PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12193170

Learning about interagency collaboration: trialling collaborative projects between hospitals and community health services.

Abstract

Interagency collaboration has increasingly been viewed as an important strategy to encourage the co-ordination of healthcare. It is seen to have a number of positive outcomes, including: improved service delivery for people requiring multiple services; more efficient use of healthcare resources; and a means for managers to share the responsibility of community care and reduce organizational stress caused by pressures of increasing demand for services within a climate of cost containment. However, establishing collaborative interagency relationships can be a challenging, long-term and complex process. The present article describes some of the findings of a research project that evaluated collaborative strategies adopted and trialed by a group of four publicly funded healthcare agencies in the southern metropolitan area of Adelaide, South Australia. Key findings from the literature about the factors supporting and impeding collaboration are discussed in the light of some of the findings from the evaluation project. Some of the themes emerging from the Adelaide study include: the need for resources for change; experience of multidisciplinary work; professional barriers to collaboration; the importance of agreed aims, agendas and project ownership; and the importance of supportive leadership. This article concludes with a discussion of the difficulties and opportunities for collaboration between community-based primary healthcare agencies and acute care hospitals. The development of partnerships which are either based on trust, or on the open negotiation of power differences and professional territories, and the management of mistrust are found to be important foundations for achieving greater genuine collaboration between primary and tertiary level healthcare.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Helen van Eyk, Fran Baum. 2002. Learning about interagency collaboration: trialling collaborative projects between hospitals and community health services.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00369.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Jordan: communities and community genetics.

The population in Jordan mounted from half a million in 1952 to 5.3 millions in 2004 and is composed of a variety of ethnic groups, the majority being Arabs. Couples nowadays tend to have fewer children, with the total fertility rate falling from 7.4 in 1976 to 3.7 in 2004. Consanguineous marriages are traditionally favored, with the preferred marriage partner being the offspring of the father's brother. First-cousin marriages declined from 28.5% for marriages contracted between 1950 and 1979 to 19.5% for marriages contracted after 1980. In the overall population, carrier rates for beta-thalassemia, alpha-thalassemia and sickle cell anemia are in the range of 2-4%, 3.2-12% of males have glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and the prevalences for familial Mediterranean fever and cystic fibrosis were estimated at around 0.04% each. A mandatory premarital screening program for beta-thalassemia carriers commenced in June 2004. The high consanguinity rate and the large family size in Jordan have contributed to the description of a number of rare and new autosomal recessive conditions. Genetic services in Jordan are still scarce and do not cover all the country due to the major impediments of a paucity of resources and trained health professionals in the area of medical genetics. The demographic data suggest that the health system in Jordan is capable of introducing some basic community genetic services into the primary health care program through comprehensive and cost-effective programs.

Community Health Services↗