PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7667923

Temporal filtering enhances direction discrimination in random-dot patterns.

Abstract

In conventional presentations of random-dot kinematograms, two frames of random dots are presented in temporal sequence, separated by a blank inter-stimulus interval, and a coherent offset in spatial position is added to dots in one frame relative to dots in the other frame. Direction discrimination performance is limited temporally to inter-stimulus intervals below about 100 msec (Tmax). Experiments are described in which temporal smoothing was applied to the onset and offset of each frame in the kinematogram. Tmax was found to increase in proportion with the time constant of the temporal smoothing function. An explanation based on contrast-dependent responses in simple motion detectors cannot accommodate the results. Instead, the increase in Tmax with temporal smoothing, and analogous increase in spatial limit (Dmax) with spatial blurring, can be related to the spatiotemporal frequency content of the stimulus. Random-dot kinematograms can be viewed as continuously drifting patterns that have been discretely sampled at regular spatiotemporal intervals. Sampling introduces artefacts (alias signals), which become more intrusive as sampling rate declines (i.e. inter-stimulus interval or spatial displacement increases) and consequently limit discrimination performance. Temporal smoothing or spatial blurring extends performance because it removes alias signals generated by high spatiotemporal frequencies in the pattern. Computational modelling to estimate the Fourier energy available in random-dot kinematograms confirmed that the sampling account can predict the proportional increase in Tmax and Dmax limits as filter time or space constant increases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Mather, H Tunley. 1995. Temporal filtering enhances direction discrimination in random-dot patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00297-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How big is a Gabor patch, and why should we care?

We propose a two-parameter model for the perceived size (spatial extent) of a Gaussian-windowed, drifting sinusoidal luminance pattern (a Gabor patch) based on the simple assumption that perceived size is determined by detection threshold for the sinusoidal carrier. Psychophysical measures of perceived size vary with peak contrast, Gaussian standard deviation, and carrier spatial frequency in a manner predicted by the model. At suprathreshold peak contrasts Gabor perceived size is relatively unaffected by systemic noise but varies in a manner that is consistent with the influence of local contrast gain control. However, at and near threshold, systemic noise plays a major role in determining perceived size. The data and the model indicate that measures of contrast threshold using Gaussian-windowed stimuli (or any other nonflat contrast window) are determined not just by contrast response of the neurons activated by the stimulus but also by integration of that activation over a noisy, contrast-dependent extent of the stimulus in space and time. Thus, when we wish to measure precisely the influence of spatial and temporal integration on threshold, we cannot do so by combining contrast threshold measures with Gaussian-windowed stimuli.

Contrast Sensitivity

Modeling spatial integration and contrast invariance in visual pattern discrimination.

PURPOSE: Human pattern discrimination performance has been reported to be largely independent of stimulus contrast but to depend on stimulus area. The authors propose a model that combines the effects of spatial integration and contrast. The model is based on the computation of similarity between pattern templates in memory and signals to be discriminated using normalized correlation. There are also two sources of additive noise, one before and one after the computation of correlation. The model was compared with human observers in an orientation discrimination task. METHODS: Orientation discrimination thresholds of human observers were measured for sinusoidal gratings of various areas, contrasts, and spatial frequencies. A two-interval, forced-choice methods was used. The performance of the model was determined by using computer simulations. RESULTS: It was found that the effects of contrast and grating area were interrelated. The decrease of orientation thresholds as a function of grating area was considerably larger at low than at high contrast. On the other hand, orientation thresholds decreased clearly as a function of contrast at the smallest grating areas but hardly at all at the largest grating areas. The model accounted well for the experimental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Because the invariance of orientation discrimination with respect to stimulus contrast depended on area, the cause of the invariance appeared to occur after spatial integration. The model explains this so that, with increasing contrast or area, the normalized correlation gradually approached a constant value. The proportion of pretemplate noise became negligible compared to the constant posttemplate noise. Thus, total noise also approached a constant value. Hence, the signal-to-noise ratio and discrimination performance became constant.

Contrast Sensitivity