PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14569230

Orality to literacy: effects on nursing knowledge.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around the time of Plato and Aristotle, writing was introduced into the Western world and caused an epistemological revolution. Academics describe this change from pre-literacy to literacy as the alphabetization of a society. If societies have no written alphabet or words, knowledge transmission is oral. Words and ideas are fluid because they are always particularized to specific situations, rather than being written and available for scrutiny. With alphabetization, people record events, experiences and exchanges. Meanings no longer change slightly with each telling because writing solidifies knowledge as people attach increasingly limited meanings to words. Nursing experienced a similar revolution from orality to literacy with the proliferation of nursing journals beginning in the 1970's. Consequently, nurses and nurse educators also experienced an epistemological revolution resulting in knowledge from literacy usually being automatically valued higher than knowledge from orality. PURPOSE: I critically examine changes to knowledge that nurse educators value as a result of an alphabetized discipline. DISCUSSION: By comparing epistemological changes resulting from alphabetization in ancient Greece with similar changes in nursing education, I discuss three important dynamics: the sedimentation of words, the growth of criticism, and the new rationality. CONCLUSION: Some epistemological changes resulting from literacy are positive for nursing (eg, the growth of criticism) while some changes are negative (eg, devaluing sensorial and experiential knowledge).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Don Flaming. Orality to literacy: effects on nursing knowledge.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.07.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗