PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Cognetti

Publications and source records attributed to F Cognetti.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1,650 to 2,500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade > or = 3: 27%) and stomatitis (grade > or = 3: 9%) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neurotoxicity (grade 1-4) was 27% with 1% grade 3-4. A global response rate was 17% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2%-32%) and the median overall survival was 12 months. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2,500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS): a complementary tumor marker to CA 15-3 in the management of breast cancer.

The efficacy of CEA and CA15-3 tumor markers in monitoring breast cancer was evaluated in 1365 patients with either benign (n = 534) or malignant (n = 831) breast diseases. Thirty-nine breast cancer patients were monitored before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three hundred forty-nine patients were monitored during post-surgical follow-up for either a minimum of 5 years or until time of recurrence. Twenty-one patients with metastases were also monitored during chemotherapy. Elevated CA 15-3 and TPS levels were found in 28.6% and 30.0% of patients. CA 15-3 and TPS sensitivities rose to 71.9% and 66.3% in metastatic patients, respectively. The addition of TPS to CA 15-3 increased the sensitivity up to 44.4% in the overall population, and to 87.6% in patients with metastases. During post-surgical follow-up CA 15-3 was elevated in 65.7% and TPS in 61.3% of patients with recurrence. The combination of TPS and CA 15-3 increased the overall sensitivity by 12.7%. Longitudinal monitoring of metastatic patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated that, when positive, both CA 15-3 and TPS paralleled response to treatment. TPS monitoring may provide additional value when used in combination with CA15-3 during post-surgical follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Ifosfamide and epirubicin combination in untreated sarcomas: two treatment schedules.

BACKGROUND: The Epirubicin (EPI) and ifosfamide (IFO) combination has been widely tested in soft tissue sarcomas, even though the optimal schedule of drug administration has still to be defined. In this article, we reviewed the activity and the toxicity of two EPI- and IFO-based schedules in newly diagnosed sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 patients (group A) received a 'concurrent' schedule of short-infusion IFO at total dose of 7.5-9 g/m(2) over 5 days plus iv bolus EPI at 90-120 mg/m(2)/cycle, repeated every 3 weeks. The other 22 patients (group B) received a 'sequential' schedule of dose-intense, continuous infusion IFO at a total dose of 14-18 g/m(2) for 2 cycles followed by bimonthly EPI at 120-160 mg/m(2)/cycle. Application of growth factors was planned for each course of treatment. RESULTS: Since 1994, 44 consecutive patients have been treated. The overall response rate was 35% with no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of response rate (group A: 33%, group B: 37%), time to progression (group A: 7 months, group B: 8 months), and overall survival (group A: 12 months, group B: 15 months). General tolerance to treatment was better in group A. Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred significantly more often with the sequential regimen. Severe hematologic toxicity was common but no toxic deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this limited experience, a concurrent schedule of EPI and IFO seems to be an appropriate management strategy in the front-line therapy of advanced sarcomas. Nevertheless, a randomized trial is warranted to define the optimal dosages to be used for further clinical trials.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A re-evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a serum marker for breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is still a widely used test for monitoring breast cancer, although recent reports discourage its routine use because of low sensitivity. This is a prospective study evaluating the efficacy of CEA and CA 15.3 in monitoring breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum CEA and CA 15.3 were measured in 2191 patients with either benign (n = 738) or malignant (n = 1453) breast diseases. Five hundred and forty-nine patients were monitored during postsurgical follow-up for either a minimum of 5 years or until time of recurrence. Fifty-three patients with metastases were also monitored during chemotherapy. RESULTS: Elevated CEA and CA 15.3 levels were found in 16.7% and 33.0% of patients, respectively. CEA sensitivity rose to 41.3% and CA 15.3 sensitivity rose to 80.8% in metastatic patients. The adjunct of CEA increased the CA 15.3 sensitivity by 6% in the overall population and by only 2.1% for patients with metastases. During postsurgical follow-up, CEA was elevated in 38.0% and CA 15.3 in 70.2% of patients with recurrence. The combination of CEA and CA 15.3 increased the overall sensitivity by only 1.4%. Longitudinal monitoring of 53 metastatic patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated that, when positive, both CEA and CA 15.3 paralleled response to treatment, although CA 15.3 was a significantly more powerful marker for determining response to treatment. The cost effectiveness ratio of CEA was clearly less favorable than that of CA 15.3. CONCLUSIONS: CEA monitoring should be considered an expensive and inefficient method of follow-up evaluation for breast cancer patients, and it provides no additional value when used in combination with CA 15.3.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

[Prevalence of anemia in oncologic patients treated with chemotherapy. Italian survey at the national level].

UNLABELLED: In Italy the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients has only been indirectly drawn from clinical studies, and a direct estimation has never been made. METHODS: This is the first nation-wide survey on the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients in Italy. In 193 Centres, clinical data were collected on consecutive patients with non-myeloid malignancies entering a new cycle of chemotherapy during a reference week in 1997. RESULTS: A total of 1763 patients has been recruited. At the time of enrollment grade I-II anemia was observed in 56% of patients, although only 1% showed severe anemia. Most of the patients (73%) experienced a decrease of haemoglobin level following treatment completion. Drop of haemoglobin correlated with a more advanced stage of the disease and with a lower performance status at baseline. CONCLUSION: Anemia is an increasingly common complication in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Improving our knowledge on occurrence of anemia and the type of neoplasms and chemotherapies which are more likely to be associated with this complication may allow the adoption of specific measures to prevent the development of anemia and to avoid the need of blood transfusion in these patients.

Anemia↗
PubMed2000

Ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: The response rate to salvage chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has been disappointing in patients who do not respond or relapse after platinum-containing regimens. Ifosfamide (IFO) showed an overall response rate of 20% and vinorelbine (VNR) 15.6%. Trials of the association of these two drugs for AOC have not yet been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1996 and August 1997, 17 patients with AOC were treated with intravenous IFO 2000 mg/m2 per day, days 1 to 3, with mesna uroprotection, and VNR 25 mg/m2 per day, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. All patients but one had been heavily pretreated. All patients had been treated with platinum compounds and 16/17 with taxanes. RESULTS: All 17 patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 16 for response (one lost to follow-up). One patient showed a partial response, 12 progressive disease and three stable disease. No complete responses were observed. The main toxicity was neutropenia (grade 3-4 in 82% of patients) with neutropenic fever in 17.6% of patients. In 70.5% of patients (19/59 of courses) VNR was not administered on day 8. In four patients (10/59 courses) the dose was reduced by 25% for persistent leukopenia grade 2-3. Other toxicities were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This combination showed no activity in this set of patients. The poor outcome, as compared with the significant activity reported with the agents used singly, could be ascribed to the patients' characteristics, the low dose intensity of VNR administered and possible cross-resistance between the study drugs and previously used agents.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Toxicity and activity of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

Docetaxel has proven effective in advanced breast cancer. Myelosuppression and cumulative fluid retention syndrome are troublesome, potentially avoidable toxicities. In this consecutive cohort study, docetaxel (100 mg/m2 by 1 hour i.v. infusion, q3 weeks) activity and toxicity was explored in 56 anthracycline-pretreated patients (eligible: 55: median age: 51 years [range: 28-68 years]; median performance status: 0 [range: 0-3]) with metastatic breast cancer, using two different granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and steroid pre- and postmedication schedules. Twenty-nine patients (group A) received a 5-day oral prednisone premedication, and 26 (group B) received 4-day low-dose i.m. dexamethasone; group B patients also received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 53 for response. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor significantly lowered the incidence of grade III-IV neutropenia and neutropenic fever (p = 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). The incidence of moderate-severe fluid retention syndrome was lower in patients receiving i.m. dexamethasone (p = 0.08). Overall response rate was 53% (4 complete responses/24 partial responses, 95% confidence interval 39.4-66.2%); 32% have stable disease and 15% progressive disease. In 21 anthracycline-refractory/resistant patients, as well as in 10 paclitaxel-pretreated patients, the overall response rate was 50%. Docetaxel is highly active in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated metastatic breast cancer, with manageable toxicity. Optimal use of both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support and steroid premedication deserves further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Patients treated with antitumor drugs displaying neurological deficits are characterized by a low circulating level of nerve growth factor.

The aim of our study was to explore whether nerve growth factor (NGF) plays any role in the development of peripheral neuropathy induced by anticancer treatment. We measured the circulating NGF levels in 23 cancer patients before and after chemotherapy. We evaluated whether the development of peripheral neurotoxicity was associated with changes in basal NGF concentrations in patients studied with a comprehensive neurological and neurophysiological examination. The results of these studies showed that the circulating levels of NGF, which are about 20 pg/ml in plasma of controls, decrease during chemotherapy and in some cases completely disappeared after prolonged treatment with antitumor agents. The decrease in NGF levels seems to be correlated with the severity of neurotoxicity. These results clearly suggest that NGF might become a useful agent to prevent neuropathies induced by antineoplastic drugs and restore peripheral nerve dysfunction induced by these pharmacological compounds.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Dacarbazine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview.

Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the only single-agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating metastatic melanoma. With DTIC as single agent, an approximately 20% objective response rate can be achieved with median response duration of 5 to 6 months and complete response rates of 5%. Current status of DTIC single agent and DTIC-based combination chemotherapy has been extensively reviewed in this article. Moreover, future directions including new combination chemotherapies and/or new therapeutical approaches have been considered. The addition to DTIC of agents such as cisplatin, nitrosoureas and tubular toxins has been reported to yield high response rates, up to 40%, in single-institution phase II trials. Historically, promising combination regimens like BOLD (bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine and DTIC) and CVD (cisplatin, vinblastine and DTIC) have induced responses on metastatic lesions to the liver, bone and brain, commonly unresponsive to DTIC alone, even though have failed to produce impact on patient survival. Several other studies have suggested a significant enhancement of antitumor effect associated with the addition of tamoxifen to various cytotoxic regimens. The four-drug combination CBDT (cisplatin, carmustine, DTIC and tamoxifen) or "Dartmouth regimen" has yielded high response rates, up to 55%, with continuous, maintained, complete responses, up to 82 months, in a subset of patients, that is considerably longer than observed with other combinations. Some authors recommend CBDT as reference therapy, even though recently presented results of a randomized phase III trial of CBDT versus DTIC alone, show no statistical difference in survival between the two groups. While a survival benefit from DTIC-based chemotherapy or DTIC alone has never been shown in metastatic melanoma patients and, therefore, the survival has remained unchanged over the past 30 years, some long term survivors have been reported with the "Dartmouth regimen" and/or with high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) based regimens whose role is going to be defined in prospective randomized phase III trials. On the other hand, the better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for melanoma chemoresistance and the development of new therapeutical strategies could change the scenario in the next future.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed1999

Ifosfamide given by continuous-intravenous infusion in association with vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: A phase I-II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine (VNR) is highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has shown an overall response rate of 40%-50% as first-line treatment. In vitro, a synergy has been observed between this drug and ifosfamide (IFX). In addition, the pharmacokinetics of IFX suggest that it may have greater activity when given by continuous-intravenous infusion (C.I.V.I.). The aim of this study was therefore to assess the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of the combination of bolus VNR and C.I.V.I. IFX as second-line therapy in anthracycline-resistant breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with MBC who had already received anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with a regimen consisting of IFX, by C.I.V.I. for 72 hours and bolus VNR. The courses were repeated every three weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Four dose intensification steps were planned. IFX, 1.5 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 1.8 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (24 patients). Sodium-2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna) was associated with IFX at an infusion ratio of 1:1 and, once the infusion was completed, per os every four hours for three times. RESULTS: All of the 42 patients entered were assessable for toxicity, and 41 of them for response. Neutropenia was the most frequently-occurring toxicity, but only five patients at the highest dose level (11.9%) presented grade 4, and none of those at the first three steps. Other significant toxic effects were mild (only grade I-II). The median relative dose intensity was 95% at the highest dose level and all the treatments were administered on an out-patient basis. The overall response rate was 36.5% with a CR rate of 4.8% (two of 41 patients, all at the highest dose level) and a PR rate of 31.7% (13 of 41 patients). The median response duration was 7.0 months (range 2-13 months). CONCLUSIONS: The present phase I-II study shows that the IFX and VNR combination is an active and well-tolerated treatment in MBC and provides an alternative to taxanes for patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Breast cancer and timing of surgery during menstrual cycle: a 5-year analysis of 248 premenopausal women.

In the present report, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of the timing of surgery during menstrual cycle on disease-free and overall survival of 248 premenopausal patients with stage I/II breast cancer who underwent surgery followed by anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 5 years, no statistically significant differences were observed in disease-free or overall survival between women operated upon during the follicular (days 0-14) and the luteal (days 15-32) phase of the menstrual cycle. The impact on disease-free and overall survival of lymph-node status, tumor size and hormone receptor expression, but not of the phase of the menstrual cycle at the time of surgery, was confirmed by univariate and multivariate analysis. However, when combined with hormone receptor status, the phase of the menstrual cycle at the time of surgery proved useful to better define the prognosis of primary breast cancer patients, with significantly longer disease-free and overall survival for patients operated upon during the follicular phase and with positive hormone receptors.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide combination in locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

From March 1993 to February 1997, 43 eligible patients with inoperable stage IIIA (ten patients) and stage IIIB (33 patients), histologically confirmed NSCLC received 3 courses of the ICE combination (ifosfamide 1.5 g m(-2) and mesna 750 mg m(-2) two times a day, cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) and etoposide 100 mg m(-2), all administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3 every 3 weeks) with G-CSF support. After three cycles, patients were submitted to radical surgery or received two additional courses of the ICE regimen and/or curative radiotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21% of 114 evaluable courses, but was of short duration, leading to neutropenic fever in 5% of the courses. Severe thrombocytopenia and anaemia were observed in 13% and 3% of the courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild with only two episodes of reversible renal impairment. The overall response rate after three chemotherapy courses was 69% (28 partial responses, one complete response). Ten patients (8/10 patients in stage IIIA, 2/33 patients in stage IIIB) underwent radical surgery. Median TTP for patients not undergoing surgery (n = 33) was 8 months (range 3-34+); median DFS for patients rendered NED by surgery (n = 10) was 26 months (range 1-54+). Median OS for the entire group was 12.5 months (range 2-57+). The ICE regimen is active in locally advanced NSCLC with acceptable toxicity and warrants further exploration as induction chemotherapy in larger series.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Ifosfamide given by continuous-intravenous infusion in association with vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a phase I-II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine (VNR) is highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has shown an overall response rate of 40%-50% as first-line treatment. In vitro, a synergy has been observed between this drug and ifosfamide (IFX). In addition, the pharmacokinetics of IFX suggest that it may have greater activity when given by continuous-intravenous infusion (c.i.v.i.). The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of the combination of bolus VNR and c.i.v.i. IFX as second-line therapy in anthracycline-resistant breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with MBC who had already received anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with a regimen consisting of IFX, by c.i.v.i. for 72 hours and bolus VNR. The courses were repeated every three weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Four dose intensification steps were planned: IFX, 1.5 g/m2 on days 1-3 + VNR, 30 mg/m2 on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/m2 on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m2 on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 1.8 mg/m2 on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/m2 on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (24 patients). Sodium-2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna) was associated with IFX at an infusion ratio of 1:1 and, once the infusion was completed, per os every four hours for three times. RESULTS: All of the 42 patients entered were assessable for toxicity, and 41 of them for response. Neutropenia was the most frequently-occurring toxicity, but only five patients at the highest dose level (11.9%) presented grade 4, and none of those at the first three steps. Other significant toxic effects were mild (only grade I-II). The median relative dose intensity was 95% at the highest dose level and all of the treatments were administered on an out-patient basis. The overall response rate was 36.5% with a CR rate of 4.8% (two of 41 patients, all at the highest dose level) and a PR rate of 31.7% (13 of 41 patients). The median response duration was 7.0 months (range 2-13 months). CONCLUSIONS: The present phase I-II study shows that the IFX and VNR combination is an active and well-tolerated treatment in MBC and provides an alternative to taxanes for patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values and no prior chemotherapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 6 months before study entry) were selected. Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m2, i.v. daily for five consecutive days, day 22-26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One alternating cycle was to be performed every six weeks. Patients were evaluated for efficacy every alternating cycle. Treatment was administered until five alternating cycles, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (28 chemotherapy-naïve and five with prior adjuvant treatment completed > 1 year prior to accrual) were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 30% (95% CI: 16-49; 10 patients/33; nine partial response and one complete response). All responses were reviewed by an independent external review committee. An additional 49% of patients had stable disease. The median survival was 16 months, the one year survival amounted to 58% and the median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Relative dose intensity was nearly 90% for both drugs. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, seen in 24% and 64% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The alternating schedule of CPT-11 350 mg/m2 with five days bolus of 5-FU and low dose LV is an active and feasible regimen as front-line therapy for metastatic CRC. It is well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping toxicity. The response rate appears promising with regard to that expected with either single agent. This regimen warrants further assessment in randomized trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Paclitaxel as salvage therapy in advanced pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

The response rate to salvage chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer has been disappointing in patients who do not respond or who relapse after platinum-containing regimens. In these cases, the identification of new drugs is a substantial challenge. The efficacy of one of these, paclitaxel, has already been assessed in many phase II trials. From July 1993 to October 1995, 33 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recurrent or refractory after platinum-based regimens, entered our study. Paclitaxel was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. All the patients were evaluable for toxicity and 27 for response. Nine patients (33.3%) responded: 6 complete (22.2%) and 3 partial responses (11.1%). Six responses (35.3%) were observed in the 17 platinum-resistant patients and 3 (30%) in the 10 platinum-responders. World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 neutropenia was common (13/33 patients, 39.4%) and peripheral neurotoxicity was observed in 29 patients (87.8%), but was WHO grade 3 in four cases (12.1%). Alopecia was ubiquitous, whereas other toxic effects were not significant. The overall response rate to paclitaxel in this study is similar to that reported in others and the high complete response (CR) rate should be emphasized. These data confirm the significant activity and safety of this drug in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, even in platinum-resistant cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Therapeutic equivalence of single oral doses of dolasetron mesilate and multiple doses of ondansetron for the prevention of emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. European Dolasetron Comparative Study Group.

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to compare the anti-emetic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of dolasetron mesilate with that of the approved oral, multiple-dose regimen of ondansetron in 399 cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Single oral doses of 25, 50, 100 or 200 mg of dolasetron mesilate were administered 1 h prior to the initiation of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Multiple doses of ondansetron (8 mg x 3 or 8 mg x 4) capsules, or matching placebo for patients randomised to dolasetron, were given 1.5 h before and 6.5, 14.5 and 22.5 h after the start of chemotherapy (total dose = 32 mg). Efficacy was evaluated for 24 h after the initiation of chemotherapy. The most frequently used moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents included cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and carboplatin (28.4, 23.1 and 20.6% of patients, respectively). A statistically significant (P < 0.001) linear dose-response relationship was observed over the entire dolasetron dosage range for all efficacy parameters. Complete response rates were 45.0, 49.4, 60.5 and 76.3% for 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg dolasetron mesilate, respectively, and 72.3% of ondansetron patients. A single oral 200 mg dolasetron mesilate dose was therapeutically equivalent to ondansetron for all efficacy parameters and patient satisfaction was high. Overall, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between any of the dolasetron mesilate doses, or between dolasetron and ondansetron. Headache was most frequently reported (approximately 15% for each drug). No clinically important changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory parameters were observed with either drug. In conclusion, a single oral 200 mg dolasetron mesilate dose was therapeutically equivalent to multiple-dose ondansetron in the prevention of emesis and nausea following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Adult↗