PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

H Aguilar-Bravo

Publications and source records attributed to H Aguilar-Bravo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Combined effects of Gepirone and (+)WAY 100135 on territorial aggression in mice.

The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate the involvement of the serotonergic 5-HT1A system in the control of aggression. The paradigm was the response of a resident mouse to an intruder into its territory. Three experiments were performed to assess the action of various doses of Gepirone (a partial agonist) and (+)WAY 100135 (a putative antagonist), separately and in combination, on aggression and on rectal body temperature. The most consistent action of Gepirone was an increase in the latency to attack. After initiation of fighting, rates of attack, chase, and tail rattling were reduced in a dose-dependent manner by i.p. administration of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg of Gepirone. There was no evidence of sedation or motor impairment, but autogrooming was decreased. When doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg of (+)WAY 100135 (WAY) were given, no effects whatsoever on aggressive or other behaviors were observed. In a third experiment, a two-factor design was followed in which injection of WAY (0, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) was followed 15 min later by injection of Gepirone (0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg). WAY decreased attack latency, increased attack rate, and attenuated the marked dose-dependent aggression reducing properties of Gepirone. The test procedure resulted in "stress hyperthermia," which was reduced by Gepirone and increased by WAY. In both behavioral and temperature measures, the larger dose of WAY proved to be less effective than the smaller one. The results support the involvement of the 5-HT1A system in the modulation of some forms of aggression.

Aggression↗

The gap effect during visual and auditory stimulation using manual responses.

Six experiments were conducted in naive human participants to examine any facilitation produced in manual reaction time (RT) by the interposition of a temporal gap between a warning signal and an imperative signal. Peripheral visual stimuli and monoaural auditory stimuli were used as targets. Participants showed a facilitation of RTs to the targets for both auditory and visual stimuli in the five experiments in which RTs were the dependent variable. In addition, the gap effect increased over successive blocks of trials, suggesting learning. RTs were facilitated only when the gap had predictive value and was salient. Using a variable temporal gap or visual warning stimulus did not change the facilitation in RTs. A further experiment demonstrated that the gap can be perceived by the participants. The dissociation between a learned and a non-learned component in the gap effect suggests that the temporal gap induces two independent processes: warning and disengagement of attention.

Acoustic Stimulation↗