Biomedical subjects

E C Jenkins

Publications and source records attributed to E C Jenkins.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Mouse chromosome fragility.

When cultures of fibroblast-like cells from inbred mouse strains RBC/Dn and AEJ/GnRk were exposed to 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR), non-random strain-specific distributions of chromosome gaps, breaks and exchanges were observed. Throughout the genomes there appeared to be specific sites at which lesions occurred preferentially. Two strain-specific fragile sites were identified in strain RBC/Dn at G-band 15A2, and at G-band 19B in strain AEJ/GnRk. Constitutive fragile sites at G-bands 12A2 and 18A2 were identified in both strains. A strain-specific marker at G-band 9B was found in strain AEJ/GnRk. The fragile sites reported here provide an animal model for the study of chromosome fragility as well as polymorphic markers for linkage studies.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Frequency of tri- or multiradial configurations in fragile X identification.

Using the FUdR system for fragile X induction, we have observed no triradial or bisatellited configurations at fra (X) (q27.3) in over 5,000 fra(X) chromosomes examined from over 150 fra(X) individuals. Based on our observations, and those of Turner and Jacobs (1983) and Daniel et al (1984), we hypothesize that triradial configurations may not occur at Xq27 with FUdR induction. To test this hypothesis we cultured whole blood simultaneously in parallel folate-deficient and FUdR fra(X) induction systems, and systematically examined fra(X) chromosomes for triradials. Neither autosomes nor X chromosomes exhibited any apparent triradial figures in the FUdR system, while 1.4% of the fra(X) chromosomes in TC 199 exhibited a triradial. Also we observed one autosomal triradial at 4q35. We conclude that triradial configurations occur in low frequencies in the folate deficient system and seldom if ever in the FUdR system.

Chromosome Fragility↗

PubMedDate not supplied

DNA linkage studies in the fragile X syndrome suggest genetic heterogeneity.

Previously, we showed genetic heterogeneity for linkage between the fra(X) locus and a factor IX DNA RFLP (Brown et al, 1985). When fra(X) families were predivided into two classes, one containing those with non-penetrant (NP) males and one with apparent full penetrance (P), evidence of significant heterogeneity was present. We have now extended this analysis by adding DNA linkage information on 2 additional probes, 52A and ST14, studied in 16 fra(X) kindreds. These data were combined with information on 16 published fra(X) families. There were 7 NP families and 25 P families. We confirmed our previous findings of a higher recombination fraction between factor IX and fra(X) in P families (0 = .32 with lod of .67) compared to as NP families (0 = .06 with lod of 6.11) which was significant at p less than .01. In comparing recombination fractions for the additional probes, more recombination between 52A and the other loci was consistently seen in P compared to NP families which suggested that there may be a higher rate of recombination proximal to the fra(X) locus in P kindreds. A strikingly higher recombination fraction between 52A and factor IX was present in comparing all fra(X) families (.18) to normal families (.02) which was significant at p less than .001. These results suggest genetic heterogeneity with respect to recombination is present both among fra(X) pedigrees and between fra(X) and normal pedigrees.

DNA↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Recent experience in prenatal fra(X) detection.

At least 35 cases of prenatal fra(X) diagnosis have been confirmed and reported. Amniotic fluid, fetal blood and chorion -ic villus samples have exhibited fra(X) (q27.3) in cultures from 26 males and 9 females. Here we have detected fra(X) in female and male amniotic fluid specimens, AF1/fra(X),X and AF2/fra(X),Y, respectively, and a male CVS/fra(X),Y using both FUdR and excess thymidine (THY) to demonstrate the marker chromosome. Both FUdR and THY detected fra(X) and usually FUdR was superior to THY with the exception of placental cultures. It was important to examine more than one culture per protocol since no fra(X) was observed in one AF2 FUdR culture while another exhibited 19.2% expression. Similarly, confirmation studies in lung fibroblast cultures for AF2 exhibited 4.3% fra(X) in one lab while another found negative results. A similar observation in whole blood cultures was also made recently by us. In addition, we have recently experienced our first false negative fra(X),X prenatal diagnosis. We have observed another case where only one cell in 300 exhibited fra(X) where the male fetus was 50% at-risk and was referred to us after the 20th week of gestation by sonography. On the basis of our experience we recommend the following: 1) the excess THY fra(X) induction system is effective but not superior to FUdR; 2) at least two duplicate cultures per induction system should be analyzed for the marker chromosome to avoid the possibility of false-negative diagnosis; 3) where fra(X) is not demonstrated or is present in very low frequencies in CVS and/or amniotic fluid cultures, complementary DNA marker studies and/or fetal blood cultures must be made available; 4) gestational age dating by ultrasonography is recommended as early as possible.

Amniocentesis↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Folic acid treatment of fragile X males: a further study.

Investigations of the effect of high dose folic acid treatment of fragile X syndrome in males has produced mixed results. However, no study had examined the possible drug effects of folic acid on non-fragile X control males. Therefore, we examined the effect of folic acid on fragile X males using non-fragile X control males. Subjects were assigned randomly to an ABA or BAB design. Duration of either folic acid or placebo condition was 4 months. Folic acid or placebo was given in a double-blind fashion. At the end of each condition, the subjects' behavior was assessed. At the end of the study, parents were asked to complete a questionnaire. Using parents' responses, we examined 22 items on the Autistic Descriptors Checklist and two subscales from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale which corresponded to areas of behavior parents' noted to have shown improvement. We did not find significant differences between fragile X males and control males, within subjects, nor across folic acid and placebo conditions. Thus, our follow-up study confirms and extends our original findings, as well as those of other researchers: namely, that no dramatic changes in behavior result from high dose folic acid. Moreover, subtle improvements observed in earlier investigations were not confirmed.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Constitutive fragile sites in fra(X) individuals.

Recently, it was proposed that the constitutive fragile site at 3p14 be used as an "internal control" to indicate the effectiveness of the FUdR fragile site induction system. We have tested this hypothesis by determining the frequency of constitutive fragile sites at 1p31, 3p14, and 16q23 in cultures from 42 known fra(X) individuals. At least 50 cells were analyzed from each case. Seventy-four percent (31/42), 95% (40/42) and 90% (38/42) of the fra(X) individuals exhibited frequencies of less than 4% at constitutive fragile sites 3p14, 1p31 and 16q23, respectively. Of the 42 individuals tested, 12 or 28.6% showed no fragility at any of the 3 sites studied. On the other hand, at least one constitutive fragile site was observed in 50 cells studied from over 70% of the 42 people studied. It is suggested that "positive controls" continue to be used, while at the same time recording all fragile sites to identify a combination of constitutive fragile sites that may serve as an internal control indicator, and that DNA marker studies be used to complement cytogenetic testing.

Chromosome Fragile Sites↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Fragile X expression in short-term whole blood cultures is affected by cell density.

The effect of cell density on expression of the fragile site at (X)(q27.3) in short-term whole-blood cultures from patients with fragile X [fra(X)] or Martin-Bell syndrome was studied. A significant increase in fra(X) frequency was observed in 7 of 8 samples when cell density was decreased. Higher fra(X) frequency was not always noted at below-routine density, but in some cases fra(X) expression was depressed at above-routine density. We conclude that decay of the FUdR effect explains the fact that fra(X) expression is affected by culture density. It is significant that a relationship exists between the two; it suggests that in order to maximize fra(X) expression in cases with low-percentage fra(X) with standard methods, cell density may have to be adjusted. It is possible that in individuals who are normally nonexpressing, such as some obligate female carriers and nonpenetrant males, fra(X) expression may be sensitive to cell density effects.

Blood Cells↗

PubMedDate not supplied

In situ nick translation of the fragile X region.

At the present time, the molecular nature of the fragile site at Xq27.3 is not well understood. To examine the sensitivity of this region to DNAase I, in situ nick translation was performed on metaphase chromosomes from a fragile X (fra(X] positive individual. In this technique DNAase I is used to nick regions of chromosomal DNA that are in "open" conformation. Biotinylated dUTP was incorporated by nick translation at these sites. The incorporation was identified by double antibody labeling and avidin-horseradish peroxidase staining. Spreads, which had been stained with this technique, were photographed and subsequently trypsin-Giemsa G banded (post-GTG banded) for chromosome identification. In 36 of 44 (82%) fra(X) positive male cells, the region distal to fra(X) (q27.3) was prominently stained in contrast to its light staining appearance in GTG preparations. The fragile site itself was outlined more clearly than can be achieved by GTG or homogeneous staining. When autosomal fragile sites were induced by the addition of 1.5 microM aphidicolin 17 hours prior to harvest, 24 of 27 (89%) fragile sites on the ends of autosomes were prominently stained in regions distal to the break. Because the fra(X) and autosomal fragile regions behaved similarly, this suggests that they have a similar conformation. Thus, while autosomal and Xq27.3 fragile sites are strongly induced by different means, the organization of these sites and the regions distal to them appear to be similar.

Chromosome Banding↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Fragile X syndrome: linkage analysis in black and white populations.

Eleven white families and 10 black families have been studied to detect racial differences in the linkage of DNA markers flanking the fragile X site (FRAXA). The differences in the recombination fractions for F9-FRAXA and DX13-FRAXA were not significant. The pair St14-FRAXA exhibited no difference between the two groups. Although the sample size was small, it would appear that these DNA markers can be used in black persons for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. A larger group of families would be necessary to determine if 4D8 and cX55.7 will be equally useful since these appear to have lower heterozygote frequencies in the black population.

Black People↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multipoint linkage of 9 anonymous probes to HPRT, factor 9, and fragile X.

We have analyzed the segregation of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) associated with 9 anonymous probes detecting loci DXS10, DXS15, DXS19, DXS37, DXS51, DXS52, DXS98, DXS99, and DXS100 and probes for HPRT and F9 in a set of 40 families segregating fragile X (fra(X]. Using two-point and multipoint analysis, we have established their relative genetic locations. The results indicate that DXS99 and DXS10, unlike previous reports, are not tightly linked to F9. A new locus was found to map within the F9 - fra(X) region. DXS98 showed 6% recombination with fra(X) and appeared to be the closest locus to fra(X). These results will be useful for mapping the relative position of newly defined X probes in this region and for future genetic studies of families with fra(X), hemophilia B, or Lesch-Nyhan mutations.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Screening developmentally disabled male populations for fragile X: the effect of sample size.

The fra(X) or Martin-Bell syndrome is the most common cause of inherited mental retardation (MR) in males. It is also associated with a variety of unusual behavioral and developmental disorders. Recent studies found great variability in the estimated strength of association between "autism" and the fra(X) syndrome, but not between MR and fra(X). We examined 31 studies which investigated the association of fra(X) syndrome with either MR or "autism" and found that the conclusion of those researchers could be significantly affected by sample size. Different behavioral and cytogenetic protocols will also influence the strength of association between fra(X) and autism.

Autistic Disorder↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Fragile X screening program in New York State.

Most fragile X [fra(X)] males in New York State have not been identified. Hence, a large number of female relatives are unaware of their risks for having an affected child. A program was established in New York State in 1987 to screen for the fra(X) syndrome in mentally retarded males with living relatives. The goal of the program is to identify affected males and inform their families about the diagnosis. In this way relatives would be able to assess their risks for having a fra(X) male. In order to identify the males a screening form was developed to assess 10 features which included physical characteristics, behavior, and family history. Males who exhibited at least 5 of these manifestations were selected for cytogenetic analysis. Any male who had macroorchidism or a family history of mental retardation was also included. A total of 995 males have been screened of which 352 (35%) were selected for cytogenetic analyses. Seventeen (10.5%) of the 161 completed studies were positive for fra(X). A large number of possible female carriers were identified in the families of the propositi. This program identifies fra(X) males in a population of the mentally retarded for whom there had been no previous diagnosis. By using a two-step procedure, it is possible to screen a large population of the mentally retarded for fra(X) without testing each male cytogenetically.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Detection of fragile X non-penetrant males by DNA marker analysis.

Segregation analysis of the fragile-X [fra(X)] syndrome uncovered an unexpected 20% excess of normal males among sibships by Sherman et al. (Sherman SL, Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Turner G [1984]. Ann Hum Genet 48:21-37; Sherman SL, Jacobs PA, Morton NE, Froster-Iskenius U, Howard-Peebles PN, Neilsen KB, Partington MW, Sutherland GR, Turner G, Watson M [1985]: Hum Genet 63:289-299). This result predicts that about 17% (1/6) of normal sons of carrier fra(X) females will be non-penetrant. A way to test this prediction is by DNA markers. We analyzed DNA samples from 100 families with a set of flanking DNA markers linked to the fra(X) locus. Ten of 51 (19.6%) normal brothers, doubly informative and non-recombinant for flanking DNA markers, were found to be non-penetrant males. This result closely confirms the predictions of the segregation analysis indicating that about 1/6 of normal brothers are non-penetrant carrier males. The use of DNA markers to identify non-penetrant brothers and grandfathers can help to clarify the inheritance of the fra(X) mutation and be of considerable clinical usefulness. Using DNA markers, it was possible to study grandparental transmission in 71 of the families. In 39 families, DNA analysis confirmed the apparent pattern of inheritance. In 18 families, the grandparents had a single daughter with affected children. Of these, a new mutation at the time of their daughters' conception was possible in 15 and quite likely in 3. In 14 families with 2 or more daughters with affected fra(X) offspring, the grandparents had no affected sons or other relatives known to be positive for fra(X).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

DNA↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Linkage in fragile X families of three distal flanking markers: ST14, DX13, and F8.

The use of linked DNA markers and linkage analysis in the fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome allows for improved genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. In order to provide the most accurate information, it is important to determine the order and location and position of flanking markers. Conflicting results have been reported for the order of 3 DNA markers distal to the fra(X) locus. We analyzed the linkage relationships of the distal markers ST14 (DXS52), DX13 (DXS15), and F8 (F8C) in 102 fra(X) families. The results indicated that the 3 DNA markers were closely linked to one another and mapped approximately 11 to 15% recombination units away from the fra(X) locus. The most likely order was fra(X)-DXS52-DXS15-F8. The order fra(X)-DXS52-F8 and 728 times more likely than the order fra(X)-F8-DXS52. One family showed a probable double recombinant: in one individual there was recombination between fra(X)-DXS52 and between DXS52-F8. The low probability of this occurring, 0.3%, raises the possibility of an alternate chromosome arrangement or an unusual recombinant mechanism in some individuals.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cytogenetically negative, linkage positive "fragile X" syndrome.

We investigated the family of a 3-year-old boy with manifestations of the Martin-Bell syndrome (MBS). His 17-year-old cousin had classic manifestations of MBS and was fragile X [fra(X)] positive. The 3-year-old boy was fra(X) negative. Linkage analysis with probes flanking the fra(X) region indicated that these cousins had the same X chromosome inherited from a normal grandfather. The DNA and cytogenetic analyses suggest that limitations in the ability to detect the fra(X) mutation cytogenetically may be responsible for fra(X)-negative MBS; or, alternatively, that a crossover occurred between a locus determining the MBS phenotype and one determining fra(X) expression.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Genetic and other factors that contribute to variability in cytogenetic expression in fragile X males.

Variability in cytogenetic expression of fragile X has been observed by many investigators. One recent study of families of fragile X brothers concluded that frequency of expression was almost completely controlled by genetic factors. We investigated the extent of genetic control over frequency of expression by evaluating fragile X families from 3 different sources using hierarchal analysis of variance model to calculate the intraclass correlation and the index of heritability, h2. Proportion of variance attributable to families was computed from 2 estimation procedures: 1) a least squares method and 2) a maximum likelihood technique. Results were comparable with one another and indicated that, although genetic factors were significant, differences between laboratories contributed a larger proportion of the total estimated variance. These results partly confirmed previous findings but indicated that the degree of genetic control over the proportion of affected cells was lower than recently suggested.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Transformation and establishment of fragile X cell lines from amniocytes.

Fragile X [fra(X)] cell lines have been established from an expressing 46,XX amniocyte culture. The amniocyte cells were transformed by the addition of an origin defective pSV40 vector. Fra(X) expression was observed at a frequency of 3% in the parental amniocyte cell line, and the transformed clones expressed the fra(X) site at a frequency of 9-13%. These cell lines maintain the cytogenetic phenotype and can serve as positive controls for testing the efficacy of the inducing systems during prenatal diagnostic studies.

Amniotic Fluid↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Distribution of diploidy, polyploidy, and endoreduplication in fra(X) positive and negative lymphocytes, amniocytes, and chorionic villi.

Expression of fragile X [fra(X)] (q27.3) and endoreduplicated metaphases have been reported in methotrexate-treated (MTX) fra(X) cultures (Kerem B, Biotein R, Schaap T [1988]: Chromosoma 97: 6-10). Further, new data (Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Goitein R, Kerem B, Werner M, Medan B, Schaap T [1991]: Am J Med Genet, this issue) indicate that MTX may specifically induce polyploidy and endoreduplication in cells with the fra(X) mutation. To confirm and extend these results, we have studied short-term lymphocyte cultures incubated in M199, a folate deficient system, and RPMI-1640 in the presence and absence of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) exposure during the last day of a 4 day culture. No endoreduplicated cells were seen under these conditions and there was no change in the level of polyploidy. We also studied the distribution of polyploid and endoreduplicated cells in amniotic fluid and chorionic villus sample cultures from one fra(X) positive and 4 at-risk specimens. No increase in the incidence of polyploidy or endoreduplication was observed in cultures exposed to MTX for both 24 and 48 hours from a fra(X) positive amniotic fluid case. Cytogenetic results were fra(X) negative for the remaining 4 cases tested. There was significant discordance between our findings and those expected based on MTX-induced increased frequencies of polyploidy and endoreduplication. Thus, our studies do not confirm the reported correlation between the presence of FRAXA and increased frequencies of polyploidy and endoreduplication in MTX-exposed amniocyte cultures and there was no evidence for increased levels of polyploidy and endoreduplication in short-term fra(X) lymphocyte cultures exposed to non-MTX fra(X) induction.

Amniotic Fluid↗