PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Ferramosca

Publications and source records attributed to E Ferramosca.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Correlation of simple imaging tests and coronary artery calcium measured by computed tomography in hemodialysis patients.

Vascular calcification is associated with an adverse prognosis in end-stage renal disease. It can be accurately quantitated with computed tomography but simple in-office techniques may provide equally useful information. Accordingly we compared the results obtained with simple non-invasive techniques with those obtained using electron beam tomography (EBT) for coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) in 140 prevalent hemodialysis patients. All patients underwent EBT imaging, a lateral X-ray of the lumbar abdominal aorta, an echocardiogram, and measurement of pulse pressure (PP). Calcification of the abdominal aorta was semiquantitatively estimated with a score (Xr-score) of 0-24 divided into tertiles, echocardiograms were graded as 0-2 for absence or presence of calcification of the mitral and aortic valve and PP was divided in quartiles. The CACS was elevated (mean 910+/-1657, median 220). The sensitivity and specificity for CACS > or = 100 was 53 and 70%, for calcification of either valve and 67 and 91%, respectively, for Xr-score > or = 7. The area under the curve for CACS > or = 100 associated with valve calcification and Xr-score was 0.62 and 0.78, respectively. The likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of CACS > or = 100 was 1.79 (1.09, 2.96) for calcification of either valve and 7.50 (2.89, 19.5) for participants with an Xr-score > or = 7. In contrast, no association was present between PP and CACS. In conclusion, simple measures of cardiovascular calcification showed a very good correlation with more sophisticated measurements obtained with EBT. These methodologies may prove very useful for in-office imaging to guide further therapeutic choices in hemodialysis patients.

Adult↗

Prometheus system: a technological support in liver failure.

The Prometheus system is a plasma filtration treatment coupling adsorption and hemodialysis (FPSA) aimed to blood purification in liver failure. After separation through an albumin-permeable membrane, plasma enters a secondary circuit where protein-bound toxic substances are removed by two adsorbers; p01, a neutral resin, and p02, an anion exchanger. Plasma is then returned to the venous line, where a high-flux hemodialyzer removes water-soluble substances. We used the Prometheus system in 12 patients with acute or acute-on-chronic liver insufficiency: eight cirrhosis, one posttransplant dysfunction, and three secondary liver insult (two cardiogenic shock and one rhabdomyolysis). All patients were severely hyperbilirubinemic, hypercholemic, and hyperammonemic. Twenty-eight sessions each lasting 340 +/- 40 minutes were performed (2.5/patient). The mean total bilirubin decreased from 33.6 +/- 20 to 22.2 +/- 13.6 mg/dL (P < .001); the reduction ratios for cholic acid and ammonia were 48.6% and 51.6%, respectively. The pre- to postsession urea reduction was 57.6% +/- 9.5% and creatinine 42.7% +/- 10%. A significant reduction was observed in the circulating levels of soluble interleukin (IL) 2 receptor (pre: 2687.2 +/- 1434.7; post: 1977.1 +/- 602 Ul/ml; P < .001) and in IL 6 (pre: 56.1 +/- 11.1; post: 35.9 +/- 10.3 pg/mL, P = .05). During treatments the hemodynamics were stable. Two patients received liver transplantations. The secondary liver insult was completely overcome in all three patients. The overall survival at 30 days was 41.6% (5/12 patients). Prometheus, based on FPSA, produced high clearance for protein-bound and water soluble markers, which resulted in high treatment efficacy.

Acute Disease↗

Mid-dilution: the perfect balance between convection and diffusion.

Although hemodiafiltration (HDF) offers the advantage of increased convective clearance for middle molecules, there is still controversy as to whether reinfusion should occur pre- or post-filter. Mid-dilution hemodiafiltration (MD HDF) is a new HDF technique that uses a special dialyzer, MD190, which allows both pre- and post-reinfusion. While externally the dialyzer looks similar to conventional hemodialyzers, the internal fibers are divided into two bundles by a special annular header that first lets the blood pass through the peripheral bundle in post-dilution, mix with the reinfusion fluid at the opposite end of the dialyzer and then proceed (after pre-dilution) to the dialyzer blood exit. The dialyzer is able to support substantially higher reinfusion rates (10-12 l/h). We have compared the removal characteristics of several small solutes and larger middle-molecular-weight toxins by examining instantaneous clearance at 45 min, the dialysis reduction ratio and total mass removal (by spilling) in a three-center prospective cross-over study. Twenty patients were randomized to a treatment sequence of one-week high-flux bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD) followed by MD HDF, or vice versa. The parameters evaluated included urea, creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, angiogenin, leptin, retinol-binding protein, and the effects on sodium, potassium, bicarbonate and calcium. Blood flow rates ranged between 300-450 ml/min (mean 359 +/- 44 HD, 367 +/- 35 MD HDF). The mean reinfusion for MD HDF was 166 +/-17 ml/min. MD HDF had a significantly better instantaneous clearance for urea (328 +/- 28 vs 277 +/- 40); creatinine (292 +/- 32 vs. 212 +/- 66); phosphate (324 +/- 38 vs. 242 +/- 63); beta2-microglobulin (249 +/- 27 vs. 100 +/- 24); angiogenin (173 +/- 27 vs. 28 +/- 32); and leptin (202 +/- 29 vs. 63 +/- 43). Treatments were well tolerated with no adverse reactions occurring during any of the treatments. The MD HDF filter's unique configuration is designed to deliver high-efficiency HDF with a significant improvement in small and middle molecule removal. MD HDF supports substantially higher ultrafiltration rates, and as such, results in a higher removal of middle-molecular-weight toxins.

Blood↗