The gap effect during visual and auditory stimulation using manual responses.

Abstract

Six experiments were conducted in naive human participants to examine any facilitation produced in manual reaction time (RT) by the interposition of a temporal gap between a warning signal and an imperative signal. Peripheral visual stimuli and monoaural auditory stimuli were used as targets. Participants showed a facilitation of RTs to the targets for both auditory and visual stimuli in the five experiments in which RTs were the dependent variable. In addition, the gap effect increased over successive blocks of trials, suggesting learning. RTs were facilitated only when the gap had predictive value and was salient. Using a variable temporal gap or visual warning stimulus did not change the facilitation in RTs. A further experiment demonstrated that the gap can be perceived by the participants. The dissociation between a learned and a non-learned component in the gap effect suggests that the temporal gap induces two independent processes: warning and disengagement of attention.