PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Daschner

Publications and source records attributed to F Daschner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether surgical site infection (SSI) rates decrease in surgical departments as a result of performing active SSI surveillance. DESIGN: Retrospective multiple logistic regression analyses. SETTING: A group of 130 surgical departments of German hospitals participating in the Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System (KISS). METHODS: Data for 19 categories of operative procedures performed between January 1997 and June 2004 were included (119,114 operations). Active SSI surveillance was performed according to National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system (NNIS) methods and definitions. Departments' SSI rates were calculated individually for each year of surveillance and for each operative procedure category, taking into account when the individual departments had begun their surveillance activities. Multiple logistic regression analyses on a single operation basis were carried out with stepwise variable selection to predict outcomes for patients with SSI. The variables included were as follows: the department's year of participation, NNIS risk index variables, patients' age and sex, and the hospitals' structural characteristics, such as yearly operation frequency, number of beds, and academic status. RESULTS: For 14 of 19 operative procedure categories analyzed, there was a tendency toward lower SSI rates that was associated with increasing duration of SSI surveillance. In multiple logistic regression analyses of pooled data for all operative procedures, the departments' participation in the surveillance system was a significant independent protective factor. Compared with the surveillance year 1, the SSI risk decreased in year 2 (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.93) and in year 3 (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.82), and there was no change in year 4. CONCLUSION: The SSI incidence was reduced by one quarter as a result of the surveillance-induced infection control efforts, which indicates the usefulness of a voluntary surveillance system.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Effectiveness of a nationwide nosocomial infection surveillance system for reducing nosocomial infections.

In recent years, several countries have established surveillance systems for nosocomial infections (NIs) on a national basis. Limited information has been published on the effectiveness of these national surveillance systems. The aim of this study was to investigate whether participation in the German national NI surveillance system [Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System (KISS)] resulted in reduced rates of NIs. Three major NIs were studied: ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and central-venous-catheter-related primary bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs), and surgical site infections (SSIs) in surgical inpatients. Data were collected from January 1997 until December 2003. Only institutions that had participated in KISS for at least 36 months were considered for analysis. Data from the first 12 months of surveillance were compared with data from the second and third 12-month periods. One hundred and fifty ICUs and 133 surgical departments fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In their first year of participation in KISS, the ICUs had an average VAP rate of 11.2 per 1000 ventilator-days and a CR-BSI rate of 2.1 per 1000 catheter-days. The average SSI rate in the surgical inpatients was 1.6 per 100 operations in their first year of participation. Comparing the infection rates in the third year with the first year, the relative risk (RR) for VAP was 0.71 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.66-0.76] and the RR for CR-BSI was 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.90). The corresponding RR for SSI was 0.72 [95% CI 0.64-0.80]. Participation in KISS was associated with a significant reduction in these three NIs.

Bacteremia↗
PubMed2005

Mortality risk factors with nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus infections in intensive care units: results from the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (KISS).

INTRODUCTION: As the number of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in German intensive care units increases, the problem of MRSA infection as such is becoming ever more serious. The aim of this study was to investigate whether mortality rates from nosocomial MRSA pneumonia and primary bloodstream infections (BSI) differ significantly from those of nosocomial pneumonia and primary BSI caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). METHODS: For the analysis data from the ICU component of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (KISS) were used (January 1997 to June 2002). To identify mortality risk factors a logistic regression analysis with step-wise variable selection was conducted including all cases of nosocomial S. aureus pneumonia and primary BSI. The possible risk factors that were evaluated were age > median, male gender, time in the ICU before infection > median, type of ICU, type and size of hospital, intubation, CVC use, total parenteral nutrition, year of investigation, infection caused by MRSA. RESULTS: Data from 274 ICUs and 505,487 ICU patients were recorded and a total of 6,888 cases of nosocomial pneumonia and 2,357 cases of primary BSI identified, of which 1,851 cases of S. aureus pneumonia and 378 cases of S. aureus primary BSI were considered for analysis. 59 of the 349 patients with MRSA pneumonia (16.9%) and 105 of the 1,502 patients with MSSA pneumonia (7.0%) died. 16 of the 95 patients with primary MRSA BSI (16.8%) and 17 of the 283 patients with primary MSSA BSI died (6.0%). Four factors were significantly associated with mortality from S. aureus pneumonia, one of them being pneumonia caused by MRSA (OR = 2.62; CI95 1.69-4.02). Only MRSA was significantly associated with death from S. aureus primary BSI (OR = 3.84; CI95 1.51-10.2). CONCLUSION: Nosocomial pneumonia and primary BSI from MRSA may be associated with death, but the cause-effect relationship of severity of illness and MRSA remains to be determined due to the limitations of surveillance data.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2005

[Amalgam risk assessment with coverage of references up to 2005].

Amalgam, which has been in use in dentistry for 150 years, consists of 50 % elemental mercury and a mixture of silver, tin, copper and zinc. Minute amounts of mercury vapour are released continuously from amalgam. Amalgam contributes substantially to human mercury load. Mercury accumulates in some organs, particularly in the brain, where it can bind to protein more tightly than other heavy metals (e. g. lead, cadmium). Therefore, the elimination half time is assumed to be up to 1 - 18 years in the brain and bones. Mercury is assumed to be one of the most toxic non-radioactive elements. There are pointers to show that mercury vapour is more neurotoxic than methyl-mercury in fish. Review of recent literature suggests that mercury from dental amalgam may lead to nephrotoxicity, neurobehavioural changes, autoimmunity, oxidative stress, autism, skin and mucosa alterations or non-specific symptoms and complaints. The development of Alzheimer's disease or multiple sclerosis has also been linked to low-dose mercury exposure. There may be individual genetical or acquired susceptibilities for negative effects from dental amalgam. Mercury levels in the blood, urine or other biomarkers do not reflect the mercury load in critical organs. Some studies regarding dental amalgam reveal substantial methodical flaws. Removal of dental amalgam leads to permanent improvement of various chronic complaints in a relevant number of patients in various trials. Summing up, available data suggests that dental amalgam is an unsuitable material for medical, occupational and ecological reasons.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The training curriculum in hospital infection control.

Standardised training curricula for infection control nurses (ICNs) and recognition of the specialty exist in many European countries, but infection control physician (ICP) is not a specialty recognised by the UEMS. To gather information on curricula for ICPs, members of the ESCMID Study Group on Nosocomial Infections received a questionnaire. There is discussion about which 'professions' should be included in an infection control team. Within the 12 countries included, the average full-time equivalents (FTEs) for ICPs and ICNs per 1000 beds were 1.2 and 3.4, respectively. In addition to ICNs and ICPs, an infection control team should also include a data manager, an epidemiologist, secretarial/administrative support, and possibly, surveillance technicians. Overall, the composition of an ideal infection control team was estimated to be 9.3 FTE per 1000 beds. The background of ICPs can be clinical microbiology or infectious diseases. Among the participants, it was predominantly clinical microbiology. The ideal training curriculum for the ICP should include 6 years of postgraduate training. Of these, at least 2 years should be 'clinical training' (e.g., internal medicine) to acquire experience in the management of high-risk patients. Furthermore, training with regard to infection control and hospital epidemiology should be offered as a 'common trunk' for those being trained in clinical microbiology or infectious diseases. Important issues that remain are: implementation/standardisation of training curricula for doctors, recognition of ICP as a separate specialty or sub-specialty of clinical microbiology and/or infectious diseases, validation of on-the-job training facilities in terms of the number of doctors and nurses who can give training and the category of patients/problems present, and mandatory postgraduate education/continuing medical education specific for infection control for doctors and nurses in the field.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2004

[Surgical site infections in hospitals and outpatient settings. Results of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (KISS)].

About 1,000,000 hospital days attributable to surgical site infections can be expected per year in German hospitals. Among the various measures for prevention, surveillance of surgical site infections is strongly recommended. Therefore, beginning in 1997 the National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections began to establish a hospital infection surveillance system in order to provide data for prevention and control of these infections. The surveillance system (called KISS) documents postoperative surgical site infections in patients undergoing selected indicator procedures. Today we have an overview of 274,050 procedures for a total of 20 operative indicator procedures. A further surveillance component focussing on surgical site infections in outpatient settings has recently been developed (AMBU-KISS). The participating hospitals and outpatient settings regularly receive their infection rates as well as the equivalent data of all hospitals involved in order to assess the position of their own hospital. However, competent and meaningful interpretation of these data is necessary for internal quality management in order to avoid wrong conclusions. The available results demonstrate that this approach can lead to a substantial reduction of surgical site infections.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2004

[AMBU-KISS: quality control in outpatient surgery].

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections are associated with considerable morbidity and additional health care costs arising from lengthy hospitalization. According to the German Infection Protection Act implemented on 1 January 2001, hospitals and outpatient surgery institutions are required to assess and document nosocomial infections. The data are to be made available to the German Ministry of Health on demand. METHOD: We report on a new surveillance module (AMBU-KISS) designed to assess and document surgical site infections in outpatient surgery. The objective is to create a reference database for these institutions. RESULTS: Preliminary results obtained for two indicator procedures show no significant differences in surgical site infection rates between outpatient surgery institutions and the hospital setting (OP-KISS). The arithmetic mean values of surgical site infection rates in arthroscopic surgery of the knee are 0.09% in AMBU-KISS and 0.11% in OP-KISS. For inguinal hernias, the respective rates are 0.65% and 0.78%. A significant difference was observed only for vein stripping procedures, with surgical site infection rates of 0.38% in AMBU-KISS and 0.64%in OP-KISS CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that AMBU-KISS is a reliable tool for assessing surgical site infections in outpatient surgery.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2002

[Reliable and unreliable health measures in surgery].

Despite high standards in theatre design, surgical skills and antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical site infections are still a major complication in modern surgery. After urinary tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections they account for 15.8% of all nosocomial infections in Germany [31]. Causes are multiple and only partially exogenous. The single most important (exogenous) risk factor is the technical skill of the surgeon. Not all surgical site infections are therefore preventable by infection control measures alone. Useful and useless infection control measures will be evaluated critically in the following review according to data in the literature.

Air Microbiology↗
PubMed2002

[MRSA as a challenge to clinical organization].

Epidemics, caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are an increasing problem in surgical hospitals. About 10 years ago, Germany only had sporadic cases with MRSA; currently, about 15% of all Staphylococcus aureus in Germany are methicillin-resistant. The most important measures in management and therapeutic strategies regarding MRSA are presented.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2002

[Proven and unproven hygiene measures in orthopedics].

Postoperative wound infections develop in approximately 2-5% of all patients after orthopedic surgery. After urinary tract infection and pneumonia, such wound infections (15%) are the third most frequent type of hospital-acquired infection. In this review we summarize all proven and unproven hygiene measures available in orthopedics, giving special attention to those implemented with the aim of preventing and controlling postoperative wound infections. Routine application only of hygiene procedures of proven efficacy will be an important contribution to economic and ecological quality assurance in hospital.

Cross Infection↗