PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francesca Vannozzi

Publications and source records attributed to Francesca Vannozzi.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization.

We aimed to compare the time efficiency of three visualization methods in CT colonography and to identify the colonic factors influencing the time for interpretation. Twenty CT colonographic examinations were prospectively analysed. Three reading methods were adopted: method 1, primary 2D analysis with the use of virtual endoscopy as problem solver, method 2, primary standard virtual endoscopy with semiautomatic navigation through the colon and use of 2D images as problem solver; method 3, primary virtual endoscopy with automatic navigation and the use of 2D images as problem solver. In method 1, time for 2D analysis ranged between 6 and 18min (mean 12) for evaluation of both supine and prone decubitus with a synchronization method. In method 2, time for 3D manual navigation in supine plus prone ranged between 9 and 24min (mean 17). In method 3, time for automated navigation ranged between 6 and 20min (mean 12) for evaluation of both supine and prone decubitus. A statistically significant difference was found between time efficiency of methods 1 and 2 (p=0.009, t-test, unequal variances). Methods 2 and 3 showed a tendency to significant differences (p=0.054, t-test, unequal variances). Faecal or fluid residuals were reported as major drawbacks in 3D navigations, requiring constant correlation with 2D images; tortuous folds influenced mostly the 2D analysis; diverticula were reported as influencing factor in all three methods. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were observed between the three viewing methods. The 3D semiautomatic navigation method* tended to increase the time for interpretation in almost all cases. There is, in particular, greatest time efficiency for 2D analysis as compared with 3D manual analysis. Two-dimensional and automated 3D navigation reading have comparable time efficiencies in a routine clinical setting.

Colonography, Computed Tomographic↗
PubMed2006

A pharmacokinetic-based test to prevent severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays a key role in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU), and as such, an impairment of DPD has been recognized as an important factor for altered 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics, predisposing patients to the development of severe 5-FU-associated toxicity. Our objectives were to avoid severe 5-FU toxicities in patients with greatly impaired 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics after the administration of a reduced test dose of 5-FU and to investigate possible 5-FU or 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters of the test dose related to the most common drug toxicities that affect patients after the first cycle of 5-FU chemotherapy. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of 5-FU/5-FDHU and DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were examined in 188 gastrointestinal cancer patients given a test dose of 5-FU, 250 mg/m2, 2 weeks before starting the planned 5-FU treatment of 370 mg/m2 plus l-folinic acid, 100 mg/m2, for 5 days every 4 weeks. Drug levels were examined by HPLC, and toxicities were graded according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: The 5-FU test dose was well tolerated in all patients. Of 188 patients, 3 (1.6%) had marked alterations of 5-FU/5-FDHU pharmacokinetics (ie, 5-FU half-life [t(1/2 beta)] >5 hours, 5-FU total body clearance [CL(TB)] <1 L x h(-1) x m(-2), and 5-FDHU time to reach maximum plasma concentration [t max] > or = 45 minutes); they were excluded from 5-FU treatments and treated with irinotecan, which was well tolerated. The plasma disposition of 5-FU in the remaining 185 patients revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 3.73 +/- 2.18 h x microg/mL (mean +/- SD), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 16.78 +/- 8.61 microg/mL, and t(1/2 beta) of 0.16 +/- 0.15 hour, whereas the CL(TB) was 65.67 +/- 31.86 L x h(-1) x m(-2). The 5-FDHU plasma profile showed a Cmax value of 3.64 +/- 1.94 microg/mL, whereas the t max value was 26.63 +/- 10.06 minutes, with an AUC value of 3.71 +/- 1.90 h x microg/mL. The PBMC DPD activity was 202.15 +/- 141.14 pmol 5-FDHU x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein (95% confidence interval, 165-239.3 pmol 5-FDHU x min(-1) x mg(-1) protein). A significant correlation between 5-FU AUC and 5-FDHU AUC was found (r = 0.5492, P < .0001), whereas a weaker correlation between PBMC DPD activity and both 5-FDHU AUC (r = 0.328, P = .0121) and 5-FDHU Cmax (r = 0.369, P = .0044) was found. Interestingly, no relationships between PBMC DPD activity and common toxicities were found, whereas 5-FDHU t max values greater than 30 minutes were associated with the risk of moderate to severe neutropenia and diarrhea (P = .0323 and P = .0138, respectively; chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a successful approach for preventing severe or life-threatening toxicities in gastrointestinal cancer patients who are candidates for standard 5-FU treatment by analyzing the 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters after the administration of a reduced 5-FU test dose.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase expression in colorectal cancer and normal mucosa in patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene polymorphism and expression in colorectal cancer (CRC), and normal mucosa in chemotherapy-naïve patients. METHODS: TS, DPD and TP mRNA expression was analysed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in primary CRC and adjacent normal tissues from 53 patients with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as housekeeping gene. TS promoter (TSER and C/G SNP) and DPD IVS14+1G>A genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Moreover, the correlation between TS, DPD and TP expression and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil was evaluated in Colo 320, HT-29, CaCo-2 and SW620 human CRC cell lines. RESULTS: TP and DPD mRNA expression was significantly different in tumour and normal tissue (7.51+/-13.50 vs. 1.10+/-0.57, P<0.05 and 0.60+/-0.63 vs. 1.17+/-0.55, P<0.0001, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in TS mRNA levels. High-grade, undifferentiated tumours (WHO grade 3) had significantly higher mRNA levels of TS with respect to moderately differentiated (WHO grade 2) carcinomas (0.38+/-0.37 vs. 0.00+/-0.44, respectively; P<0.05). Noteworthy, TS mRNA expression was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in homozygous TSER*3G/3G (-0.35+/-0.35) with respect to pooled homozygous TSER*2/2 and heterozygous TSER*2/3 genotypes (0.14+/-0.41). In-vitro results showed a higher sensitivity to 5-FU of cell lines with the lowest TS expression. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrated significant differences in DPD and TP gene expression between normal mucosa and tumour samples, while TSER*3G/3G and high-grade histology were associated with significant variation in TS gene expression in tumour samples.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Improved analysis of 5-Fluorouracil and 5,6-dihydro-5-Fluorouracil by HPLC with diode array detection for determination of cellular dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and pharmacokinetic profiling.

Administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be associated with severe toxicities in patients who are deficient of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. For this reason, a sensitive HPLC method for the analysis of 5-FU and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) was developed in the present study for the determination of DPD activity in nucleated cells of peripheral blood and pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-FU and 5-FDHU in humans. 5-FU and 5-FDHU were extracted from biologic matrices by adding sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and diethyl ether/propanol. Dried samples were reconstituted in a mobile phase (KH2PO4 35 mmol/L, pH 4.0), isocratically eluted with a Hypersil C18 stationary phase (25 cm x 4.6 mm, 10 microm), and detected by a diode array detector (measurement and reference wavelengths, 215 and 360 nm, respectively). 5-Fluorocytosine (internal standard), 5-FDHU, and 5-FU were eluted within 13 minutes of the injection without interferences. Recoveries ranged between 81% to 85% for all compounds, and the method proved to be linear, with a coefficient of linearity of 0.999. The limits of detection and quantification were 3.2 and 16 ng/mL, respectively, and the within-day and between-day CV were less than 10% for both 5-FU and 5-FDHU. The present assay proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to evaluate cellular DPD activity and measure 5-FU and 5-FDHU plasma concentrations in cancer patients, thus allowing therapeutic 5-FU monitoring in patients and identification of DPD-deficient subjects at major risk of severe toxicities.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Drug therapeutic failures in emergency department patients. A university hospital experience.

Drug therapeutic failure (DTF) could be considered as an adverse drug reaction in which the expected drug effects do not occur following a prescribed pharmacological treatment, including any clinical event that could be related to a low prescribed dose or lack of compliance. DTFs are responsible for increasing disease length, hospitalisation time and social costs, with the worsening of patient quality of life. The aims of the present study are: (1) to estimate the frequency of DTFs among cases of adverse drug events referred to the emergency department; (2) to identify drug classes implicated in DTFs; (3) to analyse the putative causes underlying DTFs. Data presented in this paper were obtained from the Pronto Soccorso and Adverse Drug Events (PSADE) study carried out to analyse drug-related emergency department admissions in several Italian hospitals. Patients, admitted to the emergency department throughout two periods of 10 days each, were interviewed to gain information on their medical status and drug intake during the last two weeks. The present study analysed the patient questionnaires collected in the emergency department of Pisa University Hospital. Among 123 recorded cases of adverse drug event, 41 cases (19:22 male:female ratio; age range: 17-98 years, median age: 75 years) were identified as suspect DTF, resulting in a frequency of 33.33%. A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of two variables, class of patient age and number of drugs assumed, on DTFs. In accordance with the present findings, showing that the number of drugs assumed by a patient may increase the risk of DTF more than advanced age (odds ratio: 1.371, P<0.02; 1.295, P<0.03, respectively), the prescription of pharmacological combinations might be proposed as a main risk factor for DTF occurrence. In conclusion, our results suggest that DTFs represent an important cause of emergency department admission, particularly in elderly subjects treated with pharmacological associations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Limited sampling model for the analysis of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Administration of 5-fluorouracil may be associated with life-threatening toxicities, resulting from a reduced drug biotransformation to the inactive metabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil. Patients with severe toxicities display significant alterations of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics, the monitoring of which may be made easier by the availability of a limited sampling model (LSM). METHODS: LSMs for 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil therapeutic monitoring have been developed in 80 patients with colorectal cancer (training set) given 5-fluorouracil, 370 mg/m(2) per day as an intravenous bolus, plus leucovorin, 100 mg/m(2) per day, for 5 days every 4 weeks. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil obtained on day 1 of the first cycle of chemotherapy, and backward stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the optimal LSM on the basis of bias (percentage mean prediction error [MPE]) and precision (percentage root mean square prediction error [RMSE]). RESULTS: An optimal model based on 2 time points was obtained (percentage MPE = 1.99% +/- 1.41%; percentage RMSE = 12.70% +/- 1.27%), and the predicted area under the time versus plasma concentration curve (AUC) was calculated as follows: predicted AUC (h x microg/mL) = 0.119 x C(5) + 1.436 x C(45) + 2.066, in which C(5) and C(45) are plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil at 5 and 45 minutes after drug administration, respectively. The application of this algorithm to pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil in 80 patients (test set) allowed a precise estimation of AUC (percentage MPE = -0.09% +/- 1.37%; percentage RMSE = 12.17% +/- 1.23%). The best LSM for 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil was characterized by a percentage MPE of -0.64% +/- 0.86% and a percentage RMSE of 7.64% +/- 0.81%, and the optimal sampling time points were 45 and 180 minutes. CONCLUSION: The current LSM allows a reliable assessment of drug exposure and improves the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for treatment optimization of 5-fluorouracil in patients with cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Relationship between plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil infusions in cancer patients.

This study investigated the relationship among the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU); the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells; and treatment-related toxicity in 26 patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer treated with short daily infusions of 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy, each cycle consisting of 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. After the first chemotherapeutic cycle, severe stomatitis and diarrhea occurred in 5 patients and were related to the variations in the systemic disposition of the drug rather than to DPD activity. These patients showed a significant decrease in 5-FU clearance, and an increase in the 5-FU/5-FDHU area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) ratio, as compared with patients who experienced mild toxicities, whereas a low DPD activity was observed in only 2 patients. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the alterations in 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics are related to severe toxicities in patients treated with short intravenous infusion of 5-FU.

Aged↗