PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Don Flaming

Publications and source records attributed to Don Flaming.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The ethics of Foucault and Ricoeur: an underrepresented discussion in nursing.

Paul Ricoeur and Michel Foucault enjoy a privileged status in nursing academia as two thinkers who influence both nursing research and philosophical explorations of nursing practice. Most nurse authors, however, focus only on the earlier works of these two philosophers and, for example, base qualitative research methodologies on Foucault's genealogy and Ricoeur's hermeneutics. In their later years, both these writers talk more explicitly about being an ethical self. Ideas from their earlier writing is evident in their writing on ethics and both writers could not discuss ethics without also exploring their ideas of the self and the other. I suggest that some of their thoughts on ethics connect with or complement each other quite well. I will first give an overview of Foucault's ethics, self and the other, and then do the same with Ricoeur's thought. In the third part of the paper I will describe how Foucault and Ricoeur complement each other, and conclude the paper by briefly suggesting how these writers influence my own practice as a nurse educator.

Ethics, Nursing↗

Nursing theories as nursing ontologies.

By understanding the constructions of knowledge we currently label nursing theories as nursing ontologies, nurses can perceive these conceptualizations differently. Paul Ricoeur and Stephen White offer a conceptualization of ontology that differs from traditional, realist perspectives because they assume that a person's experience of a phenomenon (e.g., nursing) will change, but also maintain some stability. Discussing nursing ontologies, rather than nursing theories, might increase philosophy's status in nursing and may also more accurately reflect the experience of being a nurse.

Humans↗

Using nursing science does not guarantee nursing excellence.

Nursing excellence is usually defined in terms of having and applying more and more knowledge, especially from nursing science--the more nurses know, the better their practice. This conceptualization of nursing practice has similarities with the ancient Greek mode of reasoning called techne but cannot adequately deal with the ambiguities of everyday nursing. Nursing excellence does occur, however, with phronetic, ontological practice in which a nurse's morals, habits, and dispositions guide practice. Of course, nurses need a comprehensive knowledge and skill base, but phronetic nurses negotiate the "rough ground" of nursing practice because ontological dispositions are guiding practice rather than simply applying generalizable and communal knowledge from nursing science. Techne-ical practice leads to competent nursing, but only phronetic practice results in nursing excellence. Included in this article is a description of techne-ical practice, its limitations for nursing excellence, and rationale for adopting a phronetic conceptualization of nursing practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Orality to literacy: effects on nursing knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Around the time of Plato and Aristotle, writing was introduced into the Western world and caused an epistemological revolution. Academics describe this change from pre-literacy to literacy as the alphabetization of a society. If societies have no written alphabet or words, knowledge transmission is oral. Words and ideas are fluid because they are always particularized to specific situations, rather than being written and available for scrutiny. With alphabetization, people record events, experiences and exchanges. Meanings no longer change slightly with each telling because writing solidifies knowledge as people attach increasingly limited meanings to words. Nursing experienced a similar revolution from orality to literacy with the proliferation of nursing journals beginning in the 1970's. Consequently, nurses and nurse educators also experienced an epistemological revolution resulting in knowledge from literacy usually being automatically valued higher than knowledge from orality. PURPOSE: I critically examine changes to knowledge that nurse educators value as a result of an alphabetized discipline. DISCUSSION: By comparing epistemological changes resulting from alphabetization in ancient Greece with similar changes in nursing education, I discuss three important dynamics: the sedimentation of words, the growth of criticism, and the new rationality. CONCLUSION: Some epistemological changes resulting from literacy are positive for nursing (eg, the growth of criticism) while some changes are negative (eg, devaluing sensorial and experiential knowledge).

Communication↗