PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G S Griffiths

Publications and source records attributed to G S Griffiths.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Particulate bioglass as a grafting material in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.

The present clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effects of a bioactive glass, Perioglas, in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. 20 patients, 23-55 years of age (44 sites), with intrabony defects completed the 1-year study. Teeth with furcation involvement were excluded. After completion of initial therapy, defects were randomly assigned to either a test or control procedure. Following flap reflection, root planing and removal of chronic inflammatory tissue in both groups, the test defects were restored with the bioactive glass particulate material. Mucoperiosteal flaps were replaced, sutured and a periodontal dressing was used. All the patients received postoperative antibiotics and analgesics and were seen at 1 week for suture removal. Follow-up was then carried out weekly and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year post-surgery. Plaque score, bleeding score, probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL) and gingival recession were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 1 year. Standardised radiographs for computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) were taken at baseline, immediately post-operatively and at 1 year. The CADIA data showed a significant increase (F-ratio: 15.67, p < 0.001) in radiographic density and volume between the defects treated with the Perioglas when compared to those treated with surgical debridement only. PPD and PAL showed significant improvements in both experimental and control sites, with a greater trend to improvement in the experimental sites. It was concluded that this bioactive glass is effective as an adjunct to conventional surgery in the treatment of intrabony defects.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1997

Detection of neutral protease (Periocheck) and BANA hydrolase (Perioscan) compared with traditional clinical methods of diagnosis and monitoring of chronic inflammatory periodontal disease.

Perioscan requires a plaque sample to detect the presence of enzymes capable of degrading N-benzoyl-DL-arginine-2-naphthylamide (BANA) from relatively few anaerobic periodontal pathogens. Periocheck assays the presence of neutral proteases in crevicular fluid. The aim of this study was to compare these test kits with traditional clinical methods of detecting periodontal disease and to monitor the ability of the kits to reflect the response to initial therapy. 19 patients with moderately severe chronic periodontitis were seen before and after a course of oral hygiene and root instrumentation consisting of 4 appointments. Clinical measurements and test assays were collected at 5 diseased sites and 2 healthy sites in each subject. Complete data from 125 sites were available for statistical analysis. At baseline Periocheck had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 61% whereas Perioscan had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 55%, when related to the clinical diagnosis. A composite clinical assessment, based on improvement or deterioration of one whole unit change of the subjective clinical indices and 2 mm changes or greater in probing depth or probing attachment level, revealed 75 sites which improved following treatment, whereas 45 sites did not change and 5 sites deteriorated. The probability that the tests agreed with the clinical outcome after treatment, was calculated as 50.4% for Periocheck and 52% for Perioscan. The diagnostic kits did not reliably reflect the clinical assessment of periodontal disease in the cross sectional study, or the outcome following treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

In vitro accuracy and reproducibility of automated and conventional periodontal probes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of experienced and inexperienced examiners using 3 automated periodontal probes (Florida Pocket Probe, Florida Disk Probe, Peri Probe) in comparison with 3 conventional periodontal probes (Marquis, Williams and EN-15 probes). Test blocks of aluminium had 30 holes of diameter 1.10 mm and depths ranging from 2.75 to 10.0 mm. machined with a tolerance of +/- 0.01 mm. 8 experienced examiners and 8 inexperienced examiners were selected to perform duplicate measurements on the blocks over 6 visits using each of the 6 probes. 1 automated and 1 conventional probe were used at each examination. The % accuracy and reproducibility for each of the duplicate measurements was calculated and analysed using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance and the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. On average, all probes showed high reproducibility, with the Florida Disk Probe, the Florida Pocket Probe and the Williams probe ranked best and the other 3 probes were less reproducible. On average, all probes showed a high degree of accuracy, automated probes were ranked best and were significantly better than conventional probes. Experience had little effect on reproducibility, with only the Peri Probe showing significant differences at the 5% level between the groups. Experience appeared to be more important for accuracy, as experienced examiners were more accurate than inexperienced examiners, with significant differences at the 5% level for the EN-15, Florida Disk Probe and Peri Probe. However, inexperienced examiners were significantly more accurate using the Williams probe. This in vitro study has shown that automated probes offer increased accuracy over conventional probes and the Florida Pocket and disk probes compare well with conventional probes for reproducibility.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Evaluation of the healing response following placement of Coe-pak and an experimental pack after periodontal flap surgery.

2 periodontal dressings, Coe-pak and RD8 (a product under development), were assessed following periodontal surgery, using a double-blind study of randomised split-mouth design, with each patient acting as their own control. Matched sites were selected for periodontal flap surgery under local analgesia. Sites were randomly allocated to each group. The dressings were applied by a single operator and both patients and clinical assessors were blind as to the dressing employed. The dressings were assessed as to their handling properties, in addition to a 7-day post-operative assessment of the surgical sites and a subjective patient report. Maximum pain levels were relatively low (4 in a scale 0-10); subjects reported more pain and analgesics required with RD8 than with Coe-pak. This was reflected in the results of the patient assessment which indicated that 50% preferred Coe-pak, compared to 25% who preferred the RD8 dressing. The results showed RD8 to be an acceptable periodontal dressing when compared to Coe-pak. There were no statistically significant differences between treated sites in both groups with regard to post-operative plaque scores, bleeding scores or tissue healing.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of an internal reference when performing histogram analyses in digital subtraction images and to determine the ability of the method to detect initial bone lesions. METHODS: Fifty-one Royal Air Force recruits had standardized vertical bitewing radiographs and clinical assessment of attachment level recorded annually over three years. Subtraction analyses of crestal bone changes at the mesial surface of the upper right first molar were compared with changes at the mesial surface of the same tooth. Changes over the periods from age 17 to 18 years and age 18 to 20 years were monitored using two subtraction procedures. RESULTS: Reproducibility studies revealed that Pearson correlations between duplicate measurements of the test site alone (16 crest; r = 0.74) were lower than those between duplicate measurements of changes where misalignment was controlled for, either as a difference (16 crest-16 tooth; r = 0.93) or ratio (16 crest/16 tooth; r = 0.93). We used the differences between the mean subtraction density for 16 crest and 16 tooth as our measure of change in bone density. For the duplicate measurements, the standard deviation of these differences was 3.9: a difference of +/- 7.8 was therefore taken as a threshold value for evidence of real change. Bone gain was noted between the ages of 17 and 18 years (16/21 subjects), but some early bone loss was seen between 18 and 20 years (12/21 subjects), with four subjects showing changes significantly greater than the method error. There were no associations between the clinical and radiographic observations. CONCLUSION: Use of a control site in subtraction radiography improves the reproducibility; such systems can detect small changes in alveolar bone which may assist in early diagnosis of the initial periodontal lesion which may precede observable clinical changes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Contamination of human gingival crevicular fluid by plaque and saliva.

Dental plaque and saliva are both possible contaminants of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Plaque samples from 12 sites in four subjects who had allowed plaque to accumulate for 24-48 h were quantified using the Plaque Index and then transferred to filter paper strips for fluid volume determination using the Periotron 6000. The mean volume of fluid for plaque scores of 0 was 0.02 (+/- 0.01) microliter, whereas for plaque scores of 3 the mean volume was 0.15 (+/- 0.07) microliters. In a clinical study, GCF samples, from 19/184 subjects (10.4%) were assessed as contaminated or suspected to be contaminated with saliva, but only 28/1740 strips (1.6%) were placed in these categories of contamination. An assay to confirm salivary contamination was established, using an immunochemical, double-antibody method with sheep anti-human salivary alpha-amylase followed by peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep immunoglobulin. The detection threshold of the assay was 7.5 ng of alpha-amylase, which represents approx. 15-25 nl of saliva. The assay was evaluated on 90 GCF samples categorized as 'known' (n = 16), 'suspected' (n = 16), or 'not' contaminated (n = 58) with saliva; 81.25, 50-61.5 and 5.2-8.6%, respectively, were positive for salivary alpha-amylase. In some GCF samples salivary contamination was in excess of 50%. It was concluded that GCF samples seen to be contaminated with saliva should be discarded, whereas samples considered free from contamination may be used with confidence. Samples suspected of contamination may require an alpha-amylase assay before further analysis.

Densitometry↗
PubMed1992

Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) levels in gingival crevicular fluid from adults with previous evidence of destructive periodontitis. A cross sectional study.

We have estimated the levels of Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) by ELISA in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) at 58 sites from 37 patients with adult periodontitis. GCF was collected for 5 s on filter papers and a 2nd sample was collected for 30 s 1 min later. 68/116 strips yielded detectable levels of IL-1 beta. IL-1 beta was present in both the 1st and 2nd samples at 28 sites, in the 1st only at 4 sites and in the 2nd only at 8 sites; 18 sites were below the level of detection for the assay. When the concentrations of IL-1 beta were calculated in the original volume of GCF on each strip, the mean value for positive strips was 34.16 +/- 29.45 (SD) pg/microliters with a range from 1.75 to 97.13 pg/microliters. There were no statistically significant correlations with the plaque index, bleeding index or probable crevice depth (pocket depth). The results indicate that IL-1 is present in the GCF from a proportion of sites with evidence of previous periodontal destruction.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Associations between volume and flow rate of gingival crevicular fluid and clinical assessments of gingival inflammation in a population of British male adolescents.

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling was performed on 2 occasions separated by 1 year, at 2 sites in the mouths of 102 male adolescents, mean age 17.85 years. Samples were collected onto 5 filter paper strips which were sequentially applied to the mouth of the crevice over a 9-min collection period. Volume and flow rates of GCF were determined for each site and were compared with clinical measurements of plaque, gingival colour, bleeding, gingival index (GI) and pocket depth, using a general linear models (GLM) procedure. While the initial volume of GCF showed no association with any clinical measurement, there was an association between flow rate of GCF and gingival colour. The volume of GCF collected in the final, 5th sample was associated with the GI. The sample site strongly influenced all measures of GCF volume. It is proposed that the flow rate of GCF may be a better indicator of gingival inflammation than the more imprecise clinical assessments of inflammation, since GCF flow rates more precisely reflect changes in tissue permeability. The association between the final sample, collected after 9 min, and clinical measurements, was probably a reflection of the association between clinically-detectable inflammation and the susceptibility of the site to mild irritation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Specific antibody responses to subgingival plaque bacteria as aids to the diagnosis and prognosis of destructive periodontitis.

We have reviewed the recent literature on the humoral immune responses to a variety of subgingival plaque bacterial species in patients with destructive periodontal diseases. We do not feel that the information presently available on the specific antibody responses to proposed pathogens such as Bacteroides gingivalis and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans allows antibody responses to be diagnostic. All control subjects without periodontal destruction have antibodies to candidate pathogens but the generally higher levels in patients are not sufficiently elevated to be diagnostic. Nor can they be used to predict the initiation of disease or the onset of new episodes of destruction where disease had previously occurred. Successful treatment of patients may lead to lower levels of antibodies to some organisms, including possible pathogens, and thus support a given species in the aetiopathogenesis of disease. It appears that unsuccessful treatment may be accompanied by continuing high antibody levels to some organisms and further studies may enable this observation to be used to monitor therapy. There is some evidence from serological studies that each destructive episode may be induced by a different bacterial species or consortium. The start of studies using single antigens and the techniques of molecular biology will provide not only antibody-based diagnostic methods but also allow us to determine which bacterial antigens are virulence factors and thus the role of the antibody responses, whether protective or damaging, in the periodontal diseases.

Actinobacillus↗
PubMed1990

Detection of high-risk groups and individuals for periodontal diseases: laboratory markers based on the microbiological analysis of subgingival plaque.

Periodontal microbiology is reviewed with regard to the potential of certain characteristics to serve as markers of high risk groups or individuals for periodontal diseases. The generally accepted associations between particular organisms and the various periodontal diseases are discussed. The usefulness of various clinical study designs is reviewed. The ecology of the subgingival plaque microflora is discussed and a number of suggestions for future research are made. We have concluded that there is no monospecific aetiology to any of the various periodontal conditions. Nevertheless, we give particular attention to the role of the black-pigmented bacteroides based upon our belief that they, and Bacteroides gingivalis in particular, are fundamental to our understanding of the biology of periodontal diseases in humans and other animals. Consequently, the contribution of its various virulence factors and their potential as markers of disease susceptibility and activity is addressed.

Bacterial Physiological Phenomena↗
PubMed1990

The role of histopathology in the diagnosis and prognosis of periodontal diseases.

The histological evaluation of surgical biopsies from affected tissues is a standard way of assessing pathological change and determining treatment in many diseases. In most forms of periodontal disease, however, this approach finds limited application. Here, we review what uses the histopathological approach has in the study and evaluation of the periodontal diseases. Current understanding of the changes in epithelial anatomy during pocket formation, the cellular composition and dynamics of the inflammatory infiltrate and the mechanisms of bone resorption and repair are reviewed from the perspective of the information available from microscopical investigation, including the uses and potential application of modern immunocytochemical methods to these questions. The usefulness of histological study of biopsy material is reassessed in the light of advances made in immunohistochemical techniques and their application to gingival inflammatory infiltrates and epithelia. Such techniques offer immediately valuable research opportunities with potential for diagnostic applications, noteably the recognition of phases of destructive activity and their differentiation from periods of effective host defence.

Gingiva↗
PubMed1990

Statistical models for data from periodontal research.

Many factors have been hypothesised either to characterise groups and individuals at risk for periodontal disease or to be markers of periodontal breakdown. In order to identify these as associated either with disease status or progression, a statistical association between the factor and a measure of disease will have to be demonstrated. The statistical modelling of data arising from periodontal research presents special problems. These include the large number of measurements made in each subject, the large magnitude of measurement error compared to the changes in attachment level, the analysis of longitudinal studies, the lack of a measure of instantaneous rate of attachment loss and controversies over the nature of the progression of the disease. We consider statistical methods currently available in the light of these difficulties and identify areas in which further research is necessary.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1990

The protein composition of gingival crevicular fluid sampled from male adolescents with no destructive periodontitis: baseline data of a longitudinal study.

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is a promising source for markers of destructive periodontal diseases activity. As the initial stage of a longitudinal study into the characterization of disease markers, GCF sampled from 104 sites in 74 adolescents was examined via sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS/PAGE). In this population, which had varying degrees of gingivitis but little evidence of destructive periodontitis, there was a highly homologous GCF protein profile. The plasma components, albumin, transferrin and IgG, were major constituents of all samples. In addition, a second group of non-plasma derived proteins, with molecular weights 37 kDa, 47 kDa, 57 kDa and 59 kDa, was also commonly detected. The high frequency of occurrence of these components suggests that they may represent products of normal turnover of the periodontal tissues. Analysis of GCF sampled from patients with progressing destructive disease revealed a different SDS/PAGE profile particularly with respect to proteins of non-plasma origin. It is anticipated that the major metabolic changes which accompany the destruction of the tissues during future disease episodes in the adolescent study population will be discernible as alterations to the GCF protein profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Detection of high-risk groups and individuals for periodontal diseases: laboratory markers from analysis of gingival crevicular fluid.

Gingival crevicular fluid is regarded as a promising medium for the detection of markers of periodontal diseases activity. The collection protocols are straight forward and non-invasive and can be performed at specific sites of interest in the periodontium. Because the fluid accumulates at the gingival margin, it will contain potential markers derived not only from the host tissues and serum but also the subgingival microbial plaque, and thus an extremely broad range of candidate molecules may be investigated. However, the ability to successfully describe indicators of current disease activity and predictors of future disease is dependent not only upon the choice of the biochemical marker but also on the accurate description of the health status of the sample sites using currently available clinical and radiographic methods. Areas of study which currently show the most promise involve the analysis of host enzyme activities directed against components of the extracellular matrix, the nature of the glycosaminoglycans released into the sulcus and the concentration in gingival crevicular fluid of certain mediators of the inflammatory process, most notably prostaglandin E2.

Disease Susceptibility↗
PubMed1989

Detection of high-risk groups and individuals for periodontal diseases: laboratory markers from analysis of saliva.

The use of saliva as a source of components that may identify subjects at risk of developing destructive periodontitis, or provide markers of disease potential or activity, has been reviewed. It was concluded that bacteria, their constituents or products are unlikely to be rewarding and that host-derived salivary factors such as enzymes cannot identify risk, as deficiency states for these do not exist. Secretory IgA, plasma IgA and IgG isotype levels and specific antibodies may be associated with risk, but probably only if levels fall below those which are protective or a specific antibody response is absent. More work is needed to distinguish between monomeric and dimeric IgA antibodies and to identify IgG antibodies in longitudinal clinical studies. In general, although saliva may prove to be useful as a source of indicators of current disease activity or as a means of assessing responses to treatment, it is unlikely to provide evidence for the existence of risk factors.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed1988

Detection of high-risk groups and individuals for periodontal diseases. Systemic predisposition and markers of general health.

The evidence for systemic predisposition to periodontal diseases is reviewed in relation to cellular and humoral immunity, drug therapy, diet and nutrition and stress. It is concluded that, apart from defects of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, little firm evidence exists for other diseases, though insulin-dependent diabetes and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) may accelerate and/or potentiate the damage of existing disease. The precise rôle of drugs, diet and nutrition and stress remain to be elucidated, but recent advances in these areas offer the prospect of assessing risk using carefully controlled studies.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗