PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

H Tunley

Publications and source records attributed to H Tunley.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Temporal filtering enhances direction discrimination in random-dot patterns.

In conventional presentations of random-dot kinematograms, two frames of random dots are presented in temporal sequence, separated by a blank inter-stimulus interval, and a coherent offset in spatial position is added to dots in one frame relative to dots in the other frame. Direction discrimination performance is limited temporally to inter-stimulus intervals below about 100 msec (Tmax). Experiments are described in which temporal smoothing was applied to the onset and offset of each frame in the kinematogram. Tmax was found to increase in proportion with the time constant of the temporal smoothing function. An explanation based on contrast-dependent responses in simple motion detectors cannot accommodate the results. Instead, the increase in Tmax with temporal smoothing, and analogous increase in spatial limit (Dmax) with spatial blurring, can be related to the spatiotemporal frequency content of the stimulus. Random-dot kinematograms can be viewed as continuously drifting patterns that have been discretely sampled at regular spatiotemporal intervals. Sampling introduces artefacts (alias signals), which become more intrusive as sampling rate declines (i.e. inter-stimulus interval or spatial displacement increases) and consequently limit discrimination performance. Temporal smoothing or spatial blurring extends performance because it removes alias signals generated by high spatiotemporal frequencies in the pattern. Computational modelling to estimate the Fourier energy available in random-dot kinematograms confirmed that the sampling account can predict the proportional increase in Tmax and Dmax limits as filter time or space constant increases.

Contrast Sensitivity

Motion detection in interleaved random dot patterns: evidence for a rectifying nonlinearity preceding motion analysis.

Three experiments examined direction discrimination in temporally interleaved random dot patterns. The stimulus consisted of two or more uncorrelated random patterns presented in a repeating temporal sequence, so that each pattern appeared only once every n frames, separated by uncorrelated patterns. Each pattern shifted either leftward or rightward at each re-appearance (all patterns shifted in the same direction in any one presentation). Subjects could specify shift direction correctly even when eight different patterns were interleaved, provided that the duration of each frame was brief. An explanation based on responses in first-order motion energy detectors tuned to low spatiotemporal frequencies (effectively summating the interleaved patterns over time) was tested using a stimulus in which each pattern inverted in contrast mid-way through each frame. Contrary to predictions based on temporal summation, performance with contrast-inverting patterns was only slightly lower than with non-inverting patterns. An alternative explanation was examined, based on responses in motion detectors that full-wave rectify image contrast before extracting motion energy. Computed responses from such detectors successfully predicted psychophysical performance with interleaved random patterns. Implications for models of motion analysis are discussed.

Discrimination, Psychological