be characterised by an increased use of insulin therapy. To ensure that insulin regimens are acceptable to patients, and implemented by physicians, they should be as simple and efficient as possible. Simplicity is synonymous with the regimen of once-daily basal insulin glargine given at any time of the day (at the same time each day). With such a strategy, the dose is adjusted by titrating to target fasting blood glucose values of 5.0 - 7.2 mmol/L (90 - 130 mg/dL). When these targets can no longer be achieved with reasonable doses of long-acting insulin, a rapid-acting insulin analogue should be added at meal times. A step-by-step strategy can be used; it is recommended that initially, a single daily prandial bolus of a rapid-acting insulin analogue is administered before the meal that leads to the highest post-meal blood glucose excursions. Further boluses can be added at other meal times as necessary, i.e, when post-meal blood glucose values remain above 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) and 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) at mid-morning and 2h-post-lunch or post-dinner times, respectively. This stepwise strategy may eventually lead to a standard basal-bolus regimen with 3 pre-meal injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues, a potentially small trade-off for achieving fairly-well controlled diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗

Insulin secretion and sensitivity as determinants of HbA1c in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Defects in insulin secretion and sensitivity, two major determinants of glycaemic control, can occur and progress or not in parallel. The present study was designed to compare the respective roles of both determinants on HbA1c, in type 2 diabetic patients, according to whether or not residual beta-cell function was stimulated with insulin secretagogues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity were both estimated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). HbA1c, insulin sensitivity (HOMA2%S) and insulin secretion (HOMA2%B) were determined in 289 noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients who were further divided into two groups according to treatment: metformin alone (group I, n = 57) or metformin and glyburide (group II, n = 232). The patients of both groups were further divided into three subsets in order to test the dependence of HbA1c on HOMA2%B and HOMA2%S. RESULTS: In group I mean HbA1c were greater (8.4%) in patients with HOMA2%B < 50% than in the two subsets with HOMA2%B > or = 50%: 7.2 and 6.8% (P = 0.0013). In group II mean values of stimulated-insulin secretion (HOMA2%B) were lesser (40.7 and 30.1%) in the two subsets of patients with HbA1c > or = 8% than in patients with HbA1c < 8%: 55.1% (P < 0.0001). By contrast, we found no differences in both groups with HOMA2%S. A stepwise multiple regression showed that HOMA2%B contributed to HbA1c more than HOMA2%S both in groups I (33.5% vs. 23.4%) and II (22.7% vs. 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the role of insulin sensitivity is not negligible, insulin secretion appears to be the major determinant of diabetic control in overt type 2 diabetic patients who are treated with metformin alone or with a two-drug therapy combining metformin and glyburide.

Biomarkers↗

An overview of the rationale for pharmacological strategies in type 2 diabetes: from the evidence to new perspectives.

Therapeutic strategies in type 2 diabetic patients should not only integrate both the targets and indications of the different therapies but should be also a compromise between the patient's and physician's goals and willingnesses. The rationale for therapeutic targets is based on recommendations that differ from one country to another. Even though HbA1c remains the "gold standard", monitoring of blood glucose at fasting and postprandial time-points is a complementary tool for estimating both the quality and safety of diabetic control. Despite the lack of available strong evidence-based data it seems that achieving glucose levels < 130 mg/dl at fasting and < 180 mg/dl or < 140 mg/dl over postbreakfast or postlunch periods, respectively, might be a reasonable goal in most countries. The choice of appropriate strategies for treating type 2 diabetic patients should ideally be based on pathophysiological considerations. However for practical reasons, decisions for initiating or completing antidiabetic treatments are usually made by using such simple parameters as HbA1c and plasma glucose levels. The bridge between pathophysiological and clinical rationales can be obtained from the analysis of the relative contributions of fasting and postprandial glucose to the overall hyperglycaemia. In patients with HbA1c < 7.3%, postprandial glucose makes the major contribution to the overall hyperglycaemia, whereas the contribution of fasting glucose becomes progressively predominant in patients with HbA1c > 7.3%. As a consequence of these observations, initiation of antidiabetic treatments or implementation of second-line therapies should be aimed at reducing either postprandial excursions or fasting hyperglycaemia according to whether HbA1c levels are found respectively below or above a cut-off value of 7.3%.

Blood Glucose↗

Dichotomous responses of inter and postprandial hyperglycaemia to short-term calorie restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: In type 2 diabetes the effects of short-term calorie restrictions on glycaemia are usually judged on fasting plasma glucose. As fasting duration rarely exceeds 2-3 h, we determined the effects of calorie restriction over different daytime periods using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in noninsulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Fourteen poorly controlled (mean HbA1c = 9.3%) overweight or obese patients (mean body mass index = 30.1 +/- 0.7 kg m(-2)) with type 2 diabetes were investigated twice with a CGMS, at baseline and at the end of a 18-day calorie-restricted diet (1490 kcal day(-1)). Areas under curves (AUCs) of 24-h glucose monitoring were measured and divided into postprandial and interprandial AUCs according to meal times. RESULTS: Areas under curves of 24-h glucose monitoring were significantly decreased after dieting: -37%, P = 0.0047. Both post and interprandial AUCs were significantly diminished (-26%, P = 0.0186 and -48%, P = 0.0037, respectively), but changes in interprandial AUCs were more marked than changes in postprandial AUCs (P = 0.0060). Nycthemeral peaks of glucose were observed at mid-morning times and were not significantly different before (242 +/- 15 mg dL(-1)) and after dieting (227 +/- 16 mg dL(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term calorie restriction in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes resulted in dichotomous responses between interprandial and postprandial glycaemic excursions. The resistance of mid-morning glucose peaking to calorie restriction should result in additional dietary or pharmacological measures at breakfast.

Area Under Curve↗

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetic patients: from the least common denominator to the greatest common multiple.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is recognized as necessary in insulin-treated diabetic patients. There is less evidence for the regular use of SMBG in non-insulin-using type 2 diabetic patients. The rationale for an appropriate regimen of SMBG might be to have at least one time-point of monitoring included within each of the 3 periods of daytime i.e. fasting, postprandial and postabsorptive periods. Interventional trials have indicated that a 4-to 5-point daily profile represents an optimal regimen for SMBG in type 1 diabetic patients with satisfactory diabetic control. This type of SMBG includes 4 daily glucose determinations (3 before each meal and one at bedtime) and one weekly monitoring at 3: 00 am. However additional determinations should be made within postprandial states, particularly when rapid insulin analogues or pump-treatments are used. In non-insulin-using type 2 diabetic patients, studies of diurnal glycemic profiles have indicated that postprandial glucose is an important contributor to HbA1c and that mid-morning hyperglycemia is the "weakest link" of metabolic control. Therefore mid-morning glucose testing should be recommended when HbA1c levels are not correctly controlled. Furthermore, extended postlunch determinations at 5: 00 pm can be helpful for checking both the quality and safety of diabetic control in such patients. The frequency and timing of SMBG depend both on the type (1 or 2) of diabetes and should be a compromise between optimal and minimal regimens.

Blood Glucose↗

Global assessment for quality and safety of control in type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) suffers from obvious limitations in type 2 diabetic patients at risk of hypoglycaemia or requiring rapid therapeutic adjustments. This study was conducted to discern whether the monitoring of one particular plasma glucose (PG) value of the diurnal profile can be used in such situations. DESIGN: Four diurnal PG concentrations (at 08:00, 11:00, 14:00 and 17:00 h) were measured in standardized conditions in 480 (246 men, 234 women) noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients. Sensitivities for predicting treatment success, i.e. HbA1c<7%, with a specificity > or =90% were calculated and compared using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The probabilities (areas under ROC curves) for predicting HbA1c<7% were significantly higher at 11:00, 14:00 and 17:00 h than at 08:00 h. The optimal PG cut-off values for predicting treatment success were, respectively, 6, 9, 7 and 6 mmol L(-1) at 08:00 h, 11:00, 14:00 and 17:00 h. In most patients the lowest PG values of the diurnal profile were at 17:00 h, and 17.5% of the patients with HbA1c<7% (54.5% of them treated with sulphonylureas) exhibited a PG value less than 4.4 mmol L(-1) at 17:00 h (P=0.0034 vs. the other timepoints). CONCLUSIONS: Glucose monitoring at 17:00 h, i.e. during the extended postlunch period, appears as a global marker of control in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients both for detecting patients at risk of hypoglycaemia and for assessing the short-term quality of diabetic control.

Area Under Curve↗

Exchanging carbohydrates for monounsaturated fats in energy-restricted diets: effects on metabolic profile and other cardiovascular risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, as observed in energy-balance conditions after exchanging carbohydrates (CHO) for monounsaturated (MUFA) fats, are also observed in energy-restricted conditions. DESIGN: Longitudinal, clinical intervention study using two types of energy-restricted diets (-30% of initial energy intake) with similar levels of saturated and polyunsaturated fats: a high CHO diet (55% of energy from CHOs, 10% from MUFAs) and a high MUFA diet (40% of energy from CHOs, 25% from MUFAs). SUBJECTS: A total of 32 overweight subjects (nine males, 23 females, BMI: 26-45 kg/m(2)). MEASUREMENTS: Body weight, serum lipids, fasting plasma insulin and phospholipid fatty acid composition of red blood cells were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks. Various oxidative status parameters (plasma lipid hydroperoxides, total plasma antioxidant capacity, plasma uric acid and vitamin E) and serum-induced smooth muscular cell (SMC) proliferation were also measured at these time points. RESULTS: Weight loss (1.1 kg/week over the first 4 weeks and 6.7 kg at week 8) was not significantly affected by the diet composition. Both diets reduced significantly total serum cholesterol, but the MUFA-rich diet showed better effects on fasting serum triacylglycerol (TG) than the CHO-rich diet: 1.18 vs 1.51 mmol/l for the MUFA-rich diet (after vs before, P<0.05) and 1.42 vs 1.62 for the CHO-rich diet. After 8 weeks, plasma vitamin E concentrations were positively associated with the oleic acid level of red blood cell phospholipids and showed opposite variations in both diets (increase with the MUFA-rich diet and decrease with the CHO-rich diet). Relative changes in SMC proliferation induced by sera were negatively associated with the ratio oleic:linoleic acid of red blood cell phospholipids and were significantly higher with the CHO-rich diet. CONCLUSIONS: The MUFA-rich diet showed better effects on serum TG than the CHO-rich diet, even with energy restriction and weight loss. The results suggest also a protective effect of oleic acid on oxidative stress and SMC proliferation, two other important cardiovascular risk factors.

Animals↗

[Dietary assessment in current clinical practice: how to conciliate rapidity, simplicity and reliability?].

Dietary interviews and food diaries are traditionally used for nutritional assessments. In clinical practice, these methods are time consuming, require high training, and thus remain poorly used. Furthermore, the results are frequently impaired by the underreporting phenomenon which can be due either to underrecording (failure to record what is eaten) or to undereating (volontary food restriction during the assessment period). These difficulties can be overcome by using rapid questionnaires based on 2 principles: 1) underreporting is less for proteins than for other macronutrients; 2) in developed countries, calories from proteins are relatively stable and contribute approximately to one sixth of the total daily energy intake. Estimations given by the rapid questionnaire lead to less misleading results than those provided by 7 day-food records. On the other hand, the rapid questionnaire gives an estimate of specific dietary behaviors such as nibbling, festive meals and consumption of salted entrées, sweet desserts and caloric beverages. In conclusion, helpful and simple recommendations for correcting main nutritional errors can be drawn from estimation of the above mentioned specific behaviors that correspond to a daily average of 500 kcalories.

Alcohol Drinking↗

[Very-low-calorie-diets: is there a place for them in the management of the obese diabetic?].

It is well-recognized that standard caloric restrictions (1500 kcal/day) are usually poorly effective in achieving weight losses in overweight type 2 diabetic patients. For that reason very-low-calorie-diets (VLCDs) were developed as a mean for initiating or accelerating weight reduction. Short-term studies indicate that VLCDs result generally in weight losses that are three times greater than those obtained with standard low-calorie-diets. Fasting blood glucose values are improving in parallel to weight losses and in many patients the improvement in glycemic control is better than that expected from the magnitude of weight losses. However the results are rather disappointing after several months or years of follow-up. For example it has been demonstrated that weight regain can be observed as soon as the patient is shifted to a refeeding or maintenance dietary program at the end of the VLCD period. Long-term results on glycemic control and body weight reduction are generally similar with standard low-calorie-diets and with VLCDs, the final results depending on the magnitude of weight loss whatever the prescribed diet. At short-term the VLCDs can be helpful first for initiating weight losses and second for sensitizing the patient to the potential benefits of complying to dietary measures.

Blood Glucose↗

[Primary nutritional and drug prevention of atherosclerosis].

Atherosclerosis results from a multifactorial process. For that reason, primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases requires several measures that should exhibit antiatherogenic, antithrombotic, antioxidative and antihypertensive properties. Two types of therapeutic strategies can be individualized. Nutritional interventions are the first line measures for population wide primary prevention in subjects at low risk of developing atheroscleric diseases. In high risk individuals who have either one major risk factor (LDL cholesterol above 190 mg/dL) or several additional risk factors, dietary measures must be frequently combined with drug treatments. However, the cost-effectiveness ratio should be weighed prior to any treatment especially with statins. Dietary measures consist to reduce caloric intakes in overweight subjects, or more generally to adopt eating patterns which correspond to the following recommendations: (i) proteins = 15% of total calories; (ii) saturated and polyunsatured fats = 10% each; (iii) carbohydrates plus monounsaturated fats = 65%. Such dietary instructions permit individual dietary changes, just by adjusting the carbohydrates/monounsaturates balance, the sum of both nutrients remaining in all cases equal to two-thirds to total calories. Drug treatments are only indicated after secondary dietary failure. They are generally based on the use of statins since the efficacy of these treatments has been clearly established by such preventive trials as the WOSCOP Study, provided that the therapeutic interventions result in significant reduction of LDL cholesterol levels over several years. Antiplatelet agents (aspirin), antihypertensive therapies, antioxidant supplementations with vitamins E or C are also recommended in some individuals for completing the beneficial effects of the above mentioned measures.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Assessment of insulin sensitivity from plasma insulin and glucose in the fasting or post oral glucose-load state.

OBJECTIVE: To compare insulin sensitivity indexes derived from plasma insulin (I) and glucose (G) in the basal state (Sib) and at the second hour (I2h and G2h) of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, Si2h) (i) with measurements of insulin sensitivity using the insulin modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) [Si(IVGTT)] and (ii) with modelling of fasting glucose and insulin by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). SUBJECTS: 47 subjects entered the study. 31 subjects were classified as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 10 as having impaired tolerance to glucose (IGT) and six as type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria. MEASUREMENTS: Sib and Si2h were calculated as follows. Sib = 10(8)/(I x G x VD), Si2h = 10(8)/(I2hr x G2hr x VD) where VD is an estimate of the apparent glucose distribution volume. A third insulin sensitivity index (SiM) was calculated by averaging Sib and Si2h. HOMA was calculated as follows: I/(22.5 x e(-lnG)) RESULTS: Si(IVGTT), Sib, SI2h and SiM were all significantly higher in subjects with NGT than in those with IGT or type 2 diabetes. Si(IVGTT) was highly correlated (P < or = 0.0001) with the three insulin sensitivity indexes found in the total population, in subjects with NGT and in those with IGT. In type 2 diabetic patients, a significant correlation was only noted when SiM was tested against Si(IVGTT) (P < or = 0.05). In most circumstances, the associations of Si(IVGTT) with Sib, SI2h and SiM were stronger than the corresponding associations with Ib, I2h or HOMA. SiM was the index that correlated best with Si(IVGTT) in the whole group (r = 0.92, P < 0.0001) as well as in NGT (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001), IGT (r = 0.96; P < 0.0001) and type 2 diabetes (r = 0.83, P < or = 0.05) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Calculations of sensitivity indexes from G and I concentrations in the basal state and during a conventional 2 h OGTT appear to be useful for coupling in the same simple and single test both a determination of glucose tolerance and an estimate of insulin sensitivity.

Administration, Oral↗

Relationship between insulin sensitivity, obesity, body fat distribution and beta-endorphinaemia in obese women.

OBJECTIVE: To study the associations of obesity (as body mass index (BMI)), of body fat distribution (as waist to hip ratio (WHR)) and of beta-endorphinaemia (beta-EP-aemia) with fasting insulin and glucose concentrations, with insulin secretion (as first phase insulin response (FPIR)) and with insulin sensitivity (SI) in obese women. DESIGN: a cross-sectional study of insulin sensitivity in obese women. SUBJECTS: 45 obese women (age: 20-70 y, BMI: 27-50). MEASUREMENTS: Frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT), FPIR, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, BMI, body fat topography (WHR), beta-EP-aemia, plasma ACTH. RESULTS: In univariate analysis the following positive associations were observed: fasting glucose with age and WHR, fasting insulin with BMI and WHR, beta-EP plasma concentration with WHR; SI was negatively associated with BMI, WHR and beta-EP plasma concentrations. This pattern of associations remained unaltered in multivariate analysis including age, BMI and WHR as independent variables. The contribution of beta-EP plasma concentrations to SI variability was corroborated by a stepwise multiple regression analysis: 53.8% of SI variation could be explained by BMI (30.7%), by beta-EP plasma concentrations (17.2%) and by WHR (5.9%). Finally, women were divided into two groups according to whether they had a peripheral (P-BFD, WHR < or = 0.80, n = 24) or an abdominal (A-BFD, WHR > or = 0.85, n = 16) body fat distribution. After adjustment for age and BMI, SI values were lower while beta-EP and ACTH plasma concentrations were higher in the A-BFD compared to the P-BFD group. In this latter group, 54.8% of SI variation was explained by the same variables as in the whole group. In the A-BFD group, higher WHR was associated with lower FPIR. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The major finding of this study is that, in non-diabetic obese women (especially those with a P-BFD), higher beta-EP plasma concentrations are associated with lower insulin sensitivity. This association is independent of both the magnitude of obesity and the pattern of fat distribution, although these two parameters are strong predictors of SI. 2) The major reduction in SI observed in women with A-BFD probably results from the additive effects of obesity, of elevated beta-EP plasma concentrations and of metabolic and endocrine alterations in relation with the central pattern of fat distribution.

Adult↗

[Changes in dietary management of diabetic patients].

In the late 1990s, diet remains the cornerstone of diabetes therapy. Dietary and nutritional recommendations should seek to reduce the hyperglycaemic state which is the main risk factor for microangiopathy. Furthermore, the prevention of macrovascular complications should lead to dietary prescriptions that combine such properties as antiatherosclerotic, antithrombotic, and antihypertensive measures and such advantages as reducing oxidative stress. The means for achieving such objectives are, first, weight-loss interventions in obese patients and, secondly, the choice of a judicious balance between carbohydrates and monounsaturated fats in all individuals. Dietary measures must achieve a compromise between their acceptability by the patient and medical requirements. For that reason, caloric restriction should be moderate, leading to progressive weight loss (-3 kg monthly), with reasonable weight targets at the end of the weight-reduction period. Compliance with dietary advice usually results in significant savings in medical costs. However, long-term maintenance of dietary measures is difficult to achieve in most individuals, except those enrolled in well-structured training programmes.

Body Weight↗

[Is the Mauriceau maneuver deleterious? Study of 103 cases].

The Mauriceau manoeuvre has a poor reputation in France where some obstetricians believe it leads to an increase in the number of neonatal traumal injuries. To evaluate this hypothesis we examined the results of a personal series of 103 cases of breech extraction where foetal head extraction was performed using the Mauriceau manoeuvre. Our study showed that the level of traumal complications was not worse than that of the general neonatal population. We therefore conclude that this active and organized method of breech delivery is safe and provides a young obstetrician with valuable experience of practical obstetrical manipulation.

Adolescent↗