PubMed1982
The immunological activities of three purified preparations of enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) obtained by different procedures were studied. ECA-Ma (method of A. Marx) was from Salmonella typhimurium TV149 (Ra mutant), ECA-My (method of H. Mayer) was from S. montevideo, and ECA-Ro (method of E. Romanowska) was from Shigella sonnei phase I. These preparations, on a weight basis, neutralized similar amounts of ECA antibodies, indicating that the serological activities were comparable. Neither ECA-My nor ECA-Ro elicited specific delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reactions at 24 or 48 h in immunized guinea pigs. ECA-Ma, as well as the nonpurified preparations of the antigens used for immunization, elicited reactions at 24 h but not at 48 h. Thus, ECA-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity was not detected in immunized guinea pigs. Striking differences were noted in the immunogenicity of these antigens, ECA-Ma being highly immunogenic in the rabbit in contrast to ECA-My and ECA-Ro. ECA-Ma was a potent mitogen for guinea pig spleen cells, stimulating high levels of DNA synthesis; ECA-My was only slightly active. The three antigens were mitogenic to spleen cells from both CBA/J and C3H/HeJ mice, although not to the same degree, indicating that this effect is not due to contaminating lipopolysaccharide, since the latter strain of mice is resistant to endotoxin. Since an ECA-Ma extract made from an ECA-negative mutant proved to be mitogenic to murine spleen cells, the mitogenicity is not due to the ECA haptenic determinant. The mitogenic effect is polyclonal in nature, ECA-Ma producing a maximum response on day 3. Thus, the ECA preparations are both B-cell mitogens and polyclonal activators in murine spleen cells. From these studies it is evident that the biological and immunological activities of these purified antigens depend not only on the haptenic determinant but also on associated or bound components of the preparations.