Effect of intra-arterial infusion of papaverine hydrochloride on brain tissue oxygen pressure in the management of severe vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Mauer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this report is to present first experience in comparing the course of brain tissue oxygen pressure values (PtiO2) to changes in jugular vein oxygen saturation (SjvO2), intracranial pressure (ICP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) after severe brain injury. PtiO2 monitoring was done using a polarographic Clark type microcatheter (LICOX pO2 probe) (GMS, Kiel, Germany) with a diameter of 0.5 mm and a sensitive area 7.9 mm long inserted in a right frontal position. The microcatheter was connected to a LICOX pO2 device. A fiber-optic catheter was used to measure SjvO2 and placed into the right internal jugular vein. The ICP monitoring was performed with a fiber-optic intraparenchymal device (Camino Laboratories, San Diego, Calif.) inserted in a left frontal position. Consistent correlations could be noticed between reduced PtiO2 and higher ICP and lower CPP levels. However, the absolute value of a single SjvO2 data point seemed to be less relevant diagnostically than its trend over a period of time. Owing to their experience, the authors suppose that PtiO2 monitoring will be a very important and reliable tool in the treatment of brain injury in the future, especially in its correlation to ICP and CPP.
The 1998 ERC-guidelines for airway-management recommend an tidal volume of 400-600 ml for adults undergoing CPR. As commercially available self-inflating bags were designed to meet former recommendations (800-1200 ml) we investigated how to meet the latest recommendations with these bags. We combined the head of a training manikin (Laerdal Medical) and a standard lung (VTTL; Michigan Instrument), adjusted to a physiological compliance and resistance. Volume was measured with a Wright spirometer (BOC). Seven self-inflating bags were investigated. Tests were carried out by ten people (five female and five male) for 5 min each using two different techniques. Technique 1: standard ventilation with one hand without compression of the self-inflating bag against the rescuers knee. Technique 2: modified open palm technique with total squeezing of the self-inflating bag by compression against the rescuers knee. The average tidal volumes for technique 1 ranged from 438 to 604 ml. Applying technique 2 the volumes ranged from 888 to 1192 ml. The latest recommendations were met using a single hand technique without compression against the rescuers knee for all seven bags tested. The modified open palm technique produced larger tidal volumes which were more in line with previous recommendations.
Due to the relative ineffectiveness of standard resuscitation techniques, alternative methods have been explored for many years. The aim of new methods is to improve haemodynamics and increase survival rates. In spite of some encouraging haemodynamic results, all but one study failed to show an increase in long-term survival rates with an alternative method in a convincingly large group of patients (hospital discharge without neurological damage, and 1-year survival). In this study active compression-decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) increased long-term survival compared to standard-CPR. The results from certain individual studies, which showed a significant increase in short-term survival rate, could not be reproduced in other trials. This may be attributed in part to the fact that the alternative methods are not significantly superior, but also due to logistical and statistical problems in the conduct of the studies and differences in application within and between the study sites. ACD-CPR has been the most studied method amongst the alternatives and can be recommended for patients with asystole in centres with special training and where outcome quality is regularly verified and evaluated.
The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has instituted an approach to address the impact of new alleles on the DNA-based HLA assignments obtained during volunteer donor typing. This approach was applied to the DRB typing results from 371,187 donors received from 14 laboratories in 1999. Samples were tested with a standardized set of sequence specific oligonucleotide reagents and the positive and negative hybridization results transmitted electronically to the NMDP. A software program interpreted the primary data into HLA assignments and rejected assignments which did not produce a result at the specified level of resolution. Comparison of the HLA assignments derived by the NMDP software to the assignments made by the laboratories using several local software prograins showed 90.5% of the assignments to be identical. Differences in assignments were explained by varying levels of typing resolution, variation in the inclusion of the second expressed DRB loci, disparity arising when alternative assignments were summarized, and failure to submit correct information. When the primary data collected in 1999 were interpreted into HLA assignments using the set of alleles defined in July 2000, 74% of the HLA-DRB assignments were altered by the description of new alleles, justifying the development of this software.
BACKGROUND: Improved cardiopulmonary circulation with active compression-decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) has been demonstrated in studies using different animal models and a small number of human in cardiac arrest (CA). However, prehospital studies have shown both positive and no extra benefit of ACD-CPR on survival rates and neurologic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of our prospective study was to compare standard manual CPR (S-CPR) to ACD-CPR as the initial technique of resuscitating patients with out-of-hospital CA with respect to survival rates and neurological outcome in our two-tiered EMS system with physicians in the field. RESULTS: Patients with out-of-hospital CA treated by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (ACD-CPR versus S-CPR). The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, sex, time interval from collapse to CPR, defibrillation and first epinephrine medication. There was no difference between the ACD group and the standard CPR group in terms of survival rates and neurologic outcome. No differences occurred concerning complications of CPR. CONCLUSION: In our two-tiered EMS system with physician-staffed ambulances ACD-CPR neither improved nor impaired the survival rates and the neurological prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our results are in accordance with other studies carried out in EMS systems, with first tier call-response intervals between 4 and 6 min.
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-identical sibling donor is effective therapy for patients with bone marrow failure states and those with hematologic malignancies. However, only a minority of them will have an HLA-identical sibling donor; unrelated donors, matched or partially mismatched, have been used successfully for patients lacking a related donor. Even though results with allogeneic transplants using unrelated donors are encouraging, the incidence of complications including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection or late graft failure is increased compared to identical sibling transplants. The combination of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (TBI) has been used as an effective preparative regimen for allogeneic transplants, however, the total dosage and dosing schedule of both the cyclophosphamide and TBI has varied significantly among studies. To decrease the rate of graft rejection and late graft failure with volunteer donors, we evaluated a preparative regimen of high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg over 4 consecutive days, days -8, -7, -6, -5) followed by fractionated TBI (1400 cGy administered in eight fractions over 4 days, days -4, -3, -2, -1). GVHD prophylaxis included FK506 and methotrexate. From July 1993 to January 1996, 43 adult patients, median age 38 years (range 18-58 years), were treated with this preparative regimen. Seventeen patients had low-risk disease and 26 had high-risk disease. Thirty-one donor/recipient pairs were matched for HLA-A, -B, and -DR by serology and molecular typing. Seven additional pairs were minor mismatched at the HLA-A or HLA-B loci. Four other donor/recipient pairs were HLA-A,-B, and -DR identical by serology but allele mismatched at either DRB1 or DQB. Forty patients were evaluable for myeloid engraftment. Engraftment occurred in all 40 patients at a median of 19 days. There were no cases of graft rejection or late graft failure. Nephrotoxicity was the primary adverse event with 26 patients (60%) experiencing a doubling of their creatinine. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease occurred in seven patients, six of whom had high-risk disease. All patients who had relapsed or refractory disease prior to BMT achieved a complete remission following BMT. Six patients transplanted for high-risk disease relapsed a median of 377 days post-BMT. None of the patients with low-risk disease have relapsed following transplant; the Kaplan-Meier survival for those patients with low-risk disease is 62% and 37% for those patients transplanted with high-risk disease (P = 0.0129). The median Karnofsky performance status is 100% (range 70-100%). Therefore, a preparative regimen of high-dose cyclophosphamide and fractionated TBI is an acceptable regimen for patients receiving an allograft from unrelated donors.
Improved cardiopulmonary circulation with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) has been demonstrated in studies using different animal models and a small number of humans in cardiac arrest (CA). However, prehospital studies have shown both positive and no extra benefit of ACD-CPR on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital admission and discharge rates. The aim of our prospective study was to compare standard manual CPR (S-CPR) with ACD-CPR as the initial technique of resuscitating patients with out-of-hospital CA, with respect to survival rates and neurological outcome. Patients with out-of-hospital CA treated by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel were randomly assigned to one of two groups (ACD-CPR versus S-CPR). Time intervals to key measures were documented by means of on-line tape-recording. Neurological outcome was assessed using standard scoring systems (cerebral and overall performance categories (CPC and OPC)). A total of 220 patients (S-CPR, n = 114: ACD-CPR, n = 106) were included in the study in a random order. The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, sex, time interval from collapse to CPR, defibrillation and first adrenaline medication. There was no difference between the ACD group and the standard CPR group in terms of ROSC (50.9% vs. 59.6%), hospital admission (33% vs. 33.3%), hospital discharge (16% vs. 14%), or CPC and OPC (1.82 vs. 2.13 and 2.06 vs. 2.25, respectively). Concerning complications of CPR, there was no difference between the groups. In our two-tiered EMS system with physician-staffed ambulances, ACD-CPR neither improved nor impaired survival rates and neurological prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The new CPR technique did not increase the complications associated with the resuscitation effort.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the effects of a standardized mega-code and arrhythmia training upon process elements of quality of pre-hospital advanced cardiac life support provided by a physician-staffed mobile intensive care unit. In 145 cases of adult cardiac arrest due to cardiac aetiology, time intervals from arrival of the mobile intensive care unit at the patient's side until first ECG diagnosis, first defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, and first epinephrine administration were measured with on-line tape recording, prior to, and following a standardized 8-h arrhythmia and mega-code training. Following the training, patients with asystole or pulseless electrical activity were intubated 1.1 min earlier (P = 0.03), and received epinephrine 1.3 min earlier (P = 0.01) than prior to the training. There were no significant differences in time intervals concerning management of ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. Neither admission nor discharge rates differed significantly before and after the training. Thus, practical training including rhythm analysis and mega-code session improved the performance of our mobile intensive care unit in cases of asystole and pulseless electrical activity, and, hence, process elements of quality.
Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) has been evaluated in animal cardiac arrest models and in human outcome studies. Blood flow to the brain and heart is significantly increased during ACD-CPR compared to standard CPR. Transoesophageal Doppler analysis indicates that ACD-CPR increases left ventricular blood volume, velocity of blood flow through the mitral valve (82-140%), and stroke volume (85%). Pressures, such as coronary perfusion-, systolic-, mean-, and diastolic aortic pressures, ETCO2, and tidal volume generated by chest compression and decompression, increase during ACD-CPR compared to standard CPR. Prehospital outcome studies have shown both positive and no extra benefit of ACD-CPR on return of spontaneous circulation, hospital admission, and discharge rates. The ACD-CPR method should be evaluated in patients with witnessed arrest receiving bystander CPR who are found in ventricular fibrillation and do not respond to the three initial DC shocks. There is no evidence that ACD-CPR is worse than standard CPR. Appropriate ACD-CPR training using a standardized curriculum must preceed its implementation. Long-term neurologic outcome studies are needed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In a controlled prospective randomized study, defibrillation by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) was compared with the current standard of care in Germany (basic life support by EMTs and defibrillation by emergency physicians only) in order to answer the following questions: 1. Does EMT defibrillation improve the survival rate and long-term prognosis of patients in ventricular fibrillation as compared to the current German standards in resuscitation (basic life support by EMTs and defibrillation by emergency physicians)? 2. Are the prerequisites for the use of semiautomatic defibrillators fulfilled in the emergency medical systems (EMS) of the participating centers? METHODS. The study phase includes randomization of 121 adult patients with witnessed cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation (VF) as first ECG rhythm. Prior to the onset of the study, all EMTs of the participating EMS systems were retrained in basic life support (BLS) measures. In each center, randomly assessed EMT-Ds (EMTs trained in Defibrillation) were trained to use semiautomatic defibrillators. With the help of one-line tape recording, the time intervals during resuscitation and treatment steps were evaluated. Successfully resuscitated patients were followed up with the help of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Pittsburgh Cerebral and Overall Performance Categories. RESULTS. From 1 February 1991 until 28 June 1992, 159 patients with VF were randomized. In 121 cases, collapse was witnessed. 25% (14/57) of the patients receiving defibrillation by EMT-Ds (study group = S) were discharged from the hospital alive. In the control group, 52 patients were defibrillated by emergency physicians, following BLS by EMTs [control group 1 = C1; discharged: 29% (15/52)]. Fifty patients received BLS and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) by the emergency physicians crews [control group 2 = C2; discharged: 18% (9/20)]. In the study group, the median time interval from collapse of the patient until initiation of BLS measures was 7.7 min, 7 min in C1 and 8 min in C2. ACLS measures were initiated significantly earlier (P < 0.05) in the control groups, as compared to the study group [S: 13 min, C1: 11 min; C2: 10.3 min]. Sixty-seven percent (30/45) of the study patients and 46% (36/76) of the control patients were defibrillated within 12 min. Study patients were defibrillated earlier (P < 0.05) (S: 9.9 min; C1: 12.2 min; C2: 12.75 min); return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved earlier (P < 0.05) in the study group [S: 14 min; C1: 19 min; C2: 18.2 min] and the number of patients in the study group requiring no epinephrine during resuscitation was higher (P < 0.01) than in the control groups [S: 35.3% (12/34); C1: 10% (4/40); C2: 10.5% (4/38)]. Furthermore, the total amount of epinephrine [mean (+/- standard error)] administered in the study group [S: 2.35 (+/- 0.49) mg; C1: 6.71 (+/- 0.98) mg; C2: 7.71 (+/- 1.31) mg] was significantly lower (P < 0.05). No significant differences in neurological long-term prognosis were found for the groups investigated. CONCLUSION. Neither the initial survival rate the number of patients discharged alive, nor the neurological long-term prognosis was significantly different for any of the groups investigated. Because of apparent differences in indirect prognostic parameters (time interval until ROSC, number of patients requiring no epinephrine) and because of the fact that the time interval to the first defibrillation was reduced by EMT defibrillation, EMT-Ds may perform defibrillation if: (a) they reach the patient before the emergency physician and (b) if they are trained intensively and supervised continuously. In order to increase the efficiency of defibrillation by EMT-Ds, far-reaching changes in our EMS are mandatory: (a) a reduction in the time interval from collapse until initiation of BCLS measures by intensifying layperson CPR training; (b) an increase in the number of emergency units equipped with semiautomatic defibril
UNLABELLED: In a controlled, prospective multi-centre study, defibrillation by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) was compared with the current standard of care in Germany--defibrillation by emergency physicians (EPs)-in order to answer the following questions: can EMTs in a two-tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system with physicians in the field defibrillate earlier than, and as safely as EPs? Does defibrillation by EMTs (study group) affect survival rate and long-term prognosis of patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF), as compared with the current national standards in resuscitation (basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by EMTs, and defibrillation by physicians: control group? METHODS: Prior to the onset of the study, all EMTs completed retraining in basic life support (BLS). Randomly assessed EMTs were then trained to use semi-automatic defibrillators. With the help of on-line tape recordings, the complete resuscitation sequence was evaluated. Follow-up of the patients was carried out with the help of the Glasgow Coma Scale as well as Pittsburgh Cerebral and Overall Performance Categories. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients with VF were included in the study. In 121 cases, collapse was witnessed. Of the patients receiving defibrillation by EMTs 25% were discharged from hospital alive, compared to 24% of the patients defibrillated by EPs. Of the study patients 67% were defibrillated within 12 min, while the percentage of control patients was 46%. Study patients were defibrillated earlier (P < 0.01), the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved earlier (P < 0.05), and the rate of patients requiring no adrenalin during resuscitation was higher in the study group (P < 0.05). The total amount of adrenalin administered in the study group was lower (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found concerning the neurologic long-term prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, EMT defibrillation was equally effective as defibrillation by EPs, but failed to improve survival rates or long-term outcome of patients in VF significantly, compared to EP defibrillation. Due to a reduction in the time intervals from collapse to defibrillation and to ROSC, as well as in adrenalin doses, by EMT-defibrillation, EMTs in Germany should defibrillate if they reach a patient prior to an EP, provided they have received continuous medical training and supervision.
UNLABELLED: The aim of our prospective study was to assess the structural and procedural quality of an urban emergency medical services (EMS) system providing prehospital basic and advanced cardiac life support (BLS/ACLS), to compare the onsite performance of physicians and non-physicians in ECG diagnosis and defibrillation, and to identify incidence and causes of avoidable delays in the initial treatment sequences. METHODS: Between 1 February 1991 and 1 July 1992, 162 on-line tape recordings of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts performed by the staff of the EMS system of the city of Mainz were evaluated. After arrival at the patient's side, time intervals to initial ACLS steps (first ECG-diagnosis, first defibrillation, endotracheal intubation, first epinephrine administration) were measured. Times to rhythm identification and countershock by EMT-Ds vs. physicians were compared (Mann-Whitney U-test). Time intervals are presented as median values. One-hundred sixty-two adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (ventricular fibrillation [VF] or ventricular tachycardia [VT], 72; asystole or electromechanical dissociation [EMD], 90) receiving CPR by EMTs, EMT-Ds, and physicians of the Mainz EMS were included. Patients with arrests due to non-cardiac aetiologies were excluded. RESULTS: After arrival at the patient's side, for patients with VF/VT, the EMT-Ds took 1:36 min and the physicians took 1:00 min to obtain the first ECG diagnosis (P = 0.004). The first countershock was delivered within 1:42 min by both EMT-Ds and physicians of the mobile intensive care unit (MICU). After diagnosis was established, the EMT-Ds took 0:08 min to defibrillate, whereas the physicians took 0:36 min (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The first link in the "chain of survival" concept is the activation of the emergency medical system (EMS) by a bystander after recognition of cardiac arrest (CA) or its immediate prodrome. Our ongoing study is aimed at evaluating the current effectiveness of bystander EMS activation for all cases of CA in the city and area of Mainz. Methods. Starting February 1991, we began to prospectively examine collapse-intervention intervals in all cases of CA treated by our physician-manned ambulance. Precision voice recorders carried by the ambulance crews are activated and linked to the EMS dispatcher to time the arrival of the ambulance vehicle. Time intervals starting from the time of collapse are then reconstructed from the dispatcher's time and the tapes. The emergency phone number dialled initially by the bystander and the time of collapse in witnessed cardiac arrests are identified. RESULTS. Sixty-six CAs were witnessed and included in this study. In 20% of those cases, the number dialled initially by the bystander was 19222 (EMS dispatcher), in 38% 110 (police), and in 42% other numbers (family practitioners or their on-call service, fire department). The time interval, as median (25th percentile; 75th percentile), between collapse and receipt call by the emergency dispatchers was 4 min (2; 8) for all patients (n = 66), and 6.5 min (3; 12) whenever numbers other than emergency phone numbers were dialled. All following time intervals (start of BLS or ACLS procedures) showed differences (P less than 0.05) between the 110 or 19222 group [BLS: 8.5 min (4.8; 13.1) or 10 min (7.35; 12.1); ACLS: 11.3 min (9.1; 13.45) or 12.9 min (10.6; 21.5)] vs the group, in which other phone numbers were initially dialled [BLS: 15.25 min (9.25; 19.4); ACLS: 20.11 min (12.6; 28.3)]. The first ECG rhythm showed VF in 56% and 54% in case 110 and 19222 were dialled, but only in 32% in the other group. CONCLUSION. Even one single weak link in the "chain of survival" can lower overall survival rates. An indispensable, but apparently underrated component of an effective EMS includes an informed citizenry able to call swiftly for help. Lack of an unequivocal emergency number, well known and accepted by the citizens, produces confusion and delays. In our systems, the correct medical emergency phone number (19222) was dialled in 20% of the cases only, thus demonstrating clearly the lack of public awareness of this 5-digit number. In a higher percentage, the three-digit police number (110) was dialled. In cases where numbers other than emergency numbers were dialled (42%), the longest time intervals between collapse and receipt of call by the dispatchers occurred, associated with the longest time intervals until initiation of CPR and the lowest percentage of patients found in ventricular fibrillation. We conclude that establishment of a simple three-digit EMS phone number, preferentially Europe-wide, in combination with an intensification of public awareness, could be a vital step not only to reduce time intervals between collapse and CPR in our EMS system but also to improve survival.