PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eric K Rowinsky

Publications and source records attributed to Eric K Rowinsky.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Clinical experience with monoclonal antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor.

Recent knowledge about the intermediate steps and final consequences of ligand-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation has clearly supported the notion that EGFR plays a fundamental role in regulating the proliferation and survival of malignant neoplasms. Among the rationally designed target-based therapeutics that are being assessed, those targeting EGFR appear to be some of the most clinically relevant. The strategy of using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to block ligand binding to the extracellular domain of the EGFR has led to the development of therapeutics that robustly arrest malignant cell proliferation and, in some cases, induce profound tumor regression. The chimeric mAb against EGFR, cetuximab, has already been approved by regulatory agencies worldwide to treat patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Other mAbs against EGFR, particularly panitumumab (ABX-EGF), h-R3, and EMD72000, are in advanced stages of clinical development.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Approaches to optimize the use of monoclonal antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor.

Preclinical and clinical studies consistently demonstrate the antitumor activity of the various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block ligand binding to the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the objective antitumor activities of these agents are disproportionately lower than would be expected based on the high rates of expression, overexpression, and aberrations of EGFR in human malignancies, particularly carcinomas. Several technologic and clinical approaches are being explored to optimize the potency of these antibodies, such as humanization of the murine parent molecules, and conjugation and widening of the specificity of the mAb. Also, combined therapy with the different types of EGFR-interacting or other targeted agents may lead to a heightened potential. This review highlights the results of current approaches for improvement of the therapeutic indices of these agents.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Erosion of the principal investigator role in a climate of industry dominance.

The academic investigator who was central to the development of anticancer therapeutics during the first several decades of that ushered in oncotherapeutics must now contend with working side-by-side with the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries who are dominating the scene. However, the relationships between industry and academic investigator are often strained, largely because of their incongruent and competing interests. Although the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are now developing some of the most exciting therapeutics to come along in many years, the academic investigator is facing a loss of autonomy and creativity, which may have been responsible for the successful development of many anticancer agents that would have not been developed in the present environment. This commentary discusses the impact of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries on the academic investigator, new challenges, and potential threats to optimal therapeutic development.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

A Phase II study of intravenous exatecan administered daily for 5 days, every 3 weeks to patients with biliary tract cancers.

PURPOSE: Exatecan is a hexacyclic topoisomerase-1 inhibitor that has broad in vitro and in vivo activity. A multicenter phase II study to determine the antitumor activity of exatecan was conducted in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with 0 to 1 prior chemotherapy regimens, adequate major organ function, and metastatic disease were eligible. Exatecan was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes daily on days 1 through 5 every 21 days. The primary end point was overall response rate: complete response and partial response (PR). A Simon optimal 2-stage design was employed. Response was assessed every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled. Two of 41 evaluated patients (4.9%) had a PR, 4 patients (9.8%) had a minor response, and 12 had stable disease. Twenty patients (51.2%) had progressive disease. The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia. The median overall survival was 7 months. The 6-month survival rate was 56.1% and the 12-month survival rate was 31.7%. CONCLUSION: Exatecan has minimal activity in advanced biliary tree cancers. Toxicity was predictable and manageable.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

ING-1, a monoclonal antibody targeting Ep-CAM in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of administration, safety, toxicity, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose, and biodistribution of ING-1, a high-affinity, Human-Engineered monoclonal antibody (heMAb) to the Mr 40,000 epithelial cell adhesion molecule Ep-CAM, in patients with advanced adenocarcinomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ING-1 was initially administered to patients as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Toxicity and pharmacokinetic data led to the evaluation of a weekly schedule. The distribution of iodine-131 (131I)-labeled ING-1 was studied. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received 82 courses of ING-1. Minimal toxicity was initially observed at the 0.03-, 0.10-, and 0.30-mg/kg dose levels. A patient dosed at 1.0 mg/kg developed acute pancreatitis with severe abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. A patient dosed at 0.3 mg/kg had an asymptomatic amylase and lipase elevation to 502 units/L and 1,627 units/L, respectively. Both patients made uncomplicated recoveries. No other dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Regardless of dose, the volume of distribution (mean +/- SEM) was 46.6 +/- 1.6 mL/kg. ING-1 clearance decreased with increasing dose. To minimize toxicity and increase dose intensity, we then administered ING-1 weekly. No significant toxicity was observed in 7 patients dosed at 0.1 mg/kg. Studies of 131I-labeled ING-1 biodistribution showed radiolocalization to colorectal and prostate cancers. A patient with colorectal cancer had an 80% decrement in the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for ING-1 is 0.10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion weekly. The absence of severe toxicity at this dose, low immunogenicity, and preliminary evidence of ING-1 tumor localization and antitumor efficacy support the further clinical development of this antibody to treat Ep-CAM-positive malignant diseases.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Administration of CI-1033, an irreversible pan-erbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is feasible on a 7-day on, 7-day off schedule: a phase I pharmacokinetic and food effect study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of administrating CI-1033, an oral 4-anilinoquinazoline that irreversibly inhibits the tyrosine kinase domain of all erbB subfamilies, on an intermittent schedule, and assess the interaction of CI-1033 with food on the pharmacokinetic behavior. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of CI-1033 from a dose level of 300 mg/day for 7 days every other week were administered to patients with advanced solid malignancies. Plasma concentration-time data sets from all evaluable patients were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Noncompartmental methods were used to independently assess the effect of a high-fat meal on CI-1033 absorption and bioavailability. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated with 69 twenty-eight day courses. The incidence of unacceptable toxicity, principally diarrhea and skin rash, was observed at the 300 mg/day dose level. At the 250 mg/day level, toxicity was manageable, and protracted administration was feasible. A one-compartment linear model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the pharmacokinetic disposition. CL/F, apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F), and ka (mean +/- relative SD) were 280 L/hour +/- 33%, 684 L +/- 20%, and 0.35 hour(-1)+/- 69%, respectively. Cmax values were achieved in 2 to 4 hours. Systemic CI-1033 exposure was largely unaffected by administration of a high-fat meal. At 250 mg, concentration values exceeded IC50 values required for prolonged pan-erbB tyrosine kinase inhibition in preclinical assays. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose on this schedule is 250 mg/day. Its tolerability and the biological relevance of concentrations achieved at the maximal tolerated dose warrant consideration of disease-directed evaluations. This intermittent treatment schedule can be used without regard to meals.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Col-3 (Metastat), an oral tetracycline derivative with potent matrix metalloproteinase and antitumor properties.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to assess the feasibility of administering Col-3, an oral chemically modified tetracycline derivative with potent inhibitory effects on matrix metalloproteinase activity and production, and recommend a dose on an uninterrupted once-daily schedule. The study also sought to characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of Col-3 and seek evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of Col-3 with dose level assignment according to an accelerated titration scheme. Because photosensitivity skin reactions were being reported in concurrent trials of Col-3, patients were instructed to apply sunscreen rigorously throughout the trial. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which <2 of the first 6 new patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic behavior of Col-3 was characterized, and pharmacodynamic relationships were sought. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were treated with 73 courses of Col-3 at four dose levels ranging from 36 to 98 mg/m2/day. Unacceptably high incidences of photosensitivity skin reactions and malaise were noted in the first 28-day courses of patients treated with Col-3 at doses exceeding 50 mg/m2/day. At 50 mg/m2/day, severe toxicity occurred in 2 of 12 new patients in first courses, and no additional dose-limiting toxicities were observed in subsequent courses. Other mild to modest adverse effects included nausea, vomiting, liver function tests abnormalities, diarrhea, mucositis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The pharmacokinetics of Col-3 were dose proportional, and mean trough concentrations at steady state were similar to biologically relevant concentrations in preclinical studies. Major responses did not occur, but durable disease stability was noted in 3 patients, one each with carcinosarcoma of the uterus, pancreas, and ovary, all of whom had experienced disease progression before Col-3 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II studies of Col-3 administered once daily on an uninterrupted schedule is 50 mg/m2/day accompanied by efforts that promote adherence to the use of sunscreen and other photoprotective measures. Pharmacokinetic results indicate that plasma concentrations above biologically relevant concentrations are readily maintained at this dose, and additional disease-directed studies, particularly in patients with soft tissue sarcoma, should be considered.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non--small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Erlotinib is a highly specific epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This phase II study of erlotinib in patients with HER1/EGFR-expressing non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy evaluated tumor response, survival, and symptom improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients received an oral, continuous daily dose of 150 mg of erlotinib. Assessments of objective response used WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, supplemented with a lung cancer module, Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13, was used to measure health-related quality of life. Additional analyses were performed to identify predictors of response and survival. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 12.3% (95% CI, 5.1% to 23.7%). Responses were observed regardless of type or number of prior chemotherapy regimens. Median survival time was 8.4 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 13.9 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 40% (95% CI, 28% to 54%). Erlotinib therapy was associated with tumor-related symptom improvement. The drug was well tolerated; drug-related cutaneous rash and diarrhea were observed in 75% and 56% of patients, respectively. One patient experienced toxicity consisting of severe grade 3 rash and diarrhea. Time since diagnosis and good performance status were significant predictors of survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, whereas HER1/EGFR staining intensity was not. Additionally, survival correlated with the occurrence and severity of rash. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib was active and well tolerated in this patient population, and further clinical development is clearly warranted. Cutaneous rash seems to be a surrogate marker of clinical benefit, but this finding should be confirmed in ongoing and future studies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

A Phase I pharmacokinetic and biological correlative study of oblimersen sodium (genasense, g3139), an antisense oligonucleotide to the bcl-2 mRNA, and of docetaxel in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering oblimersen sodium, a phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide directed to the Bcl-2 mRNA, with docetaxel to patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer; to characterize the pertinent pharmacokinetic parameters, Bcl-2 protein inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cell(s) (PBMC) and tumor; and to seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated with increasing doses of oblimersen sodium administered by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1 to 6 and docetaxel administered i.v. over 1 h on day 6 every 3 weeks. Plasma was sampled to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of both oblimersen and docetaxel, and Bcl-2 protein expression was measured from paired collections of PBMCs pretreatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: Twenty patients received 124 courses of the oblimersen and docetaxel combination at doses ranging from 5 to 7 mg/kg/day oblimersen and 60 to 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel. The rate of severe fatigue accompanied by severe neutropenia was unacceptably high at doses exceeding 7 mg/kg/day oblimersen and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Nausea, vomiting, and fever were common, but rarely severe. Oblimersen mean steady-state concentrations were 3.44 +/- 1.31 and 5.32 +/- 2.34 at the 5- and 7-mg/kg dose levels, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen responses were observed in 7 of 12 taxane-naïve patients, but in taxane-refractory patients no responses were observed. Preliminary evaluation of Bcl-2 expression in diagnostic tumor specimens was not predictive of response to this therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended Phase II doses for oblimersen and docetaxel on this schedule are 7 mg/kg/day continuous i.v. infusion days 1 to 6, and 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 6, respectively, once every 3 weeks. The absence of severe toxicities at this recommended dose, evidence of Bcl-2 protein inhibition in PBMC and tumor tissue, and encouraging antitumor activity in HPRC patients warrant further clinical evaluation of this combination.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1, which consists of a mixture of a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug (tegafur), a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor [5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyrimidine (CDHP)], and an inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase [potassium oxonate (oxonic acid)], was developed to increase the feasibility and therapeutic index of 5-FU administered orally. The principal objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of administering S-1 on a once-daily-for-28-day schedule every 5 weeks, determine the maximum tolerated dose, characterize the pharmacokinetics of S-1, and seek evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of S-1 on a once-daily oral schedule for 28 days every 5 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose in which fewer than two of the first six new patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the tegafur, CDHP, and oxonic acid constituents were characterized. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with 72 courses of S-1 at three dose levels ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2)/day. Diarrhea, which was often associated with abdominal discomfort and cramping, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of S-1 on this protracted schedule. Nausea, vomiting, mucositis, fatigue, and cutaneous effects were also observed but were rarely severe. Myelosuppression was modest and uncommon. A partial response and a 49% reduction in tumor size were observed in patients with fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma. The pharmacokinetic data suggested potent inhibition of 5-FU clearance by CHDP, with resultant 5-FU exposure at least 10-fold higher than that reported from equitoxic doses of tegafur modulated by uracil in the oral fluoropyrimidine UFT. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II studies of S-1 administered once daily for 28 consecutive days every 5 weeks is 50 mg/m(2)/day. The pharmacokinetic data indicate substantial modulation of 5-FU clearance by CDHP. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, the predictable toxicity profile of S-1, and the low incidence of severe adverse effects at the recommended Phase II dose, evaluations of S-1 on this schedule are warranted in malignancies that are sensitive to the fluoropyrimidines.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and to characterize its toxicity, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The antitumor activity, as well as the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of ABX-EGF, were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were treated with ABX-EGF doses of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 mg/kg weekly with no loading dose. EGFr immunostaining was performed on 76 tumor biopsy specimens (86%), and 69 (91%) scored positive. Major responses occurred in three patients, and two patients had minor responses. Forty-four patients (50%) also had stable disease at their first 8-week assessment, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 100 days (95% CI, 58 to 140 days). Low hemoglobin and high alkaline phosphatase predicted for short PFS. The principal toxicity, an acneiform rash, occurred in 68%, 95%, 87%, and 100% of patients who received at least three doses of ABX-EGF at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mg/kg/wk, respectively. A trend indicated that the severity of the rash may relate to PFS. No human antihuman antibodies were detected. ABX-EGF pharmacokinetics fit a model that incorporated both linear and saturable EGFr-mediated clearance mechanisms, and interindividual variability was low. At 2.5 mg/kg/wk, ABX-EGF concentrations throughout treatment exceeded those estimated to saturate nonlinear clearance and inhibit xenograft growth by 90%. CONCLUSION: ABX-EGF was generally well tolerated. The objective response rate was low in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although skin rash may be a pharmacodynamic marker of drug action, its potential as a surrogate marker of clinical benefit requires further evaluation.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed2004

Curtailing the high rate of late-stage attrition of investigational therapeutics against unprecedented targets in patients with lung and other malignancies.

A greater understanding of the pathogenesis and biology of cancer coupled with major advances in biotechnology has resulted in the identification of rationally designed, target-based (RDTB) anticancer therapeutics, ushering in new therapeutic opportunities and high expectations for the future as well as developmental challenges. Because these agents appear to principally target malignant cells, it is expected that they will produce less toxicity at clinically effective doses than nonspecific cytotoxic agents, but their target requirements are likely to be much more stringent. The innate complexity of the networks that contain elements targeted by these agents also decreases the probability that any single therapeutic manipulation will result in robust clinical activity and success when used alone, particularly in patients with solid malignancies that have multiple relevant signaling aberrations. In contrast, proof of principle and robust antitumor activity may be most efficiently demonstrated in nonrandomized evaluations involving tumors that are principally driven by aberrations of the specific target. The predominant therapeutic manifestation of RDTB agents in preclinical studies is due to decreased tumor growth rates and will likely be similar in the clinic; however, such manifestations are not readily detectable and quantifiable using nonrandomized clinical evaluations. To curtail the increasing rate of late-stage attrition of RDTB agents, which, if maintained, will stymie progress in cancer therapy, the design of initial nonrandomized evaluations, particularly the selection of tumors and patients, must be guided by the principal biological features of the agents. Next, evaluations, some of which must be randomized, can be performed in a wide range of tumor types, depending on the presence and relevance of the target. To validate the concept of RDTB therapeutics and to realize their full potential, radically different development, evaluation, and regulatory paradigms must be adopted.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Preclinical and clinical evaluations of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane glycoprotein, with an extracellular ligand-binding domain and intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. Ligand binding induces EGFR dimerization and autophosphorylation on several tyrosine residues in the intracellular domain, leading to mitogenic signal transduction. EGFR overexpression correlates with a poor prognosis and is often associated with malignant transformation in a variety of epithelial cancers. ABX-EGF is a high-affinity (dissociation constant K(D) = 5 x 10(-11) M) fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody against human EGFR. ABX-EGF binds EGFR and blocks receptor binding of EGF and transforming growth factor-alpha, inhibiting EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation and tumor cell activation. ABX-EGF prevents tumor formation and eradicates large, established A431 tumors in xenograft models. Tumor growth inhibition occurs at relatively low doses, without concomitant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. When combined with chemotherapeutic agents, ABX-EGF has resulted in additive antitumor activity. A Phase I clinical trial has demonstrated activity in several tumor types, and the results from a Phase II trial for renal cell cancer also showed modest activity. Therapy was generally well tolerated without statistically significant adverse events. Monoclonal antibody blockade of EGFR represents a new and exciting direction in cancer therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

A randomized phase I and pharmacological trial of sequences of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and temozolomide in patients with advanced solid neoplasms.

PURPOSE: O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT) is modulated by methylating agents, which, in turn, abrogates nitrosourea resistance in preclinical studies. The feasibility of administering various sequences of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and temozolomide (TEM) in patients with advanced solid neoplasms was evaluated in this Phase I and pharmacological study to assess this premise in the clinical setting. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) levels of BCNU and TEM as a function of Seq, to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of TEM administered both before and after BCNU, assess AGAT fluctuations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-three patients were randomized to receive treatment with oral TEM daily on days 1-5 and BCNU administered i.v., either on day 1 before TEM [Sequence (Seq) B-->T] or day 5 after TEM (Seq T-->B). Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks. Blood sampling for PK studies was performed on both days 1 and 5 of course one. PBMCs were sampled to evaluate major sequence-dependent effects on AGAT levels. RESULTS: Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities of the BCNU/TEM regimen. These effects were more prominent in patients receiving Seq T-->B, resulting in a much lower MTD of 80/100 mg/m(2)/day compared with 150/110 mg/m(2)/day for Seq B-->T. Notable antitumor activity was observed in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, sarcoma, and ovarian carcinoma. No sequence-dependent PK effects were noted to account for sequence-dependent toxicological effects. At the MTD level, AGAT activity in PBMCs decreased 3-fold, on average, and AGAT fluctuations did not appear to be sequence-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The principal toxicities of the BCNU/TEM regimen were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were consistent and predictable, albeit sequence-dependent. Seq T-->B was substantially more myelosuppressive, resulting in disparate MTDs and dose levels recommended for subsequent disease-directed evaluations (150/110 and 80/100 mg/m(2)/day for Seq B-->T and T-->B, respectively). Sequence-dependent differences in TEM PK do not account for this clinically relevant magnitude of sequence-dependent toxicity. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of BCNU/TEM, the paucity of severe nonhematological toxicities, and antitumor activity at tolerable doses warrant disease-directed evaluations on this schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A phase II study of intravenous exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) administered daily for five days every three weeks to patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the antitumor activity, toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DX-8951f administered as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with fluorouracil-resistant metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were enrolled. All had metastatic colorectal carcinoma resistant to or progressing after chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil and no prior chemotherapy with camptothecin derivatives. DX-8951f was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Responses were assessed after every two courses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluable. Fifty-one courses of therapy were delivered (median 2). Responses were one minor response, six stable disease, and eight progressive disease. The principal adverse event was neutropenia, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities in three and eight patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild to moderate; the most common were fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Plasma concentrations of DX-8951 were well described using a linear two-compartment PK model. There was no evidence of nonlinearity in the elimination of PK or auto-inhibition or induction of DX-8951 clearance over the 5 days of administration. CONCLUSIONS: DX-8951f at this dose and schedule had no significant activity in this patient population. The toxicity profile, mainly hematologic, was consistent with previous reports. The clearance and volume of distribution were not different from those previously reported.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the nonpolyglutamatable thymidylate synthase inhibitor ZD9331 plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering ZD9331, a thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor that does not undergo polyglutamation and has broad antitumor activity, in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The study also sought to determine the principal toxicities of the regimen and recommend appropriate doses for phase II studies, characterize the pharmacokinetics of the agents, evaluate the possibility of major drug-drug interactions, and seek preliminary evidence of anti-cancer activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of docetaxel as a 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusion followed 30 minutes later by ZD9331 as a 30-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks. At least three patients were treated at each dose level, and the maximum tolerated dose level was defined as the highest dose level that was not associated with an unacceptably high incidence of severe toxicity. The pharmacokinetics of both ZD9331 and docetaxel were also characterized. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated with 71 cycles of ZD9331 and docetaxel (ZD9331/docetaxel) at dose levels that encompassed dosing iterations of ZD9331 ranging from 65 to 260 mg/m(2) and docetaxel doses in the range of 50 to 75 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of the ZD9331/docetaxel regimen. Since five of six patients treated at the ZD9331/docetaxel dose-level of 260/60 mg/m(2) had grade 4 neutropenia that was brief and uncomplicated in the first course, a rigorous exploration of higher dose levels was not undertaken. Nonhematologic toxicities, consisting of malaise, diarrhea, rash, nausea, and vomiting, were also observed, but these effects were rarely severe. No major antitumor responses were observed. The pharmacokinetics of both ZD9331 and docetaxel were similar to those reported in previous studies of each agent administered alone, suggesting the lack of major drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen, consisting of ZD9331 and docetaxel, is feasible and well tolerated at single-agent doses that are clinically-relevant. This ZD9331/docetaxel regimen does not appear to be associated with either major pharmacokinetic or toxicologic drug-drug interactions. A ZD9331/docetaxel dose level of 260/60 mg/m(2) is recommended as an initial dose level in disease-directed studies of the regimen, with further dose escalation of docetaxel to 75 mg/m(2) if the initial treatment is well tolerated. Further studies with this regimen are warranted in tumor types that have demonstrated sensitivity to both agents.

Adult↗