Biomedical subjects

Georg Rainer

Publications and source records attributed to Georg Rainer.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Reproducibility of standardized retroillumination photography for quantification of posterior capsule opacification.

PURPOSE: To determine the short-term reproducibility of standardized digital retroillumination images of regeneratory posterior capsule opacification (PCO) using the photographic setup at 1 institution. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 retroillumination images of 30 eyes with varying degrees of PCO and different types of intraocular lenses were acquired with a standardized digital coaxial retroillumination system. Two images were taken per eye with a 1-minute interval between images. Ten other eyes were photographed in the same way but with a 5-day interval between the 2 images. All images were evaluated with a fully automated, objective PCO analysis software in which the PCO score was from 0 to 100. The 2 results (A, B) in each eye were compared, and the differences were calculated. RESULTS: There was a high correlation between the A and B results (r = 0.99). The mean absolute difference was 3.7%. The repeatability coefficient was 8.8%. CONCLUSION: Digital coaxial retroillumination photography provided quick acquisition of regeneratory PCO images. It provided excellent image quality and high reproducibility. The technique forms a good basis for automated quantification of PCO with new software systems.

Cataract↗

PubMed2002

Assessment of anterior capsule opacification: photographic technique and quantification.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a standardized slitlamp photographic technique to document and quantify anterior capsule opacification (ACO) in the pseudophakic eye. SETTING: University of Vienna, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: In this prospective study, slitlamp photographs were taken in 29 eyes of 19 patients with ACO of varying degrees and intraocular lenses of different materials. Digital slitlamp photographs were taken by 2 examiners using a standardized protocol. The intensity of anterior fibrosis was evaluated using subjective grading by 2 masked examiners and by image analysis. RESULTS: A standardized protocol was developed for documentation of ACO. The intraexaminer (or short-term) reproducibility (r = 0.96, P < .01) and interexaminer reproducibility (r = 0.93, P < .01) were excellent. The results of image analysis used to objectively quantify ACO correlated with the subjective grading (r = 0.95, P < .01). CONCLUSION: This standardized technique of slitlamp photography and image analysis provided reproducible documentation and can therefore serve as a basis for the quantification of ACO.

Anterior Chamber↗

PubMed2002

Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcome of cataract patients 3 months postoperatively using optical biometry obtained with a prototype version (axial length measurement, ALM, Carl Zeiss Jena) of the commercial partial coherence interferometry (PCI) instrument (IOLMaster, Carl Zeiss Jena). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna General Hospital, and Institute of Medical Physics, University of Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Forty-five patients with age-related cataract in both eyes were scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery. Axial length was measured preoperatively with a prototype (ALM) of the commercial PCI instrument as well as with immersion ultrasound (IUS). Immersion US was performed by a single experienced investigator. In each patient, the first eye was randomly assigned to receive an intraocular lens (IOL) using the Holladay IOL power formula based on ALM or IUS biometry. The other biometric technique was used in the contralateral eye. Subjective refractive outcome was assessed 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Refractive outcomes with the 2 techniques did not differ significantly (P = .28). The mean numerical error (MNE) (the difference between the refractive outcome 3 months postoperatively and the predicted spherical equivalent) was 0.13 diopter (D) and 0.03 D for the ALM and IUS, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) (the absolute value of MNE) was 0.48 D (range 0.00 to 1.58 D) and 0.46 D (range 0.01 to 1.92 D) with the ALM and IUS, respectively. By recalculating the surgeon factor retrospectively to correct the Holladay formula to obtain a postoperative MNE of zero, a theoretical MAE of 0.46 D was obtained with both biometry techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive outcome in cataract patients using PCI biometry was as good as that achieved with optimized IUS. However, the difference in axial length measured by the ALM compared to that measured by IUS must be considered when using the IOL A-constants supplied by the manufacturers.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Effect of an acrylic intraocular lens with a sharp posterior optic edge on posterior capsule opacification.

PURPOSE: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of the sharp posterior optic edge design of the Sensar OptiEdge AR40e intraocular lens (IOL) (Allergan Surgical) with that of the round-edged design of the Sensar AR40 IOL. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: This prospective randomized patient- and examiner-masked study comprised 106 eyes of 53 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received an AR40 IOL in 1 eye and an AR40e IOL in the other eye. Postoperative examinations were at 1 week, 2 and 6 months, and 1 year. Digital slitlamp and digital retroillumination images of each eye were taken. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slitlamp and objectively using automated image-analysis software. RESULTS: The AR40e group had significantly less regeneratory and fibrotic PCO 1 year after surgery. The mean automated image-analysis software PCO score (scale 0 to 10) was 2.19 in the AR40 group and 1.10 in the AR40e group (P <.001). The AR40e group had less peripheral fibrotic PCO. There was no significant difference in patient-reported edge glare between the 2 IOL groups. CONCLUSIONS: The sharp-edged design of the Sensar OptiEdge AR40e IOL led to significantly less PCO than the round-edged AR40 IOL 1 year postoperatively.

Acrylic Resins↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of ultrasound pachymetry and partial coherence interferometry in the measurement of central corneal thickness.

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with 3 ultrasound pachymeters and with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and evaluate the effect of repeated contact by a pachymetry probe on corneal thickness. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Central corneal thickness was measured in 20 eyes of 20 healthy volunteers with 3 different ultrasound pachymeters (DGH 500, DGH Technology Inc.; SP 2000, Tomey Inc.; Paxis, Biovision Inc.) and with PCI. In each eye, 5 measurements with PCI were followed by 5 measurements with each ultrasound pachymetry device and another 5 measurements with PCI. RESULTS: The mean CCT measured with the DGH 500, SP 2000, and Paxis was 541.0 microm, 539.2 microm, and 545.1 microm, respectively. Although the differences among the 3 ultrasound pachymetry devices were within 6.0 microm, they were statistically significant (P<.05). The PCI measurements were significantly smaller (P <.05) than the ultrasound measurements: 518.8 microm before and 517.5 microm after repeated contact with the ultrasound pachymetry probe (P <.05). The mean precision (standard deviation) was 0.77 microm for PCI and between 2.40 microm and 3.58 microm for ultrasound pachymetry measurements. The correlation coefficients for the intraobserver variability were 0.999 for PCI and between 0.987 and 0.995 for ultrasound pachymetry measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Partial coherence interferometry was the more precise method of measuring CCT and had better intraobserver variability. Repeated contact by a pachymetry probe reduced corneal thickness by 1.3 microm. However, the reason for the smaller measurements with PCI than with ultrasound pachymetry remains unclear.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Changing antiglaucoma therapy from timolol to betaxolol: effect on ocular blood flow.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of a therapy change from timolol to betaxolol on ocular blood flow in patients with open-angle glaucoma. This randomized double-blind study comprised 34 consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma, already treated with either timolol alone or in combination with other antiglaucoma agents. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either betaxolol (n = 17) or timolol (n = 17) instead of the present timolol drops. Additional antiglaucoma therapy remained unchanged. The retinal blood flow was assessed by scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and the pulsatile choroidal blood flow was assessed by laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation amplitude. Ocular blood flow measurement as well as systemic hemodynamic and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed at baseline and 1 week and 1 and 3 months after the therapy change. Visual field testing was performed at baseline and at 3 months. After 3 months of treatment with either timolol or betaxolol, neither the retinal nor the pulsatile choroidal blood flow were significantly altered. The power to detect a 9% change in pulsatile choroidal blood flow and a 20% change in retinal blood flow in the present study was 90%. The IOP was not significantly altered in either group. In contrast, visual fields slightly improved after betaxolol treatment compared to baseline (p = 0.047), but this effect was not significant versus timolol. Changing therapy from timolol to betaxolol has no effect on ocular blood flow in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Adolescent↗