Biomedical subjects

Emil Reisler

Publications and source records attributed to Emil Reisler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Mapping the interaction of cofilin with subdomain 2 on actin.

Cofilin, a member of the actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of proteins, is a key regulator of actin dynamics. Cofilin binds to monomer (G-) and filamentous (F-) actin, severs the filaments, and increases their turnover rate. Electron microscopy studies suggested cofilin interactions with subdomains 2 and 1/3 on adjacent actin protomers in F-actin. To probe for the presence of a cryptic cofilin binding site in subdomain 2 in G-actin, we used transglutaminase-mediated cross-linking, which targets Gln41 in subdomain 2. The cross-linking proceeded with up to 85% efficiency with skeletal alpha-actin and WT yeast actin, yielding a single product corresponding to a 1:1 actin-cofilin complex but was strongly inhibited in Q41C yeast actin (in which Q41 was substituted with cysteine). LC-MS/MS analysis of the proteolytic fragments of this complex mapped the cross-linking to Gln41 on actin and Gly1 on recombinant yeast cofilin. The actin-cofilin (AC) heterodimer was purified on FPLC for analytical ultracentrifugation and electron microscopy analysis. Sedimentation equilibrium and velocity runs revealed oligomers of AC in G-actin buffer. In the presence of excess cofilin, the covalent AC heterodimer bound a second cofilin, forming a 2:1 cofilin/actin complex, as revealed by sedimentation results. Under polymerizing conditions the cross-linked AC formed mostly short filaments, which according to image reconstruction were similar to uncross-linked actin-cofilin filaments. Although a majority of the cross-linking occurs at Gln41, a small fraction of the AC cross-linked complex forms in the Q41C yeast actin mutant. This secondary cross-linking site was sequenced by MALDI-MS/MS as linking Gln360 in actin to Lys98 on cofilin. Overall, these results demonstrate that the region around Gln41 (subdomain 2) is involved in a weak binding of cofilin to G-actin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2006

Hydrophobic loop dynamics and actin filament stability.

It has been postulated that the hydrophobic loop of actin (residues 262-274) swings out and inserts into the opposite strand in the filament, stabilizing the filament structure. Here, we analyzed the hydrophobic loop dynamics utilizing four mutants that have cysteine residues introduced at a single location along the yeast actin loop. Lateral, copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking of the mutant cysteine residues to the native C374 in the neighboring strand within the filament was fastest for S265C, followed by V266C, L267C, and then L269C. Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) studies revealed that C265 lies closest to C374 within the filament, followed by C266, C267, and then C269. These results are not predicted by the Holmes extended loop model of F-actin. Furthermore, we find that disulfide cross-linking destroys L267C and L269C filaments; only small filaments are observed via electron microscopy. Conversely, phalloidin protects the L267C and L269C filaments and inhibits their disulfide cross-linking. Combined, our data indicate that, in solution, the loop resides predominantly in a "parked" position within the filament but is able to dynamically populate other conformational states which stabilize or destabilize the filament. Such states may be exploited within a cell by filament-stabilizing and -destabilizing factors.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Polyamine-induced bundling of F-actin.

To better understand the mechanism of actin filament (F-actin) bundling by polyamines, we have measured the onset of bundling as a function of polyamine concentration. Samples were centrifuged at low speeds to separate bundles from unbundled actin, and the relative amounts of actin in the pellet and supernatant were determined via gel electrophoresis, yielding a description of the bundling transition as a function of actin and polyamine concentrations. These experiments were carried out for two different polyamines, spermine (tetravalent) and spermidine (trivalent). We found that the threshold concentration of polyamine needed to bundle actin is independent of both actin concentration and Mg2+ concentration over a wide range in Mg2+ concentration. We also find that spermine in F-actin bundles is essentially invisible in solution-phase proton NMR, suggesting that it is bound so tightly to F-actin that it is immobilized.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Actin filament severing by cofilin.

Cofilin is essential for cell viability and for actin-based motility. Cofilin severs actin filaments, which enhances the dynamics of filament assembly. We investigated the mechanism of filament severing by cofilin with direct fluorescence microscopy observation of single actin filaments in real time. In cells, actin filaments are likely to be attached at multiple points along their length, and we found that attaching filaments in such a manner greatly increased the efficiency of filament severing by cofilin. Cofilin severing increased and then decreased with increasing concentration of cofilin. Together, these results indicate that cofilin severs the actin filament by a mechanism of allosteric and cooperative destabilization. Severing is more efficient when relaxation of this cofilin-induced instability of the actin filament is inhibited by restricting the flexibility of the filament. These conclusions have particular relevance to cofilin function during actin-based motility in cells and in synthetic systems.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Antagonistic effects of cofilin, beryllium fluoride complex, and phalloidin on subdomain 2 and nucleotide-binding cleft in F-actin.

Cofilin/ADF, beryllium fluoride complex (BeFx), and phalloidin have opposing effects on actin filament structure and dynamics. Cofilin/ADF decreases the stability of F-actin by enhancing disorder in subdomain 2, and by severing and accelerating the depolymerization of the filament. BeFx and phalloidin stabilize the subdomain 2 structure and decrease the critical concentration of actin, slowing the dissociation of monomers. Yeast cofilin, unlike some other members of the cofilin/ADF family, binds to F-actin in the presence of BeFx; however, the rate of its binding is strongly inhibited by BeFx and decreases with increasing pH. The inhibition of the cofilin binding rate increases with the time of BeFx incubation with F-actin, indicating the existence of two BeFx-F-actin complexes. Cofilin dissociates BeFx from the filament, while BeFx does not bind to F-actin saturated with cofilin, presumably because of the cofilin-induced changes in the nucleotide-binding cleft of F-actin. These changes are apparent from the increase in the fluorescence intensity of F-actin bound epsilon-ADP upon cofilin binding and a decrease in its accessibility to collisional quenchers. BeFx also affects the nucleotide-binding cleft of F-actin, as indicated by an increase in the fluorescence intensity of epsilon-ADP-F-actin. Phalloidin and cofilin inhibit, but do not exclude each other binding to their complexes with F-actin. Phalloidin promotes the dissociation of cofilin from F-actin and slowly reverses the cofilin-induced disorder in the DNase I binding loop of subdomain 2.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

The Actin cross-linking domain of the Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin directly catalyzes the covalent cross-linking of actin.

Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative bacterial pathogen that exports enterotoxins to alter host cells and to elicit diarrheal disease. Among the secreted toxins is the multifunctional RTX toxin, which causes cell rounding and actin depolymerization by covalently cross-linking actin monomers into dimers, trimers, and higher multimers. The region of the toxin responsible for cross-linking activity is the actin cross-linking domain (ACD). In this study, we further investigated the role of the ACD in the actin cross-linking reaction. We show that the RTX toxin cross-links actin independently of tissue transglutaminase, thus eliminating an indirect model of ACD activity. We demonstrate that a fusion protein of the ACD and the N-terminal portion of lethal factor from Bacillus anthracis (LF(N)ACD) has cross-linking activity in vivo and in crude cell extracts. Furthermore, we determined that LF(N)ACD directly catalyzes the formation of covalent linkages between actin molecules in vitro and that Mg(2+) and ATP are essential cofactors for the cross-linking reaction. In addition, G-actin is proposed as a cytoskeletal substrate of the RTX toxin in vivo. Future studies of the in vitro cross-linking reaction will facilitate characterization of the enzymatic properties of the ACD and contribute to our knowledge of the novel mechanism of covalent actin cross-linking.

Actins↗

PubMed2006

Conformational dynamics of loop 262-274 in G- and F-actin.

According to the original Holmes model of F-actin structure, the hydrophobic loop 262-274 stabilizes the actin filament by inserting into a pocket formed at the interface between two protomers on the opposing strand. Using a yeast actin triple mutant, L180C/L269C/C374A [(LC)(2)CA], we showed previously that locking the hydrophobic loop to the G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation. We report here that the hydrophobic loop is mobile in F- as well as in G-actin, fluctuating between the extended and parked conformations. Copper-catalyzed, brief air oxidation of (LC)(2)CA F-actin on electron microscopy grids resulted in the severing of thin filaments and their conversion to amorphous aggregates. Disulfide, bis(methanethiosulfonate) (MTS), and dibromobimane (DBB) cross-linking reactions proceeded in solution at a faster rate with G- than with F-actin. Cross-linking of C180 to C269 by DBB (4.4 A) in either G- or F-actin resulted in shorter and less stable filaments. The cross-linking with a longer MTS-6 reagent (9.6 A) did not impair actin polymerization or filament structure. Myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and tropomyosin inhibited the disulfide cross-linking of phalloidin-stabilized F-actin. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements with nitroxide spin-labeled actin revealed strong spin-spin coupling and a similar mean interspin distance ( approximately 10 A) in G- and in F-actin, with a broader distance distribution in G-actin. These results show loop 262-274 fluctuations in G- and F-actin and correlate loop dynamics with actin filament formation and stability.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Severing of F-actin by yeast cofilin is pH-independent.

Cofilin plays an important role in actin turnover in cells by severing actin filaments and accelerating their depolymerization. The role of pH in the severing by cofilin was examined using fluorescence microscopy. To facilitate the imaging of actin filaments and to avoid the use of rhodamine phalloidin, which competes with cofilin, alpha-actin was labeled with tetramethylrhodamine cadaverine (TRC) at Gln41. The TRC-labeling inhibited actin treadmilling strongly, as measured by epsilonATP release. Cofilin binding, detected via an increase in light scattering, and the subsequent conformational change in filament structure, as detected by TRC fluorescence decay, occurred 2-3 times faster at pH 6.8 than at pH 8.0. In contrast, actin filaments severing by cofilin was pH-independent. The pH-independent severing by cofilin was confirmed using actin labeled at Cys374 with Oregon Green 488 maleimide. The depolymerization of actin by cofilin was faster at high pH.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2006

Inorganic phosphate regulates the binding of cofilin to actin filaments.

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) and cofilin/actin depolymerizing factor proteins have opposite effects on actin filament structure and dynamics. Pi stabilizes the subdomain 2 in F-actin and decreases the critical concentration for actin polymerization. Conversely, cofilin enhances disorder in subdomain 2, increases the critical concentration, and accelerates actin treadmilling. Here, we report that Pi inhibits the rate, but not the extent of cofilin binding to actin filaments. This inhibition is also significant at physiological concentrations of Pi, and more pronounced at low pH. Cofilin prevents conformational changes in F-actin induced by Pi, even at high Pi concentrations, probably because allosteric changes in the nucleotide cleft decrease the affinity of Pi to F-actin. Cofilin induced allosteric changes in the nucleotide cleft of F-actin are also indicated by an increase in fluorescence emission and a decrease in the accessibility of etheno-ADP to collisional quenchers. These changes transform the nucleotide cleft of F-actin to G-actin-like. Pi regulation of cofilin binding and the cofilin regulation of Pi binding to F-actin can be important aspects of actin based cell motility.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2005

Cooperative effects of cofilin (ADF) on actin structure suggest allosteric mechanism of cofilin function.

Using site-specific fluorescence probes and cross-linking we demonstrated that cofilin (ADF), a key regulator of actin cellular dynamics, weakens longitudinal contacts in F-actin in a cooperative manner. Differential scanning calorimetry detected a dual nature of cofilin effects on F-actin conformation. At sub-stoichiometric cofilin to actin ratios, cofilin stabilized sterically and non-cooperatively protomers at the points of attachment, and destabilized allosterically and cooperatively protomers in the cofilin-free parts of F-actin. This destabilizing effect had a long range, with one cofilin molecule affecting more than 100 protomers, and concentration-dependent amplitude that reached maximum at about 1:2 molar ratio of cofilin to actin. In contrast to existing models, our results suggest an allosteric mechanism of actin depolymerization by cofilin. We propose that cofilin is less likely to sever actin filaments at the points of attachment as thought previously. Instead, due to its dual structural effect, spontaneous fragmentation occurs most likely in cofilin-free segments of filaments weakened allosterically by nearby cofilin molecules.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2005

The crystal structure of a cross-linked actin dimer suggests a detailed molecular interface in F-actin.

The 2.5-A resolution crystal structure is reported for an actin dimer, composed of two protomers cross-linked along the longitudinal (or vertical) direction of the F-actin filament. The crystal structure provides an atomic resolution view of a molecular interface between actin protomers, which we argue represents a near-native interaction in the F-actin filament. The interaction involves subdomains 3 and 4 from distinct protomers. The atomic positions in the interface visualized differ by 5-10 A from those suggested by previous models of F-actin. Such differences fall within the range of uncertainties allowed by the fiber diffraction and electron microscopy methods on which previous models have been based. In the crystal, the translational arrangement of protomers lacks the slow twist found in native filaments. A plausible model of F-actin can be constructed by reintroducing the known filament twist, without disturbing significantly the interface observed in the actin dimer crystal.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2005

Structure and dynamics of the actin filament.

The structures of filamentous Mg-ATP-actin (F actin) in the presence and absence of KCl have been mapped with hydroxyl radicals (*OH) generated by synchrotron X-ray radiolysis. Proteolysis and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis revealed 52 reactive side-chain sites from 27 distinct peptides within actin. The reactivities of these probe sites with *OH in the F-actin states are compared with those of Mg-ATP-G-actin (monomers) analyzed previously [Guan, J.-Q. et al. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 11992-12000]. Filament-dependent protection within subdomains 2, 3, and 4 and at the C terminus is consistent with longitudinal contacts of monomers within the filament helical structure as predicted by the Holmes model. In the absence of KCl, the extent of filament-dependent protection rarely reached 3-fold, consistent with a highly dynamic filament characterized by relatively weak interactions between actin protomers. However, in the presence of KCl, the extents of protection are significantly increased, consistent with a well-ordered, more tightly packed filament structure. Filament-dependent enhancements of reactivity not predicted by the Holmes model are seen for a peptide that overlaps the "hydrophobic plug" (H-plug) region and for a peptide that forms contacts with the polyphosphate moiety of the bound nucleotide. Overall, these data are both consistent with and complementary to a recent deuterium-exchange MS study of filamentous actin [Chik, J. K., and Schriemer, D.C. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 334, 373-385], which also did not detect any burial of the H plug upon formation of filaments.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2004

Actin-destabilizing factors disrupt filaments by means of a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin, one of the most highly conserved and abundant eukaryotic proteins, is constantly being polymerized and depolymerized within cells as part of cellular motility, tissue formation and repair, and embryonic development. Many proteins exist that bind to monomeric or filamentous (F) forms of actin to regulate the polymerization state. It has become increasingly apparent that the ability of different proteins to bind to and regulate actin filament dynamics depends on the ability of the filament to exist in altered conformations. Yet, little is known about how these conformational changes occur at the molecular level. We have destabilized F-actin filaments by forming a disulfide that locks the "hydrophobic plug" to the body of the actin subunit or by altering the C terminus of actin with a tetramethylrhodamine label. We also examined F-actin filaments at short times after the initiation of polymerization. In all three cases, a substantial fraction of protomers can be found in a "tilted" state that also is induced by actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins. These observations suggest that F-actin filaments are annealed over time into a stable filament and that actin-depolymerizing proteins can effect a time reversal of polymerization.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2004

Cofilin induced conformational changes in F-actin expose subdomain 2 to proteolysis.

Cofilin/ADF affects strongly the structure of actin filaments and especially the intermolecular contacts of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) in subdomain 2. In G-actin, the D-loop is cleaved by subtilisin between Met47 and Gly48, while in F-actin this cleavage is inhibited. Here, we report that yeast cofilin, which is resistant to both subtilisin and trypsin, accelerates greatly the rate of subtilisin cleavage of this loop in F-actin at pH 6.8 and at pH 8.0. Similarly, cofilin accelerates strongly the tryptic cleavage in F-actin of loop 60-69 in subdomain 2, at Arg62 and Lys68. The acceleration of the loops' proteolysis cannot be attributed to an increased treadmilling of F-actin for the following reasons: (i) the rate of subtilisin cleavage is independent of pH between pH 6.8 and 8.0, unlike F-actin depolymerization, which is pH-dependent; (ii) at high concentrations of protease the cleavage rate of F-actin in the presence of cofilin is faster than the rate of monomer dissociation from the pointed end of TRC-labeled F-actin, which limits the rate of treadmilling; and (iii) cofilin also accelerates the rate of subtilisin cleavage of F-actin in which the treadmilling is blocked by interprotomer cross-linking of the D-loop to the C terminus on an adjacent protomer. This suggests a substantial flexibility of the D-loop in the cross-linked F-actin. The increased cleavage rates of the D-loop and loop 60-69 reveal extensive exposure of subdomain 2 in F-actin to proteolytic enzymes by cofilin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2004

Cofilin (ADF) affects lateral contacts in F-actin.

The effect of yeast cofilin on lateral contacts between protomers of yeast and skeletal muscle actin filaments was examined in solution. These contacts are presumably stabilized by the interactions of loop 262-274 of one protomer with two other protomers on the opposite strand in F-actin. Cofilin inhibited several-fold the rate of interstrand disulfide cross-linking between Cys265 and Cys374 in yeast S265C mutant F-actin, but enhanced excimer formation between pyrene probes attached to these cysteine residues. The possibility that these effects are due to a translocation of the C terminus of actin by cofilin was ruled out by measurements of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from tryptophan residues and ATP to acceptor probes at Cys374. Such measurements did not reveal cofilin-induced changes in FRET efficiency, suggesting that changes in Cys265-Cys374 cross-linking and excimer formation stem from the perturbation of loop 262-274 by cofilin. Changes in lateral interactions in F-actin were indicated also by the cofilin-induced partial release of rhodamine phalloidin. Disulfide cross-linking of S265C yeast F-actin inhibited strongly and reversibly the release of rhodamine phalloidin by cofilin. Overall, this study provides solution evidence for the weakening of lateral interactions in F-actin by cofilin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2004

Formation and destabilization of actin filaments with tetramethylrhodamine-modified actin.

Actin labeling at Cys(374) with tethramethylrhodamine derivatives (TMR-actin) has been widely used for direct observation of the in vitro filaments growth, branching, and treadmilling, as well as for the in vivo visualization of actin cytoskeleton. The advantage of TMR-actin is that it does not lock actin in filaments (as rhodamine-phalloidin does), possibly allowing for its use in investigating the dynamic assembly behavior of actin polymers. Although it is established that TMR-actin alone is polymerization incompetent, the impact of its copolymerization with unlabeled actin on filament structure and dynamics has not been tested yet. In this study, we show that TMR-actin perturbs the filaments structure when copolymerized with unlabeled actin; the resulting filaments are more fragile and shorter than the control filaments. Due to the increased severing of copolymer filaments, TMR-actin accelerates the polymerization of unlabeled actin in solution also at mole ratios lower than those used in most fluorescence microscopy experiments. The destabilizing and severing effect of TMR-actin is countered by filament stabilizing factors, phalloidin, S1, and tropomyosin. These results point to an analogy between the effects of TMR-actin and severing proteins on F-actin, and imply that TMR-actin may be inappropriate for investigations of actin filaments dynamics.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

PubMed2003

ADF/cofilin use an intrinsic mode of F-actin instability to disrupt actin filaments.

Proteins in the ADF/cofilin (AC) family are essential for rapid rearrangements of cellular actin structures. They have been shown to be active in both the severing and depolymerization of actin filaments in vitro, but the detailed mechanism of action is not known. Under in vitro conditions, subunits in the actin filament can treadmill; with the hydrolysis of ATP driving the addition of subunits at one end of the filament and loss of subunits from the opposite end. We have used electron microscopy and image analysis to show that AC molecules effectively disrupt one of the longitudinal contacts between protomers within one helical strand of F-actin. We show that in the absence of any AC proteins, this same longitudinal contact between actin protomers is disrupted at the depolymerizing (pointed) end of actin filaments but is prominent at the polymerizing (barbed) end. We suggest that AC proteins use an intrinsic mechanism of F-actin's internal instability to depolymerize/sever actin filaments in the cell.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

PubMed2003

Structural reorganization of proteins revealed by radiolysis and mass spectrometry: G-actin solution structure is divalent cation dependent.

The solution structures of isolated monomeric actins in their Mg(2+)-ATP and Ca(2+)-ATP bound forms and in complexes with gelsolin segment-1 have been probed using hydroxyl radicals (*OH) generated by synchrotron X-ray radiolysis. Proteolysis and mass spectrometry analysis of 28 peptides containing 58 distinct reactive probe sites within actin were used to monitor conformational variations linked to divalent cation and gelsolin segment-1 binding. The solvent accessibilities of the probe sites, as measured by footprinting in solution for the Ca(2+)-G-actin and Mg(2+)-G-actin complexes with gelsolin segment-1, were consistent with available crystallographic data. This included a specific protection at the contact interface between the partners, as revealed by reduced reactivity of peptide 337-359 in the complex. Aside from the specific protection indicated previously, the oxidation rates for the reactive residues of the isolated Ca(2+)-G-actin were similar to those of the actin gelsolin segment-1 complexes; however, the reactivity of numerous residues in the isolated Mg(2+)-G-actin form was significantly reduced. Specifically, Mg(2+)-G-actin has a set of protected sites relative to Ca(2+)-G-actin that suggest a structural reorganization in subdomains 4 and 2 and a C-terminus more closely packed onto subdomain 1. These conformational variations for isolated Mg(2+)-G-actin provide a structural basis for its greater tendency to polymerize into filaments as compared to Ca(2+)-G-actin.

Actins↗