PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hubert G Bartels

Publications and source records attributed to Hubert G Bartels.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Second order discriminant analysis in chemopreventive efficacy measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of second order discriminant analysis as a classification methodology along with the underlying assumptions and sampling requirements, with special emphasis on the use of this analysis in chemopreventive efficacy studies. STUDY DESIGN: The discriminant function score distributions derived in an analysis of 2 diagnostic groups may show such overlap that a statistically significant difference in mean values cannot be shown and, more important, that a useful case-based classification cannot be attained. By using the discriminant function score distributions from each case, it is frequently possible to derive a second order discriminant function based on case-specific characteristics, rather than characteristics of nuclei, thereby attaining improved case classification. RESULTS: Second order discriminant analysis has proven very useful in the documentation of case-level efficacy in chemopreventive trials. In a study of orally administered vitamin A, a first order discriminant analysis did not achieve a statistically significant difference in the score distributions for nuclei, but a second order discriminant analysis allowed a correct recognition of intervention effects in 85% of submitted cases. In a chemopreventive study of triamcinolone, a similarly inadequate discrimination based on discriminant function scores for nuclei resulted. After a second order discriminant analysis, a reduction in solar-actinic damage could be shown in 14/15, or 93%, of treated cases. CONCLUSION: Second order discriminant analysis can be highly effective when the discriminating information offered at the nuclear level is inadequate due to high dispersion and small differences in mean values of discriminant function scores for the diagnostic groups. Second order analysis utilizes case-specific characteristics of the discriminant function score distributions to document diagnostic group separation and/or efficacy of chemopreventive intervention by a reduction in case discriminant function scores.

Administration, Oral↗

Karyometry in rectal mucosa of patients with previous colorectal adenomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether karyometric measurements taken in biopsies from histologically normal-appearing rectal mucosa could serve as a biomarker for the risk of recurrence of polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies were taken from the rectal mucosa of cases with a prior history of colonic polyps at the baseline of the study. In 57 cases recurrent polyps occurred (R cases); in 72 cases no recurrent disease was found at the end of the study (NR cases). From each biopsy 100 nuclei were recorded at high resolution. After segmentation, feature extraction and selection of a discriminating subset of features, a number of discriminant functions were derived. Also, measures of nuclear abnormality were computed. RESULTS: The differences in karyometricfeature values for nuclei from biopsies of cases with recurrent or nonrecurrent disease were very small and not notably expressed in the majority of nuclei. It was possible by focusing on nuclei showing clear deviations from normal to derive a discriminant function that exhibited a shift for the NR and R data sets. The distributions of discriminant function scores were then subjected to a second-order discriminant analysis to separate cases according to recurrence status. This function showed a statistically highly significant correlation with recurrence. At one extreme of its score distribution were 11 of 57 cases that had a recurrence, and at the other extreme were 8-10 of 72 cases that had no recurrence. The distributions of nuclear abnormality values for these subsets of cases were drastically different, with an average value of 1.72 for the group that may be at high risk for another recurrence and 1.02 for the group possibly at low risk. All cases with a prior history of colonic polyps showed a nuclear abnormality deviating from normal. CONCLUSION: Measurement of a sample of 100 nuclei from the rectal mucosa will suggest, for approximately 10% of cases, that a high risk for recurrence of adenomatous polyps exists and, for a slightly lower proportion, confirm that the nuclei deviate only slightly from those from individuals with no history of colonic polyps. For the majority of cases with a prior history of adenoma, the nuclei in the biopsy show a notable deviation from normal, but the deviation is practically the same for cases that had a recurrence and those that did not. However, a tentative discriminant function (DF I,3) derived from the characteristics of the extreme cases correctly classified approximately 64% of nonrecurrent and 83% of recurrent cases using a Bayesian decision boundary.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize nuclei from well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions of invasive breast cancer by karyometry and to test the hypothesis that these diagnostic categories form homogeneous sets. STUDY DESIGN: Histopathologic sections from 6 cases of well-differentiated, 11 cases of moderately differentiated and 17 cases of poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas were digitally recorded. From each case 100 nuclei were segmented and analyzed by karyometry. A discriminant analysis was performed, and nuclear and lesion signatures were computed. The nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index was applied. A progression curve per diagnostic category based on mean nuclear abnormality and a discriminant function score was derived. RESULTS: The well-differentiated lesions formed a homogeneous set, but both the moderately and poorly differentiated lesions showed 2 significantly different subpopulations with nuclei of substantially different nuclear abnormality and progression. CONCLUSION: The visual histopathologic diagnostic assessment of these lesions was based on an evaluation of both tissue architectural criteria and nuclear criteria. Here, only the pattern of nuclear chromatin was evaluated. Cases belonging to the same diagnostic category as assessed by their differentiation may be further characterized by the extent to which the nuclei deviate from normal. There was substantial case-to-case heterogeneity in these invasive lesions.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Karyometric image analysis for intraepithelial and invasive cervical lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To derive an objective, numeric measure for the progression of intraepithelial and invasive squamous cell cervical lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Thin-layer cervical cytology preparations from colposcopically confirmed normal cervix, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinoma were identified from a cross-sectional study. Fifty-nine cases representing 4 diagnostic categories were selected, and 2,375 nuclei from epithelial cells representative of the diagnostic category were randomly selected for imaging and measurement from these cases. Additionally, 1,378 visually normal appearing intermediate cells from low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, as well as from carcinoma cases, were identified for analysis. The nuclei were quantitatively characterized, and discriminant analyses were performed to derive a progression curve from normal cytology to carcinoma. RESULTS: The lesion signatures show a clear increase in nuclear abnormality with increasing progression. A progression curve was derived based on mean discriminant function scores for each diagnostic category and on the mean nuclear abnormality values for the nuclei in each category, as expressed by their deviation in feature values from normal reference nuclei. CONCLUSION: A numeric assessment of lesion progression for cervical precancerous and cancerous lesions based on karyometric measurements is possible and may provide an objective, precise characterization of each lesion as well as a basis for improved performance in automated cytology-based cervical cancer screening.

Cell Nucleus↗

Preneoplastic changes in ovarian tissues.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether histologically normal epithelium within ovarian inclusion cysts and stroma exhibit changes in nuclear chromatin pattern that indicate the presence of occult ovarian lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Ovaries were collected from 10 low-risk women,from 7 high-risk women and from 3 women with ovarian cancer. Histologic sections were cut at 5 microm and hematoxylin and eosin stained. High-resolution images were recorded from the epithelium lining inclusion cysts and from the underlying stroma of ovaries from these 20 subjects. A total of 2860 epithelial nuclei and 3610 stromal nuclei were recorded. Karyometric features and nuclear abnormality were computed. Discriminant analyses and unsupervised learning algorithms defined deviations from normal that were designated "above threshold" and used to compute average nuclear abnormality of a second nuclear phenotype. RESULTS: Histologically normal epithelium from inclusion cysts of ovaries harboring a malignant lesion was shown to exhibit changes in the nuclear chromatin pattern that were statistically significant using quantitative image analysis procedures. Similar changes were seen in the inclusion cyst epithelia of high-risk ovaries. A subpopulation of cells representing a new phenotype was detected in the underlying stroma of women harboring a malignant ovarian lesion and in women at high risk of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The karyometric changes observed in the epithelia lining inclusion cysts and in the underlying stroma of ovaries either with ovarian cancer or at high risk of ovarian cancer suggest the presence of preneoplastic changes in histologically normal tissue.

Cell Nucleus↗