Diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of pediatric Behçet's disease: Systematic literature review informing the ISSAID/PRES recommendations.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-onset Behçet's disease (BD) accounts for up to 20% of cases and represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by evolving phenotypes and age-specific patterns of organ involvement. This systematic literature review synthesizes current evidence on pediatric BD, informing forthcoming recommendations by the International Society of Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (ISSAID) and the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies reporting clinical features, diagnostic criteria, management strategies, and outcomes in BD patients diagnosed before the age of 16 years were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed to give pooled estimates for organ system involvement. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies, encompassing 2929 patients, met inclusion criteria. Sex distribution was balanced, with a 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The age of onset differed, with 1 year old being the lowest median age of onset and 2 years the lowest median age of diagnosis. The pooled random-effects estimate demonstrated that 50% of patients were HLA-B51 positive (95% CI, 0.5-0.6). Mucocutaneous manifestations were nearly universal (97.8%) and frequently represented the initial feature (80.9%). Musculoskeletal (36%), ocular (35%), neurological (17.9%), gastrointestinal (20%), vascular (15.4%) manifestations showed substantial variability in prevalence. Therapeutic approaches varied widely and were extrapolated from adult practice, with treatment guided by organ involvement and severity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric BD encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of phenotypes requiring harmonized diagnostic frameworks, structured phenotypic stratification, and standardized monitoring to improve long-term outcomes. The relative burden and combination of organ manifestations varied across cohorts, reflecting both biological heterogeneity and differences in study design.