[Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Pharmacology and state of knowledge following commercial availability].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Geisslinger.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Peripheral tissue injury and inflammation may result in a facilitated spinal nociceptive transmission and central sensitization. Particularly, nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PGs) have been shown to be key mediators involved in the induction and maintenance of this state. By means of spinal cord microdialysis we have determined interstitial glutamate, NO (NO2-/NO3-), PGE2, glycerol, glucose and lactate concentrations in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord following peripheral nociceptive stimulation to gain further insight into the link between excitatory neurotransmitters and metabolic functions in the spinal cord during nociception. Formalin and zymosan injection into one hind paw evoked a biphasic release of glutamate and NO with the glutamate peaks preceding those of NO. Moreover, zymosan induced a biphasic increase of interstitial glycerol concentrations accompanied by an increase of interstitial lactate indicating metabolic disturbances. In contrast, formalin injection led to an elevation of dialysate glucose concentrations which may be interpreted as an indication of enhanced metabolic activity. The sequential release of glutamate and NO in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord in response to peripheral nociceptive stimulation supports the theory that NO may act as a retrograde transmitter. The metabolic changes observed after formalin and zymosan injection suggest that an intense peripheral nociceptive stimulation may not only activate but also disturb metabolic activity and possibly membrane integrity in the spinal cord.
PURPOSE: To assess whether topical ketoprofen, which has been reported to provide analgesic effects in clinical studies, reaches predictable tissue concentrations high enough to account for the reported analgesia. Intramuscular ketoprofen was used as positive control. METHODS: Muscle and subcutaneous tissue concentrations were assessed by microdialysis. Plasma and tissue concentrations after intramuscular injection were described using a three-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. The prediction performance of the model was assessed by superimposing tissue concentrations of 12 subjects that did not participate in the present study. RESULTS: Most dialysate concentrations after topical dosing of ketoprofen (100 mg) were below the quantification limit of 0.47 ng/ml. Plasma concentrations increased slowly and reached an apparent plateau of 7-40 ng/ml at 10-12h. No decline was observed up to 16 h. Tissue concentrations after intramuscular injection (100 mg) were about 10 times higher than those after topical dosing. Tissue concentrations measured in the majority of the 12 subjects that did not participate in the present study were found within the range of two-thirds of the predicted concentrations. CONCLUSION: Predictable and cyclooxygenase-inhibiting concentrations of ketoprofen were achieved in subcutaneous and muscle tissue after intramuscular but not after topical dosing. Thus, the tissue concentrations of ketoprofen after topical administration can hardly explain the reported clinical efficacy of topical ketoprofen.
AIMS: Genetic association studies have suggested that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at position 118 of the human mu-opioid receptor (MOR) gene could be a potential risk factor for drug treatment variability in patients. Therefore, we wanted to develop a fast and reliable detection method for this SNP which is applicable in a clinical setting. METHODS: To detect the polymorphism at position A118-->G in the human MOR gene we used the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-PCR technique with subsequent melting curve analysis. RESULTS: The polymorphism at position A118-->G in the human MOR gene could be clearly discriminated with melting peak temperatures of 69.8 degrees C and 63.8 degrees C, corresponding to the wild type and mutated MOR allele, respectively. The results from FRET-PCR were validated by sequencing and restriction-fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Screening of blood samples from 100 subjects showed an allelic distribution for the human MOR alleles of 79% (homozygous wild type), 20% (heterozygous) and 0.9% (homozygous mutated). CONCLUSIONS: The FRET-PCR protocol for detection of the human MOR gene polymorphism at position 118 offers a rapid and reliable method which could be used for population screening of this and other genes.
AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of two different formulations of ibuprofen lysinate with special focus on the expected effects. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers received cross-over ibuprofen lysinate as either one tablet of 400 mg ('test') or two tablets of 200 mg ('reference'). Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were followed up for 10 h. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard noncompartmental methods. Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were fitted with a model that took bioinversion of R- to S-ibuprofen into account. RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations of R- and S-ibuprofen were 18.1 and 20 microg ml(-1) (test), and 18.2 and 20 microg ml(-1) (reference). Areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curves were 39.7 and 67.5 microg ml(-1) h (test), and 41.1 and 68.2 microg ml(-1) h (reference). Clearance of R-ibuprofen was 5.2 (test) and 5 l h(-1) (reference). A specific plasma concentration was reached with the test formulation about 5 min later than with the reference. Parameters from compartmental modelling were (given for R-and then for S-ibuprofen): body clearance: 4.9 and 4.64 l h(-1), central volume of distribution: 2.8 and 4.1 l, intercompartment clearance: 5.1 and 5.45 l h(-1), peripheral volume of distribution: 4.1 and 5.2 l. The absorption rate constant was 1.52 h(-1), and the test but not the reference formulation had a lag time of 0.1 h. Simulations showed similarity between formulations of the expected effects except for a calculated delay of 6 min with the test formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen formulations were bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic model may serve as a basis for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic calculations after administration of racemic ibuprofen.
Nociception evoked prostaglandin (PG) release in the spinal cord considerably contributes to the induction of hyperalgesia and allodynia. To evaluate the relative contribution of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 in this process we assessed the effects of the selective COX-1 inhibitor SC560 and the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour and spinal PGE(2) release. SC560 (10 and 20 mg/kg) significantly reduced the nociceptive response and completely abolished the formalin-evoked PGE(2) raise. In contrast, celecoxib (10 and 20 mg/kg) was ineffective in both regards, i.e. the flinching behaviour was largely unaltered and the formalin-induced PGE(2) raise as assessed using microdialysis was only slightly, not significantly reduced. This suggests that the formalin-evoked rapid PG release was primarily caused by COX-1 and was independent of COX-2. Mean free spinal cord concentrations of celecoxib during the formalin assay were 32.0 +/- 4.5 nM, thus considerably higher than the reported IC50 for COX-2 (3-7 nM). Therefore, the lack of efficacy of celecoxib is most likely not to be a result of poor tissue distribution. COX-2 mRNA and protein expression in the spinal cord were not affected by microdialysis alone but the mRNA rapidly increased following formalin injection and reached a maximum at 2 h. COX-2 protein was unaltered up to 4 h after formalin injection. The time course of COX-2 up-regulation suggests that the formalin-induced nociceptive response precedes COX-2 protein de novo synthesis and may therefore be unresponsive to COX-2 inhibition. Considering the results obtained with the formalin model it may be hypothesized that the efficacy of celecoxib in early injury evoked pain may be less than that of unselective NSAIDs.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the pharmacokinetics of ketamine with special regard to enantiomer-specific differences. METHODS: Ten healthy young male volunteers (mean age, 28 +/- 4 years; mean weight, 79 +/- 11 kg) received racemic ketamine and S(+)-ketamine in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Drugs were administered by a computer-controlled device. Two infusion cycles with linearly increasing targets [slope, 0.1 microg x ml(-1) x min(-1) for S(+)-ketamine and 0.2 microg x ml(-1) x min(-1) for racemic ketamine] were administered. Concentrations of the ketamine enantiomers were determined from arterial blood, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated with a 2- and 3-compartment model. RESULTS: The total doses needed to reach defined end points were 271 +/- 80 mg and 409 +/- 75 mg for S(+)-ketamine and racemic ketamine, respectively (P <.05). S(+)-ketamine showed a significantly higher clearance (26.3 +/- 3.5 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) compared with racemic ketamine (14.8 +/- 1.7 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); P <.05) and R(-)-ketamine (13.8 +/- 1.3 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); P <.05). Furthermore, the clearance of the S (+)-ketamine was smaller in the racemate (18.5 +/- 0.7 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); P <.05) than for the pure isomer. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that R(-)-ketamine inhibits the elimination of S(+)-ketamine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Several studies have demonstrated unequivocally that certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as sodium salicylate, sulindac, ibuprofen, and flurbiprofen cause anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects independent of cyclooxygenase activity and prostaglandin synthesis inhibition. These effects are mediated through inhibition of certain transcription factors such as NF-kappaB and AP-1. The respective NSAIDs might interfere directly with the transcription factors, but their effects are probably mediated predominantly through alterations of the activity of cellular kinases such as IKKbeta, Erk, p38 MAPK, or Cdks. These effects apparently are not shared by all NSAIDs, since indomethacin failed to inhibit NF-kappaB and AP-1 activation as well as Erk and Cdk activity. In contrast, indomethacin was able to activate PPARgamma, which was not affected by sodium salicylate or aspirin. The differences in cyclooxygenase-independent mechanisms may have consequences for the specific use of these drugs in individual patients because additional effects may either enhance the efficacy or reduce the toxicity of the respective compounds.
BACKGROUND: Clinical and experimental data suggested a long delay between the plasma concentration versus time course of morphine-6-glucuronide and the time course of its central opioid effects. This study was aimed at the quantification of the transfer half-life (t(1/2,ke0)) of this delay. METHODS: Pupil size was used as a measure of central opioid effect. Eight healthy volunteers (four men, four women) participated in that single-blind randomized crossover study. Median dosages administered intravenously were 0.5 mg morphine as loading dose followed by 10.7 mg given as infusion over a period of 4.7 h, and 10.2 mg M6G as loading dose followed by 39.1 mg M6G given over a period of 3.7 h. The duration of the infusion was tailored to achieve submaximum pupil constriction. The pupil diameter was assessed every 20 min for approximately 18 h. Values of t(1/2,ke0) were obtained by semiparametric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling. RESULTS: The estimated median t(1/2,ke0) of M6G was 6.4 h (range, 2.9-16.2 h), and that of morphine was 2.8 h (range, 1.8-4.4 h). The individual t(1/2,ke0) of M6G was always longer than that of morphine. Judged by the concentration at half-maximun effect (EC50) values of the sigmoid pupil size at maximum constriction (Emax) model describing concentration-response relation, M6G was apparently 22 times less potent than morphine (EC50 = 740.5 nm [range, 500-1,520 nm] for M6G and 36.2 nm [range, 19.7-43.3 nm] for morphine). The steepness of the sigmoid Emax model did not significantly differ between morphine and M6G (gamma = 1.9 and 2.6, respectively). To produce similar pupil effects, the M6G dose had to be 2.8 times greater than the morphine dose. CONCLUSIONS: The reported numerical value of the t(1/2,ke0) of M6G in humans obtained after direct administration of M6G is a step toward a complete modeling approach to the prediction of the clinical effects of morphine. The study raises questions about the high interindividual variability of the transfer half-life between plasma and effect site (ke0) values and the apparent low potency of M6G.
Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide (M6G) is an opioid agonist that plays a role in the clinical effects of morphine. Although M6G probably crosses the blood-brain barrier with difficulty, during long term morphine administration it may reach sufficiently high CNS concentrations to exert clinically relevant opioid effects. As a consequence of its almost exclusive renal elimination, M6G may accumulate in the body of patients with impaired renal function and cause severe opioid adverse effects with insidious onset and long persistence. Its profile of receptor affinities, however, gives reason to speculate that M6G may exhibit analgesic effects while causing fewer adverse effects than morphine. This is supported by reports of the good tolerability of intrathecal and intravenous injections of M6G in humans with intact renal function. M6G may thus be contemplated as an analgesic for short term postoperative analgesia, especially for intrathecal analgesic therapy. In addition, its possibly higher potency than morphine makes M6G a candidate opioid for local or peripheral analgesic therapy. However, current knowledge is too incomplete to finally judge the clinical usefulness of M6G. The next topics for clinical research on M6G should include: (i) a comparison of the potencies of M6G and morphine to cause wanted and unwanted clinical effects; (ii) development of a predictive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of M6G with calculation of the transfer half-life between plasma and effect site; and (iii) identification of cofactors influencing the action of M6G that can serve as predictors for the clinical outcome of morphine/M6G therapy in an individual including the pharmacogenetics of M6G.
R-flurbiprofen is considered the 'inactive' isomer of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), flurbiprofen, because it does not inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) activity. However, previous studies have revealed that it has antinociceptive and antitum or effects not due to epimerization to the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting S-isomer. Here, we show that R-flurbiprofen has additional anti-inflammatory activity comparable with that of dexamethasone in the zymosan-induced paw inflammation model in rats. Different criteria suggest that the observed effects are mediated at least in part through inhibition of NF-kB activation: R-flurbiprofen inhibited i) LPS-induced NF-kB DNA binding activity in RAW 264.7 macrophages, ii) translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-kB into the nucleus of these cells, and iii) zymosan-induced NF-kB-dependent gene transcription in the inflamed paw and spinal cord of rats. S-flurbiprofen produced similar effects but was less potent. In addition, R-flurbiprofen inhibited DNA binding activity of AP-1, another key regulatory transcription factor in inflammatory processes. Because R-flurbiprofen does not cause gastrointestinal mucosal damage or other side effects associated with long-term NSAID or glucocorticoid use, it might be a useful drug in inflammatory or other diseases in which increased or constitutive NF-kB and AP-1 activation are involved in the pathophysiological processes.
The localization and regulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) were assessed in the spinal cord of mice stimulated by an intraplantar injection of zymosan. Both, nNOS and iNOS were upregulated in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord in response to the zymosan challenge. While nNOS was found in neurons of superficial laminae iNOS occurred in astrocytes. Thus, astrocytes might be involved in the processing of nociceptive stimuli. Expression of sGC was not affected by zymosan treatment. It was found exclusively in nerve fibers suggesting that it was predominantly localized to the presynaptic neuron. This supports the hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO) acts as retrograde messenger in spinal nociceptive processing.
Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), a major metabolite of morphine with agonist opioid-receptor activity, was reported to be a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Inhibition of P-gp may thus result in higher brain uptake of M6G. The goal of this observer-blinded, placebo controlled study, was to compare the antinociceptive effects of M6G in homozygous P-gp knockout (mdr1a(-/-)) and wildtype (mdr1a(+/+)) mice. M6G was injected intraperitoneally as a single dose of 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg. Eight P-gp knockout and eight wildtype mice were studied per dose. A hot plate test was performed before and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min after M6G administration. Plasma-concentrations of M6G, morphine, and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) were measured after intraperitoneal injection of 5 mg/kg M6G in another 14 P-gp knockout and 14 wildtype mice. No difference neither in the dose response relationship, nor in the time course of response latency times were observed between P-gp knockout and wildtype mice. However, latency times increased with higher doses of M6G, with antinociception significantly different from placebo at a M6G dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg. P-gp knockout mice tended to have higher plasma concentrations than the wildtype. However, plasma concentrations widely overlapped between groups and therefore no statistical significant group difference could be detected. We conclude that despite reported doubling of M6G brain uptake, absence of mdr1a coded P-gp does not enhance antinociceptive effects of M6G in the hotplate test after acute single-dose administration in mdr1a(-/-) knockout mice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Prostaglandins are important mediators in spinal nociceptive processing. They are produced by cyclo-oxygenase isoforms, cyclo-oxygenase-1 and -2, which are both constitutively expressed in the central nervous system. The present immunohistochemical study details localization and regulation of cyclo-oxygenase-1 and -2 and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in lumbar spinal cord before and after induction of a painful paw inflammation in mice. Cyclo-oxygenase-1 immunoreactivity was found in glial cells of the dorsal and ventral horns, but not in neurons. In unstimulated mice, cyclo-oxygenase-2 immunoreactivity was found in motoneurons of the ventral horns and in lamina X, but not in dorsal horn neurons. After induction of a paw inflammation with zymosan, cyclo-oxygenase-2 immunoreactivity increased dramatically in dorsal horn neurons of laminae I-VI and X, paralleled by a significant increase in prostaglandin E(2) release from lumbar spinal cord. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 was co-localized with neuronal nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity in several neurons in superficial laminae of the dorsal horns and in the area surrounding the central canal. Nitric oxide synthase was distributed in the cytoplasm and extended to processes of some neurons. In contrast, electron microscopy revealed that cyclo-oxygenase-2 immunoreactivity was restricted to the nuclear membrane and rough endoplasmic reticulum. It is shown in the present study that both cyclo-oxygenase isoforms are constitutively expressed in the spinal cord, cyclo-oxygenase-1 in glial cells of the dorsal and ventral horns and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in motoneurons. After induction of a hindpaw inflammation, several dorsal horn neurons express cyclo-oxygenase-2. Some of them are also positive for neuronal nitric oxide synthase, which is also induced following peripheral inflammation. Intracellularly, cyclo-oxygenase-2 is bound to the membranes of the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum, whereas neuronal nitric oxide synthase is found in the cytoplasm.
PURPOSE: Population pharmacokinetics of a fast release diclofenac were assessed with special focus on pharmacodynamic implications. METHODS: In a double blind four-way crossover study, 20 healthy volunteers received orally 50 and 100 mg diclofenac-Na effervescent ("fast-release NSAID"), 50 mg diclofenac tablets ("control"), or placebo. Population pharmacokinetics of the fast release diclofenac were assessed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling approach (NON-MEM). Analgesic effects were investigated by means of an experimental pain model based on both pain-ratings and cortical evoked potentials after specific stimulation of nasal nociceptors with short pulses of gaseous CO2. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of fast release diclofenac were best described by a two-compartment population model, with an estimated terminal half-life of 1.2 hours. Pharmacokinetics of diclofenac tablets were highly variable and a population pharmacokinetic model could not be obtained. As an indication of an early onset of analgesic effects, 100 mg fast release diclofenac but not the tablets significantly reduced the amplitudes of pain-related evoked potentials at 30 min after administration. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier drug absorption and lower pharmacokinetic variability of the fast-release formulation are likely to be preserved in a population.