Biomedical subjects

F Kuckuck

Publications and source records attributed to F Kuckuck.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Mixing small volumes for continuous high-throughput flow cytometry: performance of a mixing Y and peristaltic sample delivery.

BACKGROUND: Online mixing for continuous high-throughput flow cytometry has not been previously described. A simple, general high-throughput method for mixing and delivery of submicroliter volumes in laminar flow at low Reynolds numbers would be widely useful. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe a micromixing approach that is compatible with commercial autosamplers, flow cytometry, and other detection schemes that require mixing of components that have been introduced into laminar flow. The scheme is based on a previous approach to high-throughput flow cytometry (HyperCyt, Kuckuck et al.: Cytometry 44:83-90, 2001). We showed that samples from multiwell plates that have been picked up by an autosampler can be separated during delivery by the small air bubbles introduced during the transit of the autosampler probe from well to well. Here, a particle sample flowing continuously is brought together in a Y with reagent samples from wells, which have been separated by bubbles. RESULTS: In the effluent stream, the particles and reagents are mixed, most likely as a result of peristaltic action, and reagents from individual wells can be resolved. The sample volumes that can be mixed with this technology are submicroliter in volume, and samples can be mixed at rates up to at least 100/samples per minute. With the current device, carryover between samples can be eliminated if the mixing system is flushed with several volumes of buffer. The anticipated throughput for screening is expected to be at least 20 samples per minute. CONCLUSIONS: The high-throughput approach and peristaltic mixing in HyperCytTM serve to integrate autosamplers with submicroliter detection volumes for analysis in flow cytometry or in microfluidic channels.

Avidin↗

PubMed1999

Plug flow cytometry: An automated coupling device for rapid sequential flow cytometric sample analysis.

BACKGROUND: The tools for high throughput flow cytometry have been limited in part because of the requirement that the samples must flow under pressure. We describe a simple system for sampling repetitively from an open vessel. METHODS: Under computer control, the sample is loaded into a sample loop in a reciprocating eight-way valve by the action of a syringe. When the valve position is switched, the plug of sample in the sample loop is transported to the flow cytometer by a pressure-driven fluid line. By coupling the plug-forming capability to a second multi-port valve, samples can be delivered sequentially from separate vessels. RESULTS: The valve is able to deliver samples at rates ranging up to about 9 samples per minute. Each plug of sample has uniform delivery characteristics with a reproducible coefficient of variation (CV). Even at the highest sampling rate, carryover between samples is limited. CONCLUSIONS: Plug-flow flow cytometry has the potential to automate the delivery of small samples from unpressurized sources at rates compatible with many screening and assay applications.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Sheath fluid control to permit stable flow in rapid mix flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry is a potentially powerful tool to analyze the kinetics of ligand binding, cell response and molecular assembly. The difficulty in adding reactant to cells, achieving adequate mixing, delivering those cells to the laser focal point and establishing stable flow, has historically limited flow cytometry to systems with reactions times longer than 5 s. With the advent of automated syringes and flow injection methods, sample injection times shorter than 1 s have become routine. However, an inherent problem in acquiring time courses starting under 1 s is that rapid sample introduction through the flow tip to the detection point perturbs laminar flow. The purpose of this work was to determine if stable flow could be reestablished more quickly if the sheath flow was reduced during sample introduction, returning to normal sheath and sample rates afterward. METHODS: We used programmable syringes and valves to control sample mixing as well as sheath and sample delivery through the flow tip to the detection point for stream-in-air detection. Stable flow was monitored by mean particle fluorescence during sample introduction. RESULTS: With no sheath reduction, stable flow recovered after more than 1 s. By reducing sheath flow during the short period (300 msec) of sample mixing and delivery, stable laminar flow recovered within 200 msec. CONCLUSIONS: This use of automated syringes to control both sheath and sample flow provides a potential for robust sample handling applicable to kinetic as well as high throughput flow cytometric analysis.

Automation↗