A widening prospect: Imatinib and novel applications of targeted therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
Eric K Rowinsky
Publications and source records attributed to Eric K Rowinsky.
Targeting the molecular target of rapamycin (mTOR).
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The molecular target of rapamycin, which is a member of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase related kinase family and a central modulator of cell growth, is a unique and prime strategic target for anticancer therapeutic development. RECENT FINDINGS: The molecular target of rapamycin plays a critical role in transducing proliferative signals mediated through the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase and protein kinase B signaling pathways, principally by activating downstream protein kinases that are required for both ribosomal biosynthesis and translation of mRNAs of proteins that are essential for G1 to S phase traverse. By targeting the molecular target of rapamycin with high potency and specificity, the immunosuppressant and antiproliferative agent rapamycin inhibits signals required for cell cycle progression, cell growth, and proliferation. Both rapamycin and several rapamycin analogs with more favorable pharmaceutical properties have demonstrated impressive growth inhibitory effects against a broad range of human cancers in both preclinical and early clinical evaluations. SUMMARY: This review discusses recent findings regarding the principal mechanisms of action of the rapamycins, the potential utility of these agents as anticancer therapeutics, clinical results to date, and developmental challenges that lie ahead.
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
The erbB family: targets for therapeutic development against cancer and therapeutic strategies using monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
The overexpression and aberrant function of members of the erbB family of receptors, particularly erbB1 (also known as epidermal growth factor receptor), and its ligands in many human cancers have provided a rationale for targeting this signaling network with novel approaches. erbB1 is a selective target for inhibiting cancers because its activation often confers a proliferative advantage. Activation of the erbB1 tyrosine kinase provides signals that drive dysregulated proliferation, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and cell survival, and its inhibition has potential in both the treatment and prevention of these malignancies. Based on the structure and function of erbB1, two therapeutic strategies have been developed. The first uses human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) generated against the receptor's ligand-binding extracellular domain. These MAbs block binding of receptor-activating ligands, and, in some cases, can induce receptor endocytosis and downregulation. The second uses small molecules that compete with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for binding to the receptor's kinase pocket, thereby blocking receptor activation and the transduction of postreceptor signals. Early clinical studies suggest that both approaches are well tolerated and can induce clinical activity in many common malignancies.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Development of rationally designed, target-based agents for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Although there have been several recent additions to the conventional armamentarium used to treat patients with advanced colorectal cancer, principally as a result of the development of selective and nonselective pharmacologic agents and antibodies, the general outcome of patients with advanced disease is still poor. However, a greater understanding of cancer biology, as well as major advances in biotechnology, is beginning to identify and characterize molecular aberrations that are common in patients with colorectal cancer. These advances have resulted in the development of a wide range of rationally designed, target-based anticancer therapeutic agents, which, by virtue of their selectivity, would be expected to produce less nonspecific toxicity and therefore higher therapeutic indices compared with nonspecific cytotoxic agents. This review will discuss several novel targets and therapeutic agents, particularly those designed to interrupt aberrant signal transduction and apoptotic processes. It will also emphasize the complexity of these systems and the need to incorporate novel clinical development paradigms based on a thorough scientific understanding of these targets.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations on the response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: target-based populations for target-based drugs.
The recent identification of somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of tumor samples from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that portend robust response to small-molecule inhibitors of EGFR TK is a watershed event in the fields of lung cancer genetics and therapeutic agents. In addition to paralleling what is already known about c-kit mutations that drive the proliferation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and their response to imatinib, and providing the possibility of prospectively selecting patients with NSCLC who have a high probability of responding to EGFR TK inhibitors, these reports will likely have much broader implications with regard to the optimal and most expeditious means to develop rationally designed, target-based therapeutic agents--first establishing proof of principle in patients whose malignancies are dependent or driven by aberrations of the therapeutic's target. These new findings will undoubtedly lead to a greater understanding of the biology of EGFR-mutant NSCLC and the mechanism of action of EGFR TK inhibitors. This further validates EGFR as a target for anticancer therapy, particularly in tumors with activating mutations of the target, which lead to sequencing of genes that govern other relevant proteins that are currently being targeted with novel therapeutic agents. The result should be more efficient and scientifically founded clinical development strategies for rationally designed target-based therapeutic agents.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ILX-295501, an oral diarylsulfonylurea, on a weekly for 3 weeks every 4-week schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to assess the feasibility of administering the oral diarylsulfonylurea (DSU) ILX-295501 on a weekly for 3 weeks every 4-week schedule. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ILX-295501 on this schedule, characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior, and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The initial starting dose of ILX-295501 was 100 mg/m(2), which was equivalent to one-sixth of the highest dose that did not induce irreversible toxicity in dogs, and, using a modified Fibonnaci search scheme to guide dose level selection, the following dose levels were evaluated: 100, 200, 400, 600, 900, 1350, and 1800 mg/m(2). Because severe toxicities were being reported in other trials at doses that encompassed this range and a cumulative toxicity profile was emerging, the study was suspended and then reinitiated to further reevaluate the lower dosing range. In the second part of the study, the following dose levels were selected a priori for evaluation: 400, 800, 1000, 1250, and 1500 mg/m(2); and a modified continual reassessment model was used for dose assignment to determine the MTD, which was defined a priori as the highest dose in which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity in the first course did not exceed 20%. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were treated with 142 courses of ILX-295501 at doses ranging from 100 to 1800 mg/m(2). The incidences of dose-limiting toxicity, principally neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, were unacceptably high at ILX-295501 doses exceeding 1000 mg/m(2), which was determined to be the MTD for both minimally pretreated and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. In contrast to the first generation of DSUs, particularly sulofenur, clinically relevant levels of oxidized hemoglobin (methemoglobin) and secondary hemolytic anemia, were not noted. One HP patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma experienced a partial response. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that ILX-295501 was absorbed slowly, with peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) achieving 6.02 h, on average, after oral administration. The pharmacokinetic behavior of ILX-295501 was characterized by dose proportionality, a relatively small apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)/F), averaging 8.02 +/- 14.08 liters, and low apparent total body clearance (CL(t)/F) rate (mean, 0.036 +/- 0.116 liters/h). The initial drug distribution phase was rapid [harmonic mean half-life (t(1/2alpha)), 2.1 +/- 7.0 min], whereas the terminal elimination phase was slow (harmonic mean t(1/2beta,) 150.6 +/- 80.2 h). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II studies of the oral DSU ILX-295501 administered weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks is 1000 mg/m(2)/day for both minimally pretreated and HP patients. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of ILX-295501, the paucity of severe nonhematological toxicities, and preliminary antitumor activity warrant disease-directed evaluations of ILX-295501.
Administration, Oral↗
A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biological study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies.
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering tipifarnib, an oral nonpeptidomimetic competitive inhibitor of farnesyltransferase, in combination with gemcitabine and recommend doses for disease-directed clinical trials. The study also sought to identify drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, evaluate effects on protein farnesylation, and seek preliminary evidence for clinical activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with tipifarnib at doses of 100, 200, and 300 mg twice daily continuously and 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. To identify pharmacokinetic interactions, the treatment and plasma sampling schemes were designed to permit comparisons of the pharmacokinetic behavior of each agent administered alone and together. The proportions of unfarnesylated and farnesylated HDJ2, a chaperone protein that undergoes farnesylation, were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Nineteen evaluable patients were treated with 74 courses of tipifarnib/gemcitabine (mg/mg/m(2)). Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity. Dose-limiting myelosuppression occurred in 2 of 5 patients at the 300/1000 dose level, whereas 2 of 11 evaluable patients at the 200/1000 dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity. There was no evidence of clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between tipifarnib and gemcitabine. Inhibition of farnesylation of HDJ2, a potential surrogate for Ras and/or other potentially relevant farnesylated proteins, was demonstrated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at all dose levels. Partial responses were noted in patients with advanced pancreatic and nasopharyngeal carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the results of this study, the tipifarnib/gemcitabine dose level of 200/1000 is recommended for disease-directed studies. At this dose level, biologically relevant plasma concentrations of tipifarnib that consistently inhibit protein farnesylation in vitro are achieved and drug-induced inhibition of protein farnesylation is measured in most patients.
Adult↗
Dose-intense paclitaxel: deja vu all over again?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
Challenges of developing therapeutics that target signal transduction in patients with gynecologic and other malignancies.
A greater understanding of cancer biology and major advances in biotechnology have resulted in the identification of a plethora of rationally designed, target-based anticancer therapeutics, particularly those that inhibit malignant-cell signal transduction, ushering in new therapeutic opportunities and extraordinary developmental challenges. Because these agents seem to principally target malignant cells, it is expected that they will produce less toxicity at clinically effective doses than nonspecific cytotoxic agents. The innate complexity of signaling networks, which have redundant relay systems that confer robustness, adaptability, and signaling diversity, also decreases the probability that any single therapeutic manipulation against any specific signaling element will be highly successful when used alone, particularly in patients with solid malignancies that have multiple relevant signaling aberrations. In addition, because the predominant therapeutic effect of inhibitors of signal transduction processes in preclinical studies is a decreased rate of tumor growth, it is anticipated that the predominant therapeutic outcome in the clinic will be similar; however, this end point is not readily detectable or quantifiable using traditional clinical evaluation methods. Furthermore, the results of preclinical and early clinical studies indicate that dose-toxicity relationships are not likely to be as steep as with nonspecific cytotoxic agents. Therefore, both regulatory and clinical practice end points, such as time to disease progression, disease-related symptoms, and quality of life, which are generally considered secondary for cytotoxic agents, may evolve into primary end points. The cumulative results of developmental evaluations to date indicate that the development, evaluation, and general clinical use of rationally designed, target-based anticancer therapeutics will require a radical departure from traditional paradigms to exploit the full potential of these new therapies.
Animals↗
Progress in the management of gynecologic cancer: consensus summary statement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Randomized phase I trial of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemotherapy: potential role as mucosal protectant.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) when administered with fluorouracil (FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 81) received KGF by intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1 to 3, followed by FU 425 mg/m2/d IV bolus plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d IV on days 4 to 8. KGF dose levels were 1, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 microg/kg/d. A randomized, placebo-controlled design was employed (2:1 randomization of KGF to placebo). Oral mucositis was assessed by examination on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 28. In addition, patients provided daily assessments of oral symptoms using a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Skin and oral events occurred in 13 of 18 patients (eight patients, grade 1; four patients, grade 2; and one patient, grade 3) treated with 60 and 80 microg/kg of KGF and three of 11 patients treated with 40 microg/kg (grade 1). These symptoms were dose limiting in three cases (ie, in two of 10 patients treated with 80 microg/kg and in one of eight patients treated with 60 microg/kg). The frequency of grade 2 to 4 mucositis was 43% in patients treated with KGF, compared with 67% in patients treated with placebo (P =.06). Patient self-assessments of oral pain and clinical assessments of mucositis showed good correlation (Kendall's tau = 0.75). CONCLUSION: KGF is generally well tolerated when administered IV at doses up to 40 microg/kg/d for 3 days before a 5-day course of FU plus leucovorin. A clinically meaningful biologic effect was also suggested in that patients treated with the epithelial growth factor KGF had a lower rate of grade 2 to 4 mucositis than did patients treated with placebo.
Adult↗
The future of cytotoxic therapy: selective cytotoxicity based on biology is the key.
Although mortality from breast cancer is decreasing, 15% or more of all patients ultimately develop incurable metastatic disease. It is hoped that new classes of target-based cytotoxic therapeutics will significantly improve the outcome for these patients. Many of these novel agents have displayed cytotoxic activity in preclinical and clinical evaluations, with little toxicity. Such preferential cytotoxicity against malignant tissues will remain tantamount to the Holy Grail in oncologic therapeutics because this portends improved patient tolerance and overall quality of life, and the capacity to deliver combination therapy. Combinations of such rationally designed target-based therapies are likely to be increasingly important in treating patients with breast carcinoma. The anticancer efficacy of these agents will, however, remain dependent on the involvement of the targets of these agents in the biology of the individual patient's disease. Results of DNA microarray analyses have raised high hopes that the analyses of RNA expression levels can successfully predict patient prognosis, and indicate that the ability to rapidly 'fingerprint' the oncogenic profile of a patient's tumor is now possible. It is hoped that these studies will support the identification of the molecules driving a tumor's growth, and the selection of the appropriate combination of targeted agents in the near future.
Animals↗
Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193).
PURPOSE: Between February 1993 and September 1995, 739 patients with metastatic breast cancer were entered on an Intergroup trial (E1193) comparing doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)), paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)/24 h), and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT, 50 mg/m(2) and 150 mg/m(2)/24 h, plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 mg/kg) as first-line therapy. Patients receiving single-agent doxorubicin or paclitaxel were crossed over to the other agent at time of progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were well balanced for on-study characteristics. RESULTS: Responses (complete response and partial response) were seen in 36% of doxorubicin, 34% of paclitaxel, and 47% of AT patients (P =.84 for doxorubicin v paclitaxel, P =.007 for v AT, P =.004 for paclitaxel v AT). Median time to treatment failure (TTF) is 5.8, 6.0, and 8.0 months for doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and AT, respectively (P =.68 for doxorubicin v paclitaxel, P =.003 for doxorubicin v AT, P =.009 for paclitaxel v AT). Median survivals are 18.9 months for patients taking doxorubicin, 22.2 months for patients taking paclitaxel, and 22.0 months for patients taking AT (P = not significant). Responses were seen in 20% of patients crossing from doxorubicin --> paclitaxel and 22% of patients crossing from paclitaxel --> doxorubicin (P = not significant). Changes in global quality-of-life measurements from on-study to week 16 were similar in all three groups. CONCLUSION: (1) doxorubicin and paclitaxel, in the doses used here, have equivalent activity; (2) the combination of AT results in superior overall response rates and time to TTF; and (3) despite these results, combination therapy with AT did not improve either survival or quality of life compared to sequential single-agent therapy.
Adult↗
Cantuzumab mertansine, a maytansinoid immunoconjugate directed to the CanAg antigen: a phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biologic correlative study.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of cantuzumab mertansine, an immunoconjugate of the potent maytansine derivative (DM1) and the humanized monoclonal antibody (huC242) directed to CanAg, intravenously (i.v.) once every 3 weeks and to seek evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CanAg-expressing solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of cantuzumab mertansine administered i.v. every 3 weeks. The pharmacokinetic parameters of cantuzumab mertansine, the presence of plasma-shed CanAg, and the development of both human antihuman and human anti-DM1 conjugate antibodies also were characterized. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 110 courses of cantuzumab mertansine at doses ranging from 22 to 295 mg/m2. Acute, transient, and reversible elevations of hepatic transaminases were the principal toxic effects. Nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and diarrhea were common but rarely severe at the highest dose levels. Dose, peak concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve correlated with the severity of transaminase elevation. The mean (+/- SD) clearance and terminal elimination half-life values for cantuzumab mertansine averaged 39.5 (+/-13.1) mL/h/m2 and 41.1 (+/-16.1) hours, respectively. Strong expression (3+) of CanAg was documented in 68% of patients. Two patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal carcinoma had minor regressions, and four patients had persistently stable disease for more than six courses. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for cantuzumab mertansine is 235 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. The absence of severe hematologic toxic effects, preliminary evidence of cantuzumab mertansine tumor localization, and encouraging biologic activity in chemotherapy-refractory patients warrant further broad clinical development of this immunoconjugate in CanAg-expressing tumors.
Adult↗
A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pegylated camptothecin as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering camptothecin (CPT), the prototypic topoisomerase I inhibitor, as polyethylene glycol (PEG)-CPT, a macromolecule consisting of CPT conjugated to chemically modified PEG. The study also sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of PEG-CPT, characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior, and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of PEG-CPT as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks. A modified continual reassessment method was used for dose-level assignment to determine the MTD, which was defined as the highest dose level at which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity did not exceed 20%. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were treated with 144 courses of PEG-CPT at seven dose levels ranging from 600 to 8,750 mg/m(2). Severe myelosuppression was consistently experienced by heavily pretreated (HP) and minimally pretreated (MP) patients at the highest dose level evaluated, 8,750 mg/m(2), whereas both HP and MP patients tolerated repetitive treatment at 7,000 mg/m(2). Cystitis, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also observed but were rarely severe. A partial response was noted in a patient with platinum- and etoposide-resistant small-cell lung carcinoma, and minor responses were noted in one patient each with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary type and osteosarcoma. The pharmacokinetics of free CPT were dose proportional. Free CPT accumulated slowly in plasma, with maximal plasma concentrations achieved at 23 +/- 12.3 hours; the harmonic mean half-life (t(1/2)) of free CPT was long (t(1/2), 77.46 +/- 36.77 hours). CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant doses of CPT can be delivered by administering PEG-CPT. The recommended dose for phase II studies in both MP and HP patients is 7,000 mg/m(2) as 1-hour IV every 3 weeks. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of PEG-CPT, the paucity of severe nonhematologic toxicities with repetitive treatment, the preliminary antitumor activity noted, and the slow clearance of CPT enabling simulation of desirable pharmacokinetic parameters with a convenient single-dosing regimen warrant further disease-directed evaluations.
Adult↗
A phase I and pharmacologic study of pyrazoloacridine and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.
Pyrazoloacridine (PZA, NSC366140, PD115934) is an acridine derivative currently undergoing clinical evaluation. In preclinical testing, PZA has shown selectivity for solid tumor cell lines, activity in hypoxic, noncycling, and multidrug-resistant cell lines, and synergy with cisplatin in a variety of lung cancer cell lines. In early phase I clinical studies PZA has shown modest activity in ovarian, cervical, and colon cancer. The purpose of the present study was threefold: to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of PZA (3-h infusion) and cisplatin administered with and without Filgrastim (G-CSF) (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) every 3 weeks in untreated or minimally pretreated patients, to describe and quantify the clinical toxicities of combination chemotherapy with PZA and cisplatin, and to evaluate the effects of drug sequencing on the toxicity profile and pharmacologic behavior of PZA. The starting doses in this dose-escalation trial were PZA 400 mg/m2 as a 3-h intravenous infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 as a 1 mg/min intravenous infusion. The sequence of drugs was alternated with each successive course in each patient treated. Twenty-one patients with refractory solid tumors received 43 courses of therapy through four dose levels. Neutropenia was dose-limiting and defined the maximum tolerated dose of PZA 400 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 without G-CSF support. With G-CSF support, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated and recommended doses for further study of this combination are PZA 600 mg/m2 over 3 h and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that sequence does not impact on the pharmacokinetics of PZA when given in combination with cisplatin.
Acridines↗
The alkylating agent penclomedine induces degeneration of purkinje cells in the rat cerebellum.
PURPOSE: Penclomedine (PEN), a multichlorinated alpha-picoline derivative which is metabolized to highly reactive alkylating species, was selected for clinical development due to its prominent activity against a wide range of human tumor xenografts when administered either parentally or orally. Its principal dose-limiting toxicity in preclinical and clinical studies has been neurocerebellar toxicity, which has been related to the magnitude of peak plasma PEN concentrations, but not to plasma concentrations of its putative principal alkylating metabolite, 4,o-demethylpenclomedine (DMPEN). These observation, as well as PEN's toxicologic, pharmacologic, and tissue distribution profiles, have suggested that the parent compound is primarily responsible for cerebellar toxicity. The studies described in this report were undertaken to characterize the neuropathology of PEN neurotoxicity, with a long-term goal of developing strategies to maximize its therapeutic index. DESIGN: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with therapeutically relevant doses of PEN, orally and intraperitoneally (i.p.), on various administration schedules, and DMPEN administered i.p. The animals were monitored for neurotoxicity, and brain sections were examined for neuropathology, particularly Purkinje cell loss and neuronal injury. Brain sections were stained using standard histochemical techniques and immunostained with OX-42 to detect microglial cells that are activated following neuronal damage, and calbindin D(28K), a calcium-binding protein expressed by cerebellar Purkinje cells. RESULTS: Dose-related neurocerebellar toxicity associated with parasagittal bands of Purkinje cell degeneration and microglial activation in the cerebellar vermis were evident in rats treated with PEN 100-400 mg/kg i.p. as a single dose. Neuronal injury was not observed in other regions of the brain. Furthermore, neither clinical nor histopathological evidence of cerebellar toxicity was apparent in rats treated with similar total doses of PEN administered i.p. on a dailyx5-day dosing schedule. Similar histological findings, in an identical neuroanatomical distribution, were observed in rats treated with PEN orally; however, the magnitude of the neuronal toxicity was much less than in animals treated with equivalent doses of PEN administered i.p. Although acute lethality occurred in some rats treated with equimolar doses of DMPEN as a single i.p. treatment, surviving animals exhibited neither signs nor histopathological evidence of neurocerebellar toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: PEN produces selective dose- and schedule-dependent Purkinje cell degeneration in the cerebellar vermis of rats, whereas therapeutically relevant doses of PEN administered orally are better tolerated and produce less neurocerebellar toxicity. In addition, roughly equivalent, albeit intolerable, doses of the major active metabolite DMPEN, which was lethal to some animals, produced neither clinical manifestations of neurocerebellar toxicity nor Purkinje cell loss. These results support a rationale for investigating whether PEN administered orally, which may undergo significant first-pass metabolism to DMPEN and other less toxic intermediates, or treatment with DMPEN, itself, may result in less neurocerebellar toxicity and superior therapeutic indices than PEN administered parenterally.
Administration, Oral↗
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors and their potential in the treatment of breast carcinoma.
The proto-oncogene Ras requires localization to the intracellular surface of the cellular membrane to exert its mitogenic effects. This subcellular localization is dependent on post-translational modification of the Ras protein, which results in the covalent addition of a lipid hydrophobic moiety to the carboxy-terminal. This post-translational processing is catalyzed by the enzyme farnesyltransferase. This enzyme adds a 15-carbon farnesyl group to the sulfur atom of the cysteine residue in the carboxy-terminal end of the Ras protein. Specific inhibitors of farnesyltransferase have been generated to block the mitogenic function of Ras. These inhibitors can also prevent the post-translational modification and function of many other farnesylated proteins. These include the centromere-associated proteins CENP-E and CENP-F, RhoB and E, the nuclear lamins, and Rap2. Preclinical studies indicate that these agents have a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, blocking proliferation and inducing apoptosis. The lead compounds currently in clinical development are R115,777 and SCH66336. Clinical trials have shown that these compounds can be safely administered, with favorable therapeutic indices, allowing the administration of biologically active doses of drug. Recent phase II clinical trials in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma have shown that R115,777 has reproducible single-agent activity, with activity being predominantly seen in patients with HER2-positive disease. Studies evaluating combined signal transduction blockade with trastuzumab and R115,777 are therefore being pursued, with a phase I study indicating that full-dose R115,777 can be safely administered with full-dose trastuzumab. Efficacy studies of this combination in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma are ongoing. Taxane and farnesyltransferase inhibitor combinations are also being evaluated because preclinical studies suggest that these classes of anticancer agents may be synergistic. Randomized clinical studies investigating the clinical benefits of farnesyltransferase inhibition, with or without a taxane and trastuzumab, in patients with treatment-naive HER2-positive metastatic breast carcinoma are now warranted.
Alkyl and Aryl Transferases↗