[Candida granuloma and its treatment in simultaneous staphylococcal infections].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to I Pevny.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Evaluation of our standardized test results from 1972 to 1983 indicated Vioform allergies in 1.2% of all cases and Sterosan allergies in 1.1%. Our results are within the spectrum found in the literature for Vioform between 0.3 and 5.1% and for Sterosan between 0.3 and 3.7%. In the course of those 12 years we observed a growing tendency towards Vioform and Sterosan allergies on the basis of annual percentage figures. In the last year of our observation the frequency of Vioform and Sterosan allergies amounted to 1.7% each. We conclude, therefore, that inclusion of these two substances in the standard battery is justified. According to the pertinent literature, Sterosan and Vioform allergies are, on an average, 3 to 4 times more frequent in patients suffering from leg ulcers and/or chronic venous insufficiency than amongst eczema patients.
We carried out patch testing with a chinoline block comprising 25 substances in 316 patients with a suspected allergy to chinoline derivatives in the period from February 1969 to December 1983. 110 patients reacted to 2 or more substances. The reactions were totaled and tabulated in a list indicating frequency of sensitisation as decreasing in the order of Cl-F-Br-I halogens. The most frequent reactions observed were with Chlorisept, Sterosan, Vio-form, Chinosol, Ondron, and Broxychinolin, for all of which primary sensitisations are also possible. Concomitant reactions to chinaldol, chinaldine, aminochinaldine and chinoline are considered to be group allergies since contact is hardly possible with these substances in everyday life. Due to the lack of appropriate history, reactions to Resochin and the isoquinoline compounds Papaverine and Eupaverine may also be regarded as group allergies. Accordingly, non-hydroxylized chinoline derivatives are also viewed as group allergies in cases of sensitisation to hydroxy-chinoline derivatives. The group spectrum of hydroxy-chinoline allergy seems to be more far-reaching than was assumed. Five cases of a quinine allergy identified by appropriate history and confirmed epicutaneously are presented with a group allergy to various chinoline derivatives, including two cases with quinidine.
From 1981 to 1984 987 patients of the Allergy Department of the Würzburg University Dermatological Hospital were evaluated with patch testing using a standard series; 199 patients were additionally tested with a specially composed metal battery. The results of the standard series with regard to the four metals contained in it, namely mercuric chloride, nickel sulphate, cobalt sulphate and potassium bichromate, were contrasted with the test results of the metal battery. Here there were conspicuous discrepancies between the two collectives, above all, with respect to cobalt. In comparison to the data contained in the literature we found appreciable differences in the metals copper, cobalt and potassium bichromate.