PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Mather

Publications and source records attributed to G Mather.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Low-level visual processing of biological motion.

Biological motion displays depict a moving human figure by means of just a few isolated points of light attached to the major joints of the body. Naive observers readily interpret the moving pattern of dots as representing a human figure, despite the complete absence of form cues. This paper reports a series of experiments which investigated the visual processes underlying the phenomenon. Results suggest that (i) the effect relies upon responses in low-level motion-detecting processes, which operate over short temporal and spatial intervals and respond to local modulations in image intensity; and (ii) the effect does not involve hierarchical visual analysis of motion components, nor does it require the presence of dots which move in rigid relation to each other. Instead, movements of the extremities are crucial. Data are inconsistent with current theoretical treatments.

Humans↗
PubMed1991

Polarity specific adaptation to motion in the human visual system.

Three experiments investigated polarity specific adaptation to movement. Experiment 1 tested for temporal polarity specific adaptation, using counterphase sawtooth gratings as adapting and test stimuli. Each counterphase grating contained oppositely moving sawtooth components, and was thus balanced for direction, but both components of the adapting grating created only one polarity of luminance change over time, whereas the components of the test grating presented different signs. After adaptation, only the test component containing the unadapted temporal change was visible. A second experiment, using an analogous procedure, found evidence for spatial polarity specific adaptation. Experimental results can be explained by motion detectors which preserve information about spatial and temporal polarity. A third experiment found that spatial and temporal polarity specific adaptation differ in their dependence on temporal frequency.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1991

The spacing illusion: a spatial aperture problem?

A geometrical illusion in which the horizontal spacing between adjacent parallel lines in a row is underestimated when the lines are tilted away from vertical in a chevron configuration was investigated in two experiments. The perceived spacing was found to decrease as the tilt angle increased, consistent with the idea that separation judgements are influenced by the normal spacing between lines ie at right angles to the line orientation. It is proposed that this illusion reveals an analogue in spatial perception to the well-known aperture problem in motion perception. In establishing the separation of nearby or overlapping shapes in an image, the visual system cannot only rely upon the normal separation of contours belonging to each shape (as would be visible through small spatial apertures or receptive fields), since this varies with contour orientation. The system is therefore faced with a spatial aperture problem. The spacing illusion may arise because information usually available to solve the problem is absent in the illusion figure, or it may reflect a bias in favour of the orthogonal, which is adopted in the face of the ambiguity.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Computational modelling of motion detectors: responses to two-frame displays.

Schemes for motion detection fall into two classes. Reichardt correlators compare spatial luminance patterns at two locations at different times; gradient detectors compare spatial and temporal luminance gradients. Both are candidate operators for biological and machine vision systems. A large body of perceptual data exists, defining the properties of motion detectors used by human observers, which can form a basis for determining which class of detector is appropriate for the human visual system. Plausible versions of each detector were implemented, and their responses to a variety of two-frame stimuli were computed. Results indicated that both detectors can predict most of the data, but on balance gradient detectors offer the best working hypothesis for motion detection by human observers. This conclusion is necessarily limited to the type of stimuli used, and may require modification in the light of responses to continuously moving stimuli.

Humans↗
PubMed1989

Motion: the long and short of it.

Several authors have proposed that motion is analyzed by two separate processes: short-range and long-range. We claim that the differences between short-range and long-range motion phenomena are a direct consequence of the stimuli used in the two paradigms and are not evidence for the existence of two qualitatively different motion processes. We propose that a single style of motion analysis, similar to the well known Reichardt and Marr-Ullman motion detectors, underlies all motion phenomena. Although there are different detectors of this type specialized for different visual attributes (namely first-order and second-order stimuli), they all share the same mode of operation. We review the studies of second-order motion stimuli to show that they share the basic phenomena observed for first-order stimuli. The similarity across stimulus types suggests, not parallel streams of motion extraction, one short-range and passive and the other long-range and intelligent, but a concatenation of a common mode of initial motion extraction followed by a general inference process.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1988

Temporal properties of apparent motion in subjective figures.

In 'Kanizsa' figures, vivid subjective shapes are seen in the absence of explicit contours to define them. When two or more such figures are presented sequentially, so that the subjective shape occupies different positions, good apparent motion of the shape is usually reported. This motion percept must be mediated by a high-level process, in which form extraction precedes motion detection. Some spatial and temporal properties of this motion process are investigated. A major finding is that motion is only perceived when the time interval between successive frames falls below about 500 ms, and the duration of each frame exceeds about 80 ms.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1987

The dependence of edge displacement thresholds on edge blur, contrast, and displacement distance.

Two experiments measured thresholds for discriminating the movement direction of an isolated intensity edge. The luminance profile of the edge took the form of an integrated Gaussian. In the first experiment, displacement thresholds were measured as a function of edge blur width and contrast. In the second experiment, contrast thresholds were measured as a function of edge blur width and displacement. Using the estimated retinal profile of the edge (given the LSF of the display and of the optics of the eye), the data were found to collapse onto a single function relating the maximum spatial luminance gradient defined by the edge to the maximum temporal change in luminance generated by its displacement. There was a direct relationship between the two gradients at threshold, so that lower spatial gradients were paired with smaller temporal changes. Implications for current models of motion detection are examined.

Humans↗
PubMed1986

Irradiation: implications for theories of edge localization.

In a vernier alignment task, observers judged the relative positions of two blurred edges placed one above the other. If the two edges were given the same blur width and contrast polarity, their relative positions were perceived veridically. If the two edges were given different blur widths or opposite contrast polarities, reliable errors in perceived position were revealed, as if each edge were shifted into its dark phase by an amount proportional to its blur. The magnitude of shift varied from zero for sharply defined edges, to over 1 min arc for blurred edges. These illusory shifts in position are consistent with the well-known phenomenon of "irradiation". Implications for current models of edge localization are discussed.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1985

A moving display which opposes short-range and long-range signals.

A novel display is described which stimulates both the long-range and the short-range motion detecting processes simultaneously, but with opposing directions of movement. The direction in which the stimulus appears to move depends on retinal eccentricity and element size, but adaptation to the display always produces a motion aftereffect (MAE) direction opposite to the direction of the short-range component. The display may offer insights into the properties of the two-process motion detecting system.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1985

Effects of luminance and contrast on direction of ambiguous apparent motion.

A study is reported of the role of luminance and contrast in resolving ambiguous apparent motion (AM). Different results were obtained for the short-range (SR) and the long-range (LR) motion-detecting processes. For short-range jumps (7.5 min arc), the direction of ambiguous AM depended on brightness polarity, with AM only from white to white and from black to black. But for larger jumps, or when an interstimulus interval (ISI) was introduced, AM was less dependent on polarity, with white often jumping to black and black jumping to white. Two potential AMs were pitted against each other, one carried by a light stimulus and the other by a dark stimulus. The stimulus whose luminance differed most from the uniform surround captured the AM. Visual response to luminance was linear, not logarithmic. When the stimulus was modified to give continuous AM in one direction it was followed by a negative aftereffect of motion only when the spatial displacement was 1 min arc. A larger displacement (10 min arc) gave good AM but no motion aftereffect. Thus only short-range motion adapts motion-sensitive channels.

Adaptation, Physiological↗