Biomedical subjects

Eva Hosszú

Publications and source records attributed to Eva Hosszú.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Calcaneous quantitative ultrasound measurements predicts vertebral fractures in idiopathic male osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the differences in ultrasound bone variables (QUS) and to test the ability to discriminate male patients with and without vertebral fractures. METHODS: We therefore measured broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) matched for bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral deformity in idiopathic male osteoporosis. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen men (age 56.6 range 27-78) were divided into three groups (osteoporosis n=25, osteopenia n=58 and age-matched control n=34) according to BMD T-score by WHO criteria. We found 66 patients (56%) with at least one vertebral deformity during the study. BMD and BUA did not differ, while SOS was lower in osteoporosis (p<0.001) and control group (p<0.001) between the patients with and without vertebral compression. Strong positive correlation was demonstrated between BUA and BMD (lumbar spine r=0.44, p<0.001, femoral neck r=0.56, p<0.001, radius r=0.40, p<0.001), while similar association between SOS and BMD values was not shown. There was no relationship between the BUA and vertebral fracture risk (Odds ratio: 1.14 95% CI: 0.80-1.61). However, the relative risk of vertebral fracture by SOS was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.08-2.62). Adjusting for age and BMI the risk of vertebral fracture did not change (odds ratio for SOS 1.50 95% CI: 1.02-2.22). After adjustment for BMD SOS was still associated with fracture risk at all measured sites (odds ratio: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02-2.22; 1.41, 95% CI: 1.02-2.17 and 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-2.0). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that BUA values are more closely related to density and structure while SOS values are able to predict fractures.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2006

Comparative evaluation of local and international reference databases for forearm densitometry: different impacts on diagnostic decisions.

Reference databases play a key role in the management of osteoporosis. The aim of this preliminary study was to compare the diagnostic consequences of using either an international or a local reference database in peripheral densitometry. For this purpose, standard curves for bone mineral density (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the distal and proximal forearm) were generated for healthy Hungarian men and women. In total, 303 healthy volunteers of both sexes (age range: 20-94 yr) were recruited from four osteoporosis centers. Subjects with medical conditions or taking medication affecting the bone metabolism were excluded. Bone densitometry was performed with pDEXA (Norland-Stratec, Fort Atkinson, WI) devices in each center after cross-calibration of the machines. The precision error of the forearm measurement was also determined (<1% in vitro, and 1.2-2.5% in vivo). In females, the peak forearm density was detected in the 30-39-yr group. The density decreased by 8% per 5 yr in early postmenopausal females, and by 10% per 10 yr in late postmenopausal females. In males, the highest bone mineral density was found in the 30-39-yr group for the distal forearm, but 1 decade later for the proximal site. Subsequently, a 5% decrease in density occurred per 10 yr, except in the 8th decade, in which a 20% decrease was demonstrated. One thousand four hundred thirty-four patients with suspected osteoporosis were classified according to the forearm density T-scores using both the new Hungarian reference database and the international database provided by the manufacturer. Comparison of the results measured at the distal forearm with the two different databases led to similar outcomes. However, at the proximal site, one fifth of the female patients were reclassified from the low-density group to the normal group using the domestic normative database. An opposite difference was observed for the males: use of the Hungarian reference data resulted in 40% more men being categorized in the low-density group than when the international normal database was applied. Our results suggest that not only geographic differences, but also the reference database used, can influence the prevalence of the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Further data are currently being collected to increase the statistical power of the study.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of the femoral neck bone density, quantitative ultrasound and bone density of the heel between dominant and non-dominant side.

Our study was initiated to evaluate whether there are differences between the two sides, depending on hand dominance, in densitometry values and quantitative ultrasound parameters (QUS) of the lower limb. One hundred and six women and 44 men were involved. The hand dominance was determined by interview. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the left and the right femoral necks and the calcanei were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The QUS examination consisted of measuring the attenuation (BUA), the speed of the ultrasound (SOS) and quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) transversing the left and right calcanei. The density of the neck of femur of the non-dominant side did not differ from that of the dominant side. On the other hand, BMD, BUA and the QUI of the calcaneus were higher on the non-dominant side in both genders (p<0.05 for each parameter). No similar differences were seen for the SOS values. Our study has confirmed the side-to-side differences of the calcaneus in both genders, lower values were found on the dominant side. No similar differences were seen on the femur. The AUC values seemed to be higher on the dominant side, however, these differences were not strictly significant. In the case of peripheral site (heel) measurements, the practical significance of our observations is that they raise the possibility of performing peripheral DXA and QUS examinations of the calcaneus on the dominant side of the patient according to handedness.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗