Biomedical subjects

Dennis Parker

Publications and source records attributed to Dennis Parker.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Identifying stakeholder behaviors for competency-based pharmacy education: A stage 1 behavior change wheel analysis.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Competency-Based Pharmacy Education (CBPE) is a strategic priority for preparing graduates to meet evolving healthcare needs. However, efforts to implement CBPE can stall due to behavioral challenges among faculty, administrators, preceptors, and learners. This study aimed to apply Stage 1 of the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) to identify stakeholder-specific behaviors and associated determinants needed to implement the five core components of CBPE. METHODS: A multi-method approach grounded in the BCW, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behavior (COM-B) model, and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used. Data were gathered through (1) targeted literature review; (2) structured focus groups with competency-based education experts and pharmacy education stakeholders; and (3) an iterative consensus process. Behaviors were mapped to the five CBPE components: (1) defined competencies, (2) developmental progression, (3) tailored instruction, (4) authentic experiential learning, and (5) programmatic assessment, and then mapped to COM-B and TDF constructs. RESULTS: Over fifty stakeholder-specific behaviors were identified and specified across the CBPE framework. This revealed shared barriers such as limited instructional design knowledge (psychological capability), insufficient assessment of infrastructure (physical opportunity), and misaligned professional identity (reflective motivation). Key TDF domains included knowledge, environmental context, beliefs about capabilities, and professional roles. The behavioral problem statements, specifications, and determinants were identified to support future intervention planning. CONCLUSION: This Stage 1 analysis provides a behaviorally grounded foundation for CBPE implementation by identifying stakeholder behaviors and conditions that enable change. These findings will inform the development of readiness-to-change assessments and targeted interventions (BCW Stages 2 and 3), supporting scalable and sustainable CBPE transformation in pharmacy education.

Education, Pharmacy↗

PubMed2003

CTA and MRA: visualization without catheterization.

The ideal modality for vascular imaging would be noninvasive and inexpensive. A volumetric acquisition would permit visualization of vessels from arbitrary angles. High contrast between the vessel lumen and background tissue would be coupled with excellent spatial resolution allowing accurate depiction of small vessels. Characterization of the constituent components of the vessel wall would be possible. High temporal resolution would both freeze the motion of fast moving vessels and show the direction and speed of blood flow. Finally, the modality would expose the patient to a minimal amount of ionizing radiation or potentially toxic contrast agents. Diagnostic conventional catheter angiography offers unsurpassed spatial and temporal resolution. However, catheter angiography is an interventional procedure, exposes the patient to both ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast, and does not depict the vessel wall. Additionally, view angles are chosen before the administration of contrast and may not demonstrate certain lesions. These limitations have driven the development of both computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Both of these modalities rapidly acquire volumetric data sets, which can then be evaluated slice by slice or by more advanced volumetric rendering techniques. CTA and MRA are minimally invasive and less costly than angiography. While CTA and MRA cannot compete with the spatial or temporal resolution of conventional angiography, present technology has proven clinical efficacy in a wide range of applications. The principles behind CTA and MRA and their comparative strengths and weaknesses will be discussed. The different volumetric rendering techniques will be reviewed. Finally, recent advances that will likely further improve these modalities will be summarized.

Angiography↗

PubMed2003

Disposition of cefepime in the central nervous system of patients with external ventricular drains.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess central nervous system (CNS) penetration of cefepime in adults with external ventricular drains and to compare the achieved cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations with the usual minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of common pathogens. DESIGN: Open-label, prospective study. SETTING: University-affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: Seven patients with external ventricular drains and normal renal function (documented creatinine clearance > 60 ml/min) who received cefepime 2 g intravenously every 12 hours for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. INTERVENTION: Serial serum and CSF samples were obtained concurrently after the fourth dose during one dosing interval. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The concentration-time profiles in serum and CSF were comodeled by using a two-compartment model with zero-order infusion to the central compartment. The CSF concentration-time profiles of the individual patients were compared with published MIC90 of common pathogens isolated in nosocomial meningitis. Our model reasonably characterized the disposition of cefepime in serum and CSF. Penetration into the CNS was 4-34% based on area under the curve and was 5-58% based on minimum concentration. CONCLUSION: Penetration of cefepime into the CNS was variable among the patients (4-34%) but appeared similar to that reported for other cephalosporins given to treat meningitis. The concentrations attained by most patients in this study were above the MIC90 of many common nosocomial organisms.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Tolerability of bolus versus continuous gastric feeding in brain-injured patients.

Brain injured patients may exhibit altered gastric emptying; thus, some believe post-pyloric feeding to be tolerated better than gastric feeding. Reliable post-pylorus access can be difficult to obtain, so gastric feeding remains the preferred route for administering nutrition. Feeding intolerance may be associated with increased complications and costs. We sought to compare bolus (B) versus continuous (C) gastric feeding in brain injured patients. This retrospective cohort study was carried out at a neurological/neurosurgical intensive care unit at a Level 1 trauma and tertiary referral center. Our subjects were 152 consecutive patients over two years. Use of B or C feedings was based on clinicians' preferences. Abdominal examination and gastric residuals (> 75 mL over four hours) defined feeding intolerance (FI). Putative risks for FI were compared between the groups. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups B (n = 86) and C (n = 66). Feeding intolerance occurred more often in group B than in group C (60.5% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.009). Group C patients achieved 75% of nutritional goals faster than group B patients (median 3.3 vs. 4.6 days; p = 0.03). Prokinetic agent use was similar between the groups and did not reduce the time to achieve nutritional goals. There was a trend towards a reduction in the incidence of infections in group C (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of FI included: sucralfate (OR 2.3), propofol (OR 2.1), pentobarbital (OR 3.9) or paralytic (OR 3) use; older age (OR 5); days receiving mechanical ventilation (OR 1.2); and admission diagnosis of either intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 2.2) or ischemic stroke (OR 1.9). Continuous gastric feeding is better tolerated than B feedings in patients with acute brain injuries. Use of prokinetic agents did not affect time to achievement of nutritional goals. Use of common medications including sucralfate and propofol were associated with FI.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗