Biomedical subjects

G Geisslinger

Publications and source records attributed to G Geisslinger.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Postoperative pain control following remifentanil-based anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery.

Eighty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery using remifentanil-based anaesthesia were randomly allocated in a double-blind manner to receive an intravenous bolus of fentanyl, buprenorphine, morphine or piritramide 20 min before the end of surgery. A reduced dose was administered postoperatively when patients reported moderate pain. Subsequent analgesia was provided by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The mean time from the end of anaesthesia to spontaneous respiration was 9 +/- 5 min. At first pain assessment, 63% of patients reported no or mild pain; 80% of patients required the second opioid bolus, those receiving piritramide needed the bolus significantly later than patients receiving buprenorphine or fentanyl. First PCA requirement also occurred significantly later in the piritramide group. This technique provided effective postoperative pain relief and transition to routine PCA and did not compromise recovery.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2000

Inhibition of noxious stimulus-induced spinal prostaglandin E2 release by flurbiprofen enantiomers: a microdialysis study.

Peripheral noxious stimuli have been shown to induce prostaglandin (PG) E2 release at the site of inflammation and in the spinal cord. The antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects of cyclooxygenase-inhibiting drugs are thought to depend on the inhibition of PG synthesis. R-Flurbiprofen, however, does not inhibit cyclooxygenase activity in vitro but still produces antinociceptive effects. To find out whether R-flurbiprofen acts via inhibition of spinal PG release, concentrations of PGE2 and flurbiprofen in spinal cord tissue were assessed by microdialysis. The catheter was transversally implanted through the dorsal horns of the spinal cord at level L4. R- and S-flurbiprofen (9 and 27 mg kg(-1), respectively) were administered intravenously 10-15 min before subcutaneous injection of formalin into the dorsal surface of one hindpaw. Flurbiprofen was rapidly distributed into the spinal cord with maximal concentrations after 30-45 min. Baseline PGE2 dialysate concentrations were 100.6 +/- 6.4 pg ml(-1) (mean +/- SEM). After formalin injection they rose about threefold with a maximum of 299.4 +/- 68.4 pg ml(-1) at 7.5 min. After approximately 1 h PGE2 levels returned to baseline. Both flurbiprofen enantiomers completely prevented the formalin-induced increase of spinal PGE2 release and reduced PGE2 concentrations below basal levels. S- and R-flurbiprofen at 9 mg kg(-1) produced a minimum of 15.8 +/- 5.2 and 27.7 +/- 14.9 pg ml(-1), respectively, and 27 mg kg(-1) S- and R-flurbiprofen resulted in 11.7 +/- 1.7 and 9.3 +/- 4.7 pg ml(-1), respectively. PGE2 levels remained at the minimum up to the end of the observation period at 5 h. When 27 mg kg(-1) R-flurbiprofen was injected intravenously without subsequent formalin challenge, baseline immunoreactive PGE2 concentrations were not affected. S-Flurbiprofen (27 mg kg(-1)), however, led to a moderate reduction (approximately 40%). The data suggest that antinociception produced by R-flurbiprofen is mediated at least in part by inhibition of stimulated spinal PGE2 release and support the current view that increased spinal PGE2 release significantly contributes to nociceptive processing.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Plasma levels after peroral and topical ibuprofen and effects upon low pH-induced cutaneous and muscle pain.

Cutaneous applications are gaining popularity in the treatment of cutaneous pain and of painful disorders in joints and muscle. The low pH-pain model in human skin has previously been able to demonstrate the effects of NSAIDs in dose-dependent manner and to establish time-effect relationships. We examined the analgesic action of ibuprofen after cutaneous application and compared the effects with oral administration. The two studies (with n = 12 subjects each) were performed in a double-blind, randomized fashion with a 1-week cross-over interval. In study 1 volunteers received intradermal infusions with phosphate buffered saline solution of pH 5.2 and received either 800 mg ibuprofen per os and topical placebo, or 4 g of a 5% commercial ibuprofen gel topically applied and oral placebo capsules, respectively. In study 2 the same protocol was applied with painful intramuscular infusion of stronger, isotonic phosphate buffer (pH 5.2). The flow rate of the pH-infusion was individually adjusted to induce pain with a magnitude of 20% on a visual analogue scale (ranging from 'no' (0%) to 'unbearable pain' (100%)). Ibuprofen (S-, R-) plasma levels after oral administrations were measured with HPLC, and after topical applications, by gas chromatography combined with mass spectroscopy to determine plasma levels in the range of ng/ml. In the cutaneous model pain ratings decreased to zero after topical verum gel within 45 min of the observation period of 55 min. Pain reduction after peroral ibuprofen was of the same magnitude, but was achieved within only 30 min. In the muscle model, the commercial ibuprofen gel did not reduce the pain in the acidic muscle. The peroral ibuprofen was less effective in the muscle compared to the skin pain model, although there was a significant progressive pain reduction within 55 min. Reasons for the differential susceptibility of cutaneous vs muscular acidosis pain to ibuprofen remain to be established.

Acidosis↗

PubMed2000

Olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials in migraine.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal/neuronal hyperexcitability and spreading depression activating the trigemino-vascular system are discussed in migraine-pathophysiology. This study investigated trigeminal and olfactory event-related potentials in migraineurs. METHODS: Nasal chemosensitivity was assessed in 19 female migraineurs with or without aura > 72 h before or after an attack and in 19 healthy females employing event-related cortical potentials (ERPs) after specific trigeminal stimulation of nasal nociceptors with short pulses of CO2, and specific olfactory stimulation with H2S. Odour thresholds and odour identification performance were also tested. RESULTS: Migraineurs exhibited greater responses to trigeminal stimulation, indicated by significantly larger ERP amplitudes N1. In contrast, olfactory ERP amplitudes P1N1 were significantly smaller in migraineurs. A leave-one-out classification procedure on the basis of these two parameters assigned 76.3% cases correctly. The olfactory ERP amplitude discriminated better between groups than trigeminal ERPs (71.1 vs. 68.4% correct classification). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest trigeminal hyperexcitability in migraineurs. A general increase of nasal chemosensitivity is not supported because of smaller olfactory ERP amplitudes in migraineurs. Olfactory ERPs discriminate better than trigeminal ERPs between migraineurs and controls, emphasizing the significance of the olfactory system in migraine.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Incidence and costs of adverse drug reactions during hospitalisation: computerised monitoring versus stimulated spontaneous reporting.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a computer-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system and compare its results with those of stimulated spontaneous reporting, and to assess the excess lengths of stay and costs of patients with verified adverse drug reactions. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was used to assess the efficacy of computer-based monitoring, and case-matching was used to assess excess length of stay and costs. SETTING: This was a study of all patients admitted to a medical ward of a university hospital in Germany between June and December 1997. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 379 patients were included, most of whom had infectious, gastrointestinal or liver diseases, or sleep apnoea syndrome. Patients admitted because of adverse drug reactions were excluded. METHODS: All automatically generated laboratory signals and reports were evaluated by a team consisting of a clinical pharmacologist, a clinician and a pharmacist for their likelihood of being an adverse drug reaction. They were classified by severity and causality. For verified adverse drug reactions, control patients with similar primary diagnosis, age, gender and time of admission but without adverse drug reactions were matched to the cases in order to assess the excess length of hospitalisation caused by an adverse drug reaction. RESULTS: Adverse drug reactions were detected in 12% of patients by the computer-based monitoring system and stimulated spontaneous reporting together (46 adverse reactions in 45 patients) during 1718 treatment days. Computer-based monitoring identified adverse drug reactions in 34 cases, and stimulated spontaneous reporting in 17 cases. Only 5 adverse drug reactions were detected by both methods. The relative sensitivity of computer-based monitoring was 74% (relative specificity 75%), and that of stimulated spontaneous reporting was 37% (relative specificity 98%). All 3 serious adverse drug reactions were detected by computer-based monitoring, but only 2 out of the 3 were detected by stimulated spontaneous reporting. The percentage of automatically generated laboratory signals associated with an adverse drug reaction (positive predictive value) was 13%. The mean excess length of stay was 3.5 days per adverse drug reaction. 48% of adverse reactions were predictable and detected solely by computer-based monitoring. Therefore, the potential for savings on this ward from the introduction of computer-based monitoring can be calculated as EUR56 200/year ($US59 600/year) [ 1999 values]. CONCLUSION: Computer monitoring is an effective method for improving the detection of adverse drug reactions in inpatients. The excess length of stay and costs caused by adverse drug reactions are substantial and might be considerably reduced by earlier detection.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

PubMed2000

Effects of selective and unselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors on prostanoid release from various rat organs.

It has been assumed that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is solely responsible for inflammatory processes. Recently, this view has been challenged because COX-2-selective agents caused a delay of gastric ulcer healing and exacerbation of inflammation in rats. To further characterize organ-specific toxic effects of selective and nonselective COX inhibitors, we assessed the eicosanoid release from different rat organs ex vivo after oral administration of the COX-2-selective inhibitor NS-398 and the unselective COX inhibitors diclofenac, meloxicam, and ketorolac. Prostanoid and leukotriene release from tissue fragments of the stomach, kidney, lung, and brain were determined after ex vivo incubation of tissue fragments in Tyrode's solution for 10 min at 37 degrees C. Ketorolac (0.1, 0.3, and 0.9 mg/kg) inhibited prostanoid release from all organs most potently and led to a significant increase of leukotriene release from the lung. Effects of diclofenac and meloxicam (1, 3, and 9 mg/kg each) were similar for all organs tested. At 9 mg/kg, 6keto-prostaglandin F (PGF)(1alpha) release from gastric mucosa was reduced by 79.1 +/- 11.4 and 87.6 +/- 7.7% and PGE(2) release from rat kidney was inhibited by 60.4 +/- 6.8 and 78.6 +/- 16.6% by diclofenac and meloxicam, respectively. NS-398 did not reduce prostanoid release from the lung. Consistent with the reported constitutive expression of COX-2, prostanoid release from kidney and brain was reduced by 20 to 30%. The release of 6keto-PGF(1alpha) from gastric mucosa was reduced by 34.7 +/- 22.2% at 3 mg/kg and by 86.9 +/- 12.7% at 9 mg/kg. At these doses, NS-398 has been previously shown to be COX-2 selective. Because PGF(1alpha) is the stable breakdown product of PGI(2), these results suggest that COX-2 contributes to PGI(2) synthesis in the rat stomach.

6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha↗

PubMed1999

[Therapy with opioids in liver or renal failure].

In patients with renal or hepatic failure, the pharmacokinetics of opioids may be affected in several ways, leading to the necessity to correct the dose. The liver is the major site for biotransformation of most opioids. The major metabolic pathway is oxidation. Exceptions to this are morphine and buprenorphine, which undergo primarily glucuronidation, and remifentanil which is cleared by esther hydrolysis. The hydrophilic metabolites are predominantly excreted by the kidneys and may accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency. Some metabolites such as morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) or normeperidine are active opioid agonists. With high concentrations they may cause narcotic effects or respiratory depression. In addition, special risks are known for normepridine that has been shown to exert neurotoxic effects with the risk of seizures. Few cases of respiratory depression following the administration of codeine, dihydrocodeine and tramdol have been reported. The elimination half-life of these drugs was prolonged. Lastly, the disposition of methadone, buprenorphine, fentanyl, sufentanyl and remifentanil appears to be unaffected in renal failure. In patients with hepatic cirrhosis it has been shown that oxidation of opioids is reduced, resulting in a decreased drug clearance (meperidine, propoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil) and increased oral bioavailability due to reduced first-pass metabolism (meperidine, propoxyphene, pentazocine, dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, the clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and its oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administrations. As for patients with renal failure, special risks are known for meperidine with potential accumulation of normeperidine, which can cause seizures, and for propoxyphene for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine. In the case of reduced metabolism in chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Lastly, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

English Abstract↗

PubMed1999

Stereoselective disposition of tiaprofenic acid enantiomers in rats.

The pharmacokinetics and metabolic chiral inversion of the S(+)- and R(-)-enantiomers of tiaprofenic acid (S-TIA, R-TIA) were assessed in vivo in rats, and in addition the biochemistry of inversion was investigated in vitro in rat liver homogenates. Drug enantiomer concentrations in plasma were investigated following administration of S-TIA and R-TIA (i.p. 3 and 9 mg/kg) over 24 hr. Plasma concentrations of TIA enantiomers were determined by stereospecific HPLC analysis. After administration of R-TIA it was found that 1) there was a time delay of peak S-TIA plasma concentrations, 2) S-TIA concentrations exceeded R-TIA concentrations from approximately 2 hr after dosing, 3) Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) for S-TIA were greater than for R-TIA following administration of S-TIA, and 4) inversion was bidirectional but favored inversion of R-TIA to S-TIA. Bidirectional inversion was also observed when TIA enantiomers were incubated with liver homogenates up to 24 hr. However, the rate of inversion favored transformation of the R-enantiomer to the S-enantiomer. In conclusion, stereoselective pharmacokinetics of R- and S-TIA were observed in rats and bidirectional inversion in rat liver homogenates has been demonstrated for the first time. Chiral inversion of TIA may involve metabolic routes different from those associated with inversion of other 2-arylpropionic acids such as ibuprofen.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Computerized surveillance of adverse drug reactions in hospital: implementation.

OBJECTIVE: To implement and measure the effects of automatic computerized laboratory signals (ALS) as a detection support tool of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of a total of 192 patients (199 sequential medical admissions) during a 2-month period in a 34-bed medical ward at the Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. The study involved the routine (daily) distribution to staff physicians of lists of automatic signals generated from computerized laboratory data as potential indicators of ADRs. Patient charts were reviewed by the clinical pharmacology team for ADRs and to see whether these were recognized by the staff physicians. RESULTS: Seventy-one ADRs were detected in 64 of the 199 (32%) admissions. Twenty-seven per cent of the ADRs were serious, 9% of the admissions were due to ADRs. Two hundred and ninety-five ALS were generated involving 69% of the admissions. Sixty-one per cent of the ADRs were identified by ALS. ALS were present in 58% of the ADR negative admissions. Eighty-five per cent of the ADRs were recognized as such and 19% of the ALS-positive ADRs were not recognized by the staff physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The routine implementation of ALS doubled the number of ADRs recognized by the physicians while patients were hospitalized in the medical ward. The use of the system appeared valid, simple and potentially cost-effective.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗

PubMed1999

Comparison of inhibitory effects of meloxicam and diclofenac on human thromboxane biosynthesis after single doses and at steady state.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent of human cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition by meloxicam, which has been reported to preferentially inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The effects of meloxicam were compared with those of diclofenac, a nonselective COX inhibitor. METHODS: COX-1 inhibition was determined by measuring thromboxane B2 (TXB2)-generation from clotting whole blood ex vivo after single oral doses of 7.5 and 15 mg meloxicam and 75 mg diclofenac and at steady state (15 mg meloxicam daily and 150 mg diclofenac daily). The effect was expressed as percentage inhibition of serum TXB2 generation and was directly related to the serum drug concentration with use of a standard sigmoidal E(max) model. RESULTS: In terms of inhibition of TXB2 generation, diclofenac was about 1 order of magnitude more potent than meloxicam, indicated by a diclofenac EC50 (concentration of drug required to cause 50% of maximum effect) that was about 10 times lower than that of meloxicam (EC50 diclofenac single doses: 37.50+/-29.64; EC50 meloxicam single doses: 677.50+/-189.08). However, serum concentrations of meloxicam after administration of 15 mg were approximately 10-fold higher than those of diclofenac. Therefore there was no statistically significant difference in the area under the effect time curve (P = .115) and the mean effect (P = .424) between meloxicam and diclofenac. The EC50 of both drugs was significantly higher at steady state (diclofenac steady state: 87.07+/-55.24 ng/mL; meloxicam steady state: 1850.12+/-829.93 ng/mL) than after a single dose (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These data show that meloxicam inhibits TXB2 generation at clinically relevant doses, although less potently than diclofenac. Thus our data suggest that the COX-2 preference of meloxicam observed in vitro may not result in clinical advantages when the higher dose of 15 mg is needed. Because of the increase in EC50 at steady state, COX-1 is relatively spared when the lower dose of 7.5 mg is administered.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

OBJECTIVE: Meropenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used for severe infections. In patients with chronic end-stage renal failure, meropenem clearance is reduced and doses must be adjusted according to the creatinine clearance. The aim of this study was to assess pharmacokinetic data of meropenem in patients with acute renal failure and to determine the amount of drug removed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration, an often-used renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure. METHODS: Nine critically ill anuric patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration received 500 mg meropenem 2 or 3 times daily. Plasma and hemofiltrate concentrations were determined during 1 dosing interval at steady state. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for a 2-compartment open model and dose requirements were calculated. RESULTS: The total meropenem clearance was 52.0 +/- 8.4 mL/min, with a hemofiltration clearance of 22.0 +/- 4.7 mL/min and a nonrenal-nonhemofiltration clearance of 29.9 +/- 5.4 mL/min; 235.9 +/- 88.6 mg, or 47.2% +/- 17.7%, of the dose were removed through continuous venovenous hemofiltration. The terminal elimination half-life was 8.7 +/- 3.5 hours and the volume of distribution at steady state was 12.4 +/- 1.8 L. Peak and trough concentrations for a dosing interval of 12 hours were 38.9 +/- 9.7 mg/L and 7.3 +/- 1.3 mg/L, respectively. The corresponding concentrations for a dosing interval of 8 hours were 44.7 +/- 10.4 mg/L and 11.9 +/- 0.7 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic data of anuric patients with acute renal failure were similar to those of patients with end-stage renal failure. Because hemofiltration contributes significantly to meropenem elimination, the recommended dose for critically ill anuric patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration should be increased by 100% to avoid potential underdosing.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed1999

Application of microdialysis for the determination of muscle and subcutaneous tissue concentrations after oral and topical ibuprofen administration.

BACKGROUND: The topical administration of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is widely used for the treatment of soft tissue pain. However, it is not known whether effective tissue concentrations are reached with the topical route. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare unbound muscle and subcutaneous tissue ibuprofen concentrations with use of microdialysis after topical and oral administration. METHODS: In a 2-way crossover design, 11 healthy volunteers received either 800 mg oral ibuprofen or 16 g of 5% ibuprofen gel applied onto the skin of the thigh (defined area, 17 x 19 cm). Microdialysis catheters were inserted into the medial vastus muscle (25 to 30 mm) and into the subcutaneous adipose layer of the thigh (4 to 5 mm). Dialysate was collected in 20-minute intervals up to 5 hours. RESULTS: Essentially all of the orally administered dose was recovered in urine as ibuprofen or metabolites during 24 hours, but only about 0.55% of the topically administered dose was recovered. The relative systemic bioavailability of ibuprofen gel, based on urine recovery data, was (mean +/- SD) 0.57%+/-0.30%. Mean values of the dialysate areas under the drug concentration-time curves after topical and oral administration were 731.2+/-605.0 and 176.6+/-122.9 ng x h x mL(-1) for subcutaneous tissue and 63.5+/-90.3 and 213.4+/-117.2 ng x h x mL(-1) for muscle, respectively. Muscle dialysate concentrations after topical administration varied considerably among the subjects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, if target tissue concentrations correlate directly with the degree of pain relief, patients with pain caused by dermal or subcutaneous tissue damage will have greater pain relief after topical administration of ibuprofen accompanied with less systemic side effects. In addition, a proportion of patients with muscle pain may also experience pain relief from topical ibuprofen.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed1999

The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the pharmacologic properties of midazolam with special regard to age using the electroencephalogram (EEG) as a measure of the hypnotic-sedative effect. METHODS: Nine younger (24 to 28 years) and nine elderly (67 to 81 years) male volunteers received midazolam by a computer-controlled device. Two infusion cycles with linearly increasing target plasma levels (slope, 40 ng/mL/min for the younger subjects; 20 ng/mL/min for the elderly subjects) were administered until defined end points were attained (median EEG frequency <4 Hz and loss of responsiveness to acoustic stimuli). An EEG was recorded to quantitate the hypnotic effect, relating the median frequency of the power spectrum to the plasma level by a sigmoid Emax model, including an effect compartment. Pharmacokinetic data were derived from arterial blood samples with use of a three-compartment model. RESULTS: The total doses needed to reach the defined end points were 71+/-9 mg and 35+/-6 mg for the younger and elderly subjects, respectively (P < .001). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in both groups (clearance, 399+/-91 and 388+/-97 mL/min; steady-state volume of distribution, 85+/-22 and 104 +/-11 L in young and elderly subjects, respectively). Pharmacodynamic data showed a large difference in half-maximum concentration (EC50; young subjects, 522+/-236 ng/mL; elderly subjects, 223+/-56 ng/mL; P < .05), a steep concentration-response curve, and distinct hysteresis. We found much interindividual variability in the plasma concentrations necessary to achieve the clinical end points, regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the lower doses needed to reach sedation in the elderly subjects were attributable to a 50% decrease in EC50, not to changes in pharmacokinetics.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Retrospective analysis of the frequency and recognition of adverse drug reactions by means of automatically recorded laboratory signals.

AIMS: To estimate the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) identified through the use of automatic signals generated from laboratory data (ALS) in hospitalised patients. To determine the frequency of spontaneous recognition of these ADRs by the attending physicians and to assess the potential value of ALS for detection of ADRs. METHODS: Laboratory results of patients hospitalised in a nine bed medical ward were automatically recorded over a period of 17 months. Values exceeding defined boundaries were used as ALS. Charts of every third patient were analysed retrospectively with regard to adverse drug related reactions and causality was evaluated as well as whether the ADR had been recognised during the period of hospitalisation. RESULTS: The charts and ALS of 98 patients were analysed. In 18 cases a drug-related adverse reaction was probable. Awareness to the reaction by the treating physicians was evident in 6 out of these 18 ADRs. Approximately 80% of the ADRs were considered predictable. Three ADRs were regarded as serious. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug reactions are common and often preventable. Only one third of ADRs which could have been detected through ALS were recognised by the attending physicians. An increased doctor's awareness of the frequency of drug related abnormal laboratory results by means of ALS is likely to increase the recognition rate of ADRs and might help to prevent them.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency.

Visual information is conducted by two parallel pathways (luminance- and contour-processing pathways) which are thought to be differentially affected in migraine and can be investigated by means of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Components and habituation of VEPs at four spatial frequencies were compared between 26 migraineurs (13 without aura, MO; 13 with aura, MA) and 28 healthy volunteers. Migraineurs were recorded in the headache-free interval (at least 72 h before and after an attack). Five blocks of 50 responses to chequerboards of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 cycles per degree (c.p.d.) were sequentially averaged and analysed for latency and amplitude. Differences in VEPs were dependent on spatial frequency. Only when small checks were presented, i.e. at high spatial frequency (2 and 4 c.p.d.), was the latency of N2 significantly prolonged in MA and did it tend to be delayed in MO subjects. Habituation behaviour was not significantly different between groups under the stimulating conditions employed. Prolonged N2 latency might be explained by the lack or attenuation of a contour-specific component N130 in migraineurs, indicating an imbalance of the two visual pathways with relative predominance of the luminance-processing Y system. These results reflect an interictally persisting dysfunction of precortical visual processing which might be relevant in the pathophysiology of migraine.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetic modeling of M6G formation after oral administration of morphine in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Morphine is metabolized to two major metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Under the conditions of long-term oral morphine administration, the accumulation of M6G may contribute to the analgesic effects, but it may also cause respiratory depression. METHODS: Five healthy male volunteers (ages 25-34 yr) received 90 mg MST (morphine sulfate 5H2O sustained-released tablet, equivalent to 67.8 mg oral morphine). Multiple plasma and urine samples were taken for as long as 14 and 36 h, respectively. Individual pharmacokinetics after intravenous administration of morphine and M6G were available from a previous investigation. A new model that considers the M6G-plasma profile as a sum of the input from the first-pass metabolism of morphine and the input from systemically available morphine was applied to the plasma concentration versus time curves of M6G. The concentrations of M6G at the effect site after long-term morphine administration were simulated. RESULTS: The fraction of morphine absorbed from the gut was 82+/-14%. Of this, 42+/-8% passed through the liver, resulting in an oral bioavailability of morphine of 34+/-9%. Of the total amount of M6G, 71+/-7% was formed during the first-pass metabolism, and 29+/-7% was formed by metabolism of systemic morphine. After 36 h, the amounts of M6G and morphine excreted in the urine were 92+/-17% and 9+/-3%, respectively. Simulation of effect-site concentrations of M6G indicated that after multiple oral dosing of morphine in patients with normal liver and renal function, M6G might reach concentrations two times greater than that of morphine. CONCLUSIONS: M6G may contribute to the analgesic and side effects seen with long-term morphine treatment. The current model of morphine and M6G pharmacokinetics after oral administration of morphine may serve as a pharmacokinetic basis for experiments evaluating the analgesic contribution of M6G with long-term oral dosing of morphine.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1999

Acetaminophen inhibits spinal prostaglandin E2 release after peripheral noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin play a pivotal role in spinal nociceptive processing. At therapeutic concentrations, acetaminophen is not a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. inhibitor. Thus, it is antinociceptive without having antiinflammatory or gastrointestinal toxic effects. This study evaluated the role of spinal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in antinociception produced by intraperitoneally administered acetaminophen. METHODS: The PGE2 concentrations in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were measured after formalin was injected into the hind paw of rats. The effect of antinociceptive doses of acetaminophen (100, 200, and 300 mg/kg given intraperitoneally) on PGE2 levels and flinching behavior was monitored Spinal PGE2 and acetaminophen concentrations were obtained by microdialysis using a probe that was implanted transversely through the dorsal horn of the spinal cord at L4. Furthermore, the effects of acetaminophen on urinary prostaglandin excretion were determined. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal administration of acetaminophen resulted in a significant decrease in spinal PGE2 release that was associated with a significant reduction in the flinching behavior in the formalin test Acetaminophen was distributed rapidly into the spinal cord with maximum dialysate concentrations 4560 min after intraperitoneal administration. Urinary excretion of prostanoids (PGE2, PGF2alpha, and 6-keto-PGF1alpha) was not significantly altered after acetaminophen administration. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the importance of PGE2 in spinal nociceptive processing. The results suggest that antinociception after acetaminophen administration is mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of spinal PGE2 release. The mechanism, however, remains unknown. The finding that urinary excretion of prostaglandins was not affected might explain why acetaminophen is antinociceptive but does not compromise renal safety.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Administration, Oral↗