PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fran Baum

Publications and source records attributed to Fran Baum.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

What makes for sustainable Healthy Cities initiatives?--A review of the evidence from Noarlunga, Australia after 18 years.

This paper examines the factors that have enabled the Healthy Cities Noarlunga (HCN) initiative to be sustainable over 18 years (1987-2005). Sustainability related to the ability of the initiative to continue to operate continuously in a manner that indicated its existence was accorded value by the community and local service providers. The analysis is based on a narrative review of 29 documents related to HCN, including a number of evaluations. Nine factors emerged as important to ensuring sustainability: strong social health vision; inspirational leadership; a model that can adapt to local conditions; ability to juggle competing demands; strongly supported community involvement that represents genuine engagement; recognition by a broad range of players that Healthy Cities is a relatively neutral space in which to achieve goals; effective and sustainable links with a local university; an outward focus open to international links and outside perspectives; and, most crucial, the initiative makes the transition from a project to an approach and a way of working. These sustainability factors are likely to be relevant to a range of complex, community-based initiatives.

Community Health Planning↗
PubMed2006

Building healthy and equitable societies: what Australia can contribute to and learn from the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.

The Commission on Social Determinants of Health (the Commission) was launched by the World Health Organization in 2005. It aims to support countries and global health partners to act on social factors leading to ill-health and health inequalities. Taking action on the social determinants of health is not new for Australia. This paper provides a description of the work of the first 18 months of the Commission and relevant Australian examples. Taking action on the social determinants of health is never simple or easy even in the most supportive of policy environments. The global focus of the Commission should ensure that knowledge and examples of successful action will be collected from a diverse range of country and policy environments, particularly low to middle-income countries. Given Australia's experience, we encourage practitioners to contribute to the deliberations of the Commission. It is also critical that Australian practitioners engage with the Commission's different actors and stakeholders, particularly knowledge networks, to derive important policy lessons from the knowledge generated by the Commission.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Federal, State and Territory government responses to health inequities and the social determinants of health in Australia.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Planned actions by governments can play an important part in addressing the social determinants of health and health inequities. We assess the extent to which Australian health departments are committed to health equity as a core value, and the extent to which strategic directions and policies show evidence of action and achievement in reducing health inequities and attention to the social determinants of health. METHODS: Key documents guiding each health department since 2000 were sought from a key informant in each jurisdiction (State/Territory/federal). An analysis was made of the content in terms of stated values, strategies, objectives, intended and current initiatives, collaborations, funding, and reporting of achievements in relation to the reduction of health inequities and the attention accorded to the social determinants of health. RESULTS: All jurisdictions are explicitly or implicitly committed to reducing health inequities and to addressing the social determinants of health to at least a limited extent. The extent of commitment varies from those who make a clear statement of the importance of achieving health equity at both whole-of-government and health department level, to others who have extremely limited commitment. There is also variation in the extent to which directions are transformed into planned initiatives to improve health outcomes or access to health services for disadvantaged groups or areas, and variations in the degree of monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSION: Although substantial health inequities exist in Australia there is explicit or implicit recognition of the underlying value of equity within all jurisdictions and some policies designed to increase health equity in all. However, in most jurisdictions health equity could be more explicitly incorporated into core government and health department strategies and initiatives, and there is room for the development of the capacity to monitor change over time in access to services, quality of care, and improved health outcomes.

Australia↗
PubMed2005

Wealth and health: the need for more strategic public health research.

This article argues that public health researchers have often ignored the analysis of wealth in the quest to understand the social determinants of health. Wealth concentration and the inequities in wealth between and within countries are increasing. Despite this scare accurate data are available to assist the analysis of the health impact of this trend. Improved data collection on wealth distribution should be encouraged. Epidemiologists and political economy of health researchers should pay more attention to understanding the dynamics of wealth and its consequences for population health. Policy research to underpin policies designed to reduce inequities in wealth distribution should be intensified.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed2004

Making research matter: a civil society perspective on health research.

Complex global public health challenges such as the rapidly widening health inequalities, and unprecedented emergencies such as the pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) demand a reappraisal of existing priorities in health policies, expenditure and research. Research can assist in mounting an effective response, but will require increased emphasis on health determinants at both the national and global levels, as well as health systems research and broad-based and effective public health initiatives. Civil society organizations (CSOs) are already at the forefront of such research. We suggest that there are at least three ways in which the participation of CSOs in research can be increased: namely, influencing commissioning and priority-setting; becoming involved in the review process and in conducting research; and through formal partnerships between communities and universities that link CSOs with academic researchers.

Community Health Planning↗
PubMed2003

Evaluating health system change--using focus groups and a developing discussion paper to compile the "voices from the field".

The authors describe the contribution of a series of focus groups and a progressively revised discussion paper to the evaluation of health care reform in South Australia. The focus groups informed the evaluation about participants' experiences of the impact of reform on their agencies while enabling increased understanding about change in the health system. A discussion paper describing global health service trends and emerging findings from our evaluation was prepared prior to the first focus group and subsequently revised to incorporate participants' comments before being sent to the next group. The results was a paper that enhanced participants' discussion, and reflected their views. As an action research-based method, this iterative process was valuable for participants and the evaluation, and supported organizational learning.

Focus Groups↗
PubMed2002

Learning about interagency collaboration: trialling collaborative projects between hospitals and community health services.

Interagency collaboration has increasingly been viewed as an important strategy to encourage the co-ordination of healthcare. It is seen to have a number of positive outcomes, including: improved service delivery for people requiring multiple services; more efficient use of healthcare resources; and a means for managers to share the responsibility of community care and reduce organizational stress caused by pressures of increasing demand for services within a climate of cost containment. However, establishing collaborative interagency relationships can be a challenging, long-term and complex process. The present article describes some of the findings of a research project that evaluated collaborative strategies adopted and trialed by a group of four publicly funded healthcare agencies in the southern metropolitan area of Adelaide, South Australia. Key findings from the literature about the factors supporting and impeding collaboration are discussed in the light of some of the findings from the evaluation project. Some of the themes emerging from the Adelaide study include: the need for resources for change; experience of multidisciplinary work; professional barriers to collaboration; the importance of agreed aims, agendas and project ownership; and the importance of supportive leadership. This article concludes with a discussion of the difficulties and opportunities for collaboration between community-based primary healthcare agencies and acute care hospitals. The development of partnerships which are either based on trust, or on the open negotiation of power differences and professional territories, and the management of mistrust are found to be important foundations for achieving greater genuine collaboration between primary and tertiary level healthcare.

Community Health Services↗
PubMed2002

'Opportunity structures': urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia.

This paper presents data from 40 in-depth interviews that were conducted as part of a study of social capital and health in relation to people's perceptions of the influence of 'place' on their participation levels and health. These data were used to examine features of the western suburbs of Adelaide that were perceived as health damaging and health promoting. The paper demonstrates that our Australian suburban respondents expressed a considerable concern about these features and the impact they have on their perception of community and their ability to participate in it. Safety, connectedness to the area, the reputation of an area and the extent and nature of community facilities are all seen as important to a healthy community. The research found that in the more deprived socioeconomic areas within the study area, there was a significant degree of dissatisfaction with features of the urban environment, such as availability of amenities, provision of public transport, and proximity of industry to private dwellings. The paper concludes by considering certain features of urban environments that might make them more supportive of health through encouraging contact between people. We conclude that these environments could be improved using the following measures: a subsidy scheme to support the viability of local shops and cafés (thereby providing meeting places and employment); parks with facilitators (who could play a role in increasing safety in the park but also encouraging community development); attractive places to walk; and a general environmental improvement program.

Attitude to Health↗