PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Cognetti

Publications and source records attributed to F Cognetti.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Mitomycin C plus vindesine plus etoposide (MEV) versus mitomycin C plus vindesine plus cisplatin (MVP) in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase III multicentre randomised trial. The "Gruppo Oncologico Centro-Sud-Isole' (G.O.C.S.I.).

PURPOSE: To compare mitomycin C plus vindesine plus etoposide (MEV) vs. mitomycin C plus vindesine plus cisplatin (MVP) in the treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 204 patients were entered in a phase III multicentre randomised trial from June 1990 to December 1994 and stratified according to the ECOG performance status (0-1 vs. 2). MVP was given in the following dosages: mitomycin C 8 mg/m2+vindesine 3 mg/m2+cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and vindesine 3 mg/m2 i.v. day 8 with cycles repeated every 4 weeks. MEV was given in the following dosages: mitomycin C 8 mg/m2+vindesine 3 mg/ m2 i.v. day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 to 3 with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. For both treatments a maximum of 6 cycles was planned. Response and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO. Subjective responses were assessed by numerical scales. Analyses were made on the basis of intent to treat. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 21.4% (1 CR + 21 PR among 103 patients) in the MEV and 28.7% (1 CR + 28 PR among 101 patients) in the MVP arm (P = 0.48). Symptoms were similar in the two arms. 196 patients progressed and 182 died. The median times to progression were 10 weeks (95% CI 9-12) and 12 weeks (95% CI 10-15) and median survivals were 29 weeks (95% CI 25-36) and 28 weeks (95% CI 25-35) in the MEV and MVP arms, respectively. The relative risks of progressing and of dying were 0.89 (95% CL 0.66-1.20) and 0.96 (95% CL 0.71-1.30), respectively, for patients receiving MVP as compared with those receiving MEV at multivariate analysis adjusted by sex, age, histologic type, number of metastatic sites, performance status at entry, and centre. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, no significant differences were observed in response rate, survival or palliation of symptoms between the MEV and MVP regimens, while toxicity was significantly more frequent and severe with MVP. Thus, MEV should be considered a reasonable alternative to the MVP regimen in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study on mitoxantrone in adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Based on activity in a case report, mitoxantrone was studied in a phase II study in adenoid cystic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic and/or rapidly progressive metastatic or recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma were eligible for this study. They were treated with mitoxantrone given intravenously by bolus injection at a dose of 14 mg/m2, cycles repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients entered on trial, 4 were ineligible. A median of 6 cycles per patient were given. Leucocytopenia (in 97% of patients) was the most important side effect and tended to be cumulative. Other side effects were mainly mild to moderate and consisted of nausea (62%), vomiting (29%), alopecia (53%) and mucositis (41%). Four of 32 patients had a partial response (12%; 95% CI 4%-29%) lasting 3-13 months, 22 patients (69%) had a stable disease. CONCLUSION: Mitoxantrone at this dose and schedule has modest activity in adenoid cystic carcinomas.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with a combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil: a multicenter phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Vinorelbine has been demonstrated to be active against squamous cell carcinomas of the head/neck (SCHNC) and lung. This multicenter phase II trial was carried out to evaluate the activity and tolerability of the combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil given on an outpatient schedule in a series of 80 patients with recurrent SCHNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCHNC were treated with a combination of CDDP 80 mg/m2on day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on days 2-5, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 2 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 28 days. Most patients had oral cavity, larynx, or oropharynx carcinoma (88%). Forty-seven had previously received surgery alone, two radiotherapy alone, and 31 surgery plus radiotherapy. Seventy-two patients had locoregional recurrency, and eight had distant metastases. RESULTS: According to an intent-to-treat analysis, complete response (CR) of a mean duration of 12.7+ months was achieved in 13% of cases (95% CI 5%-21%), and partial response of 8.3+ months in 45% of patients (95% CI 33%-56%), for an overall response rate of 55% (95% CI 43%-65%). Nine patients (11%) showed no change, and 22 (28%) progressed. Five patients were not evaluable for response and toxicity. CR were seen more frequently in patients pretreated with only surgery than in those who had also received radiotherapy (15% vs. 9%; p = 0.7). No statistically significant differences in response rate according to site of primary tumor were found (p = 0.8, NS). The received dose intensities of 5-FU, CDDP, and VNR were 90%, 92%, and 82%, respectively. The overall survival of the series as a whole was 9.7+ months (range 4-27). Toxicity was generally acceptable. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia were recorded in 11% and 5% of patients, respectively. Noteworthy was the occurrence of pain at the tumor site after vinorelbine administration in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU and vinorelbine is quite active in the treatment of metastatic and/or recurrent SCHNC. This regimen should be tested as initial treatment in previously untreated patients and compared to a standard regimen in recurrent SCHNC.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A phase II trial of vinorelbine and thiotepa in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine as single-agent has achieved an overall response rate of > 20% as second-line treatment and 40%-50% as first-line treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine and thiotepa as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients (31: anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 16: high-dose epirubicin) were given vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 and thiotepa 12 mg/m2 d 1 and 8 every 21 days. RESULTS: Among the 32 evaluable patients two complete responses and seven partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 28% (C.I. 12-44). The median duration of response was 9 months and the median time to progression 6 months. Significant toxicity was primarily leukopenia (72%); anemia was also frequent (48%) as well as local phlebitis (39%). CONCLUSION: The present study has shown this combination to be active as second-line treatment, and its toxic effects have been well tolerated. It should be considered a reasonable option for patients with metastatic disease who have already been treated with anthracyclines.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Accelerated chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the toxicity of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF (G-CSF) given every 2 weeks and compared the dose-intensity achieved with this schedule with that obtained in a previous study we conducted in which the same regimen was given every 3 weeks without G-SCF (EC 21). The secondary objective was to explore the activity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1991 and March 1994, 41 patients (pts), 19 with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and 22 with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), were given high-dose epirubicin (Hd-Epi) (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) (600 mg/m2) on day 1 every 14 days (EC 14) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (5 mcg/kg/d s.c. on days 2-12). A total of 8 cycles in LABC pts (4 pre- and post-surgery), and 6-8 cycles in MCB pts were administered. The results were compared with those obtained in the previous study. RESULTS: The incidence of WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly reduced in the EC 14 + G-CSF regimen (25.2% vs. 46.8% in 214 and 250 evaluable cycles, respectively, p<0.0001), as well as the incidence of neutropenic fever (7% vs. 3%, p=0.05). Grade 3-4 anemia (36.6% vs. 8% pts, p=0.001) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17.1% vs. 0 pts, p=0.002), were significantly more frequent in EC 14 + G-CSF. No significant differences in the other side effects were found. A total of 17 of 207 of the cycles (8.2%) were delayed in the EC 14 + G-CSF vs. 58/271 (21.4%) in the EC 21 (p<0.0001). The main reasons for these treatment delays were neutropenia (1% vs. 15%), anemia (3% vs. 0) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 0). As a result of treatment acceleration and differences in dose delays, the patients on EC 14 + G-CSF received a higher dose-intensity (Epi 58.51 mg/m2/wk vs. 36.8 mg/m2/wk; CTX 292.52 mg/m2/wk vs. 182.9 mg/m2/wk). A complete response at surgery was obtained in 9/19 (47.4%) LABC pts. An objective CR was obtained in 11/22 MBC pts (50%) and a partial response in 8/22 (36.4%), yielding an overall response rate of 86.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Hd-Epi + CTX is very active against both LABC and MBC. The administration of G-CSF allows dose intensification of both drugs (a 59.5% increase of the actual dose intensity) with acceptable clinical tolerance (a lower incidence of neutropenia but a higher incidence of anemia and thrombocytopenia). Only a specifically designed phase III trial will lead to definitive conclusions regarding the greater antitumor activity of accelerated CSF-including regimens as compared to standard chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group study.

PURPOSE: To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity. RESULTS: Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.

Agranulocytosis↗
PubMed1995

Prognostic value of lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for large-sized operable carcinoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or radiation therapy, or both, has become the treatment of choice for patients with large-sized resectable carcinoma of the breast in whom mastectomy is the conventional option. Since tumor regression before surgery is considered a favorable prognostic factor, there is still controversy regarding the need to perform an axillary dissection after a good response to systemic induction treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Between February 1990 and December 1993, we conducted a prospective study of 56 consecutive patients receiving high-dose anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy for large but potentially resectable carcinoma of the breast. Patients who had a good clinical response to induction systemic treatment received the same chemotherapy in the adjuvant phase, while those whose response was less than optimal received alternative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. A multivariate analysis was made to evaluate the relative influence on disease-free survival rates of 11 clinicopathologic and treatment-related variables, including clinical response to primary chemotherapy, primary pathological (p-T) staging, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 36 months, only the number of metastatic lymph nodes was found to be an independent predictor of relapse. Clinical response to systemic induction treatment and p-T staging did not correlate with prognosis. In the group of patients with axillary lymph node involvement, those who did not respond to preoperative chemotherapy showed a lower relapse rate compared with those who achieved an objective response. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that axillary lymphadenectomy should be considered an important component of the combined modality therapy for patients with large-sized resectable carcinoma of the breast in order to identify subgroups of patients that may benefit from alternative treatments in the adjuvant setting.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

A phase II study of pirarubicin in patients with advanced recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) is a chemotherapy-sensitive tumour, but this sensitivity is not reflected in an impact on survival. The study of new drugs is therefore indicated. Pirarubicin (4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin) has a higher preclinical index than doxorubicin, with low cardiotoxicity in animal models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and documented progression after or during previous chemotherapy were entered into the study. Two patients were ineligible for evaluation. Pirarubicin was given at a dose of 70 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Partial remission was seen in 1 of the 24 evaluable patients. The predominant toxicity was bone marrow depression, with leucopenia in 62% of the patients. One patient died due to a gastrointestinal haemorrhage during a period with WHO grade IV thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, pirarubicin cannot be recommended as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent and metastatic HNSCC. Its possible relevance for first-line treatment cannot be judged from these data.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Randomised phase II study of methotrexate (MTX) versus methotrexate plus lonidamine (MTX + LND) in recurrent and/or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck.

Between March 1990 and March 1992, 89 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck were randomised to receive either intravenous methotrexate (MTX) at a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 plus lonidamine (LND) given orally at a starting dose of 75 mg three times daily for 3 days and then at a dose of 150 mg three times daily (arm MTX + LND) or methotrexate alone (arm MTX) at the same doses as arm MTX + LND. Complete remissions were observed in 10.5% of the patients in arm MTX + LND, and partial remissions in another 15.8%, yielding a 26.3% response rate. In arm MTX, only partial remissions were observed, yielding an overall response rate of 18.2%. Haematological toxicity was mild in both groups. Mild testicular pain (21%) and myalgias (31%) occurred only in patients treated with LND.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Phase II trial of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer.

Between February 1990 and December 1991 high-dose epirubicin (Epi)(120 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (CTX)(600 mg/m2) were given every 3 weeks to 52 patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer. 26 patients with locally advanced disease received four courses of this regimen before and after local treatments. 26 patients had metastatic disease: they received eight courses unless progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Responses were seen in 37/48 (77%) evaluable patients including 14 complete responses (CR), 23 partial responses (PR), nine stable disease, two progressive disease. Among the 25 evaluable patients with locally advanced disease, 9 had a CR and 11 a > 80% decrease in tumour volume. 6 patients (24%) had a pathologically confirmed complete response. 18 patients (72%) had a tumour reduction to 0-2 cm. The 3-year disease-free survival was 60%. Of the 23 evaluable patients with metastatic disease, 5 obtained a CR and 10 a PR, yielding an overall response rate of 65%. Myelosuppression was substantial with a grade 3-4 leucopenia in 76% of the patients even if neutropenic fever occurred in only 7% of the courses. A clinical congestive heart failure occurred in 1 patient following a total Epi dose of 960 mg/m2 and a bilateral quadrantectomy and radiotherapy. We conclude that (1) high-dose Epi + CTX is a very active regimen, in particular for the patients with locally advanced breast cancer; (2) breast conservation after this regimen in some of these patients may be considered; (3) neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity. Currently, a phase II study using the same combination given every 2 weeks together with r-methuG-CSF is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A randomized phase II study comparing sequential versus simultaneous chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Single-modality radiotherapy is still considered standard treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck. As treatment outcome is poor, attempts to integrate chemotherapy into the overall management of these patients are ongoing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized study was undertaken to compare a sequential with a simultaneous chemoradiotherapy program. Between February 1986 and February 1991, 93 eligible patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck were stratified by WHO PS, T and N class and primary site and then randomized to receive either three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2 i.v. d 1) and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/days 1-5 by continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks prior to definitive conventional radiotherapy of 65-70 Gy (sequential treatment), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, 43 given simultaneously for the duration of the same conventional radiotherapy (simultaneous treatment). RESULTS: At the end of the entire treatment 18 complete responses (47%) in the sequential-treatment arm and 18 (41%) in the simultaneous treatment arm were obtained. No statistically significant differences in the 5-yr progression-free survival, in the median time to loco-regional and distant progression and in the 5-yr overall survival were observed. Leukopenia was more frequent in the simultaneous than in the sequential arm (p = 0.03), whereas alopecia (p = 0.008) and phlebitis (p < 0.0001) were more frequent in the sequential-treatment arm. A better compliance was associated with the concomitant treatment, with 87% of the patients completing the entire radiotherapy program versus 63% of those in the sequential arm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the two treatment arms showed similar activity (complete response, progression-free and overall survival rates). Compliance to treatment was better in the concomitant arm. These data suggest that concomitant chemo-radiation therapy might be considered an option in unresectable locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. Phase III studies are needed in order to establish the superiority of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone. RESULTS: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Epirubicin in patients with advanced or recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Because of the rarity of salivary gland cancer, little is known about the single-agent activity of most anticancer agents in the different histologic types of these cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with advanced or recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with epirubicin on a low-dose weekly schedule (30 mg/m2/week) for eight weeks and, in instances of no response, a high-dose three-weekly schedule (> or = 90 mg/m2). Thirteen patients had locoregional disease (12 recurrences), seven of them also had distant metastases and seven had distant metastases only. All had documented progressive disease, and 17 were symptomatic. RESULTS: Two objective responses of 7.5 and 20 months were observed in patients with locally recurrent disease, and ten patients showed disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 16 weeks (range 2-250 weeks) and the median survival 67 weeks (range 13-272+ weeks), with three patients still alive more than five years after the initiation of chemotherapy. Contrary to the rather modest objective response rate, symptomatic improvement occurred more frequently (29.4%) and was evident within 8 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This type of chemotherapy should be reserved for patients with rapidly progressive disease or those with symptomatic disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

A phase II trial of 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin, a novel antifolate, in patients with advanced and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

Forty-seven patients with advanced and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin (10-EdAM), a new analogue of methotrexate. The drug was given as a weekly i.v. bolus injection, starting at 80 mg/m2 with two dose increments of 10% if no toxicity was observed after two weeks. Only patients with tumors of the larynx, oral cavity, oropharynx and hypopharynx were included in the trial. Eighty-two percent of the patients had had prior surgery and/or radiotherapy. Forty-four patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Five CR (12%) and five PR were obtained, yielding a response rate of 24% (CR+PR). The toxicity was similar to that usually seen with methotrexate; stomatitis and skin toxicity were rather pronounced. The data suggest that 10-EdAM has activity similar to that of methotrexate in patients with head and neck cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone.

Ondansetron (OND) is a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that give complete protection from emesis/nausea in approximately 50% of cisplatin (CDDP)-treated patients. To evaluate if dexamethasone (DEX) added to OND increases antiemetic efficacy, we carried out a double-blind randomized crossover study to compare the antiemetic activity of OND with OND plus DEX. One hundred two chemotherapy-naive patients (44 women and 58 men) scheduled to receive CDDP chemotherapy at doses greater than or equal to 50 mg/m2 entered the study. Eighty-nine patients completed both cycles with the following results: complete protection from emesis/nausea was obtained in 57/59 patients (64.0%/66.3%) with OND and in 81/79 (91.0%/88.8%) with OND plus DEX (P = .0005/P = .0021). At the end of the study, 53% of the patients expressed a treatment preference, and of these, 74% chose OND plus DEX compared with 26% who preferred OND alone, a statistically significant difference (P less than .003). Side effects were very mild and not significantly different between the two treatments. We conclude that OND plus DEX is more efficacious than OND in protecting patients from CDDP-induced emesis and nausea.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1990

Toxic dermatitis induced by 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin (10-EdAM), a novel antifolate.

A new methotrexate analog, 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin (10-EdAM), was found to induce a particular form of skin toxicity different than the skin rash reported to result from methotrexate. At histologic examination, it was found to be a toxic dermatitis that clinically most often first appears on the lower legs but can occur anywhere in the body, especially if treatment is continued. Nine cases are reported. A specific risk factor could not yet be identified. Discontinuation of 10-EdAM administration leads to complete healing; concomitant corticosteroid treatment also induces healing.

Aged↗