PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E C Jenkins

Publications and source records attributed to E C Jenkins.

140 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Improved prenatal detection of fra(X)(q27.3): methods for prevention of false negatives in chorionic villus and amniotic fluid cell cultures.

The reliable detection of fra(X)(q27.3) in prenatal samples is important for providing genetic counseling. We have identified 5 new cases of prenatal fragile X [fra(X)] detection in 3 chorionic villus sample (CVS) and 2 amniotic fluid (AF) cell cultures. In 4 of the 5 cases, either excess thymidine (THY) or a combination of THY and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) was clearly superior to FUdR alone as fra(X) inducers. Amniocytes from one case were cultured only in RPMI-1640 and later exposed to FUdR or THY separately. They showed only 2% fra(X) while parallel cultures initiated in Chang medium and incubated in RPMI for at least 7 days (recovery) before fra(X) induction exhibited strikingly increased fra(X) frequencies. Chang medium alone will not allow fra(X) induction in AF (Jenkins EC, Brown WT [1986]: "Genetic Disorders and the Fetus: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment." New York: Plenum Press, pp 185-204). Now, using CVS cells, we report that only 1% and 0% fra(X) were detected using FUdR or THY in cells cultured in RPMI for 4 days after removal from Chang medium. Cells with 7 days "recovery" in RPMI exhibited increases from 2 to 6%. Therefore, we have found that Chang medium is very helpful when the appropriate recovery time in another medium is allowed before fra(X) induction. Some false negative reports can be attributed to: induction in Chang medium alone; lack of sufficient recovery time after initiating cells in Chang before induction; and unavailability of the excess THY fra(X) induction system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amniocentesis↗

Distribution of autosomal fragile sites in specimens cultured for prenatal fragile X diagnosis.

We reviewed the distribution of autosomal fragile sites (FS) and spontaneous chromosome breaks or gaps (CB) at chromosome locations other than those recognized as FS from 100 amniotic fluid samples (AF), 19 chorionic villus samples (CVS), and 5 percutaneous umbilical blood samples (PUBS) referred for fragile X [fra(X)] analysis. We present data on the degree of expression of autosomal fragility in AF, CVS, and PUBS samples, and the relationship between degree of expression and induction system. The most common observed FS were: 3p14, 9p32, and 6q26 in AF; 9q32, 3q27, and 8q22 in CVS; and 3p14, Xq22, and 16q23 in PUBS cases. Distribution of FS and CB, when compared by induction system, was not found to be identical. Our data also indicate that the presence of any particular FS cannot be used as an indicator for the effectiveness of the fra(X) induction system in prenatal samples.

Amniotic Fluid↗

SV40-transformed fragile (X) amniocytes.

We report SV-40 transformation of female and male fragile X [fra(X)] amniocytes. In the transformants, fra(X) (q27.3) was detected in the 7th passage (9 cell generations) in fra(X) female amniocytes. It was conserved until at least the 20th passage (42 cell generations) although the frequency was reduced or became difficult to detect due to karyotypic evolution in the later generations. Similarly, for the male fra(X) amniocyte line, fra(X) was demonstrated at the 2nd passage (3 cell generations) and persisted until at least the 13th passage (29 cell generations). The prolonged period of reproductive potential of these transformed lines ranging from at least 29-42 generations suggests that the cryopreservation of significant quantities of early passage fra(X) transformed amniocytes will assure a reliable and continuous supply of positive control cells. These lines may be used for fra(X) prenatal diagnostic studies thereby improving the ability to quality control the particular fra(X) induction system being used.

Amniotic Fluid↗

Effects of age and communication level on eye contact in fragile X males and non-fragile X autistic males.

Dyadic social gaze and eye contact were examined in fragile X [fra(X)] males and in non-fra(X) autistic males as a function of age and level of communicative ability. Lag sequential analysis showed that responsive eye contact was highly correlated with age and communicative ability in non-fra(X) autistic males but not in fra(X) males. Older, more communicative non-fra(X) autistic males exhibited more responsive eye contact than their fra(X) cohorts. Implications of these observations for theory and intervention are discussed.

Age Factors↗

Mode of inheritance influences behavioral expression and molecular control of cognitive deficits in female carriers of the fragile X syndrome.

The effect of mode of inheritance on expression of fragile X syndrome [fra(X)] was investigated in nonretarded female carriers. Examination included cognitive and molecular measures. A priori predictions about cognitive impairment and size of an unstable region of DNA containing a CGG repeat on the X chromosome were tested in age and education matched heterozygotes grouped according to parental inheritance. Nine carriers with a maternal fra(X) chromosome, 11 carriers with a paternal fra(X) chromosome and 15 control mothers of children with non X-linked developmental disabilities were tested. Inheritance was established through DNA linkage analysis. Cognitive skills were assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and the Benton Visual Retention Test. Molecular status was assessed by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA digested with Eco RI and Eag I, and probed with StB 12.3. Results supported the inheritance models' predictions. Heterozygotes who inherited the fra(X) from their fathers appeared to be a homogeneous group. They were indistinguishable from controls on cognitive measures and all had genomic insertions of less than 500 base pairs. In contrast, heterozygotes who inherited the fra(X) chromosome from their mothers appeared to be made up of 2 sub-populations. They were as a group deficient in measures of attention and visual memory, but not other measures, with scores of some women consistently below the other subjects. Further, they had some members with greater than 500 base pair inserts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Prenatally detected fragile X females: long-term follow-up studies show high risk of mental impairment.

The prenatal detection of a positive fragile X [fra(X)] female raises difficult counseling issues. In order to address questions regarding the long term outlook, we have conducted follow-up studies on 4 fra(X) positive females which were carried to term. Three were prenatally detected, and one was a false negative. The subjects were between 3 and 7 years old when follow-up investigation of mental status was conducted. The first case age, 6 and 9/12 years, had an IQ of 106. On measures of achievement she had some difficulty with arithmetic. The second and third cases were clearly affected. They were judged to be mildly to moderately mentally retarded. The fourth case was borderline normal. The prenatal amniocentesis cytogenetic frequencies had a mean of 3.74% (range 0-8.5%). On postnatal follow-up testing of blood, the mean cytogenetic frequency increased to 31.75% (range 24-47%), an 8.5 fold increase. Follow-up DNA samples from 3 of the 4 subjects were analyzed for underlying DNA mutations using probe StB12.3 which detects insertions and methylation status of the FMR-1 gene. All 3 showed an affected female genotype with a large insert (greater than 500bp) and complete CpG island methylation. We conclude: (1) prenatally detected cytogenetic frequencies of females increase by an average 8.5 fold on follow-up postnatal studies, (2) genetic counseling should indicate the risks to be affected are approximately 75% when a positive female is prenatally detected, (3) DNA testing can help determine carrier status but may not accurately predict whether a female will be mentally affected.

Child↗

Prenatal detection of fra(X)(q27.3) in female identical twins: reliability of low level cytogenetic prenatal expression in females.

UNLABELLED: Recently, we detected fra(X)(q27.3) in amniocyte cultures from female identical twins. The pregnant woman did not exhibit fra(X)(q27.3) in whole blood cultures but was the sister of 2 affected brothers. DNA marker analyses showed that she was a carrier of FRAXA. Amniotic fluid cultures (AFCs) from twins A and B exhibited the fragile X [fra(X)] chromosome, but the level of cytogenetic expression was very low in twin A's AFCs. DNA marker studies indicated both twins were carriers of FRAXA. Peripheral umbilical blood sample (PUBS) cultures exhibited fra(X)(q27.3) at a frequency of about 10% for both twins. DNA fingerprinting indicated that the twins were identical, confirming the clinical impression, with a very thin separating amniotic membrane. To our knowledge, this is the only report of prenatal fra(X)(q27.3) detection in female identical twins, and the second report of identical twin detection [Rocchi et al., 1985]. We have diagnosed prenatally fra(X)(q27.3) in 5 female fetuses using AFCs. The average fra(X) frequency was 4% for these positive female fetuses with a range of 0.5% to 8.5%. Follow-up whole blood studies confirmed our original results at an average fra(X) frequency of 25%. IN CONCLUSION: 1. Low frequencies, perhaps 1 or 2%, or a few positive cells in AFCs, are likely to increase in magnitude when confirmed in whole blood cultures either pre- or postnatally. 2. It appears likely that the risk is low for false positive results in AFCs when low frequencies of fra(X)(q27.3) are encountered.

Cytogenetics↗

Fra(X)(q27.2), the common fragile site, observed in only one of 760 cases studied for the fragile X syndrome.

Cell cultures from 760 whole blood, amniotic fluid, chorionic villus sample, and peripheral umbilical blood sample specimens were exposed to multiple fra(X)(q27.3) induction systems (none had aphidicolin). Fifty-three exhibited the rare fragile site, fra(X)(q27.3) or FRAXA, none of which demonstrated the common fragile site or FRAXD at band Xq27.2. Only one cell in one of the negative whole blood FUdR-treated cultures from a mentally retarded male showed FRAXD. Therefore, it appears that FRAXD occurs very rarely in cultures treated to induce FRAXA since only one positive cell was observed in over 88,000 analyzed. It appears that very low frequencies of fra(X)(q27) can be accounted for only in part by the presence of the common fragile site since only one of 9 cases, each with one fra(X)(q27) positive cell, exhibited FRAXD and the others were FRAXA. After confirmation of FRAXA with direct DNA testing in a large number of low frequency cases, it should be possible to rely on the detection of very low frequencies of fra(X)(q27.3), e.g., 1% with at least 2 positive cells.

Amniotic Fluid↗

Fra(X) prenatal diagnosis: are endoreduplicated and polyploid cells useful diagnostic criteria?

Cytogenetic and molecular protocols for prenatal ascertainment of the fragile X syndrome and the associated fragile site at Xq27.3 are relatively reliable. Any new diagnostic method which becomes available still elicits much interest. Kimchi-Sarfaty et al. [1991] reported an increase in frequency of endoreduplication and polyploidy in fra(X) lymphoblasts and amniocytes when cultured with methotrexate (MTX) or fluorodeoxyuridine. Recently we analyzed the endoreduplication/polyploidy system using amniotic fluid, chorionic villus, and fibroblasts from fra(X) positive abortus cell cultures and from control samples. We observed no increased expression of endoreduplicated or polyploid cells in fra(X) positive amniocytes after exposure to MTX. The data presented here clearly dispute the value of endoreduplication/polyploid scoring as a diagnostic aid in prenatal fra(X) analysis.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

Dialyzed fetal bovine serum increases cytogenetic fragile X expression.

UNLABELLED: Short-term whole blood cultures from 9 unrelated male individuals with the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome were exposed to 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR). The fra(X) frequency was higher in 8 of 9 cases where the complete medium contained dialyzed fetal bovine serum (DFBS). In 3 of the cases, the fra(X) frequency nearly tripled (e.g., 12/100 to 33/100) while in 2 others, it nearly doubled (e.g., 15/100 to 29/100). When DFBS cultures from 2 other fra(X) individuals were exposed to increasing folic acid concentrations ranging from 2 to 4,000 x 10(-6) M, there was virtually no change in fra(X) expression. In 6 of 9 DFBS cultures, the mitotic index decreased, and it increased in 3. Therefore, although the fra(X) frequency increased, in most DFBS cultures the mitotic index decreased. Whether the reduction in mitotic index indicates an inverse correlation between reduced mitotic index and increased fra(X) expression, at least in cultures from some individuals, will be determined by additional studies. IN CONCLUSION: (1) medium supplementation with dialyzed fetal bovine serum should be considered when using FUdR for fra(X) identification in order to avoid potentially false negative results; (2) there appears to be no direct correlation between increased mitotic index and increased fra(X) expression in whole blood cultures; (3) increased folic acid concentrations do not affect fra(X) expression when FUdR fra(X) induction is employed; therefore requesting people to refrain from taking vitamins, including folic acid, before fra(X) testing (a practice that still persists in some places) appears unnecessary.

Animals↗

New York State screening program for fragile X syndrome: a progress report.

New York State has established a program to screen post-pubertal mentally retarded males for the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome. The goal of the program is to identify affected males and inform their families of the diagnosis. Females in these families who are at risk for inheriting the mutation will then be able to determine their carrier status and consider that information in making reproductive decisions. Males were evaluated for 10 features of the syndrome by physicians and nurses throughout the state; cytogenetic analysis was carried out on a subset of this population. A total of 1332 males has been screened and chromosome studies have been completed for 489. Forty-three (9%) were positive for fra(X), and an additional 11 other chromosome abnormalities were identified. The 43 patients belonged to 38 families. Of the 24 families who were informed of the diagnosis, 12 consulted genetic counseling centers for follow-up studies and 12 did not.

Adult↗

Polymerase chain reaction analysis of fragile X mutations.

The mutation that underlies the fragile X syndrome is presumed to be a large expansion in the number of CGG repeats within the gene FMR-1. The unusually GC-rich composition of the expanded region has impeded attempts to amplify it by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We have developed a PCR protocol that successfully amplifies the (CGG)n region in normal, carrier and affected individuals. The PCR analysis of several large fragile X families is presented. The PCR results agree with those obtained by direct genomic Southern blot analyses. These favorable comparisons suggest that the PCR assay may be suitable for rapid testing for fragile X mutations and premutations and genetic screening of at-risk individuals.

Base Sequence↗

Characterization of an analphoid, neocentromere-positive inv dup 8p marker chromosome using multiplex whole chromosome and sub-telomere FISH analyses.

A 30-year-old male patient with mild mental retardation was found to have a small supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) in 90% of his peripheral blood cells and in 100% of his fibroblast cells. Multiplex whole chromosome and sub-telomere FISH analyses were used to determine that this SMC is an inverted duplicated distal chromosome 8p fragment. Although it was negative for alpha-DNA sequences, this marker had a functional kinetochore (neocentromere) demonstrated by a positive signal with a CENP-C antibody. Apparently intact 8p telomeres at the marker's ends were demonstrated by using a telomere repeat FISH probe. The patient's phenotypically normal mother on G-banding analysis had a small marker chromosome in 8% of her peripheral blood cells in two cultures of the first specimen studied. The marker was not seen in any subsequent maternal peripheral blood or fibroblast specimens. Although it was impossible to further characterize the maternal SMC, it was suggested that the mother had the same marker as the one seen in the proband. Inverted duplicated chromosomal fragments are the most frequent type of analphoid markers. Stable inverted duplicated 8p marker chromosomes were previously reported in three other patients. They all apparently occurred de novo and were found to be positive for kinetochore-associated proteins. Evidence for the possible inheritance of an inverted-duplicated, analphoid SMC was not shown to-date. This study also demonstrates a practical, straightforward approach for analphoid marker characterization in clinical laboratory settings, using whole chromosome multiplex and subtelomere-specific FISH analyses. FISH probes for all sub-telomere chromosomal regions are commercially available and the large majority of analphoid marker chromosomes involve telomere regions.

Adult↗