PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D G Ebo

Publications and source records attributed to D G Ebo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Flow-assisted quantification of in vitro activated basophils in the diagnosis of wasp venom allergy and follow-up of wasp venom immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Correct identification of the culprit venom is a prerequisite for specific venom immunotherapy (VIT). Despite the efficacy of VIT, issues as how to monitor treatment and when to discontinue maintenance therapy remain to be established. METHODS: To evaluate diagnostic performances of the basophil activation test (BAT) in wasp venom allergy, 80 patients with a definite history of wasp venom anaphylaxis (systemic reactors) and 14 wasp-stung asymptomatic controls (stung controls) were enrolled. Venom-induced basophil activation was analyzed flow cytometrically by double-labeling with anti-IgE and anti-CD63. Results were compared to wasp IgE levels and results of a venom skin test (VST). To establish whether the BAT constitutes a candidate marker to monitor VIT, the BAT was repeated in 22 patients on the 5th day of a build-up course and after 6 months of maintenance VIT. Whether the BAT could contribute in the decision of discontinuing VIT was assessed in a cross-sectional analysis in 30 patients receiving treatment for 3 years. RESULTS: Comparison between systemic reactors and stung controls revealed a sensitivity of 86.4% and specificity of 100% for venom IgE, and sensitivity of 81.8% for VST, respectively. In contrast to stung controls, patients demonstrated dose-dependent venom-induced basophil activation. The BAT attained a sensitivity of 83.8% and specificity of 100%. At the end of the build-up course, no effect of VIT on the BAT was demonstrable. When the BAT was repeated after 6 months of treatment, submaximal stimulation of the cells demonstrated a significant decreased CD63 expression (P < 0.04). Patients having VIT for 3 years also demonstrated significantly lower venom-induced CD63 expression (P < 0.001). After 3 years, 60% of the patients had a negative BAT for submaximal stimulation of the cells whereas only 17.9% of the patients had negativation of wasp IgE. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT is a reliable instrument for the diagnosis of wasp venom anaphylaxis and might constitute an instrument to monitor wasp VIT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Antioxidant effect of bisphosphonates and simvastatin on chondrocyte lipid peroxidation.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) and simvastatin on chondrocyte lipid peroxidation. For this purpose, a flow cytometrical method using C11-BODIPY(581/591) was developed to detect hydroperoxide-induced lipid peroxidation in chondrocytes. Tertiary butylhydroperoxide (t-BHP) induced a time and concentration dependent increase in chondrocyte lipid peroxidation. Addition of a Fe2+/EDTA complex to t-BHP or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) clearly enhanced lipid peroxidation. The lipophilic simvastatin demonstrated a small inhibition in the chondrocyte lipid peroxidation. None of three tested BPs (clodronate, pamidronate, and risedronate) had an effect on chondrocyte lipid peroxidation induced by t-BHP. However, when Fe2+/EDTA complex was added to t-BHP or H2O2, BPs inhibited the lipid peroxidation process varying from 25% to 58%. This study demonstrates that BPs have antioxidant properties as iron chelators, thereby inhibiting the chondrocyte lipid peroxidation. These findings add evidence to the therapeutic potential of bisphosphonates and statins in rheumatoid arthritis.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Perioperative anaphylaxis from locally applied rifamycin SV and latex.

A patient developed severe anaphylaxis during irrigation of a wound with rifamycin SV. The temporal relationship between application of rifamycin SV, the positive skin test and basophil activation test for rifamycin SV strongly supported diagnosis of anaphylaxis from the locally applied antibiotic. However, after operation the patient had two anaphylactic reactions with pruritus, urticaria and angio-oedema after routine care by a nurse, and these were probably caused by natural rubber latex. This case report has several messages. First, it is not widely appreciated that topically applied drugs and related compounds can elicit life-threatening anaphylaxis. Second, it illustrates patients can present with more than one allergy. Finally, it provides an opportunity to summarize the applications of flow cytometry-assisted quantification of in vitro activated basophils in diagnosing the cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2006

Haemodialysis-associated anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions.

Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions related to haemodialysis have been increasingly described for almost 3 decades. The majority of these cases used to occur with ethylene oxide sterilized, and complement-activating cellulose membranes. However, a considerable number of publications have focused on polyacrylonitrile AN69 high flux membranes, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and iron as other important causes of potentially severe haemodialysis-related anaphylactoid reactions. Clinical manifestations vary considerably and generally do not allow differentiation between IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions (e.g. from nonspecific mediator release). Successful management of these patients requires multidisciplinary approach and involves prompt recognition and treatment by the attending physician, and identification of the offending agent(s) with subsequent avoidance of the incriminated compound(s). This review focuses on some major causes of anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions during haemodialysis. Special consideration is given to the therapeutic and diagnostic approach.

Allergens↗
PubMed2006

Flow-assisted allergy diagnosis: current applications and future perspectives.

Physicians predominantly rely upon quantification of serum-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and/or skin test to confirm clinically suspected IgE-mediated allergy. However, for various reasons, identification of the offending allergen(s) and potentially cross-reactive structures is not always straightforward. Flow-assisted allergy diagnosis relies upon quantification of alterations in the expression of particular basophilic activation markers. Actually, upon challenge with a specific allergen, basophils not only secrete quantifiable bioactive mediators but also upregulate the expression of different markers which can be detected efficiently by flow cytometry using specific monoclonal antibodies. Currently, the technique has been applied in the investigation of IgE-mediated allergy caused by classical inhalant allergens, food, Hevea latex, hymenoptera venoms and drugs. It is also appreciated; the technique proves valuable in the diagnosis of non-IgE-mediated (anaphylactoid) reactions such drug hypersensitivity and the detection of autoantibodies in certain forms of chronic urticaria. This review will not address immunologic features, characteristics and general pitfalls of flow-assisted analysis of in vitro-activated basophils as summarized elsewhere. After a recapitulation of the principles and some specific technical issues of flow-assisted analysis of in vitro-activated basophils, we principally focus on the current clinical and research applications of the basophil activation tests. Personal experience of both research groups is provided, where appropriate. Finally, a viewpoint on how the field might evolve in the following years is provided.

Cell Separation↗
PubMed2006

Flow-assisted diagnostic management of anaphylaxis from rocuronium bromide.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of anaphylaxis from neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) is not always straightforward. OBJECTIVES: To assess flow cytometric analysis of activated basophils (BAT) as a diagnostic instrument in anaphylaxis from rocuronium. To investigate whether the technique might help to identify cross-reactive and safe alternative compounds. METHODS: For validation of the BAT, 14 patients with perioperative anaphylaxis demonstrating a positive skin test (ST) for rocuronium and eight individuals that tolerated rocuronium and a negative ST for this drug were enrolled. To confirm specificity of the BAT, five patients that tolerated atracurium or cisatracurium with a negative ST for rocuronium were tested. Basophil activation with rocuronium, vecuronium, atracurium, cisatracurium and suxamethonium was analysed flow cytometrically by labelling with anti-CD123/anti-HLADR/anti-CD63. RESULTS: Sensitivity of BAT for rocuronium was 91.7% and specificity 100%. However, in two patients the BAT was lost as a diagnostic tool, as their cells were nonresponsive to positive control stimulation and allergen. Seven from the 12 responsive patients also demonstrated a clear basophilic activation for vecuronium. Moreover, according to ST and/or BAT cross-reactivity between rocuronium and vecuronium was suspected in 10/14 patients. Except one patient, all patients had negative BAT and ST investigations for atracurium and cisatracurium. Currently, five patients tolerated administration of cisatracurium. All control individuals demonstrated negative ST and BAT for all tested NMBA. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT constitutes a reliable instrument to diagnose anaphylaxis from rocuronium. The technique also allows quick and simultaneous testing of different potential cross-reactive NMBA and to tailor a safe alternative.

Anaphylaxis↗
PubMed2005

Perinatal risk factors for sensitization, atopic dermatitis and wheezing during the first year of life (PIPO study).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of perinatal environmental factors on early sensitization, atopic dermatitis and wheezing during the first year. METHODS: Information on pregnancy-related factors, parental atopic history, environmental factors and the clinical course of the infant until age one was gathered by questionnaires, as part of a prospective birth cohort study (Prospective study on the Influence of Perinatal factors on the Occurrence of asthma and allergies [PIPO-study]). Quantification of total and specific IgE was performed in 810 children and their parents. RESULTS: Early sensitization was found in 107/810 (13%) of the infants. Multiple regression analysis showed that specific IgE in fathers was a risk factor for early sensitization in their daughters (adjusted odds ratios (OR(adj)) 2.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.49); P=0.03), whereas in boys, day care attendance was shown to be protective for early sensitization (OR(adj) 0.38 (95% CI 0.20-0.71); P=0.001). Atopic dermatitis occurred in 195/792 infants (25%). Specific IgE in the mother (OR(adj) 1.52 (95% CI 1.06-2.19); P=0.02) and in the infant (OR(adj) 4.20 (95% CI 2.63-6.68); P<0.001) were both risk factors for the occurence of atopic dermatitis, whereas postnatal exposure to cats was negatively associated with atopic dermatitis (OR(adj) 0.68 (0.47-0.97); P=0.03). Postnatal exposure to cigarette smoke (OR(adj) 3.31 (95% CI 1.79-6.09); P<0.001) and day care attendance (OR(adj) 1.96 (95% CI 1.18-3.23); P=0.009) were significantly associated with early wheezing, which occurred in 25% (197/795) of the infants. CONCLUSION: The effect of paternal sensitization and day care attendance on sensitization is gender dependent. Maternal sensitization predisposes for atopic dermatitis, whereas postnatal exposure to cats had a protective effect.

Allergens↗
PubMed2004

Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and the ubiquitous protein profilin: mimickers of allergy.

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, evidence has been provided for profilins and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) to be capable of inducing cross-reactive IgE antibodies with little clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of sensitization to CCD and profilin in isolated allergies (birch, timothy grass, house dust mite, pets (cat and/or dog), natural rubber latex (NRL) and hymenoptera venom). To study the contribution of anti-CCD and anti-profilin IgE antibodies as a cause of clinically irrelevant IgE for NRL and apple. METHODS: For the first part of the study, 100 patients with inhalant allergy, 17 patients with NRL allergy and 40 patients with venom anaphylaxis were enrolled. Diagnosis was based on a questionnaire and a positive IgE determination and skin test for relevant allergen. Patients were identified as sensitized to CCD if they had a negative prick test and positive IgE for the glycoprotein bromelain. Sensitization to profilin was assessed by IgE for rBet v 2 (recombinant birch profilin). For the second part of the study, sera containing IgE against apple (n=82) or NRL (n=38) were classified as true-negative or false-positive according to the presence or absence of an oral allergy syndrome (OAS) or NRL-induced anaphylaxis. In these patients, sensitization to CCD and profilin was evaluated as described above. RESULTS: No sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin was found in isolated birch pollen or NRL allergy. In contrast, sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was found in 4/17 patients with isolated grass pollinosis, 5/24 patients with combined pollinosis (birch, timothy, mugwort) and 7/33 patients with venom anaphylaxis. Sensitization to profilin was almost restricted to patients with combined pollen allergy (5/24). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE against NRL the prevalence of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD and profilin IgE was higher than in NRL-allergic patients (P<0.00001 and P=0.0006, respectively). In pollen-allergic individuals with a false-positive IgE to apple, the frequency of sensitization to bromelain-type CCD was higher than in OAS patients (P=0.004). Clinically irrelevant NRL and apple were also found in four and five out of the seven patients sensitized to venom CCD, respectively. In pollinosis, clinically irrelevant NRL and apple IgE antibodies were inhibited by bromelain and recombinant birch profilin, whereas in isolated venom anaphylaxis these antibodies were inhibited by bromelain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients monoallergic to NRL or birch pollen showed no sensitization to bromelain-type CCD or profilin. Sensitization to profilin and/or bromelain-type CCD, caused by pollen (timothy grass, mugwort) or hymenoptera venom allergens, can elicit false-positive IgE antibodies against NRL and apple.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

In vitro allergy diagnosis: should we follow the flow?

During the last 5 years, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that flow cytometric quantification of in vitro basophil activation can be a quite performant and reliable tool to measure IgE-dependent allergen-specific responses in allergic patients. So far, most assays have used CD63 as a basophil activation marker and native allergen extracts for stimulation. However, other basophil markers and recombinant allergens have recently been introduced. The technique has been applied for the diagnosis of allergy to pollen, house dust mite, food, natural rubber latex, hymenoptera venom and drugs. In addition, the technique has proven to be useful in non-IgE-mediated reactions such as hypersensitivity to drugs as well as detection of auto-antibodies in chronic urticaria. This review will focus on some specific issues: (1) principles of flow cytometric analysis of in vitro-activated basophils, (2) general technical aspects of the technique (including passive sensitization), (3) clinical applications and (4) recommendations for further development and evaluation of the technique.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Differences in circulating dendritic cell subtypes in cord blood and peripheral blood of healthy and allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Different types of circulating dendritic cells have been described. Dendritic cells influence differentiation of naive T lymphocytes into T helper type 1 (Th1) and Th2 effector cells. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the number of circulating DC subtypes in peripheral blood of allergic and healthy children and in cord blood of neonates from allergic and non-allergic parents. METHODS: Circulating dendritic cells were flow cytometrically identified in whole blood samples as lineage (CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD56) negative, CD34 negative and HLA-DR-positive cells. According to the expression of CD123 and CD11c, different DC subtypes were identified. RESULTS: Apart from DC1 (CD11c+ CD123dim+) and DC2 (CD11c- CD123high+), a third DC population was described with less differentiated phenotypic characteristics, namely CD11c- CD123dim+, and therefore defined here as less differentiated DC (ldDC). These ldDC represented the major DC population in cord blood and showed an age-depended decrease. The highest level of ldDC was detected in children with atopic dermatitis, whereas asthmatic children showed the lowest ldDC counts. Furthermore, high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment in asthmatic children was related to a decreased ldDC number. The number of circulating DC2 was significantly lower in allergic children, especially in asthmatics, compared to healthy children. In cord blood, no differences in DC subtypes were detectable between neonates at low and high risk for allergic disorders. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that, apart from DC1 and DC2, a third population of dendritic cells, identified as CD11c- CD123dim+ cells and defined as less differentiated DC, must be considered in the evaluation of circulating DC. Furthermore, DC2 counts were decreased in allergic children, especially in asthmatics, which might be the consequence of an increased recruitment to the target organs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Validation of a two-color flow cytometric assay detecting in vitro basophil activation for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated natural rubber latex allergy.

BACKGROUND: IgE-dependent triggering of basophils not only elicits the release of different mediators but also the up-regulation of certain markers, e.g. CD63, which can be detected by flow cytometry. We intended to investigate if flow cytometric analysis of basophil activation could be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of latex allergy, and to evaluate if the basophil activation test (BAT) could be helpful in determining the clinical significance of a positive latex IgE in individuals with negative history and negative latex skin test. Additionally we aimed to determine the role of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) in causing positive latex IgE without apparent clinical significance. METHODS: Twelve healthy controls without a history of latex hypersensitivity with a negative latex IgE and skin test (group 1), 24 individuals without a history of latex hypersensitivity with a negative latex IgE and skin test but with other inhalant allergies (group 2), and 29 latex allergic patients with a compelling history of latex allergy with a positive latex IgE and prick test (group 3) were enrolled. The diagnostic performances of the BAT were further evaluated in 13 individuals with a history of latex allergy but with negative specific IgE and/or skin test (group 4). Twenty-four individuals with positive latex IgE without apparent clinical relevance, i.e. without history of latex hypersensitivity and negative latex skin tests, were also analyzed (group 5). The putative role of CCDs causing positive latex IgE results without apparent clinical significance was evaluated by quantification of IgE for bromelain. RESULTS: According, to the receiver operating characteristics(ROC)-generated threshold value of 17% between latex allergic patients and the pooled group of nonlatex allergic individuals, the sensitivity and specificity of the basophil activation test was 93.1% and 91.7%, respectively. In healthy controls, allergic patients without latex hypersensitivity and latex allergic patients the number of positive BATs was 0/12, 3/24 and 27/29, respectively. In the individuals with an evocative history of latex allergy but with negative latex IgE and/or skin test the BAT was positive in all 13 cases. Twenty of 24 individuals without apparent latex allergy but with positive latex IgE had a negative BAT. IgE for bromelain was positive in 1/19 sera from group 2, 1/24 sera from group 3, none of the 8 sera from group 4, but in 16/18 sera from group 5, respectively. CONCLUSION: Flow cytometric analysis of activated basophils seems a highly sensitive and specific tool for diagnosing latex allergy. In addition, the technique might help to determine the clinical relevance of positive IgE quantification in the absence of overt latex allergy. CCDs of natural rubber latex allergens were confirmed to mimic latex sensitization.

Basophils↗
PubMed2001

IgE-mediated anaphylaxis after first intravenous infusion of cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of cyclosporine, which contains Cremophor EL (a polyethoxylated castor oil; BASF, Berlin, Germany), has occasionally resulted in an anaphylactic reaction. An apparent hypersensitivity reaction (bronchospasm and decrease in blood pressure) had occurred during heart transplantation in a 59-year-old woman after intravenous infusion of cyclosporine. Subsequent oral administration of cyclosporine precipitated no reaction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to attempt to ascertain the mechanism responsible for the anaphylactic reaction. METHODS: Hypersensitivity investigations, including total serum IgE and allergen-specific IgE quantifications, skin testing, and basophil activation tests by flow cytometric determination of CD63 upregulation were undertaken in the study patient and in two healthy control subjects who were free of medication. RESULTS: The results of intradermal testing with Cremophor EL were positive after 15 minutes in the study patient only. Both cyclosporine and Cremophor EL induced considerable activation of the basophils from our study patient, with an upregulation of CD63 expression from 1% to 39% and 55%, respectively. In contrast, the expression of CD63 on basophils from the two control subjects remained essentially unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The negative investigative findings in the control subjects, the patient's clinical manifestations in temporal relationship to the infusion, her positive results on intradermal testing with Cremophor, the basophil activation test results, and her uneventful course after oral administration of cyclosporine strongly support the presence of IgE antibodies to Cremophor EL in our patient.

Anaphylaxis↗