PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Emanuel Leeuwenberg

Publications and source records attributed to Emanuel Leeuwenberg.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Symmetry cues for matching mirrored objects.

The study explores cues for matching pairs of objects. These objects were arranged into mirror-symmetrical displays and the task was to judge whether a pre-specified 180 degree rotation around the X, Y or Z axis carries one object into the mirror object. For some rotations, the object's mirror symmetry (M) and, for other rotations, the object's point-symmetry (P) could serve as a cue. The matching results suggest that M is a better cue than P, say M > P. Various attempts are made to explain this effect. The most promising one focuses on simplest structural object representations as these capture M and not P. It is furthermore plausible that M captured by reference frames at high hierarchical representation levels, say M1, serves as a better cue than M captured at low levels, say M2. The prediction M1 > M2 > P merely applies to the open surface objects in the experiment. For the closed solid objects in the experiment the expectation is M1 = M2 = P. Both predictions roughly agree with the accuracy and reaction-time data. The results suggest the perceptual relevance of representation cues and, aditionally, that cues stemming from reference frames at higher hierarchical representation levels are more effective than those from lower levels.

Cues↗

Miracles of perception.

This paper draws a bird's eye view of various counter-intuitive characteristics of perception. Peculiar is that perception is a both tool and topic of its study. As a consequence, its output is easily mistaken for its input. Furthermore, its output is characterized by remarkable Gestalt features, such as mutual dependence of stimulus elements and detour solutions. Detour solutions require a complex perception process of testing countless optional pattern interpretations against a criterion. Likelihood is a plausible criterion for reasoning. For perception, however, the simplicity criterion is more appropriate. The consideration is that reasoning aims at establishing properties of distal objects whereas perception aims at establishing objects from proximal properties. The role of knowledge in perception seems plausible but often leads to conflicts. For instance, the assumption that knowledge about handedness is present in pattern representations conflicts with image mirror-image discrimination data. Moreover, knowledge does not provide an anchor for subjective time direction, but a Gestalt quality does.

Cognition↗