PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Emil Reisler

Publications and source records attributed to Emil Reisler.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Conformation and dynamics of the SH1-SH2 helix in scallop myosin.

Atomic structures of scallop myosin subfragment 1(S1) with the bound MgADP, MgAMPPNP, and MgADP.BeF(x) provide crystallographic evidence for a destabilization of the helix containing reactive thiols SH1 (Cys703) and SH2 (Cys693). A destabilization of this helix was not observed in previous structures of S1 (from chicken skeletal, Dictyostelium discoideum, and smooth muscle myosins), including complexes for which solution experiments indicated such a destabilization. In this study, the factors that influence the SH1-SH2 helix in scallop S1 were examined using monofunctional and bifunctional thiol reagents. The rate of monofunctional labeling of scallop S1 was increased in the presence of MgADP and MgATPgammaS but was inhibited by MgADP.V(i) and actin. The resulting changes in ATPase activities of S1 were symptomatic of SH2 and not SH1 modification, which was confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis. With bifunctional reagents of various lengths, cross-linking did not occur on a short time scale in the absence of nucleotides. In the presence of MgADP, cross-linking was greatly enhanced for all of the reagents. These reactions, as well as the formation of a disulfide bond between SH1 and SH2, were much faster in scallop S1.ADP than in rabbit skeletal S1.ADP and were rate-limited by the initial attachment of the reagent to scallop S1. The cross-linking sites were mapped by mass spectrometry to SH1 and SH2. These results reveal isoform-specific differences in the conformation and dynamics of the SH1-SH2 helix, providing a possible explanation for destabilization of this helix in some scallop S1 but not in other S1 isoform structures.

Animals↗

Solution properties of tetramethylrhodamine-modified G-actin.

In the recently solved structure of TMR-modified ADP-G-actin, the nucleotide cleft is in a closed state conformation, and the D-loop contains an alpha-helix (L. R. Otterbein, P. Graceffa, and R. Dominguez, 2001, Science, 293:708-711). Subsequently, questions were raised regarding the possible role of the TMR label on Cys(374) in determining these aspects of G-actin structure. We show here that the susceptibility of D-loop on G-actin to subtilisin cleavage, and ATP/ADP-dependent changes in this cleavage, are not affected by TMR-labeling of actin. The TMR modification inhibits nucleotide exchange, but has no effect on DNase I binding and the fast phase of tryptic digestion of actin. These results show an absence of allosteric effects of TMR on subdomain 2, while confirming ATP/ADP-dependent changes in D-loop structure. In conjunction with similar results obtained on actin-gelsolin segment 1 complex, this works reveals the limitations of solution methods in probing the putative open and closed nucleotide cleft states of G-actin.

Actins↗

Chemical decoupling of ATPase activation and force production from the contractile cycle in myosin by steric hindrance of lever-arm movement.

The myosin motor protein generates force in muscle by hydrolyzing Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) while interacting transiently with actin. Structural evidence suggests the myosin globular head (subfragment 1 or S1) is articulated with semi-rigid catalytic and lever-arm domains joined by a flexible converter domain. According to the prevailing hypothesis for energy transduction, ATP binding and hydrolysis in the catalytic domain drives the relative movement of the lever arm. Actin binding and reversal of the lever-arm movement (power stroke) applies force to actin. These domains interface at the reactive lysine, Lys84, where trinitrophenylation (TNP-Lys84-S1) was observed in this work to block actin activation of myosin ATPase and in vitro sliding of actin over myosin. TNP-Lys84-S1's properties and interactions with actin were examined to determine how trinitrophenylation causes these effects. Weak and strong actin binding, the rate of mantADP release from actomyosin, and actomyosin dissociation by ATP were equivalent in TNP-Lys84-S1 and native S1. Molecular dynamics calculations indicate that lever-arm movement inhibition during ATP hydrolysis and the power stroke is caused by steric clashes between TNP and the converter or lever-arm domains. Together these findings suggest that TNP uncouples actin activation of myosin ATPase and the power stroke from other steps in the contraction cycle by inhibiting the converter and lever-arm domain movements.

Actins↗

The regulation of subtilisin-cleaved actin by tropomyosin/troponin.

Vertebrate striated muscle contraction is regulated in a Ca(2+)-dependent fashion by tropomyosin (Tm) and troponin (Tn). This regulation involves shifts in the position of Tm and Tn on actin filaments and may include conformational changes in actin that are then communicated to myosin subfragment 1 (S1). To determine whether subdomain 2 of actin plays a role in this regulation, the DNase-I loop 38-52 of this subdomain was cleaved by subtilisin between residues Met(47) and Gly(48). Despite impaired unregulated function, the potentiation and regulation of cleaved actin movement in the in vitro motility assay was not significantly different from that of uncleaved actin. Stopped-flow measurements of ADP release from regulated and unregulated cleaved acto-S1 showed a marked increase in ADP release from acto-S1 in the presence of the regulatory complex. The enhancement of the actin affinity for S1 in the presence of regulatory proteins was greater for uncleaved than for cleaved F-actin. Finally, both cleaved and uncleaved actins protect myosin loop 1 from papain cleavage equally well. Our results suggest that the potentiation of actin function in the in vitro motility assay by regulatory proteins stems from changes in cross-bridge cycle kinetics. In addition, the unimpaired calcium-sensitive regulation of cleaved actin indicates that subdomain 2 conformation does not play an essential role in the regulation process.

Actins↗

Structural effects of cofilin on longitudinal contacts in F-actin.

Structural effects of yeast cofilin on skeletal muscle and yeast actin were examined in solution. Cofilin binding to native actin was non-cooperative and saturated at a 1:1 molar ratio, with K(d)<or=0.05 microM for both CaATP-G-actin and F-actin. Cofilin binding enhanced the fluorescence of dansyl ethylenediamine (DED) attached to Gln41 on the DNase I binding loop of skeletal muscle F-actin and decreased the fluorescence of AEDANS at Cys41 on yeast Q41C/C374S mutant F-actin. However, cofilin had no effect on the spectral properties of DED or AEDANS on CaATP-G-actin. Fluorescence energy transfer (FRET) from tryptophan residues to DED at Gln41 on skeletal muscle actin and to AEDANS at Cys41 on yeast Q41C/C374S actin was decreased by cofilin binding to F- but not to G-actin. Cofilin inhibited strongly the rate of interprotomer disulfide cross-linking of Cys41 to Cys374 on yeast Q41C mutant F-actin. Binding of cofilin enhanced excimer formation between pyrene probes attached to Cys41 and Cys374 on Q41C F-actin. These results indicate that cofilin alters the interface between subdomains 1 and 2 and shifts the DNase I binding loop away from subdomain 1 of an adjacent actin protomer. Cofilin reduced FRET from tryptophan residues to 4-azido-2-nitrophenyl-putrescine (ANP) at Gln41 in skeletal muscle F-but not in G-actin. However, following the interprotomer cross-linking of Gln41 to Cys374 in F-actin by ANP, cofilin binding did not change FRET from the tryptophan residues to ANP. This suggests that cofilin binding and the conformational effect on F-actin are not coupled tightly. Overall, this study provides solution evidence for the weakening of longitudinal, subdomain 2/1 contacts in F-actin by cofilin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Locking the hydrophobic loop 262-274 to G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation.

Models of F-actin structure predict the importance of hydrophobic loop 262-274 at the interface of subdomains 3 and 4 to interstrand interactions in filaments. If this premise is correct, prevention of the loop conformational change--its swinging motion--should abort filament formation. To test this hypothesis, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create yeast actin triple mutant (LC)2CA (L180C/L269C/C374A). This mutation places two cysteine residues in positions potentially enabling the locking of loop 262-274 to the monomer surface via disulfide formation. Exposure of the purified mutant to oxidation catalysts resulted in an increased electrophoretic mobility of actin on SDS PAGE and a loss of two cysteines by DTNB titrations, consistent with disulfide formation. The polymerization of un-cross-linked mutant actin by MgCl2 was inhibited strongly but could be restored to wild type actin levels by phalloidin and improved greatly through copolymerization with the wild-type actin. Light scattering measurements revealed nonspecific aggregation of the cross-linked actin under the same conditions. Electron microscopy confirmed the absence of filaments and the presence of amorphous aggregates in the cross-linked actin samples. Reduction of the disulfide bond by DTT restored normal actin polymerization in the presence of MgCl2 and phalloidin. These observations provide strong experimental support for a critical role of the hydrophobic loop 262-274 in the polymerization of actin into filaments.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Actin cross-linking and inhibition of the actomyosin motor.

Intrastrand cross-linking of actin filaments by ANP, N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl) putrescine, between Gln-41 in subdomain 2 and Cys-374 at the C-terminus, was shown to inhibit force generation with myosin in the in vitro motility assays [Kim et al. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17801-17809]. To clarify the immobilization of which of these two sites inhibits the actomyosin motor, the properties of actins with partially overlapping cross-linked sites were examined. pPDM (N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide) and ABP [N-(4-azidobenzoyl) putrescine] were used to obtain actin filaments cross-linked ( approximately 50%) between Cys-374 and Lys-191 (interstrand) and Gln-41 and Lys-113 (intrastrand), respectively. ANP, ABP, and pPDM cross-linked filaments showed similar inhibition of their sliding speeds and force generation with myosin ( approximately 25%) in the in vitro motility assays. In analogy to ANP cross-linking of actin, pPDM and ABP cross-linkings did not change the strong S1 binding to actin and the V(max) and K(m) parameters of actomyosin ATPase. The similar effects of these three cross-linkings reveal the tight coupling between structural elements of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface and show the importance of its dynamic flexibility to force generation with myosin. The possibility that actin cross-linkings inhibit rate-limiting steps in motion and force generation during myosin cross-bridge cycle was tested in stopped-flow experiments. Measurements of the rates of mantADP release from actoS1 and ATP-induced dissociation of actoS1 did not reveal any differences between un-cross-linked and ANP cross-linked actin in these complexes. These findings are discussed in terms of the uncoupling between force generation and other aspects of actomyosin interactions due to a constrained dynamic flexibility of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface in cross-linked actin filaments.

Actins↗

Thin filament regulation and ionic interactions between the N-terminal region in actin and troponin.

The N-terminal region in actin has been shown to interact with both myosin and troponin (Tn) during the cross-bridge cycle and in regulation. To study the role of this region in regulation, we used yeast actin mutants with increased and decreased numbers of acidic residues. The mutants included D24A/D25A, with Asp(24) and Asp(25) replaced with alanines; DNEQ, with the substitution of Asp(2) and Glu(4) with their amide analogs; and 4Ac, with Glu(3) and Asp(4) inserted in lieu of Ser(3). In the in vitro motility assay, using reconstituted regulated thin filaments, the sliding speeds of DNEQ, D24A/D25A, and 4Ac were similar at all pCa values. Thus, Ca(2+)-sensitivity of the thin filaments and the inhibitory function of TnI appear to be insensitive to changes in charge (+/-2) at the N-terminus of actin, suggesting little, if any, role of that actin region in regulation. A Ca(2+)-independent conformational change in that region was detected upon troponin binding to actin-Tm via an increase in the fluorescence of a pyrene probe attached to another yeast actin mutant that we used (Cys(1)).

Actins↗

Conformational dynamics of the SH1-SH2 helix in the transition states of myosin subfragment-1.

The alpha-helix containing the thiols, SH1 (Cys-707) and SH2 (Cys-697), has been proposed to be one of the structural elements responsible for the transduction of conformational changes in the myosin head (subfragment-1 (S1)). Previous studies, using a method that isolated and measured the rate of the SH1-SH2 cross-linking step, showed that this helix undergoes ligand-induced conformational changes. However, because of long incubation times required for the formation of the transition state complexes (S1.ADP.BeF(x), S1.ADP.AlF(4)-, and S1.ADP.V(i)), this method could not be used to determine the cross-linking rate constants for such states. In this study, kinetic data from the SH1-SH2 cross-linking reaction were analyzed by computational methods to extract rate constants for the two-step mechanism. For S1.ADP.BeF(x), the results obtained were similar to those for S1.ATPgammaS. For reactions involving S1.ADP.AlF(4)- and S1.ADP.V(i), the first step (SH1 modification) is rate limiting; consequently, only lower limits could be established for the rate constants of the cross-linking step. Nevertheless, these results show that the cross-linking rate constants in the transition state complexes are increased at least 20-fold for all the reagents, including the shortest one, compared with nucleotide-free S1. Thus, the SH1-SH2 helix appears to be destabilized in the post-hydrolysis state.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗