PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D G Ebo

Publications and source records attributed to D G Ebo.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Evolution of lymphocyte transformation to wasp venom antigen during immunotherapy for wasp venom anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) has proven to be safe and effective in wasp venom anaphylaxis. However, there are no good parameters to indicate when to stop venom immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) to history and specific IgE determination, and to address the time course of lymphocyte transformation responses to wasp (Vespula) venom during VIT and the possible utility of LTT to determine the duration of therapy. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 18 individuals with a history of wasp sting anaphylaxis and a positive serum-venom-specific IgE, were stimulated with wasp venom before immunotherapy, at the end of a 5-day semi-rush immunotherapy and at 24 months during venom immunotherapy. Results, expressed as stimulation index (SI), were compared with the SI in seven asymptomatic stung controls. RESULTS: In controls the median (minimum-maximum) of the SI were 2.39 (0.52-3.39) before therapy and 2.39 (1.12-6.02) when repeated after 24 months. For patients the median (minimum-maximum) of the SI were 10.13 (1.19-44.88) before immunotherapy (d0), 2.73 (0.67-12.03) at the end of the build-up immunotherapy (d5) and 4.21 (0.88-14.66) at the end of 24 months of maintenance therapy (m24). The proliferation responses in vespid-allergic patients were significantly higher than in stung controls (P = 0.006) but only 13/18 patients showed a positive LTT result before the start of immunotherapy (sensitivity of the LTT 72%). When the LTT was repeated after a 5 day build-up hyposensitization course the SI significantly dropped as compared to the pre-treatment levels (P = 0.002). The SI of the LTT was negative in eight out of 18 patients at 24 months and the median values were significantly lower than before therapy (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although, in the absence of sting challenge data it is not possible to draw conclusions about the predictive value of the LTT, our data may suggest that abolition of the LTT during VIT might indicate clinical insensitivity. Further studies, comparing the results of sting challenges, with the results of lymphocyte transformation will be necessary in order to evaluate the role of LTT in stopping immunotherapy.

Adolescent↗

Latex-specific IgE, skin testing, and lymphocyte transformation to latex in latex allergy.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the discriminative value of latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTTs) to latex in 38 patients with latex allergy (12 nonatopic and 26 atopic) and 44 control subjects (24 nonatopic and 20 atopic). We also evaluated the recommended positive cutoff (i.e., 0.35 kU/L) of both in vitro latex-IgE tests. METHODS: Latex-specific IgE levels were determined by the Immuno-CAP (Upjohn-Pharmacia) and the ALaSTAT-RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp.) assays. Skin tests and LTFs were performed with a nonammoniated latex extract (DPC). Sensitivities and specificities were defined according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects. For the in vitro IgE tests, sensitivity and specificity were also calculated by using the proposed positive threshold of 0.35 kU/L. Sensitivities and specificities of both cutoffs were compared. RESULTS: Compared with a clinical history of latex allergy and according to the 95th percentile value of nonatopic control subjects (0.44 kU/L), latex-specific IgE determined by the Immuno-CAP assay achieved a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 86%. For the ALaSTAT-RIA assay, with 0.54 kU/L as the 95th percentile threshold value in nonatopic control subjects, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 83%. According to the threshold value of 0.35 kU/L, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 83% for the Immuno-CAP assay and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 33% for the ALaSTAT-RIA assay were observed. The latex skin test reached a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%. The LTF to latex showed a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 95%. No relation between symptoms and latex-specific IgE tests, latex skin tests, or LTTs was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that latex skin tests and latex-specific IgE assessments are sensitive and specific methods for establishing the diagnosis of latex allergy, although the specificity of the ALaSTAT-RIA assay was very low when interpreted according to the threshold of 0.35 kU/L. The LTT to nonammoniated latex is too insensitive for diagnosis of allergy to latex. This reemphasizes that in order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic procedures, one should always include an appropriate control group.

Adolescent↗

Herpes zoster myelitis occurring during treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus.

A woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presented with a zoster eruption. Transverse myelitis developed at the site of the dermatomal distribution of the rash. SLE and varicella zoster virus (VZV) can both cause myelitis, and are difficult to differentiate. The topographic association between the cutaneous and the neurological involvement suggesting VZV myelitis was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for VZV in the cerebrospinal fluid. This case illustrates the potential role of the selective amplification of VZV DNA in cerebrospinal fluid to diagnose central neurological complications associated with VZV. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord in the evaluation of patients with myelitis is emphasized.

DNA, Viral↗

Latex anaphylaxis.

In the past decade, immediate hypersensitivity to latex has been accepted as a serious problem. The proteins that are present in natural rubber are considered to be the responsible antigens, and the hypersensitivity responses induced include contact and generalized urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, bronchospasm, life threatening anaphylaxis and death. So far, children with spina bifida or severe urogenital defects, health care workers, and rubber industry employees appear to be at greater risk than the general population. Since 1991 several reports and cross-reactivity studies have demonstrated an association between latex allergy and allergy to certain fruits, especially banana, avocado and kiwi. Because our knowledge of the major allergens is still incomplete, standardised in vitro and in vivo tests are not yet readily available. Therefore, the clinician should rely on a medical history, physical examination, and reliable serological tests to confirm diagnosis of latex anaphylaxis. Because of possible systemic reactions to skin prick testing and provocation tests, these methods should be restricted to patients with a compelling history and an inconclusive serologic test result. Preventive measures are the key to successful and safe management of patients with latex anaphylaxis.

Adult↗

Hereditary angioneurotic edema: review of the literature.

Congenital C1-inhibitor deficiency, or hereditary angioneurotic edema (HAE), is a rare autosomal dominant disease due to alterations in the C1 inhibitor gene that results in a deficiency of antigenic and/or functional C1-INH. Affected patients are heterozygous, and their deficiency is incomplete, many of them having up to 20% of the normal amount of the inhibitor. The disease is characterised by recurrent, circumscribed, non-pitting, and non-pruritic subepithelial swellings of sudden onset, which fade during the course of 48-72 hours, but can persist up to 1 week. Lesions can be solitary or multiple and primarily involve the extremities, larynx, face, and bowel wall. Bradykinin is believed to be the main, but certainly not the sole, mediator responsible for the bouts of edema in HAE. The diagnosis is suggested by family history, the lack of accompanying pruritus or urticaria, the presence of recurrent gastrointestinal attacks of colics, and episodes of laryngeal edema. Diminished C4 concentrations during symptomatic periods are highly suggestive for the diagnosis. Further laboratory diagnosis depends on demonstrating a deficiency of C1-INH antigen (type I) in most kindreds, but some kindreds have an antigenically intact but dysfunctional protein (type II) and require a functional assay to establish the diagnosis. Prophylactic administration of either attenuated androgens or protease inhibitors has proved useful in reducing frequency or severity of attacks. Infusions of a vapour-heated C1-INH concentrate are safe and effective means of both preventing and treating attacks. Nevertheless, this treatment is expensive and this extract is not readily available. It is emphasised that administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is contraindicated in patients suffering from protease inhibitor deficiency states.

Androgens↗

IgE-mediated food allergy--extensive review of the literature.

Adverse reactions to food, i.e. food allergy and intolerance have gained considerable attention. This overview focuses on the diagnosis and management of IgE-mediated food allergy that is believed to be responsible for most immediate-type food-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Clinically, these reactions are characterised by a variety of signs and symptoms that occur within minutes or hours after consumption of the offending food. Reactions may be limited or more generalised with involvement of the skin, nose, eyes, and/or lungs. In more severe cases, cardiovascular symptoms including hypotension, shock, cardiac dysrhythmias and death can occur. In food-allergic individuals, IgE is produced against naturally occurring food components, primarily glycoproteins that usually retain their allergenicity after heating and/or proteolysis. While adults tend to be allergic to fish, crustaceans, peanuts and tree nuts, children tend to be allergic to cow's milk, egg white, wheat and soy more frequently. "Emerging" food allergens include tropical fruits, sesame seeds, psyllium, spices and condiments. These allergies frequently represent a cross-allergy to an allergen derived from another source, e.g. pollens or natural rubber latex. The evaluation of IgE-mediated food allergy relies on a careful history, physical examination, appropriate skin testing or in vitro testing with food extracts, and/or double blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Avoidance remains the mainstay of therapy. However, allergens may be "hidden" and labelling can be non-precise or misleading, thereby severely hampering prevention. Patients with severe allergies should keep at hand an emergency kit with adrenaline, an antihistamine and an injectable rapid onset-of-action corticosteroid. At present there is no evidence to support the use of immunotherapy, except for research purposes. Production of "hypoallergenic" food is hampered by incomplete methods for assessing the allergenic potential of such novel foods.

Allergens↗

IGE-mediated natural rubber latex allergy: an update.

In the past 2 decades, IgE-mediated NRL allergy has become a well-defined condition with recognised risk groups, established diagnostic tools, and adequate prevention strategies (1-3). Furthermore, molecular biology and biochemical techniques have significantly improved our knowledge of the proteins responsible to cause the disease. Clinical manifestations will not be addressed in this review, nor will broad preventive strategies be proposed; these have been discussed elsewhere (4, 5). After a brief introduction this review will focus on specific issues: (1) How do we estimate the prevalence of NRL allergy and who is at risk for clinical sensitisation? (2) What specific allergens cause NRL allergy? How does sensitisation for these allergens occur? Are all patients sensitised for the same allergens? Threshold allergen exposure levels. (4) What is the latex-fruit syndrome? What is the clinical relevance of a positive plant food specific IgE quantification in patients with NRL allergy? (5) How do we diagnose NRL allergy? What are the strengths and weaknesses of currently available diagnostic tools? (7) How do we manage NRL allergy? What is the role of medication and immunotherapy in the treatment of NRL allergy? How do we select an appropriate non-NRL alternative for NRL gloves? Which regulatory provisions have been implemented?

Allergens↗

Is the prevalence of specific IgE to classical inhalant aeroallergens among patients with respiratory allergy changing? Evidence from two surveys 15 years apart.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative frequencies of sensitisation to four common inhalant allergens in two atopic populations suffering from asthma and/or rhinitis. One had been studied in the period of 1975 till 1979, and a second population was evaluated between 1992 and 1995. DATA SOURCES: At both time periods patients with inhalant allergy and visiting our outpatient clinic were included. Quantification of IgE to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, birch, timothy grass, and mugwort was performed via the Phadebas RAST technique (Pharmacia, Brussels, Belgium). RESULTS: In patients suffering from respiratory allergy the frequency of birch pollen sensitisation significantly increased from 13% in the period 1975-1979 to 34% in the period 1992-1995. In contrast, the frequency of house dust mite, timothy grass pollen, and mugwort pollen sensitisation remained almost unchanged. The increase was not associated with an increase in the birch pollen count. CONCLUSION: Birch pollen hypersensitivity has almost tripled among atopic subjects during the last 2 decades. The exact mechanisms for this increase remain to be evaluated.

Allergens↗

The prevalence and diagnostic value of specific IgE antibodies to inhalant, animal and plant food, and ficus allergens in patients with natural rubber latex allergy.

BACKGROUND: It is well recognised that natural rubber latex allergy can be associated with serological cross-reactivity to plant allergens, especially tropical fruits and Ficus. In contrast, data on the frequency and clinical value of specific IgE antibodies against these allergens remain rare. In addition, little is known about the prevalence and diagnostic value of specific IgE antibodies to classical inhalant and animal allergens in NRL allergic patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, the sensitivity, and the specificity of these different specific IgE antibodies in patients suffering from NRL allergy. METHODS: Serum samples of 42 NRL allergic adults were investigated. All had a history of NRL allergy confirmed by a positive skin test for latex and a positive latex-specific IgE. Samples were analysed for IgE antibodies against 9 plant food allergens (avocado, banana, chestnut, fig, kiwi, papaya, peanut, pineapple and tomato) and Ficus benjamina. A specific IgE quantification for 3 animal food allergens (codfish, cow's milk, egg's white) and 8 common inhalant allergens (Dermatophagoïdes pteronyssinus, birch pollen, timothy grass pollen, mugwort pollen, cat and dog epithelium, Aspergillus fumigatus and Cladosporium herbarum) was also performed. Because double blind placebo-controlled challenges could not be considered, for ethical reasons, patient's food allergy or immediate hypersensitivity for Ficus and inhalant allergens was documented by a standardised questionnaire. Diagnosis of atopy was based on a relevant history and the presence of a specific IgE antibody to at least one classical inhalant allergen. For some IgE determinations presence or absence of cross-reactivity was investigated by CAP-inhibition tests. RESULTS: A specific IgE antibody to at least one of the investigated inhalant and animal food allergens was found in respectively 76% and 12% of the serum samples. A plant food-specific IgE antibody was observed in 88% of the serum samples, most frequently to papaya (71%) and least frequently to kiwi (17%). Twenty-nine percent of the serum samples contained Ficus-IgE. According to the questionnaire and the threshold of 0.35 kUa/L, sensitivity of the plant food IgE antibodies varied between 0% for papaya and 73% for avocado. Specificity varied between 28% for papaya and 91% for kiwi. For Ficus-IgE sensitivity was 20% and specificity 70%. CONCLUSIONS: For inhalant and animal food allergens sensitivity and specificity of the IgE quantification correlated generally well with the values obtained in non-NRL allergic adults. Determination of specific IgE to the investigated plant foods and Ficus was not always a sensitive neither a specific test to establish the clinical diagnosis of this allergy.

Adolescent↗

Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia: diagnostic approach.

Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions to anaesthetic and associated agents used during the perioperative period have been increasingly reported during the last 3 decades. The frequency of life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions occurring during anaesthesia has been estimated to vary between 1/1.000 and 1/25.0000 procedures, with muscle relaxants being involved in almost three quarters of the cases. The mortality from these reactions is in the range of 3-6%. Nowadays, natural rubber latex also accounts for a significant number of perioperative anaphylaxis, particularly in children. Clinical manifestations do not allow to differentiate between IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions resulting from non-specific mediator release. Successful management of these patients requires multidisciplinary approach and includes prompt recognition and stabilisation of the acute event by the attending anaesthetist, determination of the responsible agent(s) with avoidance of subsequent administration of incriminated compound(s). The latter is based upon correct identification of the responsible drug and potentially cross-reactive compounds by the allergist and requires a detailed review of the anaesthetic report as well as appropriate in vitro and in vivo allergy tests. At present, the overall performance of skin tests makes them the "gold standard" for diagnosis of muscle relaxant-induced perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, given their good negative predictive value, skin tests have been proven to be a useful tool to tailor the appropriate therapeutic alternative. For other compounds diagnosis is more difficult but newer techniques such as analysis of in vitro activated basophils can be helpful.

Anesthesia↗

Anaphylaxis to an urethral lubricant: chlorhexidine as the "hidden" allergen.

We report on a severe allergic reaction during urethral catheterisation, initially erroneously attributed to natural rubber latex (NRL). However, the negative investigations for latex, the uneventful further applications of NRL, the positive skin test and basophil activation test for chlorhexidine strongly support diagnosis of chlorhexidine anaphylaxis. This case illustrates that it is not widely appreciated that "innocent" products such as urethral lubricants may elicit serious life-threatening reactions. Careful inspection of the medical records is once again re-emphasised to be mandatory in order to avert subsequent anaphylaxis.

Aged↗

Choking, sore throat with referred otalgia and dysphagia in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH).

A patient with a progressively increasing immobilisation of the cervical spine, severe impaired swallowing (choking), sore throat with referred right-sided otalgia, mild voice disorder and dysphagia due to extrinsic bone compression of the posterior hypopharyngeal wall and oesophagus is presented. Radiographic investigation demonstrated the underlying condition to be a diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis with prominent and bumpy alteration of the anterior longitudinal ligament impinging the hypopharynx. Via an anterolateral approach towards the cervical spine the anterior irregular part of the ossification was removed and the surface of the spine flattened. The postoperative evolution was uneventful.

Aged↗