PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Donato Rigante

Publications and source records attributed to Donato Rigante.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Solid tumours in RASopathies: insights from a large monocentric cohort and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway underlies RASopathies, a family of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with variable cancer predisposition. However, the prevalence and spectrum of solid tumours and the contribution of specific variants to tumour susceptibility remain poorly defined. METHODS: We assessed solid tumour prevalence and spectrum in the largest single-centre cohort of individuals with RASopathies (n=138), excluding neurofibromatosis type 1 and integrated these findings with a systematic literature review to evaluate tumour distribution and genotype-phenotype correlations. RESULTS: In our cohort, at least one solid tumour was identified in 10.8% of individuals with Noonan syndrome (NS), 47.8% with Costello syndrome (CS) and 7.3% with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFCS). Malignant tumours occurred in 5.4%, 30.4% and 2.4%, respectively. CS showed the highest tumour burden, frequently with multiple primary tumours, predominantly of the bladder. In NS, low-grade central nervous system (CNS) tumours were most common, particularly among individuals carrying PTPN11 variants. Tumour onset occurred with a median age of 19, 14 and 13 years in NS, CS and CFCS, respectively. Literature data analysis identified candidate variants in HRAS, PTPN11 and SOS1 genes associated with increased risk for solid tumours, which differed from mutational hotspots reported in childhood leukaemia or sporadic cancers. CONCLUSION: Solid tumour risk in RASopathies is syndrome-dependent and genotype-dependent, with CS showing a high burden of bladder tumours and NS mainly associated with CNS tumours. These findings may support tailored surveillance strategies.

Human Genetics

Diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of pediatric Behçet's disease: Systematic literature review informing the ISSAID/PRES recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-onset Behçet's disease (BD) accounts for up to 20% of cases and represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by evolving phenotypes and age-specific patterns of organ involvement. This systematic literature review synthesizes current evidence on pediatric BD, informing forthcoming recommendations by the International Society of Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (ISSAID) and the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies reporting clinical features, diagnostic criteria, management strategies, and outcomes in BD patients diagnosed before the age of 16 years were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed to give pooled estimates for organ system involvement. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies, encompassing 2929 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sex distribution was balanced, with a 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The age of onset differed, with 1 year old being the lowest median age of onset and 2 years the lowest median age of diagnosis. The pooled random-effects estimate demonstrated that 50% of patients were HLA-B51 positive (95% CI, 0.5-0.6). Mucocutaneous manifestations were nearly universal (97.8%) and frequently represented the initial feature (80.9%). Musculoskeletal (36%), ocular (35%), neurological (17.9%), gastrointestinal (20%), vascular (15.4%) manifestations showed substantial variability in prevalence. Therapeutic approaches varied widely and were extrapolated from adult practice, with treatment guided by organ involvement and severity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric BD encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of phenotypes requiring harmonized diagnostic frameworks, structured phenotypic stratification, and standardized monitoring to improve long-term outcomes. The relative burden and combination of organ manifestations varied across cohorts, reflecting both biological heterogeneity and differences in study design.

Humans